First-pass extracted concept

LOV1 domains

Candidate: concept label1 source documents3 linked claims

Jump to evidence Jump to sources Jump to claims

Live refresh every 5sNext refresh in 5s

Evidence Snippets

We found that LOV1 domains are more flexible than LOV2 domains and have consistently higher triplet n,π* energies ... This finding corroborates reports in the literature that ISC is typically less efficient in LOV1 domains.

Evidence 1Source 1DOI PubMedprovenance

Supporting Sources

Source 1primary paper2026Journal of the American Chemical SocietyDOI PubMed

1 evidence snippet 3 linked claims Claim 1 Claim 2 Claim 3

Linked Claims

Claim 1comparative propertysupports2026Source 1DOI PubMed

LOV1 domains are more flexible than LOV2 domains and have higher triplet n,π* energies relative to the first optically active singlet π,π* state.

Quoted textsource-backed

We found that LOV1 domains are more flexible than LOV2 domains and have consistently higher triplet n,π* energies when compared to the first optically active singlet π,π* state.

Claim 2mechanistic insightsupports2026Source 1DOI PubMed

ISC is typically less efficient in LOV1 domains than in LOV2 domains.

Quoted textsource-backed

This finding corroborates reports in the literature that ISC is typically less efficient in LOV1 domains.

Claim 3mechanistic insightsupports2026Source 1DOI PubMed

Protein electrostatics tune the singlet-triplet energy gap in natural and engineered LOV domains.

Quoted textsource-backed

Together, these results emphasize the importance of electrostatic tuning in controlling the efficiency of ISC in LOV domains.