First-pass extracted concept

ON bipolar cell targeting

Candidate: concept label4 source documents9 linked claims
Live refresh every 5sNext refresh in 5s

Aliases

Grm6-expressing cells, ON BCs, ON BC targeting, ON-BC targeting

Extracted Explainers

What the tool is doing

This targeting strategy places ReaChR in ON bipolar cells rather than retinal ganglion cells. In the abstract, this choice yields restored responses with richer coding properties closer to wild type.

Source 1DOIPubMed

This concept refers to directing the optogenetic intervention to ON-bipolar cells rather than lost photoreceptors. In this paper, that target class supports stable ReaChR-driven retinal output across remodeling.

Source 2DOIPubMed

Resources required

The abstract supports use of Grm6-expressing cells as the ON bipolar targeting population in genetically engineered retinally degenerate mice.

Source 1DOIPubMed

What problem it solves

It addresses the loss of visual coding richness that can occur when optogenetic therapy bypasses more of the retinal circuit. The study reports better reproducibility and broader response diversity than RGC targeting.

Source 1DOIPubMed

It provides a surviving cellular substrate for vision restoration in retinal degeneration. The study evaluates whether that substrate remains usable through later remodeling stages.

Source 2DOIPubMed

Alternatives

The directly contrasted alternative in the paper is retinal ganglion-cell targeting using Brn3c-expressing cells.

Source 1DOIPubMed

The web summary mentions alternative inner-retina targets such as AII amacrine cells and starburst amacrine cells.

Source 2DOIPubMed

Evidence Snippets

ON bipolar (ON BCs) ... express the opsin ReaChR in Grm6- ... expressing cells
Evidence 1Source 1DOIPubMedprovenance
ReaChR expressed in ON-bipolar cells of the rd1 mouse
Evidence 2Source 2DOIPubMedprovenance
ON bipolar (ON BCs)
Evidence 3Source 3DOIprovenance
robust but diverse activity patterns in RGCs when LiGluR-MAG0(460) was targeted to ON-bipolar cells (ON-BCs)
Evidence 4Source 4DOIPubMedprovenance

Supporting Sources

Linked Claims

Claim 1comparative performancesupports2025Source 1DOIPubMed

Compared with ON bipolar-cell targeting, retinal ganglion-cell targeting of ReaChR decreased response reproducibility and produced more stereotyped responses with reduced diversity in response polarity, contrast sensitivity, and temporal frequency tuning.

Claim 2comparative performancesupports2025Source 1DOIPubMed

ReaChR expression targeted to ON bipolar cells and retinal ganglion cells produced equivalent response sensitivity and contrast encoding across different background irradiances in retinally degenerate mice.

Claim 3overall conclusionsupports2025Source 1DOIPubMed

Both ON bipolar-cell and retinal ganglion-cell targeting strategies restored visual responses with high fidelity, but ON bipolar-cell targeting produced a richer visual code closer to wild-type mice.

Claim 4therapeutic windowsupports2025Source 2DOIPubMed

Retinal remodeling in rd1 mice does not significantly impair and may early on enhance the ability of surviving retina to support optogenetic visual restoration, implying a wide intervention window during disease progression.

Quoted textsource-backed
Our data indicate that remodeling does not significantly impair, and at early stages may even enhance, the surviving retina's ability to support visual restoration. Clinical intervention thus remains viable throughout remodeling, suggesting a wide window in disease progression for therapeutic benefit.
Claim 5comparative coding qualitysupports2024Source 3DOI

Compared with ON bipolar cell targeting, retinal ganglion cell targeting decreased response reproducibility and produced more stereotyped responses with reduced diversity in response polarity, contrast sensitivity, and temporal frequency tuning.

Quoted textsource-backed
Compared to ON BCs, targeting RGCs decreased response reproducibility and resulted in more stereotyped responses with reduced diversity in response polarity, contrast sensitivity and temporal frequency tuning.
Claim 6comparative performancesupports2024Source 3DOI

ReaChR-evoked responses had equivalent sensitivity for ON bipolar cell targeting and retinal ganglion cell targeting and could encode contrast across different background irradiances.

Quoted textsource-backed
For both targeting strategies, we find ReaChR-evoked responses have equivalent sensitivity and can encode contrast across different background irradiances.
Claim 7overall conclusionsupports2024Source 3DOI

Both ON bipolar cell targeting and retinal ganglion cell targeting restored visual responses with high fidelity, but ON bipolar cell targeting produced a richer visual code that more closely approached wildtype mice.

Quoted textsource-backed
Our data show that while both approaches restore visual responses with impressive fidelity, ON BC targeting produces a richer visual code better approaching that of wildtype mice.
Claim 8behavioral restorationsupports2014Source 4DOIPubMed

LiGluR-MAG0(460) targeted to either retinal ganglion cells or ON-bipolar cells in rd1 mice reinstated innate light-avoidance behavior and enabled discrimination of different temporal light patterns in an associative learning task.

Quoted textsource-backed
LiGluR-MAG0(460) in either RGCs or ON-BCs of the rd1 mouse reinstated innate light-avoidance behavior and enabled mice to distinguish between different temporal patterns of light in an associative learning task.
Claim 9cell targeting effectsupports2014Source 4DOIPubMed

In blind rd1 mouse retinal explants, LiGluR-MAG0(460) targeted to ON-bipolar cells produced robust but diverse activity patterns in retinal ganglion cells.

Quoted textsource-backed
robust but diverse activity patterns in RGCs when LiGluR-MAG0(460) was targeted to ON-bipolar cells (ON-BCs)