First-pass extracted concept

retinal ganglion cell targeting

Candidate: concept label3 source documents11 linked claims
Live refresh every 5sNext refresh in 5s

Aliases

Brn3c-expressing cells, RGCs, RGC targeting

Extracted Explainers

What the tool is doing

This targeting strategy places ReaChR in retinal ganglion cells. The abstract shows that it can restore visual responses, but with less diverse and less reproducible coding than ON bipolar-cell targeting.

Source 1DOIPubMed

Resources required

The abstract supports use of Brn3c-expressing cells as the retinal ganglion-cell targeting population in genetically engineered mice.

Source 1DOIPubMed

What problem it solves

It provides a route to restore light-evoked responses in the surviving inner retina after photoreceptor degeneration.

Source 1DOIPubMed

What it does not solve

The abstract indicates it does not preserve visual feature selectivity and response diversity as well as ON bipolar-cell targeting.

Source 1DOIPubMed

Alternatives

The directly contrasted alternative in the paper is ON bipolar-cell targeting using Grm6-expressing cells.

Source 1DOIPubMed

Evidence Snippets

retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) ... express the opsin ReaChR in ... Brn3c-expressing cells
Evidence 1Source 1DOIPubMedprovenance
retinal ganglion cells (RGCs)
Evidence 2Source 2DOIprovenance
multielectrode array recordings of retinal explants revealed robust and uniform light-evoked firing when LiGluR-MAG0(460) was targeted to RGCs
Evidence 3Source 3DOIPubMedprovenance

Supporting Sources

Linked Claims

Claim 1comparative performancesupports2025Source 1DOIPubMed

Compared with ON bipolar-cell targeting, retinal ganglion-cell targeting of ReaChR decreased response reproducibility and produced more stereotyped responses with reduced diversity in response polarity, contrast sensitivity, and temporal frequency tuning.

Claim 2comparative performancesupports2025Source 1DOIPubMed

ReaChR expression targeted to ON bipolar cells and retinal ganglion cells produced equivalent response sensitivity and contrast encoding across different background irradiances in retinally degenerate mice.

Claim 3mechanistic effectsupports2025Source 1DOIPubMed

In visually intact retinas, retinal ganglion-cell-targeted ReaChR expression disrupted visual feature selectivity of individual retinal ganglion cells.

Claim 4overall conclusionsupports2025Source 1DOIPubMed

Both ON bipolar-cell and retinal ganglion-cell targeting strategies restored visual responses with high fidelity, but ON bipolar-cell targeting produced a richer visual code closer to wild-type mice.

Claim 5comparative coding qualitysupports2024Source 2DOI

Compared with ON bipolar cell targeting, retinal ganglion cell targeting decreased response reproducibility and produced more stereotyped responses with reduced diversity in response polarity, contrast sensitivity, and temporal frequency tuning.

Quoted textsource-backed
Compared to ON BCs, targeting RGCs decreased response reproducibility and resulted in more stereotyped responses with reduced diversity in response polarity, contrast sensitivity and temporal frequency tuning.
Claim 6comparative performancesupports2024Source 2DOI

ReaChR-evoked responses had equivalent sensitivity for ON bipolar cell targeting and retinal ganglion cell targeting and could encode contrast across different background irradiances.

Quoted textsource-backed
For both targeting strategies, we find ReaChR-evoked responses have equivalent sensitivity and can encode contrast across different background irradiances.
Claim 7mechanistic effectsupports2024Source 2DOI

In visually intact retinas, retinal ganglion cell-targeted ReaChR expression disrupted visual feature selectivity of individual retinal ganglion cells.

Quoted textsource-backed
Recording ReaChR-driven responses in visually intact retinas confirmed that RGC-targeted ReaChR expression disrupts visual feature selectivity of individual RGCs.
Claim 8overall conclusionsupports2024Source 2DOI

Both ON bipolar cell targeting and retinal ganglion cell targeting restored visual responses with high fidelity, but ON bipolar cell targeting produced a richer visual code that more closely approached wildtype mice.

Quoted textsource-backed
Our data show that while both approaches restore visual responses with impressive fidelity, ON BC targeting produces a richer visual code better approaching that of wildtype mice.
Claim 9behavioral restorationsupports2014Source 3DOIPubMed

LiGluR-MAG0(460) targeted to either retinal ganglion cells or ON-bipolar cells in rd1 mice reinstated innate light-avoidance behavior and enabled discrimination of different temporal light patterns in an associative learning task.

Quoted textsource-backed
LiGluR-MAG0(460) in either RGCs or ON-BCs of the rd1 mouse reinstated innate light-avoidance behavior and enabled mice to distinguish between different temporal patterns of light in an associative learning task.
Claim 10cell targeting effectsupports2014Source 3DOIPubMed

In blind rd1 mouse retinal explants, LiGluR-MAG0(460) targeted to retinal ganglion cells produced robust and uniform light-evoked firing.

Quoted textsource-backed
In the blind rd1 mouse, multielectrode array recordings of retinal explants revealed robust and uniform light-evoked firing when LiGluR-MAG0(460) was targeted to RGCs
Claim 11large animal translationsupports2014Source 3DOIPubMed

In a rod-cone dystrophy dog model of blindness, LiGluR-MAG0(460) in retinal ganglion cells restored robust light responses in retinal explants and intravitreal delivery of LiGluR and MAG0(460) was well tolerated in vivo.

Quoted textsource-backed
In the rod-cone dystrophy dog model of blindness, LiGluR-MAG0(460) in RGCs restored robust light responses to retinal explants and intravitreal delivery of LiGluR and MAG0(460) was well tolerated in vivo.