Back to first-pass browser

First-pass extracted concept

RFA

Candidate: concept label1 source documents4 linked claims
Jump to evidenceJump to sourcesJump to claims
Live refresh every 5sNext refresh in 5s

Aliases

forelimb premotor cortex

Evidence Snippets

the mouse analogs of forelimb premotor and primary motor cortex (RFA and CFA)
Evidence 1Source 1DOIPubMedprovenance

Supporting Sources

Linked Claims

Claim 1behavior dependent hierarchysupports2025Source 1DOIPubMed

Hierarchical interactions between forelimb motor cortical regions vary between behavioral contexts.

Quoted textsource-backed
These findings demonstrate that hierarchical interactions between forelimb motor cortical regions vary between behavioral contexts.
Claim 2behavior specific short latency interactionssupports2025Source 1DOIPubMed

Short-latency influence between RFA and CFA on putative excitatory and inhibitory populations in different cortical laminae is behaviorally specific.

Quoted textsource-backed
Short-latency influence between regions on putative excitatory and inhibitory populations in different cortical laminae also showed behavioral specificity.
Claim 3direction of influence shiftsupports2025Source 1DOIPubMed

During reaching, RFA has dominant influence on forelimb muscles and on CFA, whereas during climbing CFA has dominant influence on muscles and on RFA.

Quoted textsource-backed
Results revealed that RFA's dominant influence on forelimb muscles and on CFA during reaching is replaced by a dominant influence of CFA on muscles and on RFA during climbing
Claim 4timing difference losssupports2025Source 1DOIPubMed

During climbing, simultaneous recordings in RFA and CFA show loss of activity timing differences that had been seen during reaching and previously interpreted as hierarchy.

Quoted textsource-backed
Simultaneous recordings in both areas during climbing revealed a loss of activity timing differences seen during reaching previously interpreted as reflective of hierarchy.