First-pass extracted concept

screen for dark overexpression of CAB using CAB3 promoter-reporter transgenic line

Candidate: workflow template1 source documents7 linked claims2 stage observations
Live refresh every 5sNext refresh in 5s

Workflow Stage Observations

Stage 1broad screencell basedSource 1DOIPubMed

reporter-based mutant screen design

Selection basis: isolate mutants that overexpress CAB genes in the dark using a transgenic line with two CAB3 promoter-reporter fusions

Enriches for: dark derepression of CAB expression

Guards against: reporter-specific aberration affecting only one CAB3 promoter

Preserves downstream axes: normal dark-grown morphology

Stage 2selectionSource 1DOIPubMed

selection of mutants with aberrant expression of both CAB3 promoters

Selection basis: aberrant expression of both CAB3 promoters

Higher fidelity: yes

Enriches for: concordant reporter deregulation across both CAB3 promoter fusions

Guards against: single-reporter artifacts

Evidence Snippets

A screen was designed to isolate mutants that overexpressed the CAB genes in the dark, by use of transgenic line containing a T-DNA construct with two CAB3 promoter-reporter fusions.
Evidence 1Source 1DOIPubMedprovenance

Supporting Sources

Linked Claims

Claim 1epistasis relationshipsupports1994Source 1DOIPubMed

Epistasis studies suggest that DOC1 and DET3 act downstream from DET1 on two separate branches in the phototransduction pathway, whereas DOC2 appears to act on a distinct pathway from DET1.

Quoted textsource-backed
Epistasis studies suggest that DOC1 and DET3 act downstream from DET1 on two separate branches in the phototransduction pathway. In contrast, DOC2 appears to act on a distinct pathway from DET1.
Claim 2expression specificitysupports1994Source 1DOIPubMed

doc mutations are more specific for derepressing CAB expression than det1 and det2, which affect CAB and RBCS expression to approximately the same extent.

Quoted textsource-backed
Unlike det1 and det2 mutants, which affect the expression of CAB and RBCS to approximately the same extent, all three doc mutations are much more specific in derepressing the expression of CAB.
Claim 3genetic locus definitionsupports1994Source 1DOIPubMed

Most doc mutations are recessive and define at least three loci: doc1, doc2, and doc3.

Quoted textsource-backed
Genetic and phenotypic analyses indicate that most of the mutations are recessive and define at least three loci (doc1, doc2, doc3).
Claim 4growth phenotypesupports1994Source 1DOIPubMed

Mutations in doc1, doc2, or doc3 impair plant growth under short-day conditions.

Quoted textsource-backed
Mutations in doc1, doc2, or doc3 also impair plant growth under short-day conditions.
Claim 5pathway branchingsupports1994Source 1DOIPubMed

Morphological changes can be genetically separated from changes in CAB gene expression, and CAB gene regulation can be separated further from RBCS gene regulation.

Quoted textsource-backed
The phenotypes of doc mutants suggest that morphological changes can be genetically separated from changes in CAB gene expression. Moreover, the regulation of CAB gene expression can be separated further from the regulation of RBCS gene expression.
Claim 6phenotype specificitysupports1994Source 1DOIPubMed

The isolated doc mutants have normal etiolated morphology in the dark.

Quoted textsource-backed
All of the mutants have normal etiolated morphology in the dark.
Claim 7screen resultsupports1994Source 1DOIPubMed

A screen using a transgenic CAB3 promoter-reporter line isolated eight mutants with aberrant expression of both CAB3 promoters in the dark, designated doc mutants.

Quoted textsource-backed
A screen was designed to isolate mutants that overexpressed the CAB genes in the dark, by use of transgenic line containing a T-DNA construct with two CAB3 promoter-reporter fusions. Eight mutants that showed aberrant expression of both CAB3 promoters were isolated and were designated doc mutants