Toolkit/3D SMLM point-cloud network analysis pipeline
3D SMLM point-cloud network analysis pipeline
Also known as: computational pipeline, super resolution network analysis
Taxonomy: Technique Branch / Method. Workflows sit above the mechanism and technique branches rather than replacing them.
Summary
We developed a computational pipeline and applied it to analyzing 3D point clouds of SMLM localizations (event lists) of the caveolar coat protein, caveolin-1 (Cav1).
Usefulness & Problems
No literature-backed usefulness or problem-fit explainer has been materialized for this record yet.
Published Workflows
Objective: Develop and apply a computational workflow to quantitatively analyze large 3D SMLM localization datasets of caveolin-1 and define scaffold and caveolae architecture in prostate cancer cells with differing CAVIN1 expression.
Why it works: The workflow progressively converts raw SMLM localization event lists into cleaned network representations, retains geometric sub-networks as blobs, quantifies them with multiple features, and then clusters them to distinguish structural classes and infer assembly relationships.
Stages
- 1.Blink merging preprocessing(in_silico_filter)
To remove strongly interacting high-degree points before downstream network analysis.
Selection: Removal of high-degree strongly interacting points
- 2.Network comparison and blob retention(selection)
To retain a sub-network of geometric structures or blobs for downstream quantitative classification.
Selection: Comparison of Cav1 network properties with randomly generated networks to retain a sub-network of geometric structures
- 3.Feature extraction and machine-learning classification(functional_characterization)
To quantitatively describe each retained blob for downstream clustering and structural class identification.
Selection: Extraction of 28 quantitative features describing size, shape, topology, and network characteristics
- 4.Unsupervised clustering of structural classes(hit_picking)
To identify distinct scaffold and caveolae classes from quantitative blob features.
Selection: Unsupervised clustering of quantitative blob features
- 5.Modularity-based assembly inference(secondary_characterization)
To infer how smaller scaffold units may assemble into larger scaffolds and caveolae coats.
Selection: Multi-threshold modularity analysis of scaffold relationships
Steps
- 1.Remove high-degree points by iterative blink mergingpreprocessing algorithm
Reduce strongly interacting high-degree points in SMLM localization data.
This preprocessing occurs before network comparison so downstream structural analysis is performed on a cleaned point set.
- 2.Compare Cav1 network properties with random networks to retain geometric blobs
Retain a sub-network of geometric structures for downstream classification.
This filtering step narrows the candidate structures before feature extraction and clustering.
- 3.Extract 28 quantitative features from retained blobsanalysis pipeline
Quantitatively describe blob size, shape, topology, and network characteristics.
Feature extraction is needed before unsupervised clustering can identify structural classes.
- 4.Cluster blobs to identify scaffold and caveolae classes
Identify distinct structural classes among quantified blobs.
Clustering follows feature extraction because class identification depends on the quantitative blob descriptors.
- 5.Apply multi-threshold modularity analysis to infer assembly relationships
Infer how smaller scaffold units may combine into larger scaffolds and caveolae coats.
Assembly inference is performed after structural classes are identified so relationships among scaffold classes can be interpreted.
Taxonomy & Function
Primary hierarchy
Technique Branch
Method: A concrete computational method used to design, rank, or analyze an engineered system.
Mechanisms
iterative blink mergingmachine-learning-based classificationnetwork analysisunsupervised clusteringTechniques
Computational DesignTarget processes
localizationValidation
Supporting Sources
Ranked Claims
Machine-learning based classification extracted 28 quantitative features describing size, shape, topology, and network characteristics of approximately 80,000 blobs.
Machine-learning based classification extracted 28 quantitative features describing the size, shape, topology and network characteristics of ∼80,000 blobs.
The paper developed a computational pipeline for analyzing 3D point clouds of SMLM localizations of caveolin-1.
We developed a computational pipeline and applied it to analyzing 3D point clouds of SMLM localizations (event lists) of the caveolar coat protein, caveolin-1 (Cav1), in prostate cancer cells
An iterative blink merging algorithm was used to remove high-degree strongly interacting points from the SMLM-derived network data.
High degree (strongly-interacting) points were removed by an iterative blink merging algorithm
Approval Evidence
We developed a computational pipeline and applied it to analyzing 3D point clouds of SMLM localizations (event lists) of the caveolar coat protein, caveolin-1 (Cav1).
Source:
Machine-learning based classification extracted 28 quantitative features describing size, shape, topology, and network characteristics of approximately 80,000 blobs.
Machine-learning based classification extracted 28 quantitative features describing the size, shape, topology and network characteristics of ∼80,000 blobs.
Source:
The paper developed a computational pipeline for analyzing 3D point clouds of SMLM localizations of caveolin-1.
We developed a computational pipeline and applied it to analyzing 3D point clouds of SMLM localizations (event lists) of the caveolar coat protein, caveolin-1 (Cav1), in prostate cancer cells
Source:
Comparisons
No literature-backed comparison notes have been materialized for this record yet.
Ranked Citations
- 1.