Toolkit/AUREO1 bZIP-LOV truncated construct

AUREO1 bZIP-LOV truncated construct

Multi-Component Switch·Research·Since 2012

Also known as: ZL

Taxonomy: Mechanism Branch / Architecture. Workflows sit above the mechanism and technique branches rather than replacing them.

Summary

The AUREO1 bZIP-LOV truncated construct (ZL) is an N-terminally truncated aureochrome-1 derivative that retains the bZIP DNA-binding region and the LOV photosensory domain. It binds DNA in a sequence-specific manner and undergoes a blue-light-induced conformational response measurable as an approximately 5% increase in hydrodynamic radius without a detectable change in secondary structure.

Usefulness & Problems

Why this is useful

ZL is useful as a compact light-responsive DNA-binding module derived from aureochrome-1. It provides a system for studying or potentially exploiting blue-light control of a transcription factor-like protein state while preserving sequence-specific DNA binding.

Source:

Aureochrome-1 (AUREO1) is a blue light (BL) receptor that mediates the branching response in the stramenopile alga, Vaucheria frigida.

Problem solved

This construct addresses the need for a reduced aureochrome-1 variant that isolates the bZIP-LOV core while retaining light responsiveness and DNA-binding activity. The available evidence supports its use for dissecting how blue light alters the conformation of a DNA-binding photoreceptor protein.

Problem links

Need conditional recombination or state switching

Derived

The AUREO1 bZIP-LOV truncated construct (ZL) is an N-terminally truncated aureochrome-1 derivative that contains the bZIP DNA-binding region and the LOV photosensory domain. It retains sequence-specific DNA binding and undergoes a blue-light-induced conformational change detectable as an approximately 5% increase in hydrodynamic radius.

Need precise spatiotemporal control with light input

Derived

The AUREO1 bZIP-LOV truncated construct (ZL) is an N-terminally truncated aureochrome-1 derivative that contains the bZIP DNA-binding region and the LOV photosensory domain. It retains sequence-specific DNA binding and undergoes a blue-light-induced conformational change detectable as an approximately 5% increase in hydrodynamic radius.

Taxonomy & Function

Primary hierarchy

Mechanism Branch

Architecture: A composed arrangement of multiple parts that instantiates one or more mechanisms.

Techniques

No technique tags yet.

Target processes

recombination

Input: Light

Implementation Constraints

cofactor dependency: cofactor requirement unknownencoding mode: genetically encodedimplementation constraint: context specific validationimplementation constraint: multi component delivery burdenimplementation constraint: spectral hardware requirementoperating role: actuatoroperating role: sensorswitch architecture: multi componentswitch architecture: recruitmentswitch architecture: uncaging

ZL is an N-terminally truncated construct containing the bZIP and LOV regions of AUREO1. The evidence establishes blue-light responsiveness and sequence-specific DNA binding, but it does not provide construct boundaries, cofactor requirements, expression conditions, or delivery guidance.

Evidence is limited to a single cited study and focuses on biophysical characterization rather than engineered functional outputs. The supplied evidence does not demonstrate recombination control, in vivo switching performance, kinetics, reversibility, or independent replication.

Validation

Cell-freeBacteriaMammalianMouseHumanTherapeuticIndep. Replication

Supporting Sources

Ranked Claims

Claim 1dna bindingsupports2012Source 1needs review

Full-length AUREO1 and the ZL construct bind DNA in a sequence-specific manner.

FL and ZL bound to DNA in a sequence-specific manner.
Claim 2dna bindingsupports2012Source 1needs review

Full-length AUREO1 and the ZL construct bind DNA in a sequence-specific manner.

FL and ZL bound to DNA in a sequence-specific manner.
Claim 3dna bindingsupports2012Source 1needs review

Full-length AUREO1 and the ZL construct bind DNA in a sequence-specific manner.

FL and ZL bound to DNA in a sequence-specific manner.
Claim 4dna bindingsupports2012Source 1needs review

Full-length AUREO1 and the ZL construct bind DNA in a sequence-specific manner.

FL and ZL bound to DNA in a sequence-specific manner.
Claim 5dna bindingsupports2012Source 1needs review

Full-length AUREO1 and the ZL construct bind DNA in a sequence-specific manner.

FL and ZL bound to DNA in a sequence-specific manner.
Claim 6dna bindingsupports2012Source 1needs review

Full-length AUREO1 and the ZL construct bind DNA in a sequence-specific manner.

FL and ZL bound to DNA in a sequence-specific manner.
Claim 7dna bindingsupports2012Source 1needs review

Full-length AUREO1 and the ZL construct bind DNA in a sequence-specific manner.

FL and ZL bound to DNA in a sequence-specific manner.
Claim 8dna bindingsupports2012Source 1needs review

Full-length AUREO1 and the ZL construct bind DNA in a sequence-specific manner.

FL and ZL bound to DNA in a sequence-specific manner.
Claim 9dna bindingsupports2012Source 1needs review

Full-length AUREO1 and the ZL construct bind DNA in a sequence-specific manner.

FL and ZL bound to DNA in a sequence-specific manner.
Claim 10dna bindingsupports2012Source 1needs review

Full-length AUREO1 and the ZL construct bind DNA in a sequence-specific manner.

FL and ZL bound to DNA in a sequence-specific manner.
Claim 11dna bindingsupports2012Source 1needs review

Full-length AUREO1 and the ZL construct bind DNA in a sequence-specific manner.

FL and ZL bound to DNA in a sequence-specific manner.
Claim 12dna bindingsupports2012Source 1needs review

Full-length AUREO1 and the ZL construct bind DNA in a sequence-specific manner.

FL and ZL bound to DNA in a sequence-specific manner.
Claim 13dna bindingsupports2012Source 1needs review

Full-length AUREO1 and the ZL construct bind DNA in a sequence-specific manner.

FL and ZL bound to DNA in a sequence-specific manner.
Claim 14dna bindingsupports2012Source 1needs review

Full-length AUREO1 and the ZL construct bind DNA in a sequence-specific manner.

FL and ZL bound to DNA in a sequence-specific manner.
Claim 15dna bindingsupports2012Source 1needs review

Full-length AUREO1 and the ZL construct bind DNA in a sequence-specific manner.

FL and ZL bound to DNA in a sequence-specific manner.
Claim 16dna bindingsupports2012Source 1needs review

Full-length AUREO1 and the ZL construct bind DNA in a sequence-specific manner.

FL and ZL bound to DNA in a sequence-specific manner.
Claim 17dna bindingsupports2012Source 1needs review

Full-length AUREO1 and the ZL construct bind DNA in a sequence-specific manner.

FL and ZL bound to DNA in a sequence-specific manner.
Claim 18domain architecturesupports2012Source 1needs review

AUREO1 contains an N-terminal bZIP domain and a C-terminal LOV domain.

AUREO1 harbors a basic leucine zipper (bZIP) domain at the N-terminus and a light-oxygen-voltage-sensing (LOV) domain within the C-terminal region
Claim 19domain architecturesupports2012Source 1needs review

AUREO1 contains an N-terminal bZIP domain and a C-terminal LOV domain.

AUREO1 harbors a basic leucine zipper (bZIP) domain at the N-terminus and a light-oxygen-voltage-sensing (LOV) domain within the C-terminal region
Claim 20domain architecturesupports2012Source 1needs review

AUREO1 contains an N-terminal bZIP domain and a C-terminal LOV domain.

AUREO1 harbors a basic leucine zipper (bZIP) domain at the N-terminus and a light-oxygen-voltage-sensing (LOV) domain within the C-terminal region
Claim 21domain architecturesupports2012Source 1needs review

AUREO1 contains an N-terminal bZIP domain and a C-terminal LOV domain.

AUREO1 harbors a basic leucine zipper (bZIP) domain at the N-terminus and a light-oxygen-voltage-sensing (LOV) domain within the C-terminal region
Claim 22domain architecturesupports2012Source 1needs review

AUREO1 contains an N-terminal bZIP domain and a C-terminal LOV domain.

AUREO1 harbors a basic leucine zipper (bZIP) domain at the N-terminus and a light-oxygen-voltage-sensing (LOV) domain within the C-terminal region
Claim 23functional rolesupports2012Source 1needs review

Aureochrome-1 is a blue-light receptor that mediates the branching response in Vaucheria frigida.

Aureochrome-1 (AUREO1) is a blue light (BL) receptor that mediates the branching response in the stramenopile alga, Vaucheria frigida.
Claim 24functional rolesupports2012Source 1needs review

Aureochrome-1 is a blue-light receptor that mediates the branching response in Vaucheria frigida.

Aureochrome-1 (AUREO1) is a blue light (BL) receptor that mediates the branching response in the stramenopile alga, Vaucheria frigida.
Claim 25functional rolesupports2012Source 1needs review

Aureochrome-1 is a blue-light receptor that mediates the branching response in Vaucheria frigida.

Aureochrome-1 (AUREO1) is a blue light (BL) receptor that mediates the branching response in the stramenopile alga, Vaucheria frigida.
Claim 26functional rolesupports2012Source 1needs review

Aureochrome-1 is a blue-light receptor that mediates the branching response in Vaucheria frigida.

Aureochrome-1 (AUREO1) is a blue light (BL) receptor that mediates the branching response in the stramenopile alga, Vaucheria frigida.
Claim 27functional rolesupports2012Source 1needs review

Aureochrome-1 is a blue-light receptor that mediates the branching response in Vaucheria frigida.

Aureochrome-1 (AUREO1) is a blue light (BL) receptor that mediates the branching response in the stramenopile alga, Vaucheria frigida.
Claim 28light induced hydrodynamic changesupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue light induces an approximately 5% increase in hydrodynamic radius of the full-length AUREO1 construct.

Since a 5% increase of the R(H) was also observed with the FL construct
hydrodynamic radius change 5 %
Claim 29light induced hydrodynamic changesupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue light induces an approximately 5% increase in hydrodynamic radius of the full-length AUREO1 construct.

Since a 5% increase of the R(H) was also observed with the FL construct
hydrodynamic radius change 5 %
Claim 30light induced hydrodynamic changesupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue light induces an approximately 5% increase in hydrodynamic radius of the full-length AUREO1 construct.

Since a 5% increase of the R(H) was also observed with the FL construct
hydrodynamic radius change 5 %
Claim 31light induced hydrodynamic changesupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue light induces an approximately 5% increase in hydrodynamic radius of the full-length AUREO1 construct.

Since a 5% increase of the R(H) was also observed with the FL construct
hydrodynamic radius change 5 %
Claim 32light induced hydrodynamic changesupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue light induces an approximately 5% increase in hydrodynamic radius of the full-length AUREO1 construct.

Since a 5% increase of the R(H) was also observed with the FL construct
hydrodynamic radius change 5 %
Claim 33light induced hydrodynamic changesupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue light induces an approximately 5% increase in hydrodynamic radius of the full-length AUREO1 construct.

Since a 5% increase of the R(H) was also observed with the FL construct
hydrodynamic radius change 5 %
Claim 34light induced hydrodynamic changesupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue light induces an approximately 5% increase in hydrodynamic radius of the full-length AUREO1 construct.

Since a 5% increase of the R(H) was also observed with the FL construct
hydrodynamic radius change 5 %
Claim 35light induced hydrodynamic changesupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue light induces an approximately 5% increase in hydrodynamic radius of the full-length AUREO1 construct.

Since a 5% increase of the R(H) was also observed with the FL construct
hydrodynamic radius change 5 %
Claim 36light induced hydrodynamic changesupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue light induces an approximately 5% increase in hydrodynamic radius of the full-length AUREO1 construct.

Since a 5% increase of the R(H) was also observed with the FL construct
hydrodynamic radius change 5 %
Claim 37light induced hydrodynamic changesupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue light induces an approximately 5% increase in hydrodynamic radius of the full-length AUREO1 construct.

Since a 5% increase of the R(H) was also observed with the FL construct
hydrodynamic radius change 5 %
Claim 38light induced hydrodynamic changesupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue light induces an approximately 5% increase in hydrodynamic radius of the ZL construct without changing its secondary structure.

BL induced an approximately 5% increase in the R(H) of ZL, although its secondary structure was unchanged.
hydrodynamic radius change 5 %
Claim 39light induced hydrodynamic changesupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue light induces an approximately 5% increase in hydrodynamic radius of the ZL construct without changing its secondary structure.

BL induced an approximately 5% increase in the R(H) of ZL, although its secondary structure was unchanged.
hydrodynamic radius change 5 %
Claim 40light induced hydrodynamic changesupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue light induces an approximately 5% increase in hydrodynamic radius of the ZL construct without changing its secondary structure.

BL induced an approximately 5% increase in the R(H) of ZL, although its secondary structure was unchanged.
hydrodynamic radius change 5 %
Claim 41light induced hydrodynamic changesupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue light induces an approximately 5% increase in hydrodynamic radius of the ZL construct without changing its secondary structure.

BL induced an approximately 5% increase in the R(H) of ZL, although its secondary structure was unchanged.
hydrodynamic radius change 5 %
Claim 42light induced hydrodynamic changesupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue light induces an approximately 5% increase in hydrodynamic radius of the ZL construct without changing its secondary structure.

BL induced an approximately 5% increase in the R(H) of ZL, although its secondary structure was unchanged.
hydrodynamic radius change 5 %
Claim 43light induced hydrodynamic changesupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue light induces an approximately 5% increase in hydrodynamic radius of the ZL construct without changing its secondary structure.

BL induced an approximately 5% increase in the R(H) of ZL, although its secondary structure was unchanged.
hydrodynamic radius change 5 %
Claim 44light induced hydrodynamic changesupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue light induces an approximately 5% increase in hydrodynamic radius of the ZL construct without changing its secondary structure.

BL induced an approximately 5% increase in the R(H) of ZL, although its secondary structure was unchanged.
hydrodynamic radius change 5 %
Claim 45light induced hydrodynamic changesupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue light induces an approximately 5% increase in hydrodynamic radius of the ZL construct without changing its secondary structure.

BL induced an approximately 5% increase in the R(H) of ZL, although its secondary structure was unchanged.
hydrodynamic radius change 5 %
Claim 46light induced hydrodynamic changesupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue light induces an approximately 5% increase in hydrodynamic radius of the ZL construct without changing its secondary structure.

BL induced an approximately 5% increase in the R(H) of ZL, although its secondary structure was unchanged.
hydrodynamic radius change 5 %
Claim 47light induced hydrodynamic changesupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue light induces an approximately 5% increase in hydrodynamic radius of the ZL construct without changing its secondary structure.

BL induced an approximately 5% increase in the R(H) of ZL, although its secondary structure was unchanged.
hydrodynamic radius change 5 %
Claim 48light induced hydrodynamic changesupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue light induces an approximately 5% increase in hydrodynamic radius of the ZL construct without changing its secondary structure.

BL induced an approximately 5% increase in the R(H) of ZL, although its secondary structure was unchanged.
hydrodynamic radius change 5 %
Claim 49light induced hydrodynamic changesupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue light induces an approximately 5% increase in hydrodynamic radius of the ZL construct without changing its secondary structure.

BL induced an approximately 5% increase in the R(H) of ZL, although its secondary structure was unchanged.
hydrodynamic radius change 5 %
Claim 50light induced hydrodynamic changesupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue light induces an approximately 5% increase in hydrodynamic radius of the ZL construct without changing its secondary structure.

BL induced an approximately 5% increase in the R(H) of ZL, although its secondary structure was unchanged.
hydrodynamic radius change 5 %
Claim 51light induced hydrodynamic changesupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue light induces an approximately 5% increase in hydrodynamic radius of the ZL construct without changing its secondary structure.

BL induced an approximately 5% increase in the R(H) of ZL, although its secondary structure was unchanged.
hydrodynamic radius change 5 %
Claim 52light induced hydrodynamic changesupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue light induces an approximately 5% increase in hydrodynamic radius of the ZL construct without changing its secondary structure.

BL induced an approximately 5% increase in the R(H) of ZL, although its secondary structure was unchanged.
hydrodynamic radius change 5 %
Claim 53light induced hydrodynamic changesupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue light induces an approximately 5% increase in hydrodynamic radius of the ZL construct without changing its secondary structure.

BL induced an approximately 5% increase in the R(H) of ZL, although its secondary structure was unchanged.
hydrodynamic radius change 5 %
Claim 54light induced hydrodynamic changesupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue light induces an approximately 5% increase in hydrodynamic radius of the ZL construct without changing its secondary structure.

BL induced an approximately 5% increase in the R(H) of ZL, although its secondary structure was unchanged.
hydrodynamic radius change 5 %
Claim 55light induced structural changesupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue light induces a shift in the LOV-only construct from alpha-helical to beta-sheet secondary structure without altering hydrodynamic radius.

BL appeared to induce a shift of the α-helical structure of the LOV domain to a β-sheet structure, but did not alter the hydrodynamic radius (R(H)) of this domain.
Claim 56light induced structural changesupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue light induces a shift in the LOV-only construct from alpha-helical to beta-sheet secondary structure without altering hydrodynamic radius.

BL appeared to induce a shift of the α-helical structure of the LOV domain to a β-sheet structure, but did not alter the hydrodynamic radius (R(H)) of this domain.
Claim 57light induced structural changesupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue light induces a shift in the LOV-only construct from alpha-helical to beta-sheet secondary structure without altering hydrodynamic radius.

BL appeared to induce a shift of the α-helical structure of the LOV domain to a β-sheet structure, but did not alter the hydrodynamic radius (R(H)) of this domain.
Claim 58light induced structural changesupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue light induces a shift in the LOV-only construct from alpha-helical to beta-sheet secondary structure without altering hydrodynamic radius.

BL appeared to induce a shift of the α-helical structure of the LOV domain to a β-sheet structure, but did not alter the hydrodynamic radius (R(H)) of this domain.
Claim 59light induced structural changesupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue light induces a shift in the LOV-only construct from alpha-helical to beta-sheet secondary structure without altering hydrodynamic radius.

BL appeared to induce a shift of the α-helical structure of the LOV domain to a β-sheet structure, but did not alter the hydrodynamic radius (R(H)) of this domain.
Claim 60mechanistic modelsupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue-light-induced changes in the LOV domain may cause conformational changes in the bZIP and/or linker region of dimeric ZL.

These results support a schema where BL-induced changes in the LOV domain may cause conformational changes in the bZIP and/or the linker of a dimeric ZL molecule.
Claim 61mechanistic modelsupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue-light-induced changes in the LOV domain may cause conformational changes in the bZIP and/or linker region of dimeric ZL.

These results support a schema where BL-induced changes in the LOV domain may cause conformational changes in the bZIP and/or the linker of a dimeric ZL molecule.
Claim 62mechanistic modelsupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue-light-induced changes in the LOV domain may cause conformational changes in the bZIP and/or linker region of dimeric ZL.

These results support a schema where BL-induced changes in the LOV domain may cause conformational changes in the bZIP and/or the linker of a dimeric ZL molecule.
Claim 63mechanistic modelsupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue-light-induced changes in the LOV domain may cause conformational changes in the bZIP and/or linker region of dimeric ZL.

These results support a schema where BL-induced changes in the LOV domain may cause conformational changes in the bZIP and/or the linker of a dimeric ZL molecule.
Claim 64mechanistic modelsupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue-light-induced changes in the LOV domain may cause conformational changes in the bZIP and/or linker region of dimeric ZL.

These results support a schema where BL-induced changes in the LOV domain may cause conformational changes in the bZIP and/or the linker of a dimeric ZL molecule.
Claim 65mechanistic modelsupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue-light-induced changes in the LOV domain may cause conformational changes in the bZIP and/or linker region of dimeric ZL.

These results support a schema where BL-induced changes in the LOV domain may cause conformational changes in the bZIP and/or the linker of a dimeric ZL molecule.
Claim 66mechanistic modelsupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue-light-induced changes in the LOV domain may cause conformational changes in the bZIP and/or linker region of dimeric ZL.

These results support a schema where BL-induced changes in the LOV domain may cause conformational changes in the bZIP and/or the linker of a dimeric ZL molecule.
Claim 67mechanistic modelsupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue-light-induced changes in the LOV domain may cause conformational changes in the bZIP and/or linker region of dimeric ZL.

These results support a schema where BL-induced changes in the LOV domain may cause conformational changes in the bZIP and/or the linker of a dimeric ZL molecule.
Claim 68mechanistic modelsupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue-light-induced changes in the LOV domain may cause conformational changes in the bZIP and/or linker region of dimeric ZL.

These results support a schema where BL-induced changes in the LOV domain may cause conformational changes in the bZIP and/or the linker of a dimeric ZL molecule.
Claim 69mechanistic modelsupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue-light-induced changes in the LOV domain may cause conformational changes in the bZIP and/or linker region of dimeric ZL.

These results support a schema where BL-induced changes in the LOV domain may cause conformational changes in the bZIP and/or the linker of a dimeric ZL molecule.
Claim 70mechanistic modelsupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue-light-induced changes in the LOV domain may cause conformational changes in the bZIP and/or linker region of dimeric ZL.

These results support a schema where BL-induced changes in the LOV domain may cause conformational changes in the bZIP and/or the linker of a dimeric ZL molecule.
Claim 71mechanistic modelsupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue-light-induced changes in the LOV domain may cause conformational changes in the bZIP and/or linker region of dimeric ZL.

These results support a schema where BL-induced changes in the LOV domain may cause conformational changes in the bZIP and/or the linker of a dimeric ZL molecule.
Claim 72mechanistic modelsupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue-light-induced changes in the LOV domain may cause conformational changes in the bZIP and/or linker region of dimeric ZL.

These results support a schema where BL-induced changes in the LOV domain may cause conformational changes in the bZIP and/or the linker of a dimeric ZL molecule.
Claim 73mechanistic modelsupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue-light-induced changes in the LOV domain may cause conformational changes in the bZIP and/or linker region of dimeric ZL.

These results support a schema where BL-induced changes in the LOV domain may cause conformational changes in the bZIP and/or the linker of a dimeric ZL molecule.
Claim 74mechanistic modelsupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue-light-induced changes in the LOV domain may cause conformational changes in the bZIP and/or linker region of dimeric ZL.

These results support a schema where BL-induced changes in the LOV domain may cause conformational changes in the bZIP and/or the linker of a dimeric ZL molecule.
Claim 75mechanistic modelsupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue-light-induced changes in the LOV domain may cause conformational changes in the bZIP and/or linker region of dimeric ZL.

These results support a schema where BL-induced changes in the LOV domain may cause conformational changes in the bZIP and/or the linker of a dimeric ZL molecule.
Claim 76mechanistic modelsupports2012Source 1needs review

Blue-light-induced changes in the LOV domain may cause conformational changes in the bZIP and/or linker region of dimeric ZL.

These results support a schema where BL-induced changes in the LOV domain may cause conformational changes in the bZIP and/or the linker of a dimeric ZL molecule.
Claim 77mechanistic modelsupports2012Source 1needs review

Formation of the full-length AUREO1 dimer may facilitate DNA binding.

formation of the FL dimer may facilitate DNA binding.
Claim 78mechanistic modelsupports2012Source 1needs review

Formation of the full-length AUREO1 dimer may facilitate DNA binding.

formation of the FL dimer may facilitate DNA binding.
Claim 79mechanistic modelsupports2012Source 1needs review

Formation of the full-length AUREO1 dimer may facilitate DNA binding.

formation of the FL dimer may facilitate DNA binding.
Claim 80mechanistic modelsupports2012Source 1needs review

Formation of the full-length AUREO1 dimer may facilitate DNA binding.

formation of the FL dimer may facilitate DNA binding.
Claim 81mechanistic modelsupports2012Source 1needs review

Formation of the full-length AUREO1 dimer may facilitate DNA binding.

formation of the FL dimer may facilitate DNA binding.
Claim 82mechanistic modelsupports2012Source 1needs review

Formation of the full-length AUREO1 dimer may facilitate DNA binding.

formation of the FL dimer may facilitate DNA binding.
Claim 83mechanistic modelsupports2012Source 1needs review

Formation of the full-length AUREO1 dimer may facilitate DNA binding.

formation of the FL dimer may facilitate DNA binding.
Claim 84mechanistic modelsupports2012Source 1needs review

Formation of the full-length AUREO1 dimer may facilitate DNA binding.

formation of the FL dimer may facilitate DNA binding.
Claim 85mechanistic modelsupports2012Source 1needs review

Formation of the full-length AUREO1 dimer may facilitate DNA binding.

formation of the FL dimer may facilitate DNA binding.
Claim 86mechanistic modelsupports2012Source 1needs review

Formation of the full-length AUREO1 dimer may facilitate DNA binding.

formation of the FL dimer may facilitate DNA binding.
Claim 87oligomeric statesupports2012Source 1needs review

The ZL construct forms a dimer, possibly through disulfide linkages in the bZIP and linker regions.

ZL formed a dimer possibly through disulfide linkages in the bZIP and the linker region between bZIP and LOV.
Claim 88oligomeric statesupports2012Source 1needs review

The ZL construct forms a dimer, possibly through disulfide linkages in the bZIP and linker regions.

ZL formed a dimer possibly through disulfide linkages in the bZIP and the linker region between bZIP and LOV.
Claim 89oligomeric statesupports2012Source 1needs review

The ZL construct forms a dimer, possibly through disulfide linkages in the bZIP and linker regions.

ZL formed a dimer possibly through disulfide linkages in the bZIP and the linker region between bZIP and LOV.
Claim 90oligomeric statesupports2012Source 1needs review

The ZL construct forms a dimer, possibly through disulfide linkages in the bZIP and linker regions.

ZL formed a dimer possibly through disulfide linkages in the bZIP and the linker region between bZIP and LOV.
Claim 91oligomeric statesupports2012Source 1needs review

The ZL construct forms a dimer, possibly through disulfide linkages in the bZIP and linker regions.

ZL formed a dimer possibly through disulfide linkages in the bZIP and the linker region between bZIP and LOV.
Claim 92oligomeric statesupports2012Source 1needs review

The ZL construct forms a dimer, possibly through disulfide linkages in the bZIP and linker regions.

ZL formed a dimer possibly through disulfide linkages in the bZIP and the linker region between bZIP and LOV.
Claim 93oligomeric statesupports2012Source 1needs review

The ZL construct forms a dimer, possibly through disulfide linkages in the bZIP and linker regions.

ZL formed a dimer possibly through disulfide linkages in the bZIP and the linker region between bZIP and LOV.
Claim 94oligomeric statesupports2012Source 1needs review

The ZL construct forms a dimer, possibly through disulfide linkages in the bZIP and linker regions.

ZL formed a dimer possibly through disulfide linkages in the bZIP and the linker region between bZIP and LOV.
Claim 95oligomeric statesupports2012Source 1needs review

The ZL construct forms a dimer, possibly through disulfide linkages in the bZIP and linker regions.

ZL formed a dimer possibly through disulfide linkages in the bZIP and the linker region between bZIP and LOV.
Claim 96oligomeric statesupports2012Source 1needs review

The ZL construct forms a dimer, possibly through disulfide linkages in the bZIP and linker regions.

ZL formed a dimer possibly through disulfide linkages in the bZIP and the linker region between bZIP and LOV.
Claim 97oligomeric statesupports2012Source 1needs review

The ZL construct forms a dimer, possibly through disulfide linkages in the bZIP and linker regions.

ZL formed a dimer possibly through disulfide linkages in the bZIP and the linker region between bZIP and LOV.
Claim 98oligomeric statesupports2012Source 1needs review

The ZL construct forms a dimer, possibly through disulfide linkages in the bZIP and linker regions.

ZL formed a dimer possibly through disulfide linkages in the bZIP and the linker region between bZIP and LOV.
Claim 99oligomeric statesupports2012Source 1needs review

The ZL construct forms a dimer, possibly through disulfide linkages in the bZIP and linker regions.

ZL formed a dimer possibly through disulfide linkages in the bZIP and the linker region between bZIP and LOV.
Claim 100oligomeric statesupports2012Source 1needs review

The ZL construct forms a dimer, possibly through disulfide linkages in the bZIP and linker regions.

ZL formed a dimer possibly through disulfide linkages in the bZIP and the linker region between bZIP and LOV.
Claim 101oligomeric statesupports2012Source 1needs review

The ZL construct forms a dimer, possibly through disulfide linkages in the bZIP and linker regions.

ZL formed a dimer possibly through disulfide linkages in the bZIP and the linker region between bZIP and LOV.
Claim 102oligomeric statesupports2012Source 1needs review

The ZL construct forms a dimer, possibly through disulfide linkages in the bZIP and linker regions.

ZL formed a dimer possibly through disulfide linkages in the bZIP and the linker region between bZIP and LOV.
Claim 103oligomeric statesupports2012Source 1needs review

The ZL construct forms a dimer, possibly through disulfide linkages in the bZIP and linker regions.

ZL formed a dimer possibly through disulfide linkages in the bZIP and the linker region between bZIP and LOV.

Approval Evidence

1 source4 linked approval claimsfirst-pass slug aureo1-bzip-lov-truncated-construct
an N-terminal truncated construct containing bZIP and LOV (ZL)

Source:

dna bindingsupports

Full-length AUREO1 and the ZL construct bind DNA in a sequence-specific manner.

FL and ZL bound to DNA in a sequence-specific manner.

Source:

light induced hydrodynamic changesupports

Blue light induces an approximately 5% increase in hydrodynamic radius of the ZL construct without changing its secondary structure.

BL induced an approximately 5% increase in the R(H) of ZL, although its secondary structure was unchanged.

Source:

mechanistic modelsupports

Blue-light-induced changes in the LOV domain may cause conformational changes in the bZIP and/or linker region of dimeric ZL.

These results support a schema where BL-induced changes in the LOV domain may cause conformational changes in the bZIP and/or the linker of a dimeric ZL molecule.

Source:

oligomeric statesupports

The ZL construct forms a dimer, possibly through disulfide linkages in the bZIP and linker regions.

ZL formed a dimer possibly through disulfide linkages in the bZIP and the linker region between bZIP and LOV.

Source:

Comparisons

Source-backed strengths

The construct preserves sequence-specific DNA binding, as reported for both full-length AUREO1 and ZL. Blue light produces a measurable conformational change in ZL, observed as an approximately 5% increase in hydrodynamic radius, while secondary structure remains unchanged.

Compared with AQTrip EL222 variant

AUREO1 bZIP-LOV truncated construct and AQTrip EL222 variant address a similar problem space because they share recombination.

Shared frame: same top-level item type; shared target processes: recombination; shared mechanisms: heterodimerization; same primary input modality: light

AUREO1 bZIP-LOV truncated construct and LOV2-based photoswitches address a similar problem space because they share recombination.

Shared frame: same top-level item type; shared target processes: recombination; shared mechanisms: conformational_uncaging; same primary input modality: light

Relative tradeoffs: appears more independently replicated; looks easier to implement in practice.

Compared with PA-Cre 3.0

AUREO1 bZIP-LOV truncated construct and PA-Cre 3.0 address a similar problem space because they share recombination.

Shared frame: same top-level item type; shared target processes: recombination; shared mechanisms: heterodimerization; same primary input modality: light

Ranked Citations

  1. 1.
    StructuralSource 1Plant and Cell Physiology2012Claim 16Claim 2Claim 12

    Extracted from this source document.