Toolkit/base-editing-mediated directed protein evolution
base-editing-mediated directed protein evolution
Also known as: base-editing-mediated mutagenesis followed by functional selection and screening
Taxonomy: Technique Branch / Method. Workflows sit above the mechanism and technique branches rather than replacing them.
Summary
To address these limitations, we employ base-editing-mediated mutagenesis followed by several rounds of functional selection and screening. This directed protein evolution generates several gain-of-function OsTIR1 variants, including S210A, that significantly enhance the overall degron efficiency.
Usefulness & Problems
No literature-backed usefulness or problem-fit explainer has been materialized for this record yet.
Published Workflows
Objective: Compare inducible protein degradation systems and engineer an improved auxin-inducible degron system that preserves strong depletion while reducing basal degradation and improving recovery after ligand washout.
Why it works: The workflow first identifies the strongest starting degradation platform by direct comparison, then uses mutagenesis and repeated functional selection/screening to evolve receptor variants that improve the specific liabilities of the starting system.
Stages
- 1.Comparative assessment of five inducible degradation systems(broad_screen)
This stage identifies the strongest starting degradation system for further engineering.
Selection: Comparison across degradation efficiency, basal degradation, target recovery after ligand washout, and ligand impact.
- 2.Base-editing-mediated mutagenesis of OsTIR1(library_build)
This stage creates candidate OsTIR1 variants for directed evolution.
Selection: Generate OsTIR1 variant diversity to address basal degradation and slow recovery limitations of AID 2.0.
- 3.Several rounds of functional selection and screening(selection)
This stage enriches for improved OsTIR1 variants after mutagenesis.
Selection: Functional performance of OsTIR1 variants in the degron system.
- 4.Resulting improved degron system characterization(confirmatory_validation)
This stage confirms that the evolved system improves on the starting AID 2.0 tradeoffs.
Selection: Demonstrate effective depletion with minimal basal degradation and faster recovery after washout in the resulting system.
Steps
- 1.Benchmark five inducible degradation systems across shared performance criteria
Identify the most robust starting system for further engineering.
A comparative benchmark is performed first so the engineering campaign starts from the strongest available platform rather than mutating an inferior baseline.
- 2.Mutagenize OsTIR1 by base editingengineering method
Create OsTIR1 variant diversity to overcome AID 2.0 limitations.
Mutagenesis follows system selection because the authors first identify AID 2.0 as the best baseline and then engineer its limiting component.
- 3.Perform several rounds of functional selection and screening on OsTIR1 variantsengineered variants under selection
Enrich for gain-of-function OsTIR1 variants with improved degron performance.
Selection and screening occur after mutagenesis because variant diversity must first be generated before improved variants can be enriched.
- 4.Characterize the resulting AID 2.1 system for depletion, basal degradation, and recoveryresulting engineered degron system
Confirm that the evolved system improves the key tradeoffs observed in AID 2.0.
Final characterization is done after variant selection to verify that the evolved system delivers the intended performance improvements in the finished tool.
Taxonomy & Function
Primary hierarchy
Technique Branch
Method: A concrete method used to build, optimize, or evolve an engineered system.
Target processes
editingrecombinationselectionValidation
Supporting Sources
Ranked Claims
Among the five inducible protein degradation systems compared, OsTIR1-based AID 2.0 was identified as the most robust system.
This analysis identifies OsTIR1-based AID 2.0 as the most robust system.
Base-editing-mediated mutagenesis followed by several rounds of functional selection and screening generated gain-of-function OsTIR1 variants that significantly enhanced overall degron efficiency.
This directed protein evolution generates several gain-of-function OsTIR1 variants, including S210A, that significantly enhance the overall degron efficiency.
AID 2.1 maintains effective target protein depletion while reducing basal degradation and accelerating recovery after ligand washout.
The resulting degron system, named AID 2.1, maintains effective target protein depletion with minimal basal degradation and faster recovery after ligand washout
AID 2.0 combines higher degradation efficiency with target-specific basal degradation and slower recovery after ligand washout.
However, AID 2.0's higher degradation efficiency comes with target-specific basal degradation and slower recovery rates.
AID 2.1 enables characterization and rescue experiments for essential genes in dynamic biological contexts.
enabling characterization and rescue experiments for essential genes. Our comparative assessment and directed evolution approach provide a reference dataset and improved degron technology for studying gene functions in dynamic biological contexts.
Approval Evidence
To address these limitations, we employ base-editing-mediated mutagenesis followed by several rounds of functional selection and screening. This directed protein evolution generates several gain-of-function OsTIR1 variants, including S210A, that significantly enhance the overall degron efficiency.
Source:
Base-editing-mediated mutagenesis followed by several rounds of functional selection and screening generated gain-of-function OsTIR1 variants that significantly enhanced overall degron efficiency.
This directed protein evolution generates several gain-of-function OsTIR1 variants, including S210A, that significantly enhance the overall degron efficiency.
Source:
Comparisons
No literature-backed comparison notes have been materialized for this record yet.
Ranked Citations
- 1.