Source 1primary paper2026MED
Toolkit/Bibliometrix
Bibliometrix
Taxonomy: Technique Branch / Method. Workflows sit above the mechanism and technique branches rather than replacing them.
Summary
Bibliometric analyses performed using Bibliometrix, CiteSpace, and VOSviewer software to compensate for the differences in their respective algorithms.
Usefulness & Problems
No literature-backed usefulness or problem-fit explainer has been materialized for this record yet.
Published Workflows
Objective: To provide a comprehensive bibliometric assessment of the current status, hotspots, and future directions of nanoparticle applications in influenza research.
Why it works: The study combines searches across Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and PubMed to improve completeness, and uses Bibliometrix, CiteSpace, and VOSviewer to compensate for differences in their respective algorithms.
publication database searchbibliometric analysiskeyword analysis
Stages
- 1.Publication search across literature databases(broad_screen)
This stage exists to improve the completeness of the publication collection before downstream bibliometric analysis.
Selection: publications on nanoparticles and influenza from 2005 to 2025 collected from Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and PubMed
- 2.Multi-software bibliometric analysis(secondary_characterization)
This stage exists to characterize the collected literature using complementary bibliometric algorithms.
Selection: analysis of publication quantity, citation counts, and co-authorship using Bibliometrix, CiteSpace, and VOSviewer
- 3.Keyword hotspot analysis(secondary_characterization)
This stage exists to identify major thematic priorities and emerging directions in nanoparticle influenza research.
Selection: keyword analysis of the publication corpus
Steps
- 1.Search Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and PubMed for 2005-2025 publications
Assemble a comprehensive literature corpus on nanoparticles and influenza.
The publication corpus must be collected before bibliometric analyses can be performed.
- 2.Analyze the corpus with Bibliometrix, CiteSpace, and VOSviewerbibliometric analysis software
Characterize publication quantity, citation counts, and co-authorship patterns using complementary algorithms.
This follows corpus assembly because bibliometric software requires the collected publication dataset as input.
- 3.Perform keyword analysis to identify research hotspots
Infer central priorities and emerging directions in nanoparticle influenza research.
After the corpus is assembled and bibliometric characterization is performed, keyword analysis is used to interpret thematic hotspots.
Taxonomy & Function
Primary hierarchy
Technique Branch
Method: A concrete computational method used to design, rank, or analyze an engineered system.
Techniques
Computational DesignTarget processes
No target processes tagged yet.
Validation
Cell-freeBacteriaMammalianMouseHumanTherapeuticIndep. Replication
Supporting Sources
Ranked Claims
Masaru Kanekiyo's article had the highest local citation count and he was identified as the author with the greatest individual contribution.
The bibliometric analysis identified 3,478 relevant publications on nanoparticles in influenza research from 2005 to 2025.
relevant publications identified 3478 publications
The Chinese Academy of Sciences led institutional contributions in the analyzed literature.
The United States and China were the primary contributors by publication volume in nanoparticle influenza research.
Vaccines was the top-performing journal in this research field.
Approval Evidence
1 source5 linked approval claimsfirst-pass slug bibliometrix
Bibliometric analyses performed using Bibliometrix, CiteSpace, and VOSviewer software to compensate for the differences in their respective algorithms.
Source:
study resultsupports
Masaru Kanekiyo's article had the highest local citation count and he was identified as the author with the greatest individual contribution.
Source:
study resultsupports
The bibliometric analysis identified 3,478 relevant publications on nanoparticles in influenza research from 2005 to 2025.
Source:
study resultsupports
The Chinese Academy of Sciences led institutional contributions in the analyzed literature.
Source:
study resultsupports
The United States and China were the primary contributors by publication volume in nanoparticle influenza research.
Source:
study resultsupports
Vaccines was the top-performing journal in this research field.
Source:
Comparisons
No literature-backed comparison notes have been materialized for this record yet.
Ranked Citations
- 1.