Toolkit/biofunctional nanodot arrays

biofunctional nanodot arrays

Delivery Strategy·Research·Since 2022

Also known as: bNDAs

Taxonomy: Mechanism Branch / Architecture. Workflows sit above the mechanism and technique branches rather than replacing them.

Summary

Biofunctional nanodot arrays (bNDAs) are nanoscale surface-patterned delivery harnesses designed to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell-surface receptors. In live cells, they were used to capture extracellularly GFP-tagged Lrp6 and drive assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the plasma membrane.

Usefulness & Problems

Why this is useful

bNDAs are useful for imposing nanoscale spatial organization on membrane receptors in living cells and for experimentally triggering localized signaling complex assembly. In the reported application, they enabled analysis of Wnt signalosome formation and provided evidence for synergistic co-condensation associated with signaling amplification.

Source:

We achieved spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the nanoscale in the plasma membrane of live cells by capturing the co-receptor Lrp6 into bNDAs via an extracellular GFP tag.

Source:

pinpointing the synergistic effects of LLPS for Wnt signaling amplification.

Source:

Here, we have developed biofunctional nanodot arrays (bNDAs) to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at nanoscale.

Problem solved

bNDAs address the problem of how to control receptor dimerization and clustering at the plasma membrane with nanoscale spatial precision in live-cell experiments. They were specifically applied to organize Lrp6 at the cell surface and probe how spatially constrained assembly contributes to Wnt signalodroplet formation.

Source:

We achieved spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the nanoscale in the plasma membrane of live cells by capturing the co-receptor Lrp6 into bNDAs via an extracellular GFP tag.

Source:

Here, we have developed biofunctional nanodot arrays (bNDAs) to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at nanoscale.

Problem links

Current Chip Fabrication Methods are Extremely Expensive and Hard to Change

Gap mapView gap

This item directly concerns nanoscale spatial patterning via nanodot arrays, which is closer to the gap's need for assembling diverse molecular components without relying on conventional chip-fab workflows. It plausibly offers a more reconfigurable surface-patterning strategy for small-scale molecular organization.

Taxonomy & Function

Primary hierarchy

Mechanism Branch

Architecture: A delivery strategy grouped with the mechanism branch because it determines how a system is instantiated and deployed in context.

Techniques

No technique tags yet.

Target processes

localizationsignaling

Input: Chemical

Implementation Constraints

cofactor dependency: cofactor requirement unknownencoding mode: externally suppliedimplementation constraint: context specific validationimplementation constraint: multi component delivery burdenoperating role: deliveryswitch architecture: multi componentswitch architecture: recruitment

The reported implementation relied on nanoscale surface patterning and affinity-based capture of extracellularly GFP-tagged Lrp6 at the plasma membrane of live cells. The evidence supports use as a surface-presented harness for receptor organization, but does not specify fabrication chemistry, substrate composition, or delivery conditions.

The supplied evidence describes a single reported application centered on extracellularly GFP-tagged Lrp6 and Wnt signaling, so generality across receptors, cell types, and signaling systems is not established here. Practical performance metrics such as throughput, fabrication robustness, and compatibility with non-tagged endogenous targets are not provided in the evidence.

Validation

Cell-freeBacteriaMammalianMouseHumanTherapeuticIndep. Replication

Supporting Sources

Ranked Claims

Claim 1application demosupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays enabled spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the plasma membrane of live cells by capturing Lrp6 via an extracellular GFP tag.

We achieved spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the nanoscale in the plasma membrane of live cells by capturing the co-receptor Lrp6 into bNDAs via an extracellular GFP tag.
Claim 2application demosupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays enabled spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the plasma membrane of live cells by capturing Lrp6 via an extracellular GFP tag.

We achieved spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the nanoscale in the plasma membrane of live cells by capturing the co-receptor Lrp6 into bNDAs via an extracellular GFP tag.
Claim 3application demosupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays enabled spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the plasma membrane of live cells by capturing Lrp6 via an extracellular GFP tag.

We achieved spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the nanoscale in the plasma membrane of live cells by capturing the co-receptor Lrp6 into bNDAs via an extracellular GFP tag.
Claim 4application demosupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays enabled spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the plasma membrane of live cells by capturing Lrp6 via an extracellular GFP tag.

We achieved spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the nanoscale in the plasma membrane of live cells by capturing the co-receptor Lrp6 into bNDAs via an extracellular GFP tag.
Claim 5application demosupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays enabled spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the plasma membrane of live cells by capturing Lrp6 via an extracellular GFP tag.

We achieved spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the nanoscale in the plasma membrane of live cells by capturing the co-receptor Lrp6 into bNDAs via an extracellular GFP tag.
Claim 6application demosupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays enabled spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the plasma membrane of live cells by capturing Lrp6 via an extracellular GFP tag.

We achieved spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the nanoscale in the plasma membrane of live cells by capturing the co-receptor Lrp6 into bNDAs via an extracellular GFP tag.
Claim 7application demosupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays enabled spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the plasma membrane of live cells by capturing Lrp6 via an extracellular GFP tag.

We achieved spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the nanoscale in the plasma membrane of live cells by capturing the co-receptor Lrp6 into bNDAs via an extracellular GFP tag.
Claim 8application demosupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays enabled spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the plasma membrane of live cells by capturing Lrp6 via an extracellular GFP tag.

We achieved spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the nanoscale in the plasma membrane of live cells by capturing the co-receptor Lrp6 into bNDAs via an extracellular GFP tag.
Claim 9application demosupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays enabled spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the plasma membrane of live cells by capturing Lrp6 via an extracellular GFP tag.

We achieved spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the nanoscale in the plasma membrane of live cells by capturing the co-receptor Lrp6 into bNDAs via an extracellular GFP tag.
Claim 10application demosupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays enabled spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the plasma membrane of live cells by capturing Lrp6 via an extracellular GFP tag.

We achieved spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the nanoscale in the plasma membrane of live cells by capturing the co-receptor Lrp6 into bNDAs via an extracellular GFP tag.
Claim 11application demosupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays enabled spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the plasma membrane of live cells by capturing Lrp6 via an extracellular GFP tag.

We achieved spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the nanoscale in the plasma membrane of live cells by capturing the co-receptor Lrp6 into bNDAs via an extracellular GFP tag.
Claim 12application demosupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays enabled spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the plasma membrane of live cells by capturing Lrp6 via an extracellular GFP tag.

We achieved spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the nanoscale in the plasma membrane of live cells by capturing the co-receptor Lrp6 into bNDAs via an extracellular GFP tag.
Claim 13application demosupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays enabled spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the plasma membrane of live cells by capturing Lrp6 via an extracellular GFP tag.

We achieved spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the nanoscale in the plasma membrane of live cells by capturing the co-receptor Lrp6 into bNDAs via an extracellular GFP tag.
Claim 14application demosupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays enabled spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the plasma membrane of live cells by capturing Lrp6 via an extracellular GFP tag.

We achieved spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the nanoscale in the plasma membrane of live cells by capturing the co-receptor Lrp6 into bNDAs via an extracellular GFP tag.
Claim 15application demosupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays enabled spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the plasma membrane of live cells by capturing Lrp6 via an extracellular GFP tag.

We achieved spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the nanoscale in the plasma membrane of live cells by capturing the co-receptor Lrp6 into bNDAs via an extracellular GFP tag.
Claim 16application demosupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays enabled spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the plasma membrane of live cells by capturing Lrp6 via an extracellular GFP tag.

We achieved spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the nanoscale in the plasma membrane of live cells by capturing the co-receptor Lrp6 into bNDAs via an extracellular GFP tag.
Claim 17application demosupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays enabled spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the plasma membrane of live cells by capturing Lrp6 via an extracellular GFP tag.

We achieved spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the nanoscale in the plasma membrane of live cells by capturing the co-receptor Lrp6 into bNDAs via an extracellular GFP tag.
Claim 18functional implicationsupports2022Source 1needs review

The observations indicate synergistic effects of LLPS for Wnt signaling amplification.

pinpointing the synergistic effects of LLPS for Wnt signaling amplification.
Claim 19functional implicationsupports2022Source 1needs review

The observations indicate synergistic effects of LLPS for Wnt signaling amplification.

pinpointing the synergistic effects of LLPS for Wnt signaling amplification.
Claim 20functional implicationsupports2022Source 1needs review

The observations indicate synergistic effects of LLPS for Wnt signaling amplification.

pinpointing the synergistic effects of LLPS for Wnt signaling amplification.
Claim 21functional implicationsupports2022Source 1needs review

The observations indicate synergistic effects of LLPS for Wnt signaling amplification.

pinpointing the synergistic effects of LLPS for Wnt signaling amplification.
Claim 22functional implicationsupports2022Source 1needs review

The observations indicate synergistic effects of LLPS for Wnt signaling amplification.

pinpointing the synergistic effects of LLPS for Wnt signaling amplification.
Claim 23functional implicationsupports2022Source 1needs review

The observations indicate synergistic effects of LLPS for Wnt signaling amplification.

pinpointing the synergistic effects of LLPS for Wnt signaling amplification.
Claim 24functional implicationsupports2022Source 1needs review

The observations indicate synergistic effects of LLPS for Wnt signaling amplification.

pinpointing the synergistic effects of LLPS for Wnt signaling amplification.
Claim 25functional implicationsupports2022Source 1needs review

The observations indicate synergistic effects of LLPS for Wnt signaling amplification.

pinpointing the synergistic effects of LLPS for Wnt signaling amplification.
Claim 26functional implicationsupports2022Source 1needs review

The observations indicate synergistic effects of LLPS for Wnt signaling amplification.

pinpointing the synergistic effects of LLPS for Wnt signaling amplification.
Claim 27functional implicationsupports2022Source 1needs review

The observations indicate synergistic effects of LLPS for Wnt signaling amplification.

pinpointing the synergistic effects of LLPS for Wnt signaling amplification.
Claim 28functional implicationsupports2022Source 1needs review

The observations indicate synergistic effects of LLPS for Wnt signaling amplification.

pinpointing the synergistic effects of LLPS for Wnt signaling amplification.
Claim 29functional implicationsupports2022Source 1needs review

The observations indicate synergistic effects of LLPS for Wnt signaling amplification.

pinpointing the synergistic effects of LLPS for Wnt signaling amplification.
Claim 30functional implicationsupports2022Source 1needs review

The observations indicate synergistic effects of LLPS for Wnt signaling amplification.

pinpointing the synergistic effects of LLPS for Wnt signaling amplification.
Claim 31functional implicationsupports2022Source 1needs review

The observations indicate synergistic effects of LLPS for Wnt signaling amplification.

pinpointing the synergistic effects of LLPS for Wnt signaling amplification.
Claim 32functional implicationsupports2022Source 1needs review

The observations indicate synergistic effects of LLPS for Wnt signaling amplification.

pinpointing the synergistic effects of LLPS for Wnt signaling amplification.
Claim 33functional implicationsupports2022Source 1needs review

The observations indicate synergistic effects of LLPS for Wnt signaling amplification.

pinpointing the synergistic effects of LLPS for Wnt signaling amplification.
Claim 34functional implicationsupports2022Source 1needs review

The observations indicate synergistic effects of LLPS for Wnt signaling amplification.

pinpointing the synergistic effects of LLPS for Wnt signaling amplification.
Claim 35mechanistic inferencesupports2022Source 1needs review

Density variation and high effector-protein dynamics support a highly cooperative LLPS-driven assembly of Wnt signalodroplets at the plasma membrane.

Density variation and the high dynamics of effector proteins uncover highly cooperative liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS)-driven assembly of Wnt “signalodroplets” at the plasma membrane
Claim 36mechanistic inferencesupports2022Source 1needs review

Density variation and high effector-protein dynamics support a highly cooperative LLPS-driven assembly of Wnt signalodroplets at the plasma membrane.

Density variation and the high dynamics of effector proteins uncover highly cooperative liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS)-driven assembly of Wnt “signalodroplets” at the plasma membrane
Claim 37mechanistic inferencesupports2022Source 1needs review

Density variation and high effector-protein dynamics support a highly cooperative LLPS-driven assembly of Wnt signalodroplets at the plasma membrane.

Density variation and the high dynamics of effector proteins uncover highly cooperative liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS)-driven assembly of Wnt “signalodroplets” at the plasma membrane
Claim 38mechanistic inferencesupports2022Source 1needs review

Density variation and high effector-protein dynamics support a highly cooperative LLPS-driven assembly of Wnt signalodroplets at the plasma membrane.

Density variation and the high dynamics of effector proteins uncover highly cooperative liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS)-driven assembly of Wnt “signalodroplets” at the plasma membrane
Claim 39mechanistic inferencesupports2022Source 1needs review

Density variation and high effector-protein dynamics support a highly cooperative LLPS-driven assembly of Wnt signalodroplets at the plasma membrane.

Density variation and the high dynamics of effector proteins uncover highly cooperative liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS)-driven assembly of Wnt “signalodroplets” at the plasma membrane
Claim 40mechanistic inferencesupports2022Source 1needs review

Density variation and high effector-protein dynamics support a highly cooperative LLPS-driven assembly of Wnt signalodroplets at the plasma membrane.

Density variation and the high dynamics of effector proteins uncover highly cooperative liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS)-driven assembly of Wnt “signalodroplets” at the plasma membrane
Claim 41mechanistic inferencesupports2022Source 1needs review

Density variation and high effector-protein dynamics support a highly cooperative LLPS-driven assembly of Wnt signalodroplets at the plasma membrane.

Density variation and the high dynamics of effector proteins uncover highly cooperative liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS)-driven assembly of Wnt “signalodroplets” at the plasma membrane
Claim 42mechanistic inferencesupports2022Source 1needs review

Density variation and high effector-protein dynamics support a highly cooperative LLPS-driven assembly of Wnt signalodroplets at the plasma membrane.

Density variation and the high dynamics of effector proteins uncover highly cooperative liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS)-driven assembly of Wnt “signalodroplets” at the plasma membrane
Claim 43mechanistic inferencesupports2022Source 1needs review

Density variation and high effector-protein dynamics support a highly cooperative LLPS-driven assembly of Wnt signalodroplets at the plasma membrane.

Density variation and the high dynamics of effector proteins uncover highly cooperative liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS)-driven assembly of Wnt “signalodroplets” at the plasma membrane
Claim 44mechanistic inferencesupports2022Source 1needs review

Density variation and high effector-protein dynamics support a highly cooperative LLPS-driven assembly of Wnt signalodroplets at the plasma membrane.

Density variation and the high dynamics of effector proteins uncover highly cooperative liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS)-driven assembly of Wnt “signalodroplets” at the plasma membrane
Claim 45mechanistic inferencesupports2022Source 1needs review

Density variation and high effector-protein dynamics support a highly cooperative LLPS-driven assembly of Wnt signalodroplets at the plasma membrane.

Density variation and the high dynamics of effector proteins uncover highly cooperative liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS)-driven assembly of Wnt “signalodroplets” at the plasma membrane
Claim 46mechanistic inferencesupports2022Source 1needs review

Density variation and high effector-protein dynamics support a highly cooperative LLPS-driven assembly of Wnt signalodroplets at the plasma membrane.

Density variation and the high dynamics of effector proteins uncover highly cooperative liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS)-driven assembly of Wnt “signalodroplets” at the plasma membrane
Claim 47mechanistic inferencesupports2022Source 1needs review

Density variation and high effector-protein dynamics support a highly cooperative LLPS-driven assembly of Wnt signalodroplets at the plasma membrane.

Density variation and the high dynamics of effector proteins uncover highly cooperative liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS)-driven assembly of Wnt “signalodroplets” at the plasma membrane
Claim 48mechanistic inferencesupports2022Source 1needs review

Density variation and high effector-protein dynamics support a highly cooperative LLPS-driven assembly of Wnt signalodroplets at the plasma membrane.

Density variation and the high dynamics of effector proteins uncover highly cooperative liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS)-driven assembly of Wnt “signalodroplets” at the plasma membrane
Claim 49mechanistic inferencesupports2022Source 1needs review

Density variation and high effector-protein dynamics support a highly cooperative LLPS-driven assembly of Wnt signalodroplets at the plasma membrane.

Density variation and the high dynamics of effector proteins uncover highly cooperative liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS)-driven assembly of Wnt “signalodroplets” at the plasma membrane
Claim 50mechanistic inferencesupports2022Source 1needs review

Density variation and high effector-protein dynamics support a highly cooperative LLPS-driven assembly of Wnt signalodroplets at the plasma membrane.

Density variation and the high dynamics of effector proteins uncover highly cooperative liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS)-driven assembly of Wnt “signalodroplets” at the plasma membrane
Claim 51mechanistic inferencesupports2022Source 1needs review

Density variation and high effector-protein dynamics support a highly cooperative LLPS-driven assembly of Wnt signalodroplets at the plasma membrane.

Density variation and the high dynamics of effector proteins uncover highly cooperative liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS)-driven assembly of Wnt “signalodroplets” at the plasma membrane
Claim 52physical characteristicsupports2022Source 1needs review

The reported biofunctional nanodot arrays had spot diameters of approximately 300 nm.

High-contrast bNDAs with spot diameters of ∼300 nm were obtained by capillary nanostamping of BSA bioconjugates
spot diameter 300 nm
Claim 53physical characteristicsupports2022Source 1needs review

The reported biofunctional nanodot arrays had spot diameters of approximately 300 nm.

High-contrast bNDAs with spot diameters of ∼300 nm were obtained by capillary nanostamping of BSA bioconjugates
spot diameter 300 nm
Claim 54physical characteristicsupports2022Source 1needs review

The reported biofunctional nanodot arrays had spot diameters of approximately 300 nm.

High-contrast bNDAs with spot diameters of ∼300 nm were obtained by capillary nanostamping of BSA bioconjugates
spot diameter 300 nm
Claim 55physical characteristicsupports2022Source 1needs review

The reported biofunctional nanodot arrays had spot diameters of approximately 300 nm.

High-contrast bNDAs with spot diameters of ∼300 nm were obtained by capillary nanostamping of BSA bioconjugates
spot diameter 300 nm
Claim 56physical characteristicsupports2022Source 1needs review

The reported biofunctional nanodot arrays had spot diameters of approximately 300 nm.

High-contrast bNDAs with spot diameters of ∼300 nm were obtained by capillary nanostamping of BSA bioconjugates
spot diameter 300 nm
Claim 57physical characteristicsupports2022Source 1needs review

The reported biofunctional nanodot arrays had spot diameters of approximately 300 nm.

High-contrast bNDAs with spot diameters of ∼300 nm were obtained by capillary nanostamping of BSA bioconjugates
spot diameter 300 nm
Claim 58physical characteristicsupports2022Source 1needs review

The reported biofunctional nanodot arrays had spot diameters of approximately 300 nm.

High-contrast bNDAs with spot diameters of ∼300 nm were obtained by capillary nanostamping of BSA bioconjugates
spot diameter 300 nm
Claim 59physical characteristicsupports2022Source 1needs review

The reported biofunctional nanodot arrays had spot diameters of approximately 300 nm.

High-contrast bNDAs with spot diameters of ∼300 nm were obtained by capillary nanostamping of BSA bioconjugates
spot diameter 300 nm
Claim 60physical characteristicsupports2022Source 1needs review

The reported biofunctional nanodot arrays had spot diameters of approximately 300 nm.

High-contrast bNDAs with spot diameters of ∼300 nm were obtained by capillary nanostamping of BSA bioconjugates
spot diameter 300 nm
Claim 61physical characteristicsupports2022Source 1needs review

The reported biofunctional nanodot arrays had spot diameters of approximately 300 nm.

High-contrast bNDAs with spot diameters of ∼300 nm were obtained by capillary nanostamping of BSA bioconjugates
spot diameter 300 nm
Claim 62physical characteristicsupports2022Source 1needs review

The reported biofunctional nanodot arrays had spot diameters of approximately 300 nm.

High-contrast bNDAs with spot diameters of ∼300 nm were obtained by capillary nanostamping of BSA bioconjugates
spot diameter 300 nm
Claim 63physical characteristicsupports2022Source 1needs review

The reported biofunctional nanodot arrays had spot diameters of approximately 300 nm.

High-contrast bNDAs with spot diameters of ∼300 nm were obtained by capillary nanostamping of BSA bioconjugates
spot diameter 300 nm
Claim 64physical characteristicsupports2022Source 1needs review

The reported biofunctional nanodot arrays had spot diameters of approximately 300 nm.

High-contrast bNDAs with spot diameters of ∼300 nm were obtained by capillary nanostamping of BSA bioconjugates
spot diameter 300 nm
Claim 65physical characteristicsupports2022Source 1needs review

The reported biofunctional nanodot arrays had spot diameters of approximately 300 nm.

High-contrast bNDAs with spot diameters of ∼300 nm were obtained by capillary nanostamping of BSA bioconjugates
spot diameter 300 nm
Claim 66physical characteristicsupports2022Source 1needs review

The reported biofunctional nanodot arrays had spot diameters of approximately 300 nm.

High-contrast bNDAs with spot diameters of ∼300 nm were obtained by capillary nanostamping of BSA bioconjugates
spot diameter 300 nm
Claim 67physical characteristicsupports2022Source 1needs review

The reported biofunctional nanodot arrays had spot diameters of approximately 300 nm.

High-contrast bNDAs with spot diameters of ∼300 nm were obtained by capillary nanostamping of BSA bioconjugates
spot diameter 300 nm
Claim 68physical characteristicsupports2022Source 1needs review

The reported biofunctional nanodot arrays had spot diameters of approximately 300 nm.

High-contrast bNDAs with spot diameters of ∼300 nm were obtained by capillary nanostamping of BSA bioconjugates
spot diameter 300 nm
Claim 69recruitment observationsupports2022Source 1needs review

Frizzled-8, Axin-1, and Disheveled-2 were co-recruited into Lrp6 nanodots in the absence of ligand.

Strikingly, we observed co-recruitment of co-receptor Frizzled-8 as well as the cytosolic scaffold proteins Axin-1 and Disheveled-2 into Lrp6 nanodots in the absence of ligand.
Claim 70recruitment observationsupports2022Source 1needs review

Frizzled-8, Axin-1, and Disheveled-2 were co-recruited into Lrp6 nanodots in the absence of ligand.

Strikingly, we observed co-recruitment of co-receptor Frizzled-8 as well as the cytosolic scaffold proteins Axin-1 and Disheveled-2 into Lrp6 nanodots in the absence of ligand.
Claim 71recruitment observationsupports2022Source 1needs review

Frizzled-8, Axin-1, and Disheveled-2 were co-recruited into Lrp6 nanodots in the absence of ligand.

Strikingly, we observed co-recruitment of co-receptor Frizzled-8 as well as the cytosolic scaffold proteins Axin-1 and Disheveled-2 into Lrp6 nanodots in the absence of ligand.
Claim 72recruitment observationsupports2022Source 1needs review

Frizzled-8, Axin-1, and Disheveled-2 were co-recruited into Lrp6 nanodots in the absence of ligand.

Strikingly, we observed co-recruitment of co-receptor Frizzled-8 as well as the cytosolic scaffold proteins Axin-1 and Disheveled-2 into Lrp6 nanodots in the absence of ligand.
Claim 73recruitment observationsupports2022Source 1needs review

Frizzled-8, Axin-1, and Disheveled-2 were co-recruited into Lrp6 nanodots in the absence of ligand.

Strikingly, we observed co-recruitment of co-receptor Frizzled-8 as well as the cytosolic scaffold proteins Axin-1 and Disheveled-2 into Lrp6 nanodots in the absence of ligand.
Claim 74recruitment observationsupports2022Source 1needs review

Frizzled-8, Axin-1, and Disheveled-2 were co-recruited into Lrp6 nanodots in the absence of ligand.

Strikingly, we observed co-recruitment of co-receptor Frizzled-8 as well as the cytosolic scaffold proteins Axin-1 and Disheveled-2 into Lrp6 nanodots in the absence of ligand.
Claim 75recruitment observationsupports2022Source 1needs review

Frizzled-8, Axin-1, and Disheveled-2 were co-recruited into Lrp6 nanodots in the absence of ligand.

Strikingly, we observed co-recruitment of co-receptor Frizzled-8 as well as the cytosolic scaffold proteins Axin-1 and Disheveled-2 into Lrp6 nanodots in the absence of ligand.
Claim 76recruitment observationsupports2022Source 1needs review

Frizzled-8, Axin-1, and Disheveled-2 were co-recruited into Lrp6 nanodots in the absence of ligand.

Strikingly, we observed co-recruitment of co-receptor Frizzled-8 as well as the cytosolic scaffold proteins Axin-1 and Disheveled-2 into Lrp6 nanodots in the absence of ligand.
Claim 77recruitment observationsupports2022Source 1needs review

Frizzled-8, Axin-1, and Disheveled-2 were co-recruited into Lrp6 nanodots in the absence of ligand.

Strikingly, we observed co-recruitment of co-receptor Frizzled-8 as well as the cytosolic scaffold proteins Axin-1 and Disheveled-2 into Lrp6 nanodots in the absence of ligand.
Claim 78recruitment observationsupports2022Source 1needs review

Frizzled-8, Axin-1, and Disheveled-2 were co-recruited into Lrp6 nanodots in the absence of ligand.

Strikingly, we observed co-recruitment of co-receptor Frizzled-8 as well as the cytosolic scaffold proteins Axin-1 and Disheveled-2 into Lrp6 nanodots in the absence of ligand.
Claim 79recruitment observationsupports2022Source 1needs review

Frizzled-8, Axin-1, and Disheveled-2 were co-recruited into Lrp6 nanodots in the absence of ligand.

Strikingly, we observed co-recruitment of co-receptor Frizzled-8 as well as the cytosolic scaffold proteins Axin-1 and Disheveled-2 into Lrp6 nanodots in the absence of ligand.
Claim 80recruitment observationsupports2022Source 1needs review

Frizzled-8, Axin-1, and Disheveled-2 were co-recruited into Lrp6 nanodots in the absence of ligand.

Strikingly, we observed co-recruitment of co-receptor Frizzled-8 as well as the cytosolic scaffold proteins Axin-1 and Disheveled-2 into Lrp6 nanodots in the absence of ligand.
Claim 81recruitment observationsupports2022Source 1needs review

Frizzled-8, Axin-1, and Disheveled-2 were co-recruited into Lrp6 nanodots in the absence of ligand.

Strikingly, we observed co-recruitment of co-receptor Frizzled-8 as well as the cytosolic scaffold proteins Axin-1 and Disheveled-2 into Lrp6 nanodots in the absence of ligand.
Claim 82recruitment observationsupports2022Source 1needs review

Frizzled-8, Axin-1, and Disheveled-2 were co-recruited into Lrp6 nanodots in the absence of ligand.

Strikingly, we observed co-recruitment of co-receptor Frizzled-8 as well as the cytosolic scaffold proteins Axin-1 and Disheveled-2 into Lrp6 nanodots in the absence of ligand.
Claim 83recruitment observationsupports2022Source 1needs review

Frizzled-8, Axin-1, and Disheveled-2 were co-recruited into Lrp6 nanodots in the absence of ligand.

Strikingly, we observed co-recruitment of co-receptor Frizzled-8 as well as the cytosolic scaffold proteins Axin-1 and Disheveled-2 into Lrp6 nanodots in the absence of ligand.
Claim 84recruitment observationsupports2022Source 1needs review

Frizzled-8, Axin-1, and Disheveled-2 were co-recruited into Lrp6 nanodots in the absence of ligand.

Strikingly, we observed co-recruitment of co-receptor Frizzled-8 as well as the cytosolic scaffold proteins Axin-1 and Disheveled-2 into Lrp6 nanodots in the absence of ligand.
Claim 85recruitment observationsupports2022Source 1needs review

Frizzled-8, Axin-1, and Disheveled-2 were co-recruited into Lrp6 nanodots in the absence of ligand.

Strikingly, we observed co-recruitment of co-receptor Frizzled-8 as well as the cytosolic scaffold proteins Axin-1 and Disheveled-2 into Lrp6 nanodots in the absence of ligand.
Claim 86tool developmentsupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays were developed to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at the nanoscale.

Here, we have developed biofunctional nanodot arrays (bNDAs) to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at nanoscale.
Claim 87tool developmentsupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays were developed to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at the nanoscale.

Here, we have developed biofunctional nanodot arrays (bNDAs) to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at nanoscale.
Claim 88tool developmentsupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays were developed to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at the nanoscale.

Here, we have developed biofunctional nanodot arrays (bNDAs) to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at nanoscale.
Claim 89tool developmentsupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays were developed to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at the nanoscale.

Here, we have developed biofunctional nanodot arrays (bNDAs) to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at nanoscale.
Claim 90tool developmentsupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays were developed to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at the nanoscale.

Here, we have developed biofunctional nanodot arrays (bNDAs) to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at nanoscale.
Claim 91tool developmentsupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays were developed to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at the nanoscale.

Here, we have developed biofunctional nanodot arrays (bNDAs) to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at nanoscale.
Claim 92tool developmentsupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays were developed to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at the nanoscale.

Here, we have developed biofunctional nanodot arrays (bNDAs) to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at nanoscale.
Claim 93tool developmentsupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays were developed to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at the nanoscale.

Here, we have developed biofunctional nanodot arrays (bNDAs) to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at nanoscale.
Claim 94tool developmentsupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays were developed to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at the nanoscale.

Here, we have developed biofunctional nanodot arrays (bNDAs) to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at nanoscale.
Claim 95tool developmentsupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays were developed to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at the nanoscale.

Here, we have developed biofunctional nanodot arrays (bNDAs) to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at nanoscale.
Claim 96tool developmentsupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays were developed to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at the nanoscale.

Here, we have developed biofunctional nanodot arrays (bNDAs) to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at nanoscale.
Claim 97tool developmentsupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays were developed to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at the nanoscale.

Here, we have developed biofunctional nanodot arrays (bNDAs) to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at nanoscale.
Claim 98tool developmentsupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays were developed to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at the nanoscale.

Here, we have developed biofunctional nanodot arrays (bNDAs) to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at nanoscale.
Claim 99tool developmentsupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays were developed to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at the nanoscale.

Here, we have developed biofunctional nanodot arrays (bNDAs) to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at nanoscale.
Claim 100tool developmentsupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays were developed to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at the nanoscale.

Here, we have developed biofunctional nanodot arrays (bNDAs) to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at nanoscale.
Claim 101tool developmentsupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays were developed to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at the nanoscale.

Here, we have developed biofunctional nanodot arrays (bNDAs) to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at nanoscale.
Claim 102tool developmentsupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays were developed to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at the nanoscale.

Here, we have developed biofunctional nanodot arrays (bNDAs) to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at nanoscale.
Claim 103use potentialsupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays have potential for systematically interrogating nanoscale signaling platforms and condensation at the plasma membrane of live cells.

These insights highlight the potential of bNDAs for systematically interrogating nanoscale signaling platforms and condensation at the plasma membrane of live cells.
Claim 104use potentialsupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays have potential for systematically interrogating nanoscale signaling platforms and condensation at the plasma membrane of live cells.

These insights highlight the potential of bNDAs for systematically interrogating nanoscale signaling platforms and condensation at the plasma membrane of live cells.
Claim 105use potentialsupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays have potential for systematically interrogating nanoscale signaling platforms and condensation at the plasma membrane of live cells.

These insights highlight the potential of bNDAs for systematically interrogating nanoscale signaling platforms and condensation at the plasma membrane of live cells.
Claim 106use potentialsupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays have potential for systematically interrogating nanoscale signaling platforms and condensation at the plasma membrane of live cells.

These insights highlight the potential of bNDAs for systematically interrogating nanoscale signaling platforms and condensation at the plasma membrane of live cells.
Claim 107use potentialsupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays have potential for systematically interrogating nanoscale signaling platforms and condensation at the plasma membrane of live cells.

These insights highlight the potential of bNDAs for systematically interrogating nanoscale signaling platforms and condensation at the plasma membrane of live cells.
Claim 108use potentialsupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays have potential for systematically interrogating nanoscale signaling platforms and condensation at the plasma membrane of live cells.

These insights highlight the potential of bNDAs for systematically interrogating nanoscale signaling platforms and condensation at the plasma membrane of live cells.
Claim 109use potentialsupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays have potential for systematically interrogating nanoscale signaling platforms and condensation at the plasma membrane of live cells.

These insights highlight the potential of bNDAs for systematically interrogating nanoscale signaling platforms and condensation at the plasma membrane of live cells.
Claim 110use potentialsupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays have potential for systematically interrogating nanoscale signaling platforms and condensation at the plasma membrane of live cells.

These insights highlight the potential of bNDAs for systematically interrogating nanoscale signaling platforms and condensation at the plasma membrane of live cells.
Claim 111use potentialsupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays have potential for systematically interrogating nanoscale signaling platforms and condensation at the plasma membrane of live cells.

These insights highlight the potential of bNDAs for systematically interrogating nanoscale signaling platforms and condensation at the plasma membrane of live cells.
Claim 112use potentialsupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays have potential for systematically interrogating nanoscale signaling platforms and condensation at the plasma membrane of live cells.

These insights highlight the potential of bNDAs for systematically interrogating nanoscale signaling platforms and condensation at the plasma membrane of live cells.
Claim 113use potentialsupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays have potential for systematically interrogating nanoscale signaling platforms and condensation at the plasma membrane of live cells.

These insights highlight the potential of bNDAs for systematically interrogating nanoscale signaling platforms and condensation at the plasma membrane of live cells.
Claim 114use potentialsupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays have potential for systematically interrogating nanoscale signaling platforms and condensation at the plasma membrane of live cells.

These insights highlight the potential of bNDAs for systematically interrogating nanoscale signaling platforms and condensation at the plasma membrane of live cells.
Claim 115use potentialsupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays have potential for systematically interrogating nanoscale signaling platforms and condensation at the plasma membrane of live cells.

These insights highlight the potential of bNDAs for systematically interrogating nanoscale signaling platforms and condensation at the plasma membrane of live cells.
Claim 116use potentialsupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays have potential for systematically interrogating nanoscale signaling platforms and condensation at the plasma membrane of live cells.

These insights highlight the potential of bNDAs for systematically interrogating nanoscale signaling platforms and condensation at the plasma membrane of live cells.
Claim 117use potentialsupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays have potential for systematically interrogating nanoscale signaling platforms and condensation at the plasma membrane of live cells.

These insights highlight the potential of bNDAs for systematically interrogating nanoscale signaling platforms and condensation at the plasma membrane of live cells.
Claim 118use potentialsupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays have potential for systematically interrogating nanoscale signaling platforms and condensation at the plasma membrane of live cells.

These insights highlight the potential of bNDAs for systematically interrogating nanoscale signaling platforms and condensation at the plasma membrane of live cells.
Claim 119use potentialsupports2022Source 1needs review

Biofunctional nanodot arrays have potential for systematically interrogating nanoscale signaling platforms and condensation at the plasma membrane of live cells.

These insights highlight the potential of bNDAs for systematically interrogating nanoscale signaling platforms and condensation at the plasma membrane of live cells.

Approval Evidence

1 source7 linked approval claimsfirst-pass slug biofunctional-nanodot-arrays
Here, we have developed biofunctional nanodot arrays (bNDAs) to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at nanoscale.

Source:

application demosupports

Biofunctional nanodot arrays enabled spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the plasma membrane of live cells by capturing Lrp6 via an extracellular GFP tag.

We achieved spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the nanoscale in the plasma membrane of live cells by capturing the co-receptor Lrp6 into bNDAs via an extracellular GFP tag.

Source:

functional implicationsupports

The observations indicate synergistic effects of LLPS for Wnt signaling amplification.

pinpointing the synergistic effects of LLPS for Wnt signaling amplification.

Source:

mechanistic inferencesupports

Density variation and high effector-protein dynamics support a highly cooperative LLPS-driven assembly of Wnt signalodroplets at the plasma membrane.

Density variation and the high dynamics of effector proteins uncover highly cooperative liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS)-driven assembly of Wnt “signalodroplets” at the plasma membrane

Source:

physical characteristicsupports

The reported biofunctional nanodot arrays had spot diameters of approximately 300 nm.

High-contrast bNDAs with spot diameters of ∼300 nm were obtained by capillary nanostamping of BSA bioconjugates

Source:

recruitment observationsupports

Frizzled-8, Axin-1, and Disheveled-2 were co-recruited into Lrp6 nanodots in the absence of ligand.

Strikingly, we observed co-recruitment of co-receptor Frizzled-8 as well as the cytosolic scaffold proteins Axin-1 and Disheveled-2 into Lrp6 nanodots in the absence of ligand.

Source:

tool developmentsupports

Biofunctional nanodot arrays were developed to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at the nanoscale.

Here, we have developed biofunctional nanodot arrays (bNDAs) to spatially control dimerization and clustering of cell surface receptors at nanoscale.

Source:

use potentialsupports

Biofunctional nanodot arrays have potential for systematically interrogating nanoscale signaling platforms and condensation at the plasma membrane of live cells.

These insights highlight the potential of bNDAs for systematically interrogating nanoscale signaling platforms and condensation at the plasma membrane of live cells.

Source:

Comparisons

Source-backed strengths

The tool was demonstrated in live cells and supported spatially controlled assembly of active Wnt signalosomes at the plasma membrane. The study further reported density-dependent behavior and high effector-protein dynamics consistent with a highly cooperative liquid-liquid phase separation-driven assembly process.

Compared with CIB1

biofunctional nanodot arrays and CIB1 address a similar problem space because they share localization, signaling.

Shared frame: shared target processes: localization, signaling; shared mechanisms: heterodimerization; same primary input modality: chemical

Relative tradeoffs: appears more independently replicated; looks easier to implement in practice.

Compared with Opto-RhoGEFs

biofunctional nanodot arrays and Opto-RhoGEFs address a similar problem space because they share localization, signaling.

Shared frame: shared target processes: localization, signaling; shared mechanisms: heterodimerization

Strengths here: looks easier to implement in practice.

biofunctional nanodot arrays and single-component optogenetic tools for inducible RhoA GTPase signaling address a similar problem space because they share localization, signaling.

Shared frame: shared target processes: localization, signaling; shared mechanisms: heterodimerization

Strengths here: looks easier to implement in practice.

Ranked Citations

  1. 1.

    Extracted from this source document.