Toolkit/computational modeling

computational modeling

Computational Method·Research·Since 2015

Taxonomy: Technique Branch / Method. Workflows sit above the mechanism and technique branches rather than replacing them.

Summary

Computational modeling was used to analyze how promoters decode light-driven transcription factor nuclear translocation dynamics. In the cited work, the modeling identified promoter kinetic regimes that enable efficient expression under short light pulses and proposed a multi-stage, thresholded activation scheme to explain opposite promoter-response phenotypes.

Usefulness & Problems

Why this is useful

This approach is useful for interpreting how promoter activation and inactivation kinetics shape transcriptional responses to optogenetically controlled nuclear localization inputs. It provides a framework for linking dynamic light stimulation to promoter-specific gene expression behavior and for guiding construct design decisions in related systems.

Source:

we present CLASP (Controllable Light Activated Shuttling and Plasma membrane sequestration), a tool that enables precise, modular, and reversible control of TF localization using a combination of two optimized LOV2 optogenetic constructs

Source:

By expressing AsLOV2 chimeras in Neuro2a cells, we achieved light-dependent modulation of REST target genes

Source:

and boosted Na(+) currents and neuronal firing

Problem solved

It addresses the problem of explaining why different promoters can respond differently to the same light-driven transcription factor translocation dynamics. Specifically, it helps identify kinetic features associated with efficient short-pulse expression and offers a mechanistic explanation for opposite response phenotypes through thresholded multi-stage activation.

Published Workflows

Objective: Characterize how plasmid copy number and regulatory architecture shape phenotypic mutation rate in engineered genetic modules to inform rational design of biocircuits with either higher stability or higher evolvability.

Why it works: The study combines modeling with in vivo mutagenesis experiments so that evolutionary effects of circuit design variables can be characterized rather than ignored during module design.

gene dosage via plasmid copy numbermutation masking versus phenotypic prominenceregulatory architecture effects on mutation manifestationcomputational modelingin vivo mutagenesis experiments

Taxonomy & Function

Primary hierarchy

Technique Branch

Method: A concrete computational method used to design, rank, or analyze an engineered system.

Target processes

No target processes tagged yet.

Input: Light

Implementation Constraints

The relevant biological context involved light-responsive control of transcription factor localization, including a CLASP system in which blue light releases cargo from plasma membrane sequestration and reveals a nuclear localization sequence for nuclear import. The evidence does not specify software, mathematical formalism, training data, or implementation requirements for the computational modeling itself.

The supplied evidence supports modeling conclusions but does not provide detailed information on model structure, parameterization, predictive accuracy, or external benchmarking. Validation appears limited to the cited studies, and no independent replication or broad cross-system generalization is documented in the provided evidence.

Validation

Cell-freeBacteriaMammalianMouseHumanTherapeuticIndep. Replication

Supporting Sources

Ranked Claims

Claim 1capabilitysupports2025Source 1needs review

AI enhances data integration, risk prediction, and clinical interpretability in vascular disease research.

Claim 2capabilitysupports2025Source 1needs review

Optogenetics and organ-on-chip platforms allow controlled manipulation and physiologically relevant modeling in vascular disease research.

Claim 3capabilitysupports2025Source 1needs review

Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics, super-resolution and photoacoustic imaging, microfluidic organ-on-chip platforms, CRISPR/Cas9-based gene editing, and AI have created new opportunities for investigating the cellular and molecular basis of vascular diseases.

Claim 4capabilitysupports2025Source 1needs review

These emerging technologies enable high-resolution mapping of cellular heterogeneity and functional alterations, facilitating biomarker discovery, disease modeling, and therapeutic development in vascular diseases.

Claim 5future directionsupports2025Source 1needs review

Future progress in vascular disease research should prioritize multi-center large-scale validation studies, harmonization of assay protocols, and integration with clinical datasets and human samples.

Claim 6future directionsupports2025Source 1needs review

Multi-omics approaches and computational modeling hold promise for unraveling disease complexity, and digital twins may accelerate personalized medicine in vascular disease research and treatment.

Claim 7mechanistic insightsupports2025Source 1needs review

Integrating single-cell and multiomics approaches highlights disease-driving cell types and gene programs in vascular disease.

Claim 8mechanismsupports2019Source 2needs review

In CLASP, one light-responsive construct sequesters cargo at the plasma membrane in the dark and releases it upon blue light exposure, while a second light-responsive construct reveals a nuclear localization sequence that shuttles released cargo to the nucleus.

The first sequesters the cargo in the dark at the plasma membrane and releases it upon exposure to blue light, while light exposure of the second reveals a nuclear localization sequence that shuttles the released cargo to the nucleus.
Claim 9mechanismsupports2019Source 2needs review

In CLASP, one light-responsive construct sequesters cargo at the plasma membrane in the dark and releases it upon blue light exposure, while a second light-responsive construct reveals a nuclear localization sequence that shuttles released cargo to the nucleus.

The first sequesters the cargo in the dark at the plasma membrane and releases it upon exposure to blue light, while light exposure of the second reveals a nuclear localization sequence that shuttles the released cargo to the nucleus.
Claim 10mechanismsupports2019Source 2needs review

In CLASP, one light-responsive construct sequesters cargo at the plasma membrane in the dark and releases it upon blue light exposure, while a second light-responsive construct reveals a nuclear localization sequence that shuttles released cargo to the nucleus.

The first sequesters the cargo in the dark at the plasma membrane and releases it upon exposure to blue light, while light exposure of the second reveals a nuclear localization sequence that shuttles the released cargo to the nucleus.
Claim 11mechanismsupports2019Source 2needs review

In CLASP, one light-responsive construct sequesters cargo at the plasma membrane in the dark and releases it upon blue light exposure, while a second light-responsive construct reveals a nuclear localization sequence that shuttles released cargo to the nucleus.

The first sequesters the cargo in the dark at the plasma membrane and releases it upon exposure to blue light, while light exposure of the second reveals a nuclear localization sequence that shuttles the released cargo to the nucleus.
Claim 12mechanismsupports2019Source 2needs review

In CLASP, one light-responsive construct sequesters cargo at the plasma membrane in the dark and releases it upon blue light exposure, while a second light-responsive construct reveals a nuclear localization sequence that shuttles released cargo to the nucleus.

The first sequesters the cargo in the dark at the plasma membrane and releases it upon exposure to blue light, while light exposure of the second reveals a nuclear localization sequence that shuttles the released cargo to the nucleus.
Claim 13mechanismsupports2019Source 2needs review

In CLASP, one light-responsive construct sequesters cargo at the plasma membrane in the dark and releases it upon blue light exposure, while a second light-responsive construct reveals a nuclear localization sequence that shuttles released cargo to the nucleus.

The first sequesters the cargo in the dark at the plasma membrane and releases it upon exposure to blue light, while light exposure of the second reveals a nuclear localization sequence that shuttles the released cargo to the nucleus.
Claim 14mechanismsupports2019Source 2needs review

In CLASP, one light-responsive construct sequesters cargo at the plasma membrane in the dark and releases it upon blue light exposure, while a second light-responsive construct reveals a nuclear localization sequence that shuttles released cargo to the nucleus.

The first sequesters the cargo in the dark at the plasma membrane and releases it upon exposure to blue light, while light exposure of the second reveals a nuclear localization sequence that shuttles the released cargo to the nucleus.
Claim 15modeling resultsupports2019Source 2needs review

Computational modeling indicates that efficient gene expression in response to short pulsing requires fast promoter activation and slow inactivation.

We show using computational modeling that efficient gene expression in response to short pulsing requires fast promoter activation and slow inactivation
Claim 16modeling resultsupports2019Source 2needs review

Computational modeling indicates that efficient gene expression in response to short pulsing requires fast promoter activation and slow inactivation.

We show using computational modeling that efficient gene expression in response to short pulsing requires fast promoter activation and slow inactivation
Claim 17modeling resultsupports2019Source 2needs review

Computational modeling indicates that efficient gene expression in response to short pulsing requires fast promoter activation and slow inactivation.

We show using computational modeling that efficient gene expression in response to short pulsing requires fast promoter activation and slow inactivation
Claim 18modeling resultsupports2019Source 2needs review

Computational modeling indicates that efficient gene expression in response to short pulsing requires fast promoter activation and slow inactivation.

We show using computational modeling that efficient gene expression in response to short pulsing requires fast promoter activation and slow inactivation
Claim 19modeling resultsupports2019Source 2needs review

Computational modeling indicates that efficient gene expression in response to short pulsing requires fast promoter activation and slow inactivation.

We show using computational modeling that efficient gene expression in response to short pulsing requires fast promoter activation and slow inactivation
Claim 20modeling resultsupports2019Source 2needs review

Computational modeling indicates that efficient gene expression in response to short pulsing requires fast promoter activation and slow inactivation.

We show using computational modeling that efficient gene expression in response to short pulsing requires fast promoter activation and slow inactivation
Claim 21modeling resultsupports2019Source 2needs review

Computational modeling indicates that efficient gene expression in response to short pulsing requires fast promoter activation and slow inactivation.

We show using computational modeling that efficient gene expression in response to short pulsing requires fast promoter activation and slow inactivation
Claim 22modeling resultsupports2019Source 2needs review

Computational modeling indicates that the opposite promoter-response phenotype can arise from multi-stage promoter activation in which a transition in the first stage is thresholded.

and that the opposite phenotype can ensue from a multi-stage promoter activation, where a transition in the first stage is thresholded
Claim 23modeling resultsupports2019Source 2needs review

Computational modeling indicates that the opposite promoter-response phenotype can arise from multi-stage promoter activation in which a transition in the first stage is thresholded.

and that the opposite phenotype can ensue from a multi-stage promoter activation, where a transition in the first stage is thresholded
Claim 24modeling resultsupports2019Source 2needs review

Computational modeling indicates that the opposite promoter-response phenotype can arise from multi-stage promoter activation in which a transition in the first stage is thresholded.

and that the opposite phenotype can ensue from a multi-stage promoter activation, where a transition in the first stage is thresholded
Claim 25modeling resultsupports2019Source 2needs review

Computational modeling indicates that the opposite promoter-response phenotype can arise from multi-stage promoter activation in which a transition in the first stage is thresholded.

and that the opposite phenotype can ensue from a multi-stage promoter activation, where a transition in the first stage is thresholded
Claim 26modeling resultsupports2019Source 2needs review

Computational modeling indicates that the opposite promoter-response phenotype can arise from multi-stage promoter activation in which a transition in the first stage is thresholded.

and that the opposite phenotype can ensue from a multi-stage promoter activation, where a transition in the first stage is thresholded
Claim 27modeling resultsupports2019Source 2needs review

Computational modeling indicates that the opposite promoter-response phenotype can arise from multi-stage promoter activation in which a transition in the first stage is thresholded.

and that the opposite phenotype can ensue from a multi-stage promoter activation, where a transition in the first stage is thresholded
Claim 28modeling resultsupports2019Source 2needs review

Computational modeling indicates that the opposite promoter-response phenotype can arise from multi-stage promoter activation in which a transition in the first stage is thresholded.

and that the opposite phenotype can ensue from a multi-stage promoter activation, where a transition in the first stage is thresholded
Claim 29performancesupports2019Source 2needs review

CLASP achieves minute-level resolution, reversible translocation of many transcription factor cargos, large dynamic range, and tunable target gene expression.

CLASP achieves minute-level resolution, reversible translocation of many TF cargos, large dynamic range, and tunable target gene expression.
temporal resolution minute-level
Claim 30performancesupports2019Source 2needs review

CLASP achieves minute-level resolution, reversible translocation of many transcription factor cargos, large dynamic range, and tunable target gene expression.

CLASP achieves minute-level resolution, reversible translocation of many TF cargos, large dynamic range, and tunable target gene expression.
temporal resolution minute-level
Claim 31performancesupports2019Source 2needs review

CLASP achieves minute-level resolution, reversible translocation of many transcription factor cargos, large dynamic range, and tunable target gene expression.

CLASP achieves minute-level resolution, reversible translocation of many TF cargos, large dynamic range, and tunable target gene expression.
temporal resolution minute-level
Claim 32performancesupports2019Source 2needs review

CLASP achieves minute-level resolution, reversible translocation of many transcription factor cargos, large dynamic range, and tunable target gene expression.

CLASP achieves minute-level resolution, reversible translocation of many TF cargos, large dynamic range, and tunable target gene expression.
temporal resolution minute-level
Claim 33performancesupports2019Source 2needs review

CLASP achieves minute-level resolution, reversible translocation of many transcription factor cargos, large dynamic range, and tunable target gene expression.

CLASP achieves minute-level resolution, reversible translocation of many TF cargos, large dynamic range, and tunable target gene expression.
temporal resolution minute-level
Claim 34performancesupports2019Source 2needs review

CLASP achieves minute-level resolution, reversible translocation of many transcription factor cargos, large dynamic range, and tunable target gene expression.

CLASP achieves minute-level resolution, reversible translocation of many TF cargos, large dynamic range, and tunable target gene expression.
temporal resolution minute-level
Claim 35performancesupports2019Source 2needs review

CLASP achieves minute-level resolution, reversible translocation of many transcription factor cargos, large dynamic range, and tunable target gene expression.

CLASP achieves minute-level resolution, reversible translocation of many TF cargos, large dynamic range, and tunable target gene expression.
temporal resolution minute-level
Claim 36tool capabilitysupports2019Source 2needs review

CLASP enables precise, modular, and reversible control of transcription factor localization using two optimized LOV2 optogenetic constructs.

we present CLASP (Controllable Light Activated Shuttling and Plasma membrane sequestration), a tool that enables precise, modular, and reversible control of TF localization using a combination of two optimized LOV2 optogenetic constructs
Claim 37tool capabilitysupports2019Source 2needs review

CLASP enables precise, modular, and reversible control of transcription factor localization using two optimized LOV2 optogenetic constructs.

we present CLASP (Controllable Light Activated Shuttling and Plasma membrane sequestration), a tool that enables precise, modular, and reversible control of TF localization using a combination of two optimized LOV2 optogenetic constructs
Claim 38tool capabilitysupports2019Source 2needs review

CLASP enables precise, modular, and reversible control of transcription factor localization using two optimized LOV2 optogenetic constructs.

we present CLASP (Controllable Light Activated Shuttling and Plasma membrane sequestration), a tool that enables precise, modular, and reversible control of TF localization using a combination of two optimized LOV2 optogenetic constructs
Claim 39tool capabilitysupports2019Source 2needs review

CLASP enables precise, modular, and reversible control of transcription factor localization using two optimized LOV2 optogenetic constructs.

we present CLASP (Controllable Light Activated Shuttling and Plasma membrane sequestration), a tool that enables precise, modular, and reversible control of TF localization using a combination of two optimized LOV2 optogenetic constructs
Claim 40tool capabilitysupports2019Source 2needs review

CLASP enables precise, modular, and reversible control of transcription factor localization using two optimized LOV2 optogenetic constructs.

we present CLASP (Controllable Light Activated Shuttling and Plasma membrane sequestration), a tool that enables precise, modular, and reversible control of TF localization using a combination of two optimized LOV2 optogenetic constructs
Claim 41tool capabilitysupports2019Source 2needs review

CLASP enables precise, modular, and reversible control of transcription factor localization using two optimized LOV2 optogenetic constructs.

we present CLASP (Controllable Light Activated Shuttling and Plasma membrane sequestration), a tool that enables precise, modular, and reversible control of TF localization using a combination of two optimized LOV2 optogenetic constructs
Claim 42tool capabilitysupports2019Source 2needs review

CLASP enables precise, modular, and reversible control of transcription factor localization using two optimized LOV2 optogenetic constructs.

we present CLASP (Controllable Light Activated Shuttling and Plasma membrane sequestration), a tool that enables precise, modular, and reversible control of TF localization using a combination of two optimized LOV2 optogenetic constructs
Claim 43capabilitysupports2015Source 3needs review

AsLOV2 REST-inhibitory chimeras enabled light-dependent modulation of REST target genes in Neuro2a cells.

By expressing AsLOV2 chimeras in Neuro2a cells, we achieved light-dependent modulation of REST target genes
Claim 44capabilitysupports2015Source 3needs review

AsLOV2 REST-inhibitory chimeras enabled light-dependent modulation of REST target genes in Neuro2a cells.

By expressing AsLOV2 chimeras in Neuro2a cells, we achieved light-dependent modulation of REST target genes
Claim 45capabilitysupports2015Source 3needs review

AsLOV2 REST-inhibitory chimeras enabled light-dependent modulation of REST target genes in Neuro2a cells.

By expressing AsLOV2 chimeras in Neuro2a cells, we achieved light-dependent modulation of REST target genes
Claim 46capabilitysupports2015Source 3needs review

AsLOV2 REST-inhibitory chimeras enabled light-dependent modulation of REST target genes in Neuro2a cells.

By expressing AsLOV2 chimeras in Neuro2a cells, we achieved light-dependent modulation of REST target genes
Claim 47capabilitysupports2015Source 3needs review

AsLOV2 REST-inhibitory chimeras enabled light-dependent modulation of REST target genes in Neuro2a cells.

By expressing AsLOV2 chimeras in Neuro2a cells, we achieved light-dependent modulation of REST target genes
Claim 48capabilitysupports2015Source 3needs review

AsLOV2 REST-inhibitory chimeras enabled light-dependent modulation of REST target genes in Neuro2a cells.

By expressing AsLOV2 chimeras in Neuro2a cells, we achieved light-dependent modulation of REST target genes
Claim 49capabilitysupports2015Source 3needs review

AsLOV2 REST-inhibitory chimeras enabled light-dependent modulation of REST target genes in Neuro2a cells.

By expressing AsLOV2 chimeras in Neuro2a cells, we achieved light-dependent modulation of REST target genes
Claim 50design strategysupports2015Source 3needs review

Computational modeling guided fusion of REST-inhibitory domains to AsLOV2.

Computational modeling guided the fusion of the inhibitory domains to the light-sensitive Avena sativa light-oxygen-voltage-sensing (LOV) 2-phototrophin 1 (AsLOV2).
Claim 51design strategysupports2015Source 3needs review

Computational modeling guided fusion of REST-inhibitory domains to AsLOV2.

Computational modeling guided the fusion of the inhibitory domains to the light-sensitive Avena sativa light-oxygen-voltage-sensing (LOV) 2-phototrophin 1 (AsLOV2).
Claim 52design strategysupports2015Source 3needs review

Computational modeling guided fusion of REST-inhibitory domains to AsLOV2.

Computational modeling guided the fusion of the inhibitory domains to the light-sensitive Avena sativa light-oxygen-voltage-sensing (LOV) 2-phototrophin 1 (AsLOV2).
Claim 53design strategysupports2015Source 3needs review

Computational modeling guided fusion of REST-inhibitory domains to AsLOV2.

Computational modeling guided the fusion of the inhibitory domains to the light-sensitive Avena sativa light-oxygen-voltage-sensing (LOV) 2-phototrophin 1 (AsLOV2).
Claim 54design strategysupports2015Source 3needs review

Computational modeling guided fusion of REST-inhibitory domains to AsLOV2.

Computational modeling guided the fusion of the inhibitory domains to the light-sensitive Avena sativa light-oxygen-voltage-sensing (LOV) 2-phototrophin 1 (AsLOV2).
Claim 55design strategysupports2015Source 3needs review

Computational modeling guided fusion of REST-inhibitory domains to AsLOV2.

Computational modeling guided the fusion of the inhibitory domains to the light-sensitive Avena sativa light-oxygen-voltage-sensing (LOV) 2-phototrophin 1 (AsLOV2).
Claim 56design strategysupports2015Source 3needs review

Computational modeling guided fusion of REST-inhibitory domains to AsLOV2.

Computational modeling guided the fusion of the inhibitory domains to the light-sensitive Avena sativa light-oxygen-voltage-sensing (LOV) 2-phototrophin 1 (AsLOV2).
Claim 57functional effectsupports2015Source 3needs review

In primary neurons, light-mediated REST inhibition boosted Na+ currents and neuronal firing.

and boosted Na(+) currents and neuronal firing
Claim 58functional effectsupports2015Source 3needs review

In primary neurons, light-mediated REST inhibition boosted Na+ currents and neuronal firing.

and boosted Na(+) currents and neuronal firing
Claim 59functional effectsupports2015Source 3needs review

In primary neurons, light-mediated REST inhibition boosted Na+ currents and neuronal firing.

and boosted Na(+) currents and neuronal firing
Claim 60functional effectsupports2015Source 3needs review

In primary neurons, light-mediated REST inhibition boosted Na+ currents and neuronal firing.

and boosted Na(+) currents and neuronal firing
Claim 61functional effectsupports2015Source 3needs review

In primary neurons, light-mediated REST inhibition boosted Na+ currents and neuronal firing.

and boosted Na(+) currents and neuronal firing
Claim 62functional effectsupports2015Source 3needs review

In primary neurons, light-mediated REST inhibition boosted Na+ currents and neuronal firing.

and boosted Na(+) currents and neuronal firing
Claim 63functional effectsupports2015Source 3needs review

In primary neurons, light-mediated REST inhibition boosted Na+ currents and neuronal firing.

and boosted Na(+) currents and neuronal firing
Claim 64phenotypic effectsupports2015Source 3needs review

Light-dependent modulation of REST target genes by AsLOV2 chimeras in Neuro2a cells was associated with improved neural differentiation.

we achieved light-dependent modulation of REST target genes that was associated with an improved neural differentiation
Claim 65phenotypic effectsupports2015Source 3needs review

Light-dependent modulation of REST target genes by AsLOV2 chimeras in Neuro2a cells was associated with improved neural differentiation.

we achieved light-dependent modulation of REST target genes that was associated with an improved neural differentiation
Claim 66phenotypic effectsupports2015Source 3needs review

Light-dependent modulation of REST target genes by AsLOV2 chimeras in Neuro2a cells was associated with improved neural differentiation.

we achieved light-dependent modulation of REST target genes that was associated with an improved neural differentiation
Claim 67phenotypic effectsupports2015Source 3needs review

Light-dependent modulation of REST target genes by AsLOV2 chimeras in Neuro2a cells was associated with improved neural differentiation.

we achieved light-dependent modulation of REST target genes that was associated with an improved neural differentiation
Claim 68phenotypic effectsupports2015Source 3needs review

Light-dependent modulation of REST target genes by AsLOV2 chimeras in Neuro2a cells was associated with improved neural differentiation.

we achieved light-dependent modulation of REST target genes that was associated with an improved neural differentiation
Claim 69phenotypic effectsupports2015Source 3needs review

Light-dependent modulation of REST target genes by AsLOV2 chimeras in Neuro2a cells was associated with improved neural differentiation.

we achieved light-dependent modulation of REST target genes that was associated with an improved neural differentiation
Claim 70phenotypic effectsupports2015Source 3needs review

Light-dependent modulation of REST target genes by AsLOV2 chimeras in Neuro2a cells was associated with improved neural differentiation.

we achieved light-dependent modulation of REST target genes that was associated with an improved neural differentiation
Claim 71transcriptional effectsupports2015Source 3needs review

In primary neurons, light-mediated REST inhibition increased Na+-channel 1.2 and brain-derived neurotrophic factor transcription.

In primary neurons, light-mediated REST inhibition increased Na(+)-channel 1.2 and brain-derived neurotrophic factor transcription
Claim 72transcriptional effectsupports2015Source 3needs review

In primary neurons, light-mediated REST inhibition increased Na+-channel 1.2 and brain-derived neurotrophic factor transcription.

In primary neurons, light-mediated REST inhibition increased Na(+)-channel 1.2 and brain-derived neurotrophic factor transcription
Claim 73transcriptional effectsupports2015Source 3needs review

In primary neurons, light-mediated REST inhibition increased Na+-channel 1.2 and brain-derived neurotrophic factor transcription.

In primary neurons, light-mediated REST inhibition increased Na(+)-channel 1.2 and brain-derived neurotrophic factor transcription
Claim 74transcriptional effectsupports2015Source 3needs review

In primary neurons, light-mediated REST inhibition increased Na+-channel 1.2 and brain-derived neurotrophic factor transcription.

In primary neurons, light-mediated REST inhibition increased Na(+)-channel 1.2 and brain-derived neurotrophic factor transcription
Claim 75transcriptional effectsupports2015Source 3needs review

In primary neurons, light-mediated REST inhibition increased Na+-channel 1.2 and brain-derived neurotrophic factor transcription.

In primary neurons, light-mediated REST inhibition increased Na(+)-channel 1.2 and brain-derived neurotrophic factor transcription
Claim 76transcriptional effectsupports2015Source 3needs review

In primary neurons, light-mediated REST inhibition increased Na+-channel 1.2 and brain-derived neurotrophic factor transcription.

In primary neurons, light-mediated REST inhibition increased Na(+)-channel 1.2 and brain-derived neurotrophic factor transcription
Claim 77transcriptional effectsupports2015Source 3needs review

In primary neurons, light-mediated REST inhibition increased Na+-channel 1.2 and brain-derived neurotrophic factor transcription.

In primary neurons, light-mediated REST inhibition increased Na(+)-channel 1.2 and brain-derived neurotrophic factor transcription

Approval Evidence

4 sources5 linked approval claimsfirst-pass slug computational-modeling
Multi-omics approaches and computational modeling hold promise for unraveling disease complexity, while advances in regulatory science and digital simulation (such as digital twins) may further accelerate personalized medicine in vascular disease research and treatment.

Source:

Combining computational modeling and in vivo mutagenesis experiments in Escherichia coli

Source:

We show using computational modeling that efficient gene expression in response to short pulsing requires fast promoter activation and slow inactivation

Source:

Computational modeling guided the fusion of the inhibitory domains

Source:

future directionsupports

Future progress in vascular disease research should prioritize multi-center large-scale validation studies, harmonization of assay protocols, and integration with clinical datasets and human samples.

Source:

future directionsupports

Multi-omics approaches and computational modeling hold promise for unraveling disease complexity, and digital twins may accelerate personalized medicine in vascular disease research and treatment.

Source:

modeling resultsupports

Computational modeling indicates that efficient gene expression in response to short pulsing requires fast promoter activation and slow inactivation.

We show using computational modeling that efficient gene expression in response to short pulsing requires fast promoter activation and slow inactivation

Source:

modeling resultsupports

Computational modeling indicates that the opposite promoter-response phenotype can arise from multi-stage promoter activation in which a transition in the first stage is thresholded.

and that the opposite phenotype can ensue from a multi-stage promoter activation, where a transition in the first stage is thresholded

Source:

design strategysupports

Computational modeling guided fusion of REST-inhibitory domains to AsLOV2.

Computational modeling guided the fusion of the inhibitory domains to the light-sensitive Avena sativa light-oxygen-voltage-sensing (LOV) 2-phototrophin 1 (AsLOV2).

Source:

Comparisons

Source-backed strengths

The modeling generated specific mechanistic hypotheses rather than only descriptive fits, including the requirement for fast promoter activation and slow inactivation for efficient short-pulse responses. It also proposed a concrete multi-stage activation architecture with a thresholded first transition to account for opposite promoter behaviors, and one source states that computational modeling guided fusion of inhibitory domains.

Source:

CLASP achieves minute-level resolution, reversible translocation of many TF cargos, large dynamic range, and tunable target gene expression.

Ranked Citations

  1. 1.

    Seeded from load plan for claim c6. Extracted from this source document.

  2. 2.

    Extracted from this source document.

  3. 3.
    StructuralSource 3Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences2015Claim 43Claim 44Claim 45

    Extracted from this source document.

  4. 4.
    StructuralSource 4MED2025

    Extracted from this source document.