Toolkit/down-conversion phosphors

down-conversion phosphors

Delivery Strategy·Research·Since 2021

Taxonomy: Mechanism Branch / Architecture. Workflows sit above the mechanism and technique branches rather than replacing them.

Summary

Down-conversion phosphors are material-based light-delivery harnesses explored for remote optogenetic control of neuronal activity in living animals. They are used in wireless, less invasive optical stimulation strategies to control cellular functions in the brain and other tissues.

Usefulness & Problems

Why this is useful

These phosphor-based approaches are useful because they aim to deliver optogenetic stimulation remotely without relying on fiber optics placed close to the target tissue. The cited literature frames them as a materials-enabled route toward less invasive and wireless control of cellular functions in vivo.

Problem solved

They address the invasiveness of conventional optogenetics, which commonly uses fiber optics positioned near the target and is described as highly invasive and problematic. The tool is therefore intended to support remote optical control in tissues such as the brain where implanted light guides are a major limitation.

Taxonomy & Function

Primary hierarchy

Mechanism Branch

Architecture: A delivery strategy grouped with the mechanism branch because it determines how a system is instantiated and deployed in context.

Techniques

No technique tags yet.

Target processes

No target processes tagged yet.

Input: Light

Implementation Constraints

The evidence supports only that these are materials-based phosphors used as part of remote optical stimulation systems in living animals. Practical details such as formulation, implantation or injection strategy, tissue localization, and compatibility with specific optogenetic actuators are not provided in the supplied sources.

The provided evidence does not specify particular phosphor compositions, excitation and emission wavelengths, target opsins, or quantitative performance metrics. It also does not document independent replication, comparative efficacy, or detailed safety and delivery constraints for in vivo use.

Validation

Cell-freeBacteriaMammalianMouseHumanTherapeuticIndep. Replication

Supporting Sources

Ranked Claims

Claim 1design goalsupports2021Source 1needs review

These phosphor-based remote optogenetic methods are being explored as less invasive, wireless approaches for controlling cellular functions in the brain and other tissues.

The development of these methodologies has stimulated researchers to test novel strategies for less invasive, wireless control of cellular functions in the brain and other tissues.
Claim 2design goalsupports2021Source 1needs review

These phosphor-based remote optogenetic methods are being explored as less invasive, wireless approaches for controlling cellular functions in the brain and other tissues.

The development of these methodologies has stimulated researchers to test novel strategies for less invasive, wireless control of cellular functions in the brain and other tissues.
Claim 3design goalsupports2021Source 1needs review

These phosphor-based remote optogenetic methods are being explored as less invasive, wireless approaches for controlling cellular functions in the brain and other tissues.

The development of these methodologies has stimulated researchers to test novel strategies for less invasive, wireless control of cellular functions in the brain and other tissues.
Claim 4design goalsupports2021Source 1needs review

These phosphor-based remote optogenetic methods are being explored as less invasive, wireless approaches for controlling cellular functions in the brain and other tissues.

The development of these methodologies has stimulated researchers to test novel strategies for less invasive, wireless control of cellular functions in the brain and other tissues.
Claim 5design goalsupports2021Source 1needs review

These phosphor-based remote optogenetic methods are being explored as less invasive, wireless approaches for controlling cellular functions in the brain and other tissues.

The development of these methodologies has stimulated researchers to test novel strategies for less invasive, wireless control of cellular functions in the brain and other tissues.
Claim 6design goalsupports2021Source 1needs review

These phosphor-based remote optogenetic methods are being explored as less invasive, wireless approaches for controlling cellular functions in the brain and other tissues.

The development of these methodologies has stimulated researchers to test novel strategies for less invasive, wireless control of cellular functions in the brain and other tissues.
Claim 7design goalsupports2021Source 1needs review

These phosphor-based remote optogenetic methods are being explored as less invasive, wireless approaches for controlling cellular functions in the brain and other tissues.

The development of these methodologies has stimulated researchers to test novel strategies for less invasive, wireless control of cellular functions in the brain and other tissues.
Claim 8invasiveness limitationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Conventional optogenetics commonly uses fiber optics placed close to the target, which is highly invasive and problematic.

Conventional optogenetics employs fiber optics inserted close to the target, which is highly invasive and poses various problems for researchers.
Claim 9invasiveness limitationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Conventional optogenetics commonly uses fiber optics placed close to the target, which is highly invasive and problematic.

Conventional optogenetics employs fiber optics inserted close to the target, which is highly invasive and poses various problems for researchers.
Claim 10invasiveness limitationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Conventional optogenetics commonly uses fiber optics placed close to the target, which is highly invasive and problematic.

Conventional optogenetics employs fiber optics inserted close to the target, which is highly invasive and poses various problems for researchers.
Claim 11invasiveness limitationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Conventional optogenetics commonly uses fiber optics placed close to the target, which is highly invasive and problematic.

Conventional optogenetics employs fiber optics inserted close to the target, which is highly invasive and poses various problems for researchers.
Claim 12invasiveness limitationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Conventional optogenetics commonly uses fiber optics placed close to the target, which is highly invasive and problematic.

Conventional optogenetics employs fiber optics inserted close to the target, which is highly invasive and poses various problems for researchers.
Claim 13invasiveness limitationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Conventional optogenetics commonly uses fiber optics placed close to the target, which is highly invasive and problematic.

Conventional optogenetics employs fiber optics inserted close to the target, which is highly invasive and poses various problems for researchers.
Claim 14invasiveness limitationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Conventional optogenetics commonly uses fiber optics placed close to the target, which is highly invasive and problematic.

Conventional optogenetics employs fiber optics inserted close to the target, which is highly invasive and poses various problems for researchers.
Claim 15remote control capabilitysupports2021Source 1needs review

Up-conversion and down-conversion phosphors have enabled remote optogenetic control of neuronal activity in living animals.

Recent advances in material science integrated with neuroscience have enabled remote optogenetic control of neuronal activities in living animals using up- or down-conversion phosphors.
Claim 16remote control capabilitysupports2021Source 1needs review

Up-conversion and down-conversion phosphors have enabled remote optogenetic control of neuronal activity in living animals.

Recent advances in material science integrated with neuroscience have enabled remote optogenetic control of neuronal activities in living animals using up- or down-conversion phosphors.
Claim 17remote control capabilitysupports2021Source 1needs review

Up-conversion and down-conversion phosphors have enabled remote optogenetic control of neuronal activity in living animals.

Recent advances in material science integrated with neuroscience have enabled remote optogenetic control of neuronal activities in living animals using up- or down-conversion phosphors.
Claim 18remote control capabilitysupports2021Source 1needs review

Up-conversion and down-conversion phosphors have enabled remote optogenetic control of neuronal activity in living animals.

Recent advances in material science integrated with neuroscience have enabled remote optogenetic control of neuronal activities in living animals using up- or down-conversion phosphors.
Claim 19remote control capabilitysupports2021Source 1needs review

Up-conversion and down-conversion phosphors have enabled remote optogenetic control of neuronal activity in living animals.

Recent advances in material science integrated with neuroscience have enabled remote optogenetic control of neuronal activities in living animals using up- or down-conversion phosphors.
Claim 20remote control capabilitysupports2021Source 1needs review

Up-conversion and down-conversion phosphors have enabled remote optogenetic control of neuronal activity in living animals.

Recent advances in material science integrated with neuroscience have enabled remote optogenetic control of neuronal activities in living animals using up- or down-conversion phosphors.
Claim 21remote control capabilitysupports2021Source 1needs review

Up-conversion and down-conversion phosphors have enabled remote optogenetic control of neuronal activity in living animals.

Recent advances in material science integrated with neuroscience have enabled remote optogenetic control of neuronal activities in living animals using up- or down-conversion phosphors.
Claim 22spectral constraintsupports2021Source 1needs review

Microbial rhodopsins used for optogenetics are sensitive to visible light.

Microbial rhodopsins widely used for optogenetics are sensitive to light in the visible spectrum.
Claim 23spectral constraintsupports2021Source 1needs review

Microbial rhodopsins used for optogenetics are sensitive to visible light.

Microbial rhodopsins widely used for optogenetics are sensitive to light in the visible spectrum.
Claim 24spectral constraintsupports2021Source 1needs review

Microbial rhodopsins used for optogenetics are sensitive to visible light.

Microbial rhodopsins widely used for optogenetics are sensitive to light in the visible spectrum.
Claim 25spectral constraintsupports2021Source 1needs review

Microbial rhodopsins used for optogenetics are sensitive to visible light.

Microbial rhodopsins widely used for optogenetics are sensitive to light in the visible spectrum.
Claim 26spectral constraintsupports2021Source 1needs review

Microbial rhodopsins used for optogenetics are sensitive to visible light.

Microbial rhodopsins widely used for optogenetics are sensitive to light in the visible spectrum.
Claim 27spectral constraintsupports2021Source 1needs review

Microbial rhodopsins used for optogenetics are sensitive to visible light.

Microbial rhodopsins widely used for optogenetics are sensitive to light in the visible spectrum.
Claim 28spectral constraintsupports2021Source 1needs review

Microbial rhodopsins used for optogenetics are sensitive to visible light.

Microbial rhodopsins widely used for optogenetics are sensitive to light in the visible spectrum.
Claim 29tissue penetration limitationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Visible light delivered externally does not reach deep tissue effectively because it is heavily scattered and absorbed by tissue.

As visible light is heavily scattered and absorbed by tissue, stimulating light for optogenetic control does not reach deep in the tissue irradiated from outside the subject body.
Claim 30tissue penetration limitationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Visible light delivered externally does not reach deep tissue effectively because it is heavily scattered and absorbed by tissue.

As visible light is heavily scattered and absorbed by tissue, stimulating light for optogenetic control does not reach deep in the tissue irradiated from outside the subject body.
Claim 31tissue penetration limitationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Visible light delivered externally does not reach deep tissue effectively because it is heavily scattered and absorbed by tissue.

As visible light is heavily scattered and absorbed by tissue, stimulating light for optogenetic control does not reach deep in the tissue irradiated from outside the subject body.
Claim 32tissue penetration limitationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Visible light delivered externally does not reach deep tissue effectively because it is heavily scattered and absorbed by tissue.

As visible light is heavily scattered and absorbed by tissue, stimulating light for optogenetic control does not reach deep in the tissue irradiated from outside the subject body.
Claim 33tissue penetration limitationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Visible light delivered externally does not reach deep tissue effectively because it is heavily scattered and absorbed by tissue.

As visible light is heavily scattered and absorbed by tissue, stimulating light for optogenetic control does not reach deep in the tissue irradiated from outside the subject body.
Claim 34tissue penetration limitationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Visible light delivered externally does not reach deep tissue effectively because it is heavily scattered and absorbed by tissue.

As visible light is heavily scattered and absorbed by tissue, stimulating light for optogenetic control does not reach deep in the tissue irradiated from outside the subject body.
Claim 35tissue penetration limitationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Visible light delivered externally does not reach deep tissue effectively because it is heavily scattered and absorbed by tissue.

As visible light is heavily scattered and absorbed by tissue, stimulating light for optogenetic control does not reach deep in the tissue irradiated from outside the subject body.
Claim 36translational statussupports2021Source 1needs review

Current phosphor-enabled remote optogenetic technologies still have limitations and require further development toward non-invasive clinical applications.

Here, we review recent reports related to these new technologies and discuss the current limitations and future perspectives toward the establishment of non-invasive optogenetics for clinical applications.
Claim 37translational statussupports2021Source 1needs review

Current phosphor-enabled remote optogenetic technologies still have limitations and require further development toward non-invasive clinical applications.

Here, we review recent reports related to these new technologies and discuss the current limitations and future perspectives toward the establishment of non-invasive optogenetics for clinical applications.
Claim 38translational statussupports2021Source 1needs review

Current phosphor-enabled remote optogenetic technologies still have limitations and require further development toward non-invasive clinical applications.

Here, we review recent reports related to these new technologies and discuss the current limitations and future perspectives toward the establishment of non-invasive optogenetics for clinical applications.
Claim 39translational statussupports2021Source 1needs review

Current phosphor-enabled remote optogenetic technologies still have limitations and require further development toward non-invasive clinical applications.

Here, we review recent reports related to these new technologies and discuss the current limitations and future perspectives toward the establishment of non-invasive optogenetics for clinical applications.
Claim 40translational statussupports2021Source 1needs review

Current phosphor-enabled remote optogenetic technologies still have limitations and require further development toward non-invasive clinical applications.

Here, we review recent reports related to these new technologies and discuss the current limitations and future perspectives toward the establishment of non-invasive optogenetics for clinical applications.
Claim 41translational statussupports2021Source 1needs review

Current phosphor-enabled remote optogenetic technologies still have limitations and require further development toward non-invasive clinical applications.

Here, we review recent reports related to these new technologies and discuss the current limitations and future perspectives toward the establishment of non-invasive optogenetics for clinical applications.
Claim 42translational statussupports2021Source 1needs review

Current phosphor-enabled remote optogenetic technologies still have limitations and require further development toward non-invasive clinical applications.

Here, we review recent reports related to these new technologies and discuss the current limitations and future perspectives toward the establishment of non-invasive optogenetics for clinical applications.

Approval Evidence

1 source3 linked approval claimsfirst-pass slug down-conversion-phosphors
Recent advances in material science integrated with neuroscience have enabled remote optogenetic control of neuronal activities in living animals using up- or down-conversion phosphors.

Source:

design goalsupports

These phosphor-based remote optogenetic methods are being explored as less invasive, wireless approaches for controlling cellular functions in the brain and other tissues.

The development of these methodologies has stimulated researchers to test novel strategies for less invasive, wireless control of cellular functions in the brain and other tissues.

Source:

remote control capabilitysupports

Up-conversion and down-conversion phosphors have enabled remote optogenetic control of neuronal activity in living animals.

Recent advances in material science integrated with neuroscience have enabled remote optogenetic control of neuronal activities in living animals using up- or down-conversion phosphors.

Source:

translational statussupports

Current phosphor-enabled remote optogenetic technologies still have limitations and require further development toward non-invasive clinical applications.

Here, we review recent reports related to these new technologies and discuss the current limitations and future perspectives toward the establishment of non-invasive optogenetics for clinical applications.

Source:

Comparisons

Source-backed strengths

The available evidence indicates that down-conversion phosphors have been explored for remote optogenetic control of neuronal activities in living animals. Their principal stated advantage is enabling wireless, less invasive light-delivery strategies relative to conventional fiber-based illumination.

Ranked Citations

  1. 1.
    StructuralSource 1Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences2021Claim 1Claim 2Claim 3

    Seeded from load plan for claim cl4. Extracted from this source document.