Toolkit/FLP/FRT system

FLP/FRT system

Also known as: FLP/FRT

Taxonomy: Mechanism Branch / Architecture. Workflows sit above the mechanism and technique branches rather than replacing them.

Summary

FLP/FRT and CRISPR/Cas9 homology-directed repair (HDR) strategies, as well as their combinations, are currently the most effective for SSTI in maize.

Usefulness & Problems

No literature-backed usefulness or problem-fit explainer has been materialized for this record yet.

Taxonomy & Function

Primary hierarchy

Mechanism Branch

Architecture: A composed arrangement of multiple parts that instantiates one or more mechanisms.

Target processes

editingselection

Validation

Cell-freeBacteriaMammalianMouseHumanTherapeuticIndep. Replication

Supporting Sources

Ranked Claims

Claim 1comparative advantagesupports2025Source 1needs review

Because CRISPR/Cas9 HDR targets known insertion sites, it can effectively direct SSTI in maize while requiring fewer transgenic events.

SSTI is effectively targeted by CRISPR/Cas9 HDR, requiring a smaller number of transgenic events.
Claim 2limitationsupports2025Source 1needs review

The FLP/FRT system for maize SSTI requires many transgenic events, selection of a recombinant target line, and co-transformation with a second T-DNA because insertion-site stability is not known in advance.

The FLP/FRT system still depends on generating a high number of transgenic events, selecting a recombinant target line (RTL), and co-transforming this RTL with a second T-DNA, since there is no prior information on whether the insertion site is considered stable.
Claim 3requirementsupports2025Source 1needs review

CRISPR/Cas9 HDR for maize SSTI requires prior information about the insertion site.

CRISPR/Cas9 HDR requires prior information about the insertion site.
Claim 4state of the artsupports2025Source 1needs review

FLP/FRT and CRISPR/Cas9 HDR strategies, including combinations of them, are currently the most effective approaches for site-specific transgene insertion in maize.

FLP/FRT and CRISPR/Cas9 homology-directed repair (HDR) strategies, as well as their combinations, are currently the most effective for SSTI in maize.

Approval Evidence

1 source2 linked approval claimsfirst-pass slug flp-frt-system
FLP/FRT and CRISPR/Cas9 homology-directed repair (HDR) strategies, as well as their combinations, are currently the most effective for SSTI in maize.

Source:

limitationsupports

The FLP/FRT system for maize SSTI requires many transgenic events, selection of a recombinant target line, and co-transformation with a second T-DNA because insertion-site stability is not known in advance.

The FLP/FRT system still depends on generating a high number of transgenic events, selecting a recombinant target line (RTL), and co-transforming this RTL with a second T-DNA, since there is no prior information on whether the insertion site is considered stable.

Source:

state of the artsupports

FLP/FRT and CRISPR/Cas9 HDR strategies, including combinations of them, are currently the most effective approaches for site-specific transgene insertion in maize.

FLP/FRT and CRISPR/Cas9 homology-directed repair (HDR) strategies, as well as their combinations, are currently the most effective for SSTI in maize.

Source:

Comparisons

No literature-backed comparison notes have been materialized for this record yet.

Ranked Citations

  1. 1.

    Extracted from this source document.