Toolkit/fragment-based screening by nuclear magnetic resonance

fragment-based screening by nuclear magnetic resonance

Also known as: FBS by NMR, fragment-based screening

Taxonomy: Technique Branch / Method. Workflows sit above the mechanism and technique branches rather than replacing them.

Summary

Here, we report on the discovery of ligands for the DNA binding domain of MITF, using fragment-based screening (FBS) by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR).

Usefulness & Problems

No literature-backed usefulness or problem-fit explainer has been materialized for this record yet.

Published Workflows

Objective: Discover and optimize direct ligands for the MITF DNA binding domain to enable pharmacological targeting of MITF.

Why it works: The workflow starts from NMR-detected fragment binders to the MITF DNA binding domain and then uses structural and biophysical information to optimize weak binders into higher-affinity ligands while probing how binding perturbs MITF conformational behavior.

ligand binding to the MITF kink pocketperturbation of dynamic conformational exchange between helices in the asymmetric homodimerfragment-based screening by NMRstructure-based designX-ray crystallographybiophysicsmolecular dynamics simulations

Stages

  1. 1.
    NMR fragment-based screening for MITF binders(broad_screen)

    This stage identifies initial ligands for the MITF DNA binding domain on a target class described as unprecedented for direct targeting.

    Selection: fragment binding to the MITF DNA binding domain

  2. 2.
    Structure-based optimization of weak MITF kink-pocket fragments(secondary_characterization)

    This stage improves very weak initial fragment binders into more potent ligands using structural and biophysical guidance.

    Selection: improved affinity from weak initial fragment binders

  3. 3.
    Mechanistic characterization of ligand-induced MITF conformational perturbation(functional_characterization)

    This stage examines how ligand binding affects the dynamic conformational exchange within the asymmetric MITF homodimer.

    Selection: evidence that ligand binding perturbs MITF conformational exchange

Steps

  1. 1.
    Screen fragments against the MITF DNA binding domain by NMRscreening method

    Identify initial ligands for the MITF DNA binding domain.

    The campaign first needs direct binders before any optimization can occur.

  2. 2.
    Optimize weak MITF kink-pocket fragments by structure-based design using X-ray crystallography and biophysics

    Increase affinity of initial MITF-binding fragments.

    Optimization follows initial hit discovery because the starting fragments bind very weakly.

  3. 3.
    Use NMR and molecular dynamics to assess conformational exchange and its perturbation by ligand binding

    Characterize the dynamic mechanism associated with ligand binding to MITF.

    Mechanistic analysis is performed after ligands are available so their effects on MITF conformational exchange can be examined.

Taxonomy & Function

Primary hierarchy

Technique Branch

Method: A concrete method used to build, optimize, or evolve an engineered system.

Target processes

recombinationselection

Input: Chemical

Validation

Cell-freeBacteriaMammalianMouseHumanTherapeuticIndep. Replication

Supporting Sources

Ranked Claims

Claim 1discoverysupports2025Source 1needs review

NMR-based fragment screening identified ligands for the MITF DNA binding domain.

Approval Evidence

1 source1 linked approval claimfirst-pass slug fragment-based-screening-by-nuclear-magnetic-resonance
Here, we report on the discovery of ligands for the DNA binding domain of MITF, using fragment-based screening (FBS) by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR).

Source:

discoverysupports

NMR-based fragment screening identified ligands for the MITF DNA binding domain.

Source:

Comparisons

No literature-backed comparison notes have been materialized for this record yet.

Ranked Citations

  1. 1.
    StructuralSource 1MED2025Claim 1

    Extracted from this source document.