Toolkit/fusion proteins with large N-terminal anchors

fusion proteins with large N-terminal anchors

Multi-Component Switch·Research·Since 2021

Taxonomy: Mechanism Branch / Architecture. Workflows sit above the mechanism and technique branches rather than replacing them.

Summary

Fusion proteins with large N-terminal anchors are an anchor-design variant for the light-inducible iLID recruitment system. In this configuration, the modified anchor supports light-controlled recruitment of components to subcellular locations, including micron-scale regions of the plasma membrane, to improve control of protein localization and signaling outputs.

Usefulness & Problems

Why this is useful

This design is useful for experiments requiring tighter optogenetic control of subcellular protein localization. The cited study frames these anchor variants as tools for greater control across diverse cell biological applications and for selective recruitment to defined subcellular regions.

Source:

Our findings highlight key sources of imprecision within light-inducible dimer systems and provide tools that allow greater control of subcellular protein localization across diverse cell biological applications.

Source:

the improved Light-Inducible Dimer (iLID) system, offer the ability to selectively recruit components to subcellular locations, such as micron-scale regions of the plasma membrane

Source:

These tools, including the improved Light-Inducible Dimer (iLID) system, offer the ability to selectively recruit components to subcellular locations, such as micron-scale regions of the plasma membrane.

Problem solved

This tool addresses the problem of achieving selective light-inducible recruitment of proteins to precise subcellular locations. The available evidence specifically supports improved control over localization at sites such as micron-scale regions of the plasma membrane.

Source:

Our findings highlight key sources of imprecision within light-inducible dimer systems and provide tools that allow greater control of subcellular protein localization across diverse cell biological applications.

Taxonomy & Function

Primary hierarchy

Mechanism Branch

Architecture: A composed arrangement of multiple parts that instantiates one or more mechanisms.

Techniques

No technique tags yet.

Target processes

localizationsignaling

Input: Light

Implementation Constraints

This tool is implemented within the iLID light-inducible recruitment system and uses fusion proteins with large N-terminal anchors. The provided evidence does not specify construct architecture beyond the N-terminal anchor feature, nor does it state illumination wavelength, expression context, or cofactor requirements.

The supplied evidence is limited to a single source and provides little direct mechanistic or performance detail for the large N-terminal anchor configuration itself. No explicit data are provided here on kinetics, dynamic range, reversibility, cell-type generality, or comparisons against other anchor architectures.

Validation

Cell-freeBacteriaMammalianMouseHumanTherapeuticIndep. Replication

Supporting Sources

Ranked Claims

Claim 1application scopesupports2021Source 1needs review

The findings provide tools that allow greater control of subcellular protein localization across diverse cell biological applications.

Our findings highlight key sources of imprecision within light-inducible dimer systems and provide tools that allow greater control of subcellular protein localization across diverse cell biological applications.
Claim 2application scopesupports2021Source 1needs review

The findings provide tools that allow greater control of subcellular protein localization across diverse cell biological applications.

Our findings highlight key sources of imprecision within light-inducible dimer systems and provide tools that allow greater control of subcellular protein localization across diverse cell biological applications.
Claim 3application scopesupports2021Source 1needs review

The findings provide tools that allow greater control of subcellular protein localization across diverse cell biological applications.

Our findings highlight key sources of imprecision within light-inducible dimer systems and provide tools that allow greater control of subcellular protein localization across diverse cell biological applications.
Claim 4application scopesupports2021Source 1needs review

The findings provide tools that allow greater control of subcellular protein localization across diverse cell biological applications.

Our findings highlight key sources of imprecision within light-inducible dimer systems and provide tools that allow greater control of subcellular protein localization across diverse cell biological applications.
Claim 5application scopesupports2021Source 1needs review

The findings provide tools that allow greater control of subcellular protein localization across diverse cell biological applications.

Our findings highlight key sources of imprecision within light-inducible dimer systems and provide tools that allow greater control of subcellular protein localization across diverse cell biological applications.
Claim 6application scopesupports2021Source 1needs review

The findings provide tools that allow greater control of subcellular protein localization across diverse cell biological applications.

Our findings highlight key sources of imprecision within light-inducible dimer systems and provide tools that allow greater control of subcellular protein localization across diverse cell biological applications.
Claim 7application scopesupports2021Source 1needs review

The findings provide tools that allow greater control of subcellular protein localization across diverse cell biological applications.

Our findings highlight key sources of imprecision within light-inducible dimer systems and provide tools that allow greater control of subcellular protein localization across diverse cell biological applications.
Claim 8capabilitysupports2021Source 1needs review

The iLID system enables selective recruitment of components to subcellular locations, including micron-scale regions of the plasma membrane.

These tools, including the improved Light-Inducible Dimer (iLID) system, offer the ability to selectively recruit components to subcellular locations, such as micron-scale regions of the plasma membrane.
Claim 9capabilitysupports2021Source 1needs review

The iLID system enables selective recruitment of components to subcellular locations, including micron-scale regions of the plasma membrane.

These tools, including the improved Light-Inducible Dimer (iLID) system, offer the ability to selectively recruit components to subcellular locations, such as micron-scale regions of the plasma membrane.
Claim 10capabilitysupports2021Source 1needs review

The iLID system enables selective recruitment of components to subcellular locations, including micron-scale regions of the plasma membrane.

These tools, including the improved Light-Inducible Dimer (iLID) system, offer the ability to selectively recruit components to subcellular locations, such as micron-scale regions of the plasma membrane.
Claim 11capabilitysupports2021Source 1needs review

The iLID system enables selective recruitment of components to subcellular locations, including micron-scale regions of the plasma membrane.

These tools, including the improved Light-Inducible Dimer (iLID) system, offer the ability to selectively recruit components to subcellular locations, such as micron-scale regions of the plasma membrane.
Claim 12capabilitysupports2021Source 1needs review

The iLID system enables selective recruitment of components to subcellular locations, including micron-scale regions of the plasma membrane.

These tools, including the improved Light-Inducible Dimer (iLID) system, offer the ability to selectively recruit components to subcellular locations, such as micron-scale regions of the plasma membrane.
Claim 13capabilitysupports2021Source 1needs review

The iLID system enables selective recruitment of components to subcellular locations, including micron-scale regions of the plasma membrane.

These tools, including the improved Light-Inducible Dimer (iLID) system, offer the ability to selectively recruit components to subcellular locations, such as micron-scale regions of the plasma membrane.
Claim 14capabilitysupports2021Source 1needs review

The iLID system enables selective recruitment of components to subcellular locations, including micron-scale regions of the plasma membrane.

These tools, including the improved Light-Inducible Dimer (iLID) system, offer the ability to selectively recruit components to subcellular locations, such as micron-scale regions of the plasma membrane.
Claim 15capabilitysupports2021Source 1needs review

The iLID system enables selective recruitment of components to subcellular locations, including micron-scale regions of the plasma membrane.

These tools, including the improved Light-Inducible Dimer (iLID) system, offer the ability to selectively recruit components to subcellular locations, such as micron-scale regions of the plasma membrane.
Claim 16capabilitysupports2021Source 1needs review

The iLID system enables selective recruitment of components to subcellular locations such as micron-scale regions of the plasma membrane.

the improved Light-Inducible Dimer (iLID) system, offer the ability to selectively recruit components to subcellular locations, such as micron-scale regions of the plasma membrane
Claim 17capabilitysupports2021Source 1needs review

The iLID system enables selective recruitment of components to subcellular locations such as micron-scale regions of the plasma membrane.

the improved Light-Inducible Dimer (iLID) system, offer the ability to selectively recruit components to subcellular locations, such as micron-scale regions of the plasma membrane
Claim 18capabilitysupports2021Source 1needs review

The iLID system enables selective recruitment of components to subcellular locations such as micron-scale regions of the plasma membrane.

the improved Light-Inducible Dimer (iLID) system, offer the ability to selectively recruit components to subcellular locations, such as micron-scale regions of the plasma membrane
Claim 19capabilitysupports2021Source 1needs review

The iLID system enables selective recruitment of components to subcellular locations such as micron-scale regions of the plasma membrane.

the improved Light-Inducible Dimer (iLID) system, offer the ability to selectively recruit components to subcellular locations, such as micron-scale regions of the plasma membrane
Claim 20capabilitysupports2021Source 1needs review

The iLID system enables selective recruitment of components to subcellular locations such as micron-scale regions of the plasma membrane.

the improved Light-Inducible Dimer (iLID) system, offer the ability to selectively recruit components to subcellular locations, such as micron-scale regions of the plasma membrane
Claim 21capabilitysupports2021Source 1needs review

The iLID system enables selective recruitment of components to subcellular locations such as micron-scale regions of the plasma membrane.

the improved Light-Inducible Dimer (iLID) system, offer the ability to selectively recruit components to subcellular locations, such as micron-scale regions of the plasma membrane
Claim 22capabilitysupports2021Source 1needs review

The iLID system enables selective recruitment of components to subcellular locations such as micron-scale regions of the plasma membrane.

the improved Light-Inducible Dimer (iLID) system, offer the ability to selectively recruit components to subcellular locations, such as micron-scale regions of the plasma membrane
Claim 23comparative performancesupports2021Source 1needs review

Compared with the commonly used C-terminal iLID fusion, fusion proteins with large N-terminal anchors show stronger local recruitment, slower diffusion of recruited components, efficient recruitment over wider gene expression ranges, and improved spatial control over signaling outputs.

Compared to the commonly used C-terminal iLID fusion, fusion proteins with large N-terminal anchors show stronger local recruitment, slower diffusion of recruited components, efficient recruitment over wider gene expression ranges, and improved spatial control over signaling outputs.
Claim 24comparative performancesupports2021Source 1needs review

Compared with the commonly used C-terminal iLID fusion, fusion proteins with large N-terminal anchors show stronger local recruitment, slower diffusion of recruited components, efficient recruitment over wider gene expression ranges, and improved spatial control over signaling outputs.

Compared to the commonly used C-terminal iLID fusion, fusion proteins with large N-terminal anchors show stronger local recruitment, slower diffusion of recruited components, efficient recruitment over wider gene expression ranges, and improved spatial control over signaling outputs.
Claim 25comparative performancesupports2021Source 1needs review

Compared with the commonly used C-terminal iLID fusion, fusion proteins with large N-terminal anchors show stronger local recruitment, slower diffusion of recruited components, efficient recruitment over wider gene expression ranges, and improved spatial control over signaling outputs.

Compared to the commonly used C-terminal iLID fusion, fusion proteins with large N-terminal anchors show stronger local recruitment, slower diffusion of recruited components, efficient recruitment over wider gene expression ranges, and improved spatial control over signaling outputs.
Claim 26comparative performancesupports2021Source 1needs review

Compared with the commonly used C-terminal iLID fusion, fusion proteins with large N-terminal anchors show stronger local recruitment, slower diffusion of recruited components, efficient recruitment over wider gene expression ranges, and improved spatial control over signaling outputs.

Compared to the commonly used C-terminal iLID fusion, fusion proteins with large N-terminal anchors show stronger local recruitment, slower diffusion of recruited components, efficient recruitment over wider gene expression ranges, and improved spatial control over signaling outputs.
Claim 27comparative performancesupports2021Source 1needs review

Compared with the commonly used C-terminal iLID fusion, fusion proteins with large N-terminal anchors show stronger local recruitment, slower diffusion of recruited components, efficient recruitment over wider gene expression ranges, and improved spatial control over signaling outputs.

Compared to the commonly used C-terminal iLID fusion, fusion proteins with large N-terminal anchors show stronger local recruitment, slower diffusion of recruited components, efficient recruitment over wider gene expression ranges, and improved spatial control over signaling outputs.
Claim 28comparative performancesupports2021Source 1needs review

Compared with the commonly used C-terminal iLID fusion, fusion proteins with large N-terminal anchors show stronger local recruitment, slower diffusion of recruited components, efficient recruitment over wider gene expression ranges, and improved spatial control over signaling outputs.

Compared to the commonly used C-terminal iLID fusion, fusion proteins with large N-terminal anchors show stronger local recruitment, slower diffusion of recruited components, efficient recruitment over wider gene expression ranges, and improved spatial control over signaling outputs.
Claim 29comparative performancesupports2021Source 1needs review

Compared with the commonly used C-terminal iLID fusion, fusion proteins with large N-terminal anchors show stronger local recruitment, slower diffusion of recruited components, efficient recruitment over wider gene expression ranges, and improved spatial control over signaling outputs.

Compared to the commonly used C-terminal iLID fusion, fusion proteins with large N-terminal anchors show stronger local recruitment, slower diffusion of recruited components, efficient recruitment over wider gene expression ranges, and improved spatial control over signaling outputs.
Claim 30comparative performancesupports2021Source 1needs review

Compared with the commonly used C-terminal iLID fusion, large N-terminal anchor fusions provide stronger local recruitment, slower diffusion of recruited components, efficient recruitment over wider gene expression ranges, and improved spatial control over signaling outputs.

Compared to the commonly used C-terminal iLID fusion, fusion proteins with large N-terminal anchors show stronger local recruitment, slower diffusion of recruited components, efficient recruitment over wider gene expression ranges, and improved spatial control over signaling outputs.
Claim 31comparative performancesupports2021Source 1needs review

Compared with the commonly used C-terminal iLID fusion, large N-terminal anchor fusions provide stronger local recruitment, slower diffusion of recruited components, efficient recruitment over wider gene expression ranges, and improved spatial control over signaling outputs.

Compared to the commonly used C-terminal iLID fusion, fusion proteins with large N-terminal anchors show stronger local recruitment, slower diffusion of recruited components, efficient recruitment over wider gene expression ranges, and improved spatial control over signaling outputs.
Claim 32comparative performancesupports2021Source 1needs review

Compared with the commonly used C-terminal iLID fusion, large N-terminal anchor fusions provide stronger local recruitment, slower diffusion of recruited components, efficient recruitment over wider gene expression ranges, and improved spatial control over signaling outputs.

Compared to the commonly used C-terminal iLID fusion, fusion proteins with large N-terminal anchors show stronger local recruitment, slower diffusion of recruited components, efficient recruitment over wider gene expression ranges, and improved spatial control over signaling outputs.
Claim 33comparative performancesupports2021Source 1needs review

Compared with the commonly used C-terminal iLID fusion, large N-terminal anchor fusions provide stronger local recruitment, slower diffusion of recruited components, efficient recruitment over wider gene expression ranges, and improved spatial control over signaling outputs.

Compared to the commonly used C-terminal iLID fusion, fusion proteins with large N-terminal anchors show stronger local recruitment, slower diffusion of recruited components, efficient recruitment over wider gene expression ranges, and improved spatial control over signaling outputs.
Claim 34comparative performancesupports2021Source 1needs review

Compared with the commonly used C-terminal iLID fusion, large N-terminal anchor fusions provide stronger local recruitment, slower diffusion of recruited components, efficient recruitment over wider gene expression ranges, and improved spatial control over signaling outputs.

Compared to the commonly used C-terminal iLID fusion, fusion proteins with large N-terminal anchors show stronger local recruitment, slower diffusion of recruited components, efficient recruitment over wider gene expression ranges, and improved spatial control over signaling outputs.
Claim 35comparative performancesupports2021Source 1needs review

Compared with the commonly used C-terminal iLID fusion, large N-terminal anchor fusions provide stronger local recruitment, slower diffusion of recruited components, efficient recruitment over wider gene expression ranges, and improved spatial control over signaling outputs.

Compared to the commonly used C-terminal iLID fusion, fusion proteins with large N-terminal anchors show stronger local recruitment, slower diffusion of recruited components, efficient recruitment over wider gene expression ranges, and improved spatial control over signaling outputs.
Claim 36comparative performancesupports2021Source 1needs review

Compared with the commonly used C-terminal iLID fusion, large N-terminal anchor fusions provide stronger local recruitment, slower diffusion of recruited components, efficient recruitment over wider gene expression ranges, and improved spatial control over signaling outputs.

Compared to the commonly used C-terminal iLID fusion, fusion proteins with large N-terminal anchors show stronger local recruitment, slower diffusion of recruited components, efficient recruitment over wider gene expression ranges, and improved spatial control over signaling outputs.
Claim 37comparative performancesupports2021Source 1needs review

Compared with the commonly used C-terminal iLID fusion, large N-terminal anchor fusions provide stronger local recruitment, slower diffusion of recruited components, efficient recruitment over wider gene expression ranges, and improved spatial control over signaling outputs.

Compared to the commonly used C-terminal iLID fusion, fusion proteins with large N-terminal anchors show stronger local recruitment, slower diffusion of recruited components, efficient recruitment over wider gene expression ranges, and improved spatial control over signaling outputs.
Claim 38design guidancesupports2021Source 1needs review

The study defines guidelines for component expression regimes for optimal recruitment for both cell-wide and subcellular recruitment strategies.

We also define guidelines for component expression regimes for optimal recruitment for both cell-wide and subcellular recruitment strategies.
Claim 39design guidancesupports2021Source 1needs review

The study defines guidelines for component expression regimes for optimal recruitment for both cell-wide and subcellular recruitment strategies.

We also define guidelines for component expression regimes for optimal recruitment for both cell-wide and subcellular recruitment strategies.
Claim 40design guidancesupports2021Source 1needs review

The study defines guidelines for component expression regimes for optimal recruitment for both cell-wide and subcellular recruitment strategies.

We also define guidelines for component expression regimes for optimal recruitment for both cell-wide and subcellular recruitment strategies.
Claim 41design guidancesupports2021Source 1needs review

The study defines guidelines for component expression regimes for optimal recruitment for both cell-wide and subcellular recruitment strategies.

We also define guidelines for component expression regimes for optimal recruitment for both cell-wide and subcellular recruitment strategies.
Claim 42design guidancesupports2021Source 1needs review

The study defines guidelines for component expression regimes for optimal recruitment for both cell-wide and subcellular recruitment strategies.

We also define guidelines for component expression regimes for optimal recruitment for both cell-wide and subcellular recruitment strategies.
Claim 43design guidancesupports2021Source 1needs review

The study defines guidelines for component expression regimes for optimal recruitment for both cell-wide and subcellular recruitment strategies.

We also define guidelines for component expression regimes for optimal recruitment for both cell-wide and subcellular recruitment strategies.
Claim 44design guidancesupports2021Source 1needs review

The study defines guidelines for component expression regimes for optimal recruitment for both cell-wide and subcellular recruitment strategies.

We also define guidelines for component expression regimes for optimal recruitment for both cell-wide and subcellular recruitment strategies.
Claim 45limitationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Consistent recruitment in optogenetic dimerization systems is limited by heterogeneous optogenetic component expression, and spatial precision is diminished by protein diffusion, especially over long time scales.

Currently, consistent recruitment is limited by heterogeneous optogenetic component expression, and spatial precision is diminished by protein diffusion, especially over long time scales.
Claim 46limitationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Consistent recruitment in optogenetic dimerization systems is limited by heterogeneous optogenetic component expression, and spatial precision is diminished by protein diffusion, especially over long time scales.

Currently, consistent recruitment is limited by heterogeneous optogenetic component expression, and spatial precision is diminished by protein diffusion, especially over long time scales.
Claim 47limitationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Consistent recruitment in optogenetic dimerization systems is limited by heterogeneous optogenetic component expression, and spatial precision is diminished by protein diffusion, especially over long time scales.

Currently, consistent recruitment is limited by heterogeneous optogenetic component expression, and spatial precision is diminished by protein diffusion, especially over long time scales.
Claim 48limitationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Consistent recruitment in optogenetic dimerization systems is limited by heterogeneous optogenetic component expression, and spatial precision is diminished by protein diffusion, especially over long time scales.

Currently, consistent recruitment is limited by heterogeneous optogenetic component expression, and spatial precision is diminished by protein diffusion, especially over long time scales.
Claim 49limitationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Consistent recruitment in optogenetic dimerization systems is limited by heterogeneous optogenetic component expression, and spatial precision is diminished by protein diffusion, especially over long time scales.

Currently, consistent recruitment is limited by heterogeneous optogenetic component expression, and spatial precision is diminished by protein diffusion, especially over long time scales.
Claim 50limitationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Consistent recruitment in optogenetic dimerization systems is limited by heterogeneous optogenetic component expression, and spatial precision is diminished by protein diffusion, especially over long time scales.

Currently, consistent recruitment is limited by heterogeneous optogenetic component expression, and spatial precision is diminished by protein diffusion, especially over long time scales.
Claim 51limitationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Consistent recruitment in optogenetic dimerization systems is limited by heterogeneous optogenetic component expression, and spatial precision is diminished by protein diffusion, especially over long time scales.

Currently, consistent recruitment is limited by heterogeneous optogenetic component expression, and spatial precision is diminished by protein diffusion, especially over long time scales.
Claim 52limitationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Within iLID-based recruitment, consistent recruitment is limited by heterogeneous optogenetic component expression and spatial precision is reduced by protein diffusion, especially over long time scales.

Currently, consistent recruitment is limited by heterogeneous optogenetic component expression, and spatial precision is diminished by protein diffusion, especially over long time scales.
Claim 53limitationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Within iLID-based recruitment, consistent recruitment is limited by heterogeneous optogenetic component expression and spatial precision is reduced by protein diffusion, especially over long time scales.

Currently, consistent recruitment is limited by heterogeneous optogenetic component expression, and spatial precision is diminished by protein diffusion, especially over long time scales.
Claim 54limitationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Within iLID-based recruitment, consistent recruitment is limited by heterogeneous optogenetic component expression and spatial precision is reduced by protein diffusion, especially over long time scales.

Currently, consistent recruitment is limited by heterogeneous optogenetic component expression, and spatial precision is diminished by protein diffusion, especially over long time scales.
Claim 55limitationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Within iLID-based recruitment, consistent recruitment is limited by heterogeneous optogenetic component expression and spatial precision is reduced by protein diffusion, especially over long time scales.

Currently, consistent recruitment is limited by heterogeneous optogenetic component expression, and spatial precision is diminished by protein diffusion, especially over long time scales.
Claim 56limitationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Within iLID-based recruitment, consistent recruitment is limited by heterogeneous optogenetic component expression and spatial precision is reduced by protein diffusion, especially over long time scales.

Currently, consistent recruitment is limited by heterogeneous optogenetic component expression, and spatial precision is diminished by protein diffusion, especially over long time scales.
Claim 57limitationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Within iLID-based recruitment, consistent recruitment is limited by heterogeneous optogenetic component expression and spatial precision is reduced by protein diffusion, especially over long time scales.

Currently, consistent recruitment is limited by heterogeneous optogenetic component expression, and spatial precision is diminished by protein diffusion, especially over long time scales.
Claim 58limitationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Within iLID-based recruitment, consistent recruitment is limited by heterogeneous optogenetic component expression and spatial precision is reduced by protein diffusion, especially over long time scales.

Currently, consistent recruitment is limited by heterogeneous optogenetic component expression, and spatial precision is diminished by protein diffusion, especially over long time scales.
Claim 59limitationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Within iLID-based recruitment, consistent recruitment is limited by heterogeneous optogenetic component expression and spatial precision is reduced by protein diffusion, especially over long time scales.

Currently, consistent recruitment is limited by heterogeneous optogenetic component expression, and spatial precision is diminished by protein diffusion, especially over long time scales.
Claim 60mechanistic effectsupports2021Source 1needs review

Anchoring strategy affects component expression and diffusion, which in turn impact recruitment strength, kinetics, and spatial dynamics in the iLID system.

we demonstrate that the anchoring strategy affects both component expression and diffusion, which in turn impact recruitment strength, kinetics, and spatial dynamics
Claim 61mechanistic effectsupports2021Source 1needs review

Anchoring strategy affects component expression and diffusion, which in turn impact recruitment strength, kinetics, and spatial dynamics in the iLID system.

we demonstrate that the anchoring strategy affects both component expression and diffusion, which in turn impact recruitment strength, kinetics, and spatial dynamics
Claim 62mechanistic effectsupports2021Source 1needs review

Anchoring strategy affects component expression and diffusion, which in turn impact recruitment strength, kinetics, and spatial dynamics in the iLID system.

we demonstrate that the anchoring strategy affects both component expression and diffusion, which in turn impact recruitment strength, kinetics, and spatial dynamics
Claim 63mechanistic effectsupports2021Source 1needs review

Anchoring strategy affects component expression and diffusion, which in turn impact recruitment strength, kinetics, and spatial dynamics in the iLID system.

we demonstrate that the anchoring strategy affects both component expression and diffusion, which in turn impact recruitment strength, kinetics, and spatial dynamics
Claim 64mechanistic effectsupports2021Source 1needs review

Anchoring strategy affects component expression and diffusion, which in turn impact recruitment strength, kinetics, and spatial dynamics in the iLID system.

we demonstrate that the anchoring strategy affects both component expression and diffusion, which in turn impact recruitment strength, kinetics, and spatial dynamics
Claim 65mechanistic effectsupports2021Source 1needs review

Anchoring strategy affects component expression and diffusion, which in turn impact recruitment strength, kinetics, and spatial dynamics in the iLID system.

we demonstrate that the anchoring strategy affects both component expression and diffusion, which in turn impact recruitment strength, kinetics, and spatial dynamics
Claim 66mechanistic effectsupports2021Source 1needs review

Anchoring strategy affects component expression and diffusion, which in turn impact recruitment strength, kinetics, and spatial dynamics in the iLID system.

we demonstrate that the anchoring strategy affects both component expression and diffusion, which in turn impact recruitment strength, kinetics, and spatial dynamics
Claim 67mechanistic effectsupports2021Source 1needs review

In the iLID system, anchoring strategy affects component expression and diffusion, which in turn impact recruitment strength, kinetics, and spatial dynamics.

Using live cell imaging and mathematical modeling, we demonstrate that the anchoring strategy affects both component expression and diffusion, which in turn impact recruitment strength, kinetics, and spatial dynamics.
Claim 68mechanistic effectsupports2021Source 1needs review

In the iLID system, anchoring strategy affects component expression and diffusion, which in turn impact recruitment strength, kinetics, and spatial dynamics.

Using live cell imaging and mathematical modeling, we demonstrate that the anchoring strategy affects both component expression and diffusion, which in turn impact recruitment strength, kinetics, and spatial dynamics.
Claim 69mechanistic effectsupports2021Source 1needs review

In the iLID system, anchoring strategy affects component expression and diffusion, which in turn impact recruitment strength, kinetics, and spatial dynamics.

Using live cell imaging and mathematical modeling, we demonstrate that the anchoring strategy affects both component expression and diffusion, which in turn impact recruitment strength, kinetics, and spatial dynamics.
Claim 70mechanistic effectsupports2021Source 1needs review

In the iLID system, anchoring strategy affects component expression and diffusion, which in turn impact recruitment strength, kinetics, and spatial dynamics.

Using live cell imaging and mathematical modeling, we demonstrate that the anchoring strategy affects both component expression and diffusion, which in turn impact recruitment strength, kinetics, and spatial dynamics.
Claim 71mechanistic effectsupports2021Source 1needs review

In the iLID system, anchoring strategy affects component expression and diffusion, which in turn impact recruitment strength, kinetics, and spatial dynamics.

Using live cell imaging and mathematical modeling, we demonstrate that the anchoring strategy affects both component expression and diffusion, which in turn impact recruitment strength, kinetics, and spatial dynamics.
Claim 72mechanistic effectsupports2021Source 1needs review

In the iLID system, anchoring strategy affects component expression and diffusion, which in turn impact recruitment strength, kinetics, and spatial dynamics.

Using live cell imaging and mathematical modeling, we demonstrate that the anchoring strategy affects both component expression and diffusion, which in turn impact recruitment strength, kinetics, and spatial dynamics.
Claim 73mechanistic effectsupports2021Source 1needs review

In the iLID system, anchoring strategy affects component expression and diffusion, which in turn impact recruitment strength, kinetics, and spatial dynamics.

Using live cell imaging and mathematical modeling, we demonstrate that the anchoring strategy affects both component expression and diffusion, which in turn impact recruitment strength, kinetics, and spatial dynamics.
Claim 74mechanistic effectsupports2021Source 1needs review

In the iLID system, anchoring strategy affects component expression and diffusion, which in turn impact recruitment strength, kinetics, and spatial dynamics.

Using live cell imaging and mathematical modeling, we demonstrate that the anchoring strategy affects both component expression and diffusion, which in turn impact recruitment strength, kinetics, and spatial dynamics.
Claim 75usage guidancesupports2021Source 1needs review

The study defines guidelines for component expression regimes that optimize recruitment for both cell-wide and subcellular recruitment strategies.

We also define guidelines for component expression regimes for optimal recruitment for both cell-wide and subcellular recruitment strategies.
Claim 76usage guidancesupports2021Source 1needs review

The study defines guidelines for component expression regimes that optimize recruitment for both cell-wide and subcellular recruitment strategies.

We also define guidelines for component expression regimes for optimal recruitment for both cell-wide and subcellular recruitment strategies.
Claim 77usage guidancesupports2021Source 1needs review

The study defines guidelines for component expression regimes that optimize recruitment for both cell-wide and subcellular recruitment strategies.

We also define guidelines for component expression regimes for optimal recruitment for both cell-wide and subcellular recruitment strategies.
Claim 78usage guidancesupports2021Source 1needs review

The study defines guidelines for component expression regimes that optimize recruitment for both cell-wide and subcellular recruitment strategies.

We also define guidelines for component expression regimes for optimal recruitment for both cell-wide and subcellular recruitment strategies.
Claim 79usage guidancesupports2021Source 1needs review

The study defines guidelines for component expression regimes that optimize recruitment for both cell-wide and subcellular recruitment strategies.

We also define guidelines for component expression regimes for optimal recruitment for both cell-wide and subcellular recruitment strategies.
Claim 80usage guidancesupports2021Source 1needs review

The study defines guidelines for component expression regimes that optimize recruitment for both cell-wide and subcellular recruitment strategies.

We also define guidelines for component expression regimes for optimal recruitment for both cell-wide and subcellular recruitment strategies.
Claim 81usage guidancesupports2021Source 1needs review

The study defines guidelines for component expression regimes that optimize recruitment for both cell-wide and subcellular recruitment strategies.

We also define guidelines for component expression regimes for optimal recruitment for both cell-wide and subcellular recruitment strategies.
Claim 82usage guidancesupports2021Source 1needs review

The study defines guidelines for component expression regimes that optimize recruitment for both cell-wide and subcellular recruitment strategies.

We also define guidelines for component expression regimes for optimal recruitment for both cell-wide and subcellular recruitment strategies.

Approval Evidence

1 source3 linked approval claimsfirst-pass slug fusion-proteins-with-large-n-terminal-anchors
fusion proteins with large N-terminal anchors

Source:

application scopesupports

The findings provide tools that allow greater control of subcellular protein localization across diverse cell biological applications.

Our findings highlight key sources of imprecision within light-inducible dimer systems and provide tools that allow greater control of subcellular protein localization across diverse cell biological applications.

Source:

comparative performancesupports

Compared with the commonly used C-terminal iLID fusion, fusion proteins with large N-terminal anchors show stronger local recruitment, slower diffusion of recruited components, efficient recruitment over wider gene expression ranges, and improved spatial control over signaling outputs.

Compared to the commonly used C-terminal iLID fusion, fusion proteins with large N-terminal anchors show stronger local recruitment, slower diffusion of recruited components, efficient recruitment over wider gene expression ranges, and improved spatial control over signaling outputs.

Source:

mechanistic effectsupports

Anchoring strategy affects component expression and diffusion, which in turn impact recruitment strength, kinetics, and spatial dynamics in the iLID system.

we demonstrate that the anchoring strategy affects both component expression and diffusion, which in turn impact recruitment strength, kinetics, and spatial dynamics

Source:

Comparisons

Source-backed strengths

The available evidence supports selective recruitment of components to subcellular locations, including micron-scale plasma membrane regions. The current summary further attributes improved recruitment performance to large N-terminal anchors through stronger local recruitment, slower diffusion of recruited components, and improved spatial control, but the provided extraction text does not include quantitative benchmarking.

Source:

Compared to the commonly used C-terminal iLID fusion, fusion proteins with large N-terminal anchors show stronger local recruitment, slower diffusion of recruited components, efficient recruitment over wider gene expression ranges, and improved spatial control over signaling outputs.

Ranked Citations

  1. 1.
    StructuralSource 1ACS Synthetic Biology2021Claim 1Claim 2Claim 3

    Extracted from this source document.