Toolkit/integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain

integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain

Protein Domain·Research·Since 2011

Taxonomy: Mechanism Branch / Component. Workflows sit above the mechanism and technique branches rather than replacing them.

Summary

The integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain is a platelet integrin tail segment that functions as a specific binding partner for the calcium- and integrin-binding protein CIB1. Solution structural analysis indicates that this interaction involves EF-hand III of CIB1 and is associated with a CIB1 conformational response distinct from that of related EF-hand proteins.

Usefulness & Problems

Why this is useful

This domain is useful as a defined peptide-binding element for studying and exploiting the specific CIB1–αIIb interaction. It provides a biologically grounded handle for probing CIB1 recognition by an integrin cytoplasmic tail in the context of Ca2+-CIB1 and Mg2+-CIB1.

Problem solved

It helps address the problem of obtaining a specific protein interaction module for CIB1 rather than relying on less specific EF-hand protein interactions. The cited work specifically maps the CIB1-contacting region to EF-hand III, clarifying the molecular interface used for αIIb tail recognition.

Taxonomy & Function

Primary hierarchy

Mechanism Branch

Component: A low-level protein part used inside a larger architecture that realizes a mechanism.

Techniques

No technique tags yet.

Target processes

No target processes tagged yet.

Implementation Constraints

cofactor dependency: cofactor requirement unknownencoding mode: genetically encodedimplementation constraint: context specific validationimplementation constraint: multi component delivery burdenoperating role: actuatoroperating role: sensorswitch architecture: multi componentswitch architecture: recruitment

Practical use is currently defined mainly by its interaction with CIB1, including both Ca2+-bound and Mg2+-bound CIB1 states examined in solution structural work. The supplied evidence does not specify construct boundaries, expression format, delivery strategy, or whether the isolated αIIb cytoplasmic domain is sufficient in all experimental contexts.

The evidence provided is limited to a single 2011 study centered on structural characterization of the CIB1 side of the interaction. The supplied evidence does not report quantitative affinity, transferability to engineered systems, or validation in applications beyond the native binding context.

Validation

Cell-freeBacteriaMammalianMouseHumanTherapeuticIndep. Replication

Supporting Sources

Ranked Claims

Claim 1binding interactionsupports2011Source 1needs review

CIB1 is a specific binding partner for the platelet integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain.

The calcium- and integrin-binding protein 1 (CIB1) is a ubiquitous Ca(2+)-binding protein and a specific binding partner for the platelet integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain
Claim 2binding interactionsupports2011Source 1needs review

CIB1 is a specific binding partner for the platelet integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain.

The calcium- and integrin-binding protein 1 (CIB1) is a ubiquitous Ca(2+)-binding protein and a specific binding partner for the platelet integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain
Claim 3binding interactionsupports2011Source 1needs review

CIB1 is a specific binding partner for the platelet integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain.

The calcium- and integrin-binding protein 1 (CIB1) is a ubiquitous Ca(2+)-binding protein and a specific binding partner for the platelet integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain
Claim 4binding interactionsupports2011Source 1needs review

CIB1 is a specific binding partner for the platelet integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain.

The calcium- and integrin-binding protein 1 (CIB1) is a ubiquitous Ca(2+)-binding protein and a specific binding partner for the platelet integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain
Claim 5binding interactionsupports2011Source 1needs review

CIB1 is a specific binding partner for the platelet integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain.

The calcium- and integrin-binding protein 1 (CIB1) is a ubiquitous Ca(2+)-binding protein and a specific binding partner for the platelet integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain
Claim 6binding interactionsupports2011Source 1needs review

CIB1 is a specific binding partner for the platelet integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain.

The calcium- and integrin-binding protein 1 (CIB1) is a ubiquitous Ca(2+)-binding protein and a specific binding partner for the platelet integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain
Claim 7binding interactionsupports2011Source 1needs review

CIB1 is a specific binding partner for the platelet integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain.

The calcium- and integrin-binding protein 1 (CIB1) is a ubiquitous Ca(2+)-binding protein and a specific binding partner for the platelet integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain
Claim 8binding interactionsupports2011Source 1needs review

CIB1 is a specific binding partner for the platelet integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain.

The calcium- and integrin-binding protein 1 (CIB1) is a ubiquitous Ca(2+)-binding protein and a specific binding partner for the platelet integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain
Claim 9binding interactionsupports2011Source 1needs review

CIB1 is a specific binding partner for the platelet integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain.

The calcium- and integrin-binding protein 1 (CIB1) is a ubiquitous Ca(2+)-binding protein and a specific binding partner for the platelet integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain
Claim 10binding interactionsupports2011Source 1needs review

CIB1 is a specific binding partner for the platelet integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain.

The calcium- and integrin-binding protein 1 (CIB1) is a ubiquitous Ca(2+)-binding protein and a specific binding partner for the platelet integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain
Claim 11binding interactionsupports2011Source 1needs review

CIB1 is a specific binding partner for the platelet integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain.

The calcium- and integrin-binding protein 1 (CIB1) is a ubiquitous Ca(2+)-binding protein and a specific binding partner for the platelet integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain
Claim 12binding interactionsupports2011Source 1needs review

CIB1 is a specific binding partner for the platelet integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain.

The calcium- and integrin-binding protein 1 (CIB1) is a ubiquitous Ca(2+)-binding protein and a specific binding partner for the platelet integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain
Claim 13binding interactionsupports2011Source 1needs review

CIB1 is a specific binding partner for the platelet integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain.

The calcium- and integrin-binding protein 1 (CIB1) is a ubiquitous Ca(2+)-binding protein and a specific binding partner for the platelet integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain
Claim 14binding interactionsupports2011Source 1needs review

CIB1 is a specific binding partner for the platelet integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain.

The calcium- and integrin-binding protein 1 (CIB1) is a ubiquitous Ca(2+)-binding protein and a specific binding partner for the platelet integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain
Claim 15binding interactionsupports2011Source 1needs review

CIB1 is a specific binding partner for the platelet integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain.

The calcium- and integrin-binding protein 1 (CIB1) is a ubiquitous Ca(2+)-binding protein and a specific binding partner for the platelet integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain
Claim 16binding interactionsupports2011Source 1needs review

CIB1 is a specific binding partner for the platelet integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain.

The calcium- and integrin-binding protein 1 (CIB1) is a ubiquitous Ca(2+)-binding protein and a specific binding partner for the platelet integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain
Claim 17binding interactionsupports2011Source 1needs review

CIB1 is a specific binding partner for the platelet integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain.

The calcium- and integrin-binding protein 1 (CIB1) is a ubiquitous Ca(2+)-binding protein and a specific binding partner for the platelet integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain
Claim 18binding site mappingsupports2011Source 1needs review

EF-hand III of both Ca2+-CIB1 and Mg2+-CIB1 is directly involved in the interaction of CIB1 with αIIb.

The EF-hand III of both Ca(2+)-CIB1 and Mg(2+)-CIB1 was identified to be directly involved in the interaction of CIB1 with αIIb.
Claim 19binding site mappingsupports2011Source 1needs review

EF-hand III of both Ca2+-CIB1 and Mg2+-CIB1 is directly involved in the interaction of CIB1 with αIIb.

The EF-hand III of both Ca(2+)-CIB1 and Mg(2+)-CIB1 was identified to be directly involved in the interaction of CIB1 with αIIb.
Claim 20binding site mappingsupports2011Source 1needs review

EF-hand III of both Ca2+-CIB1 and Mg2+-CIB1 is directly involved in the interaction of CIB1 with αIIb.

The EF-hand III of both Ca(2+)-CIB1 and Mg(2+)-CIB1 was identified to be directly involved in the interaction of CIB1 with αIIb.
Claim 21binding site mappingsupports2011Source 1needs review

EF-hand III of both Ca2+-CIB1 and Mg2+-CIB1 is directly involved in the interaction of CIB1 with αIIb.

The EF-hand III of both Ca(2+)-CIB1 and Mg(2+)-CIB1 was identified to be directly involved in the interaction of CIB1 with αIIb.
Claim 22binding site mappingsupports2011Source 1needs review

EF-hand III of both Ca2+-CIB1 and Mg2+-CIB1 is directly involved in the interaction of CIB1 with αIIb.

The EF-hand III of both Ca(2+)-CIB1 and Mg(2+)-CIB1 was identified to be directly involved in the interaction of CIB1 with αIIb.
Claim 23binding site mappingsupports2011Source 1needs review

EF-hand III of both Ca2+-CIB1 and Mg2+-CIB1 is directly involved in the interaction of CIB1 with αIIb.

The EF-hand III of both Ca(2+)-CIB1 and Mg(2+)-CIB1 was identified to be directly involved in the interaction of CIB1 with αIIb.
Claim 24binding site mappingsupports2011Source 1needs review

EF-hand III of both Ca2+-CIB1 and Mg2+-CIB1 is directly involved in the interaction of CIB1 with αIIb.

The EF-hand III of both Ca(2+)-CIB1 and Mg(2+)-CIB1 was identified to be directly involved in the interaction of CIB1 with αIIb.
Claim 25binding site mappingsupports2011Source 1needs review

EF-hand III of both Ca2+-CIB1 and Mg2+-CIB1 is directly involved in the interaction of CIB1 with αIIb.

The EF-hand III of both Ca(2+)-CIB1 and Mg(2+)-CIB1 was identified to be directly involved in the interaction of CIB1 with αIIb.
Claim 26binding site mappingsupports2011Source 1needs review

EF-hand III of both Ca2+-CIB1 and Mg2+-CIB1 is directly involved in the interaction of CIB1 with αIIb.

The EF-hand III of both Ca(2+)-CIB1 and Mg(2+)-CIB1 was identified to be directly involved in the interaction of CIB1 with αIIb.
Claim 27binding site mappingsupports2011Source 1needs review

EF-hand III of both Ca2+-CIB1 and Mg2+-CIB1 is directly involved in the interaction of CIB1 with αIIb.

The EF-hand III of both Ca(2+)-CIB1 and Mg(2+)-CIB1 was identified to be directly involved in the interaction of CIB1 with αIIb.
Claim 28binding site mappingsupports2011Source 1needs review

EF-hand III of both Ca2+-CIB1 and Mg2+-CIB1 is directly involved in the interaction of CIB1 with αIIb.

The EF-hand III of both Ca(2+)-CIB1 and Mg(2+)-CIB1 was identified to be directly involved in the interaction of CIB1 with αIIb.
Claim 29binding site mappingsupports2011Source 1needs review

EF-hand III of both Ca2+-CIB1 and Mg2+-CIB1 is directly involved in the interaction of CIB1 with αIIb.

The EF-hand III of both Ca(2+)-CIB1 and Mg(2+)-CIB1 was identified to be directly involved in the interaction of CIB1 with αIIb.
Claim 30binding site mappingsupports2011Source 1needs review

EF-hand III of both Ca2+-CIB1 and Mg2+-CIB1 is directly involved in the interaction of CIB1 with αIIb.

The EF-hand III of both Ca(2+)-CIB1 and Mg(2+)-CIB1 was identified to be directly involved in the interaction of CIB1 with αIIb.
Claim 31binding site mappingsupports2011Source 1needs review

EF-hand III of both Ca2+-CIB1 and Mg2+-CIB1 is directly involved in the interaction of CIB1 with αIIb.

The EF-hand III of both Ca(2+)-CIB1 and Mg(2+)-CIB1 was identified to be directly involved in the interaction of CIB1 with αIIb.
Claim 32binding site mappingsupports2011Source 1needs review

EF-hand III of both Ca2+-CIB1 and Mg2+-CIB1 is directly involved in the interaction of CIB1 with αIIb.

The EF-hand III of both Ca(2+)-CIB1 and Mg(2+)-CIB1 was identified to be directly involved in the interaction of CIB1 with αIIb.
Claim 33binding site mappingsupports2011Source 1needs review

EF-hand III of both Ca2+-CIB1 and Mg2+-CIB1 is directly involved in the interaction of CIB1 with αIIb.

The EF-hand III of both Ca(2+)-CIB1 and Mg(2+)-CIB1 was identified to be directly involved in the interaction of CIB1 with αIIb.
Claim 34binding site mappingsupports2011Source 1needs review

EF-hand III of both Ca2+-CIB1 and Mg2+-CIB1 is directly involved in the interaction of CIB1 with αIIb.

The EF-hand III of both Ca(2+)-CIB1 and Mg(2+)-CIB1 was identified to be directly involved in the interaction of CIB1 with αIIb.
Claim 35comparative behaviorsupports2011Source 1needs review

CIB1 behaves differently from related EF-hand regulatory calcium-binding proteins such as calmodulin or neuronal calcium sensor proteins.

Together, these data illustrate that CIB1 behaves quite differently from related EF-hand regulatory calcium-binding proteins, such as calmodulin or neuronal calcium sensor proteins.
Claim 36comparative behaviorsupports2011Source 1needs review

CIB1 behaves differently from related EF-hand regulatory calcium-binding proteins such as calmodulin or neuronal calcium sensor proteins.

Together, these data illustrate that CIB1 behaves quite differently from related EF-hand regulatory calcium-binding proteins, such as calmodulin or neuronal calcium sensor proteins.
Claim 37comparative behaviorsupports2011Source 1needs review

CIB1 behaves differently from related EF-hand regulatory calcium-binding proteins such as calmodulin or neuronal calcium sensor proteins.

Together, these data illustrate that CIB1 behaves quite differently from related EF-hand regulatory calcium-binding proteins, such as calmodulin or neuronal calcium sensor proteins.
Claim 38comparative behaviorsupports2011Source 1needs review

CIB1 behaves differently from related EF-hand regulatory calcium-binding proteins such as calmodulin or neuronal calcium sensor proteins.

Together, these data illustrate that CIB1 behaves quite differently from related EF-hand regulatory calcium-binding proteins, such as calmodulin or neuronal calcium sensor proteins.
Claim 39comparative behaviorsupports2011Source 1needs review

CIB1 behaves differently from related EF-hand regulatory calcium-binding proteins such as calmodulin or neuronal calcium sensor proteins.

Together, these data illustrate that CIB1 behaves quite differently from related EF-hand regulatory calcium-binding proteins, such as calmodulin or neuronal calcium sensor proteins.
Claim 40conformational changesupports2011Source 1needs review

The C-terminal helix of Ca2+-CIB1 is displaced upon αIIb binding.

NMR measurements of backbone amide proton slow motion (microsecond to millisecond) dynamics confirmed that the C-terminal helix of Ca(2+)-CIB1 is displaced upon αIIb binding.
Claim 41conformational changesupports2011Source 1needs review

The C-terminal helix of Ca2+-CIB1 is displaced upon αIIb binding.

NMR measurements of backbone amide proton slow motion (microsecond to millisecond) dynamics confirmed that the C-terminal helix of Ca(2+)-CIB1 is displaced upon αIIb binding.
Claim 42conformational changesupports2011Source 1needs review

The C-terminal helix of Ca2+-CIB1 is displaced upon αIIb binding.

NMR measurements of backbone amide proton slow motion (microsecond to millisecond) dynamics confirmed that the C-terminal helix of Ca(2+)-CIB1 is displaced upon αIIb binding.
Claim 43conformational changesupports2011Source 1needs review

The C-terminal helix of Ca2+-CIB1 is displaced upon αIIb binding.

NMR measurements of backbone amide proton slow motion (microsecond to millisecond) dynamics confirmed that the C-terminal helix of Ca(2+)-CIB1 is displaced upon αIIb binding.
Claim 44conformational changesupports2011Source 1needs review

The C-terminal helix of Ca2+-CIB1 is displaced upon αIIb binding.

NMR measurements of backbone amide proton slow motion (microsecond to millisecond) dynamics confirmed that the C-terminal helix of Ca(2+)-CIB1 is displaced upon αIIb binding.
Claim 45conformational changesupports2011Source 1needs review

The C-terminal helix of Ca2+-CIB1 is displaced upon αIIb binding.

NMR measurements of backbone amide proton slow motion (microsecond to millisecond) dynamics confirmed that the C-terminal helix of Ca(2+)-CIB1 is displaced upon αIIb binding.
Claim 46conformational changesupports2011Source 1needs review

The C-terminal helix of Ca2+-CIB1 is displaced upon αIIb binding.

NMR measurements of backbone amide proton slow motion (microsecond to millisecond) dynamics confirmed that the C-terminal helix of Ca(2+)-CIB1 is displaced upon αIIb binding.
Claim 47conformational changesupports2011Source 1needs review

The C-terminal helix of Ca2+-CIB1 is displaced upon αIIb binding.

NMR measurements of backbone amide proton slow motion (microsecond to millisecond) dynamics confirmed that the C-terminal helix of Ca(2+)-CIB1 is displaced upon αIIb binding.
Claim 48conformational changesupports2011Source 1needs review

The C-terminal helix of Ca2+-CIB1 is displaced upon αIIb binding.

NMR measurements of backbone amide proton slow motion (microsecond to millisecond) dynamics confirmed that the C-terminal helix of Ca(2+)-CIB1 is displaced upon αIIb binding.
Claim 49conformational changesupports2011Source 1needs review

The C-terminal helix of Ca2+-CIB1 is displaced upon αIIb binding.

NMR measurements of backbone amide proton slow motion (microsecond to millisecond) dynamics confirmed that the C-terminal helix of Ca(2+)-CIB1 is displaced upon αIIb binding.
Claim 50conformational changesupports2011Source 1needs review

The C-terminal helix of Ca2+-CIB1 is displaced upon αIIb binding.

NMR measurements of backbone amide proton slow motion (microsecond to millisecond) dynamics confirmed that the C-terminal helix of Ca(2+)-CIB1 is displaced upon αIIb binding.
Claim 51conformational changesupports2011Source 1needs review

The C-terminal helix of Ca2+-CIB1 is displaced upon αIIb binding.

NMR measurements of backbone amide proton slow motion (microsecond to millisecond) dynamics confirmed that the C-terminal helix of Ca(2+)-CIB1 is displaced upon αIIb binding.
Claim 52conformational changesupports2011Source 1needs review

The C-terminal helix of Ca2+-CIB1 is displaced upon αIIb binding.

NMR measurements of backbone amide proton slow motion (microsecond to millisecond) dynamics confirmed that the C-terminal helix of Ca(2+)-CIB1 is displaced upon αIIb binding.
Claim 53conformational changesupports2011Source 1needs review

The C-terminal helix of Ca2+-CIB1 is displaced upon αIIb binding.

NMR measurements of backbone amide proton slow motion (microsecond to millisecond) dynamics confirmed that the C-terminal helix of Ca(2+)-CIB1 is displaced upon αIIb binding.
Claim 54conformational changesupports2011Source 1needs review

The C-terminal helix of Ca2+-CIB1 is displaced upon αIIb binding.

NMR measurements of backbone amide proton slow motion (microsecond to millisecond) dynamics confirmed that the C-terminal helix of Ca(2+)-CIB1 is displaced upon αIIb binding.
Claim 55conformational changesupports2011Source 1needs review

The C-terminal helix of Ca2+-CIB1 is displaced upon αIIb binding.

NMR measurements of backbone amide proton slow motion (microsecond to millisecond) dynamics confirmed that the C-terminal helix of Ca(2+)-CIB1 is displaced upon αIIb binding.
Claim 56conformational changesupports2011Source 1needs review

The C-terminal helix of Ca2+-CIB1 is displaced upon αIIb binding.

NMR measurements of backbone amide proton slow motion (microsecond to millisecond) dynamics confirmed that the C-terminal helix of Ca(2+)-CIB1 is displaced upon αIIb binding.
Claim 57structural comparisonsupports2011Source 1needs review

Ca2+-CIB1 and Mg2+-CIB1 have similar structures, but the N-lobe of Mg2+-CIB1 is slightly more opened than that of Ca2+-CIB1.

Ca(2+)-CIB1 and Mg(2+)-CIB1 have similar structures, but the N-lobe of Mg(2+)-CIB1 is slightly more opened than that of Ca(2+)-CIB1.
Claim 58structural comparisonsupports2011Source 1needs review

Ca2+-CIB1 and Mg2+-CIB1 have similar structures, but the N-lobe of Mg2+-CIB1 is slightly more opened than that of Ca2+-CIB1.

Ca(2+)-CIB1 and Mg(2+)-CIB1 have similar structures, but the N-lobe of Mg(2+)-CIB1 is slightly more opened than that of Ca(2+)-CIB1.
Claim 59structural comparisonsupports2011Source 1needs review

Ca2+-CIB1 and Mg2+-CIB1 have similar structures, but the N-lobe of Mg2+-CIB1 is slightly more opened than that of Ca2+-CIB1.

Ca(2+)-CIB1 and Mg(2+)-CIB1 have similar structures, but the N-lobe of Mg(2+)-CIB1 is slightly more opened than that of Ca(2+)-CIB1.
Claim 60structural comparisonsupports2011Source 1needs review

Ca2+-CIB1 and Mg2+-CIB1 have similar structures, but the N-lobe of Mg2+-CIB1 is slightly more opened than that of Ca2+-CIB1.

Ca(2+)-CIB1 and Mg(2+)-CIB1 have similar structures, but the N-lobe of Mg(2+)-CIB1 is slightly more opened than that of Ca(2+)-CIB1.
Claim 61structural comparisonsupports2011Source 1needs review

Ca2+-CIB1 and Mg2+-CIB1 have similar structures, but the N-lobe of Mg2+-CIB1 is slightly more opened than that of Ca2+-CIB1.

Ca(2+)-CIB1 and Mg(2+)-CIB1 have similar structures, but the N-lobe of Mg(2+)-CIB1 is slightly more opened than that of Ca(2+)-CIB1.
Claim 62structural observationsupports2011Source 1needs review

The solution structure of Ca2+-CIB1 has smaller opened EF-hands in its C-domain than available crystal structures.

The solution structure of Ca(2+)-CIB1 possesses smaller opened EF-hands in its C-domain compared with available crystal structures.
Claim 63structural observationsupports2011Source 1needs review

The solution structure of Ca2+-CIB1 has smaller opened EF-hands in its C-domain than available crystal structures.

The solution structure of Ca(2+)-CIB1 possesses smaller opened EF-hands in its C-domain compared with available crystal structures.
Claim 64structural observationsupports2011Source 1needs review

The solution structure of Ca2+-CIB1 has smaller opened EF-hands in its C-domain than available crystal structures.

The solution structure of Ca(2+)-CIB1 possesses smaller opened EF-hands in its C-domain compared with available crystal structures.
Claim 65structural observationsupports2011Source 1needs review

The solution structure of Ca2+-CIB1 has smaller opened EF-hands in its C-domain than available crystal structures.

The solution structure of Ca(2+)-CIB1 possesses smaller opened EF-hands in its C-domain compared with available crystal structures.
Claim 66structural observationsupports2011Source 1needs review

The solution structure of Ca2+-CIB1 has smaller opened EF-hands in its C-domain than available crystal structures.

The solution structure of Ca(2+)-CIB1 possesses smaller opened EF-hands in its C-domain compared with available crystal structures.

Approval Evidence

1 source3 linked approval claimsfirst-pass slug integrin-iib-cytoplasmic-domain
a specific binding partner for the platelet integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain

Source:

binding interactionsupports

CIB1 is a specific binding partner for the platelet integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain.

The calcium- and integrin-binding protein 1 (CIB1) is a ubiquitous Ca(2+)-binding protein and a specific binding partner for the platelet integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain

Source:

binding site mappingsupports

EF-hand III of both Ca2+-CIB1 and Mg2+-CIB1 is directly involved in the interaction of CIB1 with αIIb.

The EF-hand III of both Ca(2+)-CIB1 and Mg(2+)-CIB1 was identified to be directly involved in the interaction of CIB1 with αIIb.

Source:

conformational changesupports

The C-terminal helix of Ca2+-CIB1 is displaced upon αIIb binding.

NMR measurements of backbone amide proton slow motion (microsecond to millisecond) dynamics confirmed that the C-terminal helix of Ca(2+)-CIB1 is displaced upon αIIb binding.

Source:

Comparisons

Source-backed strengths

The interaction is supported by solution structural studies reported for both Ca2+-CIB1 and Mg2+-CIB1, which strengthens evidence that the αIIb cytoplasmic domain is a bona fide CIB1-binding partner. Binding-site mapping further localizes the interaction to EF-hand III of CIB1, providing mechanistic specificity.

Source:

Together, these data illustrate that CIB1 behaves quite differently from related EF-hand regulatory calcium-binding proteins, such as calmodulin or neuronal calcium sensor proteins.

integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain and Arabidopsis thaliana cryptochrome 2 address a similar problem space.

Shared frame: same top-level item type; shared mechanisms: heterodimerization

Relative tradeoffs: appears more independently replicated.

Compared with Q-PAS1

integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain and Q-PAS1 address a similar problem space.

Shared frame: same top-level item type; shared mechanisms: heterodimerization

integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain and Rel/NF-κB family of transcription factors address a similar problem space.

Shared frame: same top-level item type; shared mechanisms: heterodimerization

Strengths here: looks easier to implement in practice.

Ranked Citations

  1. 1.
    StructuralSource 1Journal of Biological Chemistry2011Claim 17Claim 16Claim 17

    Extracted from this source document.