Toolkit/Light-Oxygen-Voltage domain

Light-Oxygen-Voltage domain

Protein Domain·Research·Since 2014

Also known as: LOV domain, LOV domains, LOV modules

Taxonomy: Mechanism Branch / Component. Workflows sit above the mechanism and technique branches rather than replacing them.

Summary

Light-Oxygen-Voltage (LOV) domains are small, light-responsive protein modules found in algae, plants, bacteria, and fungi that function as blue-light sensors controlling cellular responses to light. They are presented as a platform for constructing optogenetic tools that confer photoregulated control of cellular signaling.

Usefulness & Problems

Why this is useful

LOV domains are useful as compact sensory modules for building optogenetic systems that respond to blue light. Their value lies in providing a biologically widespread, light-responsive domain family that can be incorporated into tools for photoregulated control of signaling.

Source:

Algae, plants, bacteria and fungi contain Light-Oxygen-Voltage (LOV) domains that function as blue light sensors to control cellular responses to light.

Problem solved

LOV domains help address the need for genetically encoded modules that couple light input to control of cellular signaling. The cited work specifically frames them as a platform for constructing optogenetic devices, although detailed application-specific performance is not provided in the supplied evidence.

Taxonomy & Function

Primary hierarchy

Mechanism Branch

Component: A low-level protein part used inside a larger architecture that realizes a mechanism.

Target processes

No target processes tagged yet.

Input: Light

Implementation Constraints

The supplied evidence supports blue light as the input modality and identifies LOV domains as protein modules used in optogenetic device construction. However, the evidence does not specify cofactors, expression systems, delivery methods, or particular construct architectures.

Construction of highly sensitive LOV-based devices with fast on/off kinetics is complicated by divergent photocycle properties among LOV family members. Design and implementation are also hindered by incomplete understanding of how light-driven allosteric conformational changes activate diverse signal transduction domains.

Validation

Cell-freeBacteriaMammalianMouseHumanTherapeuticIndep. Replication

Supporting Sources

Ranked Claims

Claim 1engineering constraintsupports2015Source 1needs review

Divergent photocycle properties among LOV family members complicate construction of highly sensitive devices with fast on/off kinetics.

Further, divergent photocycle properties amongst LOV family members complicate construction of highly sensitive devices with fast on/off kinetics.
Claim 2engineering constraintsupports2015Source 1needs review

Divergent photocycle properties among LOV family members complicate construction of highly sensitive devices with fast on/off kinetics.

Further, divergent photocycle properties amongst LOV family members complicate construction of highly sensitive devices with fast on/off kinetics.
Claim 3engineering constraintsupports2015Source 1needs review

Divergent photocycle properties among LOV family members complicate construction of highly sensitive devices with fast on/off kinetics.

Further, divergent photocycle properties amongst LOV family members complicate construction of highly sensitive devices with fast on/off kinetics.
Claim 4engineering constraintsupports2015Source 1needs review

Divergent photocycle properties among LOV family members complicate construction of highly sensitive devices with fast on/off kinetics.

Further, divergent photocycle properties amongst LOV family members complicate construction of highly sensitive devices with fast on/off kinetics.
Claim 5engineering constraintsupports2015Source 1needs review

Divergent photocycle properties among LOV family members complicate construction of highly sensitive devices with fast on/off kinetics.

Further, divergent photocycle properties amongst LOV family members complicate construction of highly sensitive devices with fast on/off kinetics.
Claim 6engineering constraintsupports2015Source 1needs review

Divergent photocycle properties among LOV family members complicate construction of highly sensitive devices with fast on/off kinetics.

Further, divergent photocycle properties amongst LOV family members complicate construction of highly sensitive devices with fast on/off kinetics.
Claim 7engineering constraintsupports2015Source 1needs review

Divergent photocycle properties among LOV family members complicate construction of highly sensitive devices with fast on/off kinetics.

Further, divergent photocycle properties amongst LOV family members complicate construction of highly sensitive devices with fast on/off kinetics.
Claim 8engineering limitationsupports2015Source 1needs review

Design and implementation of LOV-based optogenetic devices are hindered by incomplete understanding of how light-driven allosteric conformational changes activate diverse signal transduction domains.

Currently, the design and implementation of these devices is partially hindered by a lack of understanding of how light drives allosteric changes in protein conformation to activate diverse signal transduction domains.
Claim 9engineering limitationsupports2015Source 1needs review

Design and implementation of LOV-based optogenetic devices are hindered by incomplete understanding of how light-driven allosteric conformational changes activate diverse signal transduction domains.

Currently, the design and implementation of these devices is partially hindered by a lack of understanding of how light drives allosteric changes in protein conformation to activate diverse signal transduction domains.
Claim 10engineering limitationsupports2015Source 1needs review

Design and implementation of LOV-based optogenetic devices are hindered by incomplete understanding of how light-driven allosteric conformational changes activate diverse signal transduction domains.

Currently, the design and implementation of these devices is partially hindered by a lack of understanding of how light drives allosteric changes in protein conformation to activate diverse signal transduction domains.
Claim 11engineering limitationsupports2015Source 1needs review

Design and implementation of LOV-based optogenetic devices are hindered by incomplete understanding of how light-driven allosteric conformational changes activate diverse signal transduction domains.

Currently, the design and implementation of these devices is partially hindered by a lack of understanding of how light drives allosteric changes in protein conformation to activate diverse signal transduction domains.
Claim 12engineering limitationsupports2015Source 1needs review

Design and implementation of LOV-based optogenetic devices are hindered by incomplete understanding of how light-driven allosteric conformational changes activate diverse signal transduction domains.

Currently, the design and implementation of these devices is partially hindered by a lack of understanding of how light drives allosteric changes in protein conformation to activate diverse signal transduction domains.
Claim 13engineering limitationsupports2015Source 1needs review

Design and implementation of LOV-based optogenetic devices are hindered by incomplete understanding of how light-driven allosteric conformational changes activate diverse signal transduction domains.

Currently, the design and implementation of these devices is partially hindered by a lack of understanding of how light drives allosteric changes in protein conformation to activate diverse signal transduction domains.
Claim 14engineering limitationsupports2015Source 1needs review

Design and implementation of LOV-based optogenetic devices are hindered by incomplete understanding of how light-driven allosteric conformational changes activate diverse signal transduction domains.

Currently, the design and implementation of these devices is partially hindered by a lack of understanding of how light drives allosteric changes in protein conformation to activate diverse signal transduction domains.
Claim 15platform potentialsupports2015Source 1needs review

LOV modules are presented as a platform for constructing optogenetic tools.

The small, light responsive LOV modules offer a novel platform for the construction of optogenetic tools.
Claim 16platform potentialsupports2015Source 1needs review

LOV modules are presented as a platform for constructing optogenetic tools.

The small, light responsive LOV modules offer a novel platform for the construction of optogenetic tools.
Claim 17platform potentialsupports2015Source 1needs review

LOV modules are presented as a platform for constructing optogenetic tools.

The small, light responsive LOV modules offer a novel platform for the construction of optogenetic tools.
Claim 18platform potentialsupports2015Source 1needs review

LOV modules are presented as a platform for constructing optogenetic tools.

The small, light responsive LOV modules offer a novel platform for the construction of optogenetic tools.
Claim 19platform potentialsupports2015Source 1needs review

LOV modules are presented as a platform for constructing optogenetic tools.

The small, light responsive LOV modules offer a novel platform for the construction of optogenetic tools.
Claim 20platform potentialsupports2015Source 1needs review

LOV modules are presented as a platform for constructing optogenetic tools.

The small, light responsive LOV modules offer a novel platform for the construction of optogenetic tools.
Claim 21platform potentialsupports2015Source 1needs review

LOV modules are presented as a platform for constructing optogenetic tools.

The small, light responsive LOV modules offer a novel platform for the construction of optogenetic tools.
Claim 22review focusneutral2015Source 1needs review

The review focuses on tuning LOV domain chemistry and signal transduction to improve optogenetic tools.

In the present review we discuss the history of LOV domain research with primary emphasis on tuning LOV domain chemistry and signal transduction to allow for improved optogenetic tools.
Claim 23review focusneutral2015Source 1needs review

The review focuses on tuning LOV domain chemistry and signal transduction to improve optogenetic tools.

In the present review we discuss the history of LOV domain research with primary emphasis on tuning LOV domain chemistry and signal transduction to allow for improved optogenetic tools.
Claim 24review focusneutral2015Source 1needs review

The review focuses on tuning LOV domain chemistry and signal transduction to improve optogenetic tools.

In the present review we discuss the history of LOV domain research with primary emphasis on tuning LOV domain chemistry and signal transduction to allow for improved optogenetic tools.
Claim 25review focusneutral2015Source 1needs review

The review focuses on tuning LOV domain chemistry and signal transduction to improve optogenetic tools.

In the present review we discuss the history of LOV domain research with primary emphasis on tuning LOV domain chemistry and signal transduction to allow for improved optogenetic tools.
Claim 26review focusneutral2015Source 1needs review

The review focuses on tuning LOV domain chemistry and signal transduction to improve optogenetic tools.

In the present review we discuss the history of LOV domain research with primary emphasis on tuning LOV domain chemistry and signal transduction to allow for improved optogenetic tools.
Claim 27review focusneutral2015Source 1needs review

The review focuses on tuning LOV domain chemistry and signal transduction to improve optogenetic tools.

In the present review we discuss the history of LOV domain research with primary emphasis on tuning LOV domain chemistry and signal transduction to allow for improved optogenetic tools.
Claim 28review focusneutral2015Source 1needs review

The review focuses on tuning LOV domain chemistry and signal transduction to improve optogenetic tools.

In the present review we discuss the history of LOV domain research with primary emphasis on tuning LOV domain chemistry and signal transduction to allow for improved optogenetic tools.
Claim 29functionsupports2014Source 2needs review

LOV domains function as blue light sensors that control cellular responses to light.

Algae, plants, bacteria and fungi contain Light-Oxygen-Voltage (LOV) domains that function as blue light sensors to control cellular responses to light.
Claim 30mechanismsupports2014Source 2needs review

LOV domains contain a bound flavin chromophore that is reduced upon photon absorption and forms a reversible metastable covalent bond with a nearby cysteine residue.

All LOV domains contain a bound flavin chromophore that is reduced upon photon absorption and forms a reversible, metastable covalent bond with a nearby cysteine residue.

Approval Evidence

2 sources6 linked approval claimsfirst-pass slug light-oxygen-voltage-domain
The Light-Oxygen-Voltage domain family of proteins is widespread in biology... The small, light responsive LOV modules offer a novel platform for the construction of optogenetic tools.

Source:

Algae, plants, bacteria and fungi contain Light-Oxygen-Voltage (LOV) domains that function as blue light sensors to control cellular responses to light.

Source:

engineering constraintsupports

Divergent photocycle properties among LOV family members complicate construction of highly sensitive devices with fast on/off kinetics.

Further, divergent photocycle properties amongst LOV family members complicate construction of highly sensitive devices with fast on/off kinetics.

Source:

engineering limitationsupports

Design and implementation of LOV-based optogenetic devices are hindered by incomplete understanding of how light-driven allosteric conformational changes activate diverse signal transduction domains.

Currently, the design and implementation of these devices is partially hindered by a lack of understanding of how light drives allosteric changes in protein conformation to activate diverse signal transduction domains.

Source:

platform potentialsupports

LOV modules are presented as a platform for constructing optogenetic tools.

The small, light responsive LOV modules offer a novel platform for the construction of optogenetic tools.

Source:

review focusneutral

The review focuses on tuning LOV domain chemistry and signal transduction to improve optogenetic tools.

In the present review we discuss the history of LOV domain research with primary emphasis on tuning LOV domain chemistry and signal transduction to allow for improved optogenetic tools.

Source:

functionsupports

LOV domains function as blue light sensors that control cellular responses to light.

Algae, plants, bacteria and fungi contain Light-Oxygen-Voltage (LOV) domains that function as blue light sensors to control cellular responses to light.

Source:

mechanismsupports

LOV domains contain a bound flavin chromophore that is reduced upon photon absorption and forms a reversible metastable covalent bond with a nearby cysteine residue.

All LOV domains contain a bound flavin chromophore that is reduced upon photon absorption and forms a reversible, metastable covalent bond with a nearby cysteine residue.

Source:

Comparisons

Source-backed strengths

The evidence describes LOV modules as small and light responsive, properties that support their use as engineering components in optogenetic tool construction. They are also widespread across algae, plants, bacteria, and fungi, indicating a broadly occurring class of blue-light sensory domains.

Source:

Further, divergent photocycle properties amongst LOV family members complicate construction of highly sensitive devices with fast on/off kinetics.

Source:

Currently, the design and implementation of these devices is partially hindered by a lack of understanding of how light drives allosteric changes in protein conformation to activate diverse signal transduction domains.

Ranked Citations

  1. 1.
    Best ReviewSource 1Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences2015Claim 1Claim 2Claim 3

    Seeded from load plan for claim cl1.