Toolkit/LOV-PvuII fusion enzyme

LOV-PvuII fusion enzyme

Multi-Component Switch·Research·Since 2012

Also known as: light-controllable endonuclease, light-inducible chimeric endonucleases, LOV-PvuII variants

Taxonomy: Mechanism Branch / Architecture. Workflows sit above the mechanism and technique branches rather than replacing them.

Summary

The LOV-PvuII fusion enzyme is a genetically encoded light-controllable endonuclease created by fusing the Avena sativa phototropin1 LOV2 photosensory domain to the restriction enzyme PvuII. In analyzed variants, blue light modulated DNA cleavage activity relative to dark conditions, with the direction of regulation determined by the fusion interface.

Usefulness & Problems

Why this is useful

This tool provides optical control over restriction endonuclease activity using a genetically encoded protein fusion rather than an added chemical regulator. It is useful where reversible blue-light-dependent modulation of DNA cleavage is desired and where different fusion designs can bias activity toward either the dark or illuminated state.

Problem solved

It addresses the problem of making DNA cleavage by PvuII responsive to light. The reported chimeras convert blue-light input into altered nuclease activity, enabling conditional control of cleavage state through protein engineering at the fusion interface.

Taxonomy & Function

Primary hierarchy

Mechanism Branch

Architecture: A composed arrangement of multiple parts that instantiates one or more mechanisms.

Techniques

No technique tags yet.

Target processes

recombination

Input: Light

Implementation Constraints

The construct is implemented as a fusion between the Avena sativa phototropin1 LOV2 domain and the PvuII restriction enzyme. Blue-light illumination and dark conditions were the compared input states, and functional behavior depended on the specific fusion interface used; no additional practical details on expression, cofactors, or delivery are provided in the supplied evidence.

The available evidence is limited to a single cited study and a small set of analyzed variants. Quantitative performance is only reported as an approximately 3-fold light/dark activity difference, and the provided evidence does not describe validation in cells, genome engineering contexts, or recombination assays.

Validation

Cell-freeBacteriaMammalianMouseHumanTherapeuticIndep. Replication

Supporting Sources

Ranked Claims

Claim 1activity modulationsupports2012Source 1needs review

Analyzed LOV-PvuII fusion variants showed a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity between blue-light illumination and dark conditions.

By analyzing several LOV-PvuII fusion enzymes, variants were obtained that show a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity, when illuminated with blue light or kept in the dark.
DNA cleavage activity difference 3 fold
Claim 2activity modulationsupports2012Source 1needs review

Analyzed LOV-PvuII fusion variants showed a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity between blue-light illumination and dark conditions.

By analyzing several LOV-PvuII fusion enzymes, variants were obtained that show a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity, when illuminated with blue light or kept in the dark.
DNA cleavage activity difference 3 fold
Claim 3activity modulationsupports2012Source 1needs review

Analyzed LOV-PvuII fusion variants showed a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity between blue-light illumination and dark conditions.

By analyzing several LOV-PvuII fusion enzymes, variants were obtained that show a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity, when illuminated with blue light or kept in the dark.
DNA cleavage activity difference 3 fold
Claim 4activity modulationsupports2012Source 1needs review

Analyzed LOV-PvuII fusion variants showed a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity between blue-light illumination and dark conditions.

By analyzing several LOV-PvuII fusion enzymes, variants were obtained that show a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity, when illuminated with blue light or kept in the dark.
DNA cleavage activity difference 3 fold
Claim 5activity modulationsupports2012Source 1needs review

Analyzed LOV-PvuII fusion variants showed a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity between blue-light illumination and dark conditions.

By analyzing several LOV-PvuII fusion enzymes, variants were obtained that show a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity, when illuminated with blue light or kept in the dark.
DNA cleavage activity difference 3 fold
Claim 6activity modulationsupports2012Source 1needs review

Analyzed LOV-PvuII fusion variants showed a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity between blue-light illumination and dark conditions.

By analyzing several LOV-PvuII fusion enzymes, variants were obtained that show a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity, when illuminated with blue light or kept in the dark.
DNA cleavage activity difference 3 fold
Claim 7activity modulationsupports2012Source 1needs review

Analyzed LOV-PvuII fusion variants showed a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity between blue-light illumination and dark conditions.

By analyzing several LOV-PvuII fusion enzymes, variants were obtained that show a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity, when illuminated with blue light or kept in the dark.
DNA cleavage activity difference 3 fold
Claim 8engineering resultsupports2012Source 1needs review

Fusion of the Avena sativa phototropin1 LOV2 domain to PvuII generated a genetically encoded light-controllable endonuclease.

Here, we have fused the light-sensitive LOV2 domain from Avena sativa phototropin1 to the restriction enzyme PvuII to generate a genetically encoded, light-controllable endonuclease.
Claim 9engineering resultsupports2012Source 1needs review

Fusion of the Avena sativa phototropin1 LOV2 domain to PvuII generated a genetically encoded light-controllable endonuclease.

Here, we have fused the light-sensitive LOV2 domain from Avena sativa phototropin1 to the restriction enzyme PvuII to generate a genetically encoded, light-controllable endonuclease.
Claim 10engineering resultsupports2012Source 1needs review

Fusion of the Avena sativa phototropin1 LOV2 domain to PvuII generated a genetically encoded light-controllable endonuclease.

Here, we have fused the light-sensitive LOV2 domain from Avena sativa phototropin1 to the restriction enzyme PvuII to generate a genetically encoded, light-controllable endonuclease.
Claim 11engineering resultsupports2012Source 1needs review

Fusion of the Avena sativa phototropin1 LOV2 domain to PvuII generated a genetically encoded light-controllable endonuclease.

Here, we have fused the light-sensitive LOV2 domain from Avena sativa phototropin1 to the restriction enzyme PvuII to generate a genetically encoded, light-controllable endonuclease.
Claim 12engineering resultsupports2012Source 1needs review

Fusion of the Avena sativa phototropin1 LOV2 domain to PvuII generated a genetically encoded light-controllable endonuclease.

Here, we have fused the light-sensitive LOV2 domain from Avena sativa phototropin1 to the restriction enzyme PvuII to generate a genetically encoded, light-controllable endonuclease.
Claim 13engineering resultsupports2012Source 1needs review

Fusion of the Avena sativa phototropin1 LOV2 domain to PvuII generated a genetically encoded light-controllable endonuclease.

Here, we have fused the light-sensitive LOV2 domain from Avena sativa phototropin1 to the restriction enzyme PvuII to generate a genetically encoded, light-controllable endonuclease.
Claim 14engineering resultsupports2012Source 1needs review

Fusion of the Avena sativa phototropin1 LOV2 domain to PvuII generated a genetically encoded light-controllable endonuclease.

Here, we have fused the light-sensitive LOV2 domain from Avena sativa phototropin1 to the restriction enzyme PvuII to generate a genetically encoded, light-controllable endonuclease.
Claim 15mechanistic behaviorsupports2012Source 1needs review

LOV-PvuII variants displayed bidirectional polarity in photoactivation depending on the fusion interface, with increased DNA cleavage activity occurring either in the dark state or in the blue-light photoexcited state.

Depending on the particular fusion interface, the LOV-PvuII variants obtained had a bidirectional polarity in photoactivation; i.e., increased DNA cleavage activity was observed either in the dark state, with a compact folded LOV domain, or in the blue light photoexcitation state, when the LOV domain is partially unfolded.
Claim 16mechanistic behaviorsupports2012Source 1needs review

LOV-PvuII variants displayed bidirectional polarity in photoactivation depending on the fusion interface, with increased DNA cleavage activity occurring either in the dark state or in the blue-light photoexcited state.

Depending on the particular fusion interface, the LOV-PvuII variants obtained had a bidirectional polarity in photoactivation; i.e., increased DNA cleavage activity was observed either in the dark state, with a compact folded LOV domain, or in the blue light photoexcitation state, when the LOV domain is partially unfolded.
Claim 17mechanistic behaviorsupports2012Source 1needs review

LOV-PvuII variants displayed bidirectional polarity in photoactivation depending on the fusion interface, with increased DNA cleavage activity occurring either in the dark state or in the blue-light photoexcited state.

Depending on the particular fusion interface, the LOV-PvuII variants obtained had a bidirectional polarity in photoactivation; i.e., increased DNA cleavage activity was observed either in the dark state, with a compact folded LOV domain, or in the blue light photoexcitation state, when the LOV domain is partially unfolded.
Claim 18mechanistic behaviorsupports2012Source 1needs review

LOV-PvuII variants displayed bidirectional polarity in photoactivation depending on the fusion interface, with increased DNA cleavage activity occurring either in the dark state or in the blue-light photoexcited state.

Depending on the particular fusion interface, the LOV-PvuII variants obtained had a bidirectional polarity in photoactivation; i.e., increased DNA cleavage activity was observed either in the dark state, with a compact folded LOV domain, or in the blue light photoexcitation state, when the LOV domain is partially unfolded.
Claim 19mechanistic behaviorsupports2012Source 1needs review

LOV-PvuII variants displayed bidirectional polarity in photoactivation depending on the fusion interface, with increased DNA cleavage activity occurring either in the dark state or in the blue-light photoexcited state.

Depending on the particular fusion interface, the LOV-PvuII variants obtained had a bidirectional polarity in photoactivation; i.e., increased DNA cleavage activity was observed either in the dark state, with a compact folded LOV domain, or in the blue light photoexcitation state, when the LOV domain is partially unfolded.
Claim 20mechanistic behaviorsupports2012Source 1needs review

LOV-PvuII variants displayed bidirectional polarity in photoactivation depending on the fusion interface, with increased DNA cleavage activity occurring either in the dark state or in the blue-light photoexcited state.

Depending on the particular fusion interface, the LOV-PvuII variants obtained had a bidirectional polarity in photoactivation; i.e., increased DNA cleavage activity was observed either in the dark state, with a compact folded LOV domain, or in the blue light photoexcitation state, when the LOV domain is partially unfolded.
Claim 21mechanistic behaviorsupports2012Source 1needs review

LOV-PvuII variants displayed bidirectional polarity in photoactivation depending on the fusion interface, with increased DNA cleavage activity occurring either in the dark state or in the blue-light photoexcited state.

Depending on the particular fusion interface, the LOV-PvuII variants obtained had a bidirectional polarity in photoactivation; i.e., increased DNA cleavage activity was observed either in the dark state, with a compact folded LOV domain, or in the blue light photoexcitation state, when the LOV domain is partially unfolded.
Claim 22reversibilitysupports2012Source 1needs review

The light-dependent effect on LOV-PvuII fusion enzyme activity was fully reversible over multiple photocycles.

The effect is fully reversible over multiple photocycles.
Claim 23reversibilitysupports2012Source 1needs review

The light-dependent effect on LOV-PvuII fusion enzyme activity was fully reversible over multiple photocycles.

The effect is fully reversible over multiple photocycles.
Claim 24reversibilitysupports2012Source 1needs review

The light-dependent effect on LOV-PvuII fusion enzyme activity was fully reversible over multiple photocycles.

The effect is fully reversible over multiple photocycles.
Claim 25reversibilitysupports2012Source 1needs review

The light-dependent effect on LOV-PvuII fusion enzyme activity was fully reversible over multiple photocycles.

The effect is fully reversible over multiple photocycles.
Claim 26reversibilitysupports2012Source 1needs review

The light-dependent effect on LOV-PvuII fusion enzyme activity was fully reversible over multiple photocycles.

The effect is fully reversible over multiple photocycles.
Claim 27reversibilitysupports2012Source 1needs review

The light-dependent effect on LOV-PvuII fusion enzyme activity was fully reversible over multiple photocycles.

The effect is fully reversible over multiple photocycles.
Claim 28reversibilitysupports2012Source 1needs review

The light-dependent effect on LOV-PvuII fusion enzyme activity was fully reversible over multiple photocycles.

The effect is fully reversible over multiple photocycles.

Approval Evidence

1 source4 linked approval claimsfirst-pass slug lov-pvuii-fusion-enzyme
Here, we have fused the light-sensitive LOV2 domain from Avena sativa phototropin1 to the restriction enzyme PvuII to generate a genetically encoded, light-controllable endonuclease.

Source:

activity modulationsupports

Analyzed LOV-PvuII fusion variants showed a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity between blue-light illumination and dark conditions.

By analyzing several LOV-PvuII fusion enzymes, variants were obtained that show a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity, when illuminated with blue light or kept in the dark.

Source:

engineering resultsupports

Fusion of the Avena sativa phototropin1 LOV2 domain to PvuII generated a genetically encoded light-controllable endonuclease.

Here, we have fused the light-sensitive LOV2 domain from Avena sativa phototropin1 to the restriction enzyme PvuII to generate a genetically encoded, light-controllable endonuclease.

Source:

mechanistic behaviorsupports

LOV-PvuII variants displayed bidirectional polarity in photoactivation depending on the fusion interface, with increased DNA cleavage activity occurring either in the dark state or in the blue-light photoexcited state.

Depending on the particular fusion interface, the LOV-PvuII variants obtained had a bidirectional polarity in photoactivation; i.e., increased DNA cleavage activity was observed either in the dark state, with a compact folded LOV domain, or in the blue light photoexcitation state, when the LOV domain is partially unfolded.

Source:

reversibilitysupports

The light-dependent effect on LOV-PvuII fusion enzyme activity was fully reversible over multiple photocycles.

The effect is fully reversible over multiple photocycles.

Source:

Comparisons

Source-backed strengths

The reported fusion strategy successfully generated a light-controllable endonuclease from defined components, Avena sativa phototropin1 LOV2 and PvuII. Analyzed variants showed about a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity between blue-light illumination and dark conditions, and the system supported bidirectional photoactivation polarity depending on fusion design.

Source:

Here, we have fused the light-sensitive LOV2 domain from Avena sativa phototropin1 to the restriction enzyme PvuII to generate a genetically encoded, light-controllable endonuclease.

Ranked Citations

  1. 1.
    StructuralSource 1Bioconjugate Chemistry2012Claim 1Claim 2Claim 3

    Extracted from this source document.