Toolkit/LOV-PvuII fusion enzyme

LOV-PvuII fusion enzyme

Multi-Component Switch·Research·Since 2012

Also known as: light-controllable endonuclease, light-inducible chimeric endonucleases, LOV-PvuII variants

Taxonomy: Mechanism Branch / Architecture. Workflows sit above the mechanism and technique branches rather than replacing them.

Summary

The LOV-PvuII fusion enzyme is a genetically encoded light-controllable endonuclease created by fusing the Avena sativa phototropin1 LOV2 photosensory domain to the restriction enzyme PvuII. In analyzed variants, blue light modulated DNA cleavage activity relative to dark conditions, with the direction of regulation determined by the fusion interface.

Usefulness & Problems

Why this is useful

This tool provides optical control over restriction endonuclease activity using a genetically encoded protein fusion rather than an added chemical regulator. It is useful where reversible blue-light-dependent modulation of DNA cleavage is desired and where different fusion designs can bias activity toward either the dark or illuminated state.

Problem solved

It addresses the problem of making DNA cleavage by PvuII responsive to light. The reported chimeras convert blue-light input into altered nuclease activity, enabling conditional control of cleavage state through protein engineering at the fusion interface.

Problem links

Need conditional recombination or state switching

Derived

The LOV-PvuII fusion enzyme is a genetically encoded light-controllable endonuclease created by fusing the Avena sativa phototropin1 LOV2 domain to the restriction enzyme PvuII. In analyzed variants, blue light modulated DNA cleavage activity relative to dark conditions, and the direction of regulation depended on the fusion interface.

Need precise spatiotemporal control with light input

Derived

The LOV-PvuII fusion enzyme is a genetically encoded light-controllable endonuclease created by fusing the Avena sativa phototropin1 LOV2 domain to the restriction enzyme PvuII. In analyzed variants, blue light modulated DNA cleavage activity relative to dark conditions, and the direction of regulation depended on the fusion interface.

Taxonomy & Function

Primary hierarchy

Mechanism Branch

Architecture: A composed arrangement of multiple parts that instantiates one or more mechanisms.

Techniques

No technique tags yet.

Target processes

recombination

Input: Light

Implementation Constraints

cofactor dependency: cofactor requirement unknownencoding mode: genetically encodedimplementation constraint: context specific validationimplementation constraint: multi component delivery burdenimplementation constraint: spectral hardware requirementoperating role: actuatoroperating role: regulatorswitch architecture: cleavageswitch architecture: multi componentswitch architecture: uncaging

The construct is implemented as a fusion between the Avena sativa phototropin1 LOV2 domain and the PvuII restriction enzyme. Blue-light illumination and dark conditions were the compared input states, and functional behavior depended on the specific fusion interface used; no additional practical details on expression, cofactors, or delivery are provided in the supplied evidence.

The available evidence is limited to a single cited study and a small set of analyzed variants. Quantitative performance is only reported as an approximately 3-fold light/dark activity difference, and the provided evidence does not describe validation in cells, genome engineering contexts, or recombination assays.

Validation

Cell-freeBacteriaMammalianMouseHumanTherapeuticIndep. Replication

Supporting Sources

Ranked Claims

Claim 1activity modulationsupports2012Source 1needs review

Analyzed LOV-PvuII fusion variants showed a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity between blue-light illumination and dark conditions.

By analyzing several LOV-PvuII fusion enzymes, variants were obtained that show a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity, when illuminated with blue light or kept in the dark.
DNA cleavage activity difference 3 fold
Claim 2activity modulationsupports2012Source 1needs review

Analyzed LOV-PvuII fusion variants showed a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity between blue-light illumination and dark conditions.

By analyzing several LOV-PvuII fusion enzymes, variants were obtained that show a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity, when illuminated with blue light or kept in the dark.
DNA cleavage activity difference 3 fold
Claim 3activity modulationsupports2012Source 1needs review

Analyzed LOV-PvuII fusion variants showed a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity between blue-light illumination and dark conditions.

By analyzing several LOV-PvuII fusion enzymes, variants were obtained that show a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity, when illuminated with blue light or kept in the dark.
DNA cleavage activity difference 3 fold
Claim 4activity modulationsupports2012Source 1needs review

Analyzed LOV-PvuII fusion variants showed a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity between blue-light illumination and dark conditions.

By analyzing several LOV-PvuII fusion enzymes, variants were obtained that show a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity, when illuminated with blue light or kept in the dark.
DNA cleavage activity difference 3 fold
Claim 5activity modulationsupports2012Source 1needs review

Analyzed LOV-PvuII fusion variants showed a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity between blue-light illumination and dark conditions.

By analyzing several LOV-PvuII fusion enzymes, variants were obtained that show a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity, when illuminated with blue light or kept in the dark.
DNA cleavage activity difference 3 fold
Claim 6activity modulationsupports2012Source 1needs review

Analyzed LOV-PvuII fusion variants showed a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity between blue-light illumination and dark conditions.

By analyzing several LOV-PvuII fusion enzymes, variants were obtained that show a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity, when illuminated with blue light or kept in the dark.
DNA cleavage activity difference 3 fold
Claim 7activity modulationsupports2012Source 1needs review

Analyzed LOV-PvuII fusion variants showed a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity between blue-light illumination and dark conditions.

By analyzing several LOV-PvuII fusion enzymes, variants were obtained that show a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity, when illuminated with blue light or kept in the dark.
DNA cleavage activity difference 3 fold
Claim 8activity modulationsupports2012Source 1needs review

Analyzed LOV-PvuII fusion variants showed a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity between blue-light illumination and dark conditions.

By analyzing several LOV-PvuII fusion enzymes, variants were obtained that show a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity, when illuminated with blue light or kept in the dark.
DNA cleavage activity difference 3 fold
Claim 9activity modulationsupports2012Source 1needs review

Analyzed LOV-PvuII fusion variants showed a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity between blue-light illumination and dark conditions.

By analyzing several LOV-PvuII fusion enzymes, variants were obtained that show a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity, when illuminated with blue light or kept in the dark.
DNA cleavage activity difference 3 fold
Claim 10activity modulationsupports2012Source 1needs review

Analyzed LOV-PvuII fusion variants showed a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity between blue-light illumination and dark conditions.

By analyzing several LOV-PvuII fusion enzymes, variants were obtained that show a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity, when illuminated with blue light or kept in the dark.
DNA cleavage activity difference 3 fold
Claim 11activity modulationsupports2012Source 1needs review

Analyzed LOV-PvuII fusion variants showed a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity between blue-light illumination and dark conditions.

By analyzing several LOV-PvuII fusion enzymes, variants were obtained that show a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity, when illuminated with blue light or kept in the dark.
DNA cleavage activity difference 3 fold
Claim 12activity modulationsupports2012Source 1needs review

Analyzed LOV-PvuII fusion variants showed a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity between blue-light illumination and dark conditions.

By analyzing several LOV-PvuII fusion enzymes, variants were obtained that show a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity, when illuminated with blue light or kept in the dark.
DNA cleavage activity difference 3 fold
Claim 13activity modulationsupports2012Source 1needs review

Analyzed LOV-PvuII fusion variants showed a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity between blue-light illumination and dark conditions.

By analyzing several LOV-PvuII fusion enzymes, variants were obtained that show a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity, when illuminated with blue light or kept in the dark.
DNA cleavage activity difference 3 fold
Claim 14activity modulationsupports2012Source 1needs review

Analyzed LOV-PvuII fusion variants showed a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity between blue-light illumination and dark conditions.

By analyzing several LOV-PvuII fusion enzymes, variants were obtained that show a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity, when illuminated with blue light or kept in the dark.
DNA cleavage activity difference 3 fold
Claim 15activity modulationsupports2012Source 1needs review

Analyzed LOV-PvuII fusion variants showed a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity between blue-light illumination and dark conditions.

By analyzing several LOV-PvuII fusion enzymes, variants were obtained that show a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity, when illuminated with blue light or kept in the dark.
DNA cleavage activity difference 3 fold
Claim 16activity modulationsupports2012Source 1needs review

Analyzed LOV-PvuII fusion variants showed a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity between blue-light illumination and dark conditions.

By analyzing several LOV-PvuII fusion enzymes, variants were obtained that show a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity, when illuminated with blue light or kept in the dark.
DNA cleavage activity difference 3 fold
Claim 17activity modulationsupports2012Source 1needs review

Analyzed LOV-PvuII fusion variants showed a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity between blue-light illumination and dark conditions.

By analyzing several LOV-PvuII fusion enzymes, variants were obtained that show a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity, when illuminated with blue light or kept in the dark.
DNA cleavage activity difference 3 fold
Claim 18engineering resultsupports2012Source 1needs review

Fusion of the Avena sativa phototropin1 LOV2 domain to PvuII generated a genetically encoded light-controllable endonuclease.

Here, we have fused the light-sensitive LOV2 domain from Avena sativa phototropin1 to the restriction enzyme PvuII to generate a genetically encoded, light-controllable endonuclease.
Claim 19engineering resultsupports2012Source 1needs review

Fusion of the Avena sativa phototropin1 LOV2 domain to PvuII generated a genetically encoded light-controllable endonuclease.

Here, we have fused the light-sensitive LOV2 domain from Avena sativa phototropin1 to the restriction enzyme PvuII to generate a genetically encoded, light-controllable endonuclease.
Claim 20engineering resultsupports2012Source 1needs review

Fusion of the Avena sativa phototropin1 LOV2 domain to PvuII generated a genetically encoded light-controllable endonuclease.

Here, we have fused the light-sensitive LOV2 domain from Avena sativa phototropin1 to the restriction enzyme PvuII to generate a genetically encoded, light-controllable endonuclease.
Claim 21engineering resultsupports2012Source 1needs review

Fusion of the Avena sativa phototropin1 LOV2 domain to PvuII generated a genetically encoded light-controllable endonuclease.

Here, we have fused the light-sensitive LOV2 domain from Avena sativa phototropin1 to the restriction enzyme PvuII to generate a genetically encoded, light-controllable endonuclease.
Claim 22engineering resultsupports2012Source 1needs review

Fusion of the Avena sativa phototropin1 LOV2 domain to PvuII generated a genetically encoded light-controllable endonuclease.

Here, we have fused the light-sensitive LOV2 domain from Avena sativa phototropin1 to the restriction enzyme PvuII to generate a genetically encoded, light-controllable endonuclease.
Claim 23engineering resultsupports2012Source 1needs review

Fusion of the Avena sativa phototropin1 LOV2 domain to PvuII generated a genetically encoded light-controllable endonuclease.

Here, we have fused the light-sensitive LOV2 domain from Avena sativa phototropin1 to the restriction enzyme PvuII to generate a genetically encoded, light-controllable endonuclease.
Claim 24engineering resultsupports2012Source 1needs review

Fusion of the Avena sativa phototropin1 LOV2 domain to PvuII generated a genetically encoded light-controllable endonuclease.

Here, we have fused the light-sensitive LOV2 domain from Avena sativa phototropin1 to the restriction enzyme PvuII to generate a genetically encoded, light-controllable endonuclease.
Claim 25engineering resultsupports2012Source 1needs review

Fusion of the Avena sativa phototropin1 LOV2 domain to PvuII generated a genetically encoded light-controllable endonuclease.

Here, we have fused the light-sensitive LOV2 domain from Avena sativa phototropin1 to the restriction enzyme PvuII to generate a genetically encoded, light-controllable endonuclease.
Claim 26engineering resultsupports2012Source 1needs review

Fusion of the Avena sativa phototropin1 LOV2 domain to PvuII generated a genetically encoded light-controllable endonuclease.

Here, we have fused the light-sensitive LOV2 domain from Avena sativa phototropin1 to the restriction enzyme PvuII to generate a genetically encoded, light-controllable endonuclease.
Claim 27engineering resultsupports2012Source 1needs review

Fusion of the Avena sativa phototropin1 LOV2 domain to PvuII generated a genetically encoded light-controllable endonuclease.

Here, we have fused the light-sensitive LOV2 domain from Avena sativa phototropin1 to the restriction enzyme PvuII to generate a genetically encoded, light-controllable endonuclease.
Claim 28engineering resultsupports2012Source 1needs review

Fusion of the Avena sativa phototropin1 LOV2 domain to PvuII generated a genetically encoded light-controllable endonuclease.

Here, we have fused the light-sensitive LOV2 domain from Avena sativa phototropin1 to the restriction enzyme PvuII to generate a genetically encoded, light-controllable endonuclease.
Claim 29engineering resultsupports2012Source 1needs review

Fusion of the Avena sativa phototropin1 LOV2 domain to PvuII generated a genetically encoded light-controllable endonuclease.

Here, we have fused the light-sensitive LOV2 domain from Avena sativa phototropin1 to the restriction enzyme PvuII to generate a genetically encoded, light-controllable endonuclease.
Claim 30engineering resultsupports2012Source 1needs review

Fusion of the Avena sativa phototropin1 LOV2 domain to PvuII generated a genetically encoded light-controllable endonuclease.

Here, we have fused the light-sensitive LOV2 domain from Avena sativa phototropin1 to the restriction enzyme PvuII to generate a genetically encoded, light-controllable endonuclease.
Claim 31engineering resultsupports2012Source 1needs review

Fusion of the Avena sativa phototropin1 LOV2 domain to PvuII generated a genetically encoded light-controllable endonuclease.

Here, we have fused the light-sensitive LOV2 domain from Avena sativa phototropin1 to the restriction enzyme PvuII to generate a genetically encoded, light-controllable endonuclease.
Claim 32engineering resultsupports2012Source 1needs review

Fusion of the Avena sativa phototropin1 LOV2 domain to PvuII generated a genetically encoded light-controllable endonuclease.

Here, we have fused the light-sensitive LOV2 domain from Avena sativa phototropin1 to the restriction enzyme PvuII to generate a genetically encoded, light-controllable endonuclease.
Claim 33engineering resultsupports2012Source 1needs review

Fusion of the Avena sativa phototropin1 LOV2 domain to PvuII generated a genetically encoded light-controllable endonuclease.

Here, we have fused the light-sensitive LOV2 domain from Avena sativa phototropin1 to the restriction enzyme PvuII to generate a genetically encoded, light-controllable endonuclease.
Claim 34engineering resultsupports2012Source 1needs review

Fusion of the Avena sativa phototropin1 LOV2 domain to PvuII generated a genetically encoded light-controllable endonuclease.

Here, we have fused the light-sensitive LOV2 domain from Avena sativa phototropin1 to the restriction enzyme PvuII to generate a genetically encoded, light-controllable endonuclease.
Claim 35mechanistic behaviorsupports2012Source 1needs review

LOV-PvuII variants displayed bidirectional polarity in photoactivation depending on the fusion interface, with increased DNA cleavage activity occurring either in the dark state or in the blue-light photoexcited state.

Depending on the particular fusion interface, the LOV-PvuII variants obtained had a bidirectional polarity in photoactivation; i.e., increased DNA cleavage activity was observed either in the dark state, with a compact folded LOV domain, or in the blue light photoexcitation state, when the LOV domain is partially unfolded.
Claim 36mechanistic behaviorsupports2012Source 1needs review

LOV-PvuII variants displayed bidirectional polarity in photoactivation depending on the fusion interface, with increased DNA cleavage activity occurring either in the dark state or in the blue-light photoexcited state.

Depending on the particular fusion interface, the LOV-PvuII variants obtained had a bidirectional polarity in photoactivation; i.e., increased DNA cleavage activity was observed either in the dark state, with a compact folded LOV domain, or in the blue light photoexcitation state, when the LOV domain is partially unfolded.
Claim 37mechanistic behaviorsupports2012Source 1needs review

LOV-PvuII variants displayed bidirectional polarity in photoactivation depending on the fusion interface, with increased DNA cleavage activity occurring either in the dark state or in the blue-light photoexcited state.

Depending on the particular fusion interface, the LOV-PvuII variants obtained had a bidirectional polarity in photoactivation; i.e., increased DNA cleavage activity was observed either in the dark state, with a compact folded LOV domain, or in the blue light photoexcitation state, when the LOV domain is partially unfolded.
Claim 38mechanistic behaviorsupports2012Source 1needs review

LOV-PvuII variants displayed bidirectional polarity in photoactivation depending on the fusion interface, with increased DNA cleavage activity occurring either in the dark state or in the blue-light photoexcited state.

Depending on the particular fusion interface, the LOV-PvuII variants obtained had a bidirectional polarity in photoactivation; i.e., increased DNA cleavage activity was observed either in the dark state, with a compact folded LOV domain, or in the blue light photoexcitation state, when the LOV domain is partially unfolded.
Claim 39mechanistic behaviorsupports2012Source 1needs review

LOV-PvuII variants displayed bidirectional polarity in photoactivation depending on the fusion interface, with increased DNA cleavage activity occurring either in the dark state or in the blue-light photoexcited state.

Depending on the particular fusion interface, the LOV-PvuII variants obtained had a bidirectional polarity in photoactivation; i.e., increased DNA cleavage activity was observed either in the dark state, with a compact folded LOV domain, or in the blue light photoexcitation state, when the LOV domain is partially unfolded.
Claim 40mechanistic behaviorsupports2012Source 1needs review

LOV-PvuII variants displayed bidirectional polarity in photoactivation depending on the fusion interface, with increased DNA cleavage activity occurring either in the dark state or in the blue-light photoexcited state.

Depending on the particular fusion interface, the LOV-PvuII variants obtained had a bidirectional polarity in photoactivation; i.e., increased DNA cleavage activity was observed either in the dark state, with a compact folded LOV domain, or in the blue light photoexcitation state, when the LOV domain is partially unfolded.
Claim 41mechanistic behaviorsupports2012Source 1needs review

LOV-PvuII variants displayed bidirectional polarity in photoactivation depending on the fusion interface, with increased DNA cleavage activity occurring either in the dark state or in the blue-light photoexcited state.

Depending on the particular fusion interface, the LOV-PvuII variants obtained had a bidirectional polarity in photoactivation; i.e., increased DNA cleavage activity was observed either in the dark state, with a compact folded LOV domain, or in the blue light photoexcitation state, when the LOV domain is partially unfolded.
Claim 42mechanistic behaviorsupports2012Source 1needs review

LOV-PvuII variants displayed bidirectional polarity in photoactivation depending on the fusion interface, with increased DNA cleavage activity occurring either in the dark state or in the blue-light photoexcited state.

Depending on the particular fusion interface, the LOV-PvuII variants obtained had a bidirectional polarity in photoactivation; i.e., increased DNA cleavage activity was observed either in the dark state, with a compact folded LOV domain, or in the blue light photoexcitation state, when the LOV domain is partially unfolded.
Claim 43mechanistic behaviorsupports2012Source 1needs review

LOV-PvuII variants displayed bidirectional polarity in photoactivation depending on the fusion interface, with increased DNA cleavage activity occurring either in the dark state or in the blue-light photoexcited state.

Depending on the particular fusion interface, the LOV-PvuII variants obtained had a bidirectional polarity in photoactivation; i.e., increased DNA cleavage activity was observed either in the dark state, with a compact folded LOV domain, or in the blue light photoexcitation state, when the LOV domain is partially unfolded.
Claim 44mechanistic behaviorsupports2012Source 1needs review

LOV-PvuII variants displayed bidirectional polarity in photoactivation depending on the fusion interface, with increased DNA cleavage activity occurring either in the dark state or in the blue-light photoexcited state.

Depending on the particular fusion interface, the LOV-PvuII variants obtained had a bidirectional polarity in photoactivation; i.e., increased DNA cleavage activity was observed either in the dark state, with a compact folded LOV domain, or in the blue light photoexcitation state, when the LOV domain is partially unfolded.
Claim 45mechanistic behaviorsupports2012Source 1needs review

LOV-PvuII variants displayed bidirectional polarity in photoactivation depending on the fusion interface, with increased DNA cleavage activity occurring either in the dark state or in the blue-light photoexcited state.

Depending on the particular fusion interface, the LOV-PvuII variants obtained had a bidirectional polarity in photoactivation; i.e., increased DNA cleavage activity was observed either in the dark state, with a compact folded LOV domain, or in the blue light photoexcitation state, when the LOV domain is partially unfolded.
Claim 46mechanistic behaviorsupports2012Source 1needs review

LOV-PvuII variants displayed bidirectional polarity in photoactivation depending on the fusion interface, with increased DNA cleavage activity occurring either in the dark state or in the blue-light photoexcited state.

Depending on the particular fusion interface, the LOV-PvuII variants obtained had a bidirectional polarity in photoactivation; i.e., increased DNA cleavage activity was observed either in the dark state, with a compact folded LOV domain, or in the blue light photoexcitation state, when the LOV domain is partially unfolded.
Claim 47mechanistic behaviorsupports2012Source 1needs review

LOV-PvuII variants displayed bidirectional polarity in photoactivation depending on the fusion interface, with increased DNA cleavage activity occurring either in the dark state or in the blue-light photoexcited state.

Depending on the particular fusion interface, the LOV-PvuII variants obtained had a bidirectional polarity in photoactivation; i.e., increased DNA cleavage activity was observed either in the dark state, with a compact folded LOV domain, or in the blue light photoexcitation state, when the LOV domain is partially unfolded.
Claim 48mechanistic behaviorsupports2012Source 1needs review

LOV-PvuII variants displayed bidirectional polarity in photoactivation depending on the fusion interface, with increased DNA cleavage activity occurring either in the dark state or in the blue-light photoexcited state.

Depending on the particular fusion interface, the LOV-PvuII variants obtained had a bidirectional polarity in photoactivation; i.e., increased DNA cleavage activity was observed either in the dark state, with a compact folded LOV domain, or in the blue light photoexcitation state, when the LOV domain is partially unfolded.
Claim 49mechanistic behaviorsupports2012Source 1needs review

LOV-PvuII variants displayed bidirectional polarity in photoactivation depending on the fusion interface, with increased DNA cleavage activity occurring either in the dark state or in the blue-light photoexcited state.

Depending on the particular fusion interface, the LOV-PvuII variants obtained had a bidirectional polarity in photoactivation; i.e., increased DNA cleavage activity was observed either in the dark state, with a compact folded LOV domain, or in the blue light photoexcitation state, when the LOV domain is partially unfolded.
Claim 50mechanistic behaviorsupports2012Source 1needs review

LOV-PvuII variants displayed bidirectional polarity in photoactivation depending on the fusion interface, with increased DNA cleavage activity occurring either in the dark state or in the blue-light photoexcited state.

Depending on the particular fusion interface, the LOV-PvuII variants obtained had a bidirectional polarity in photoactivation; i.e., increased DNA cleavage activity was observed either in the dark state, with a compact folded LOV domain, or in the blue light photoexcitation state, when the LOV domain is partially unfolded.
Claim 51mechanistic behaviorsupports2012Source 1needs review

LOV-PvuII variants displayed bidirectional polarity in photoactivation depending on the fusion interface, with increased DNA cleavage activity occurring either in the dark state or in the blue-light photoexcited state.

Depending on the particular fusion interface, the LOV-PvuII variants obtained had a bidirectional polarity in photoactivation; i.e., increased DNA cleavage activity was observed either in the dark state, with a compact folded LOV domain, or in the blue light photoexcitation state, when the LOV domain is partially unfolded.
Claim 52reversibilitysupports2012Source 1needs review

The light-dependent effect on LOV-PvuII fusion enzyme activity was fully reversible over multiple photocycles.

The effect is fully reversible over multiple photocycles.
Claim 53reversibilitysupports2012Source 1needs review

The light-dependent effect on LOV-PvuII fusion enzyme activity was fully reversible over multiple photocycles.

The effect is fully reversible over multiple photocycles.
Claim 54reversibilitysupports2012Source 1needs review

The light-dependent effect on LOV-PvuII fusion enzyme activity was fully reversible over multiple photocycles.

The effect is fully reversible over multiple photocycles.
Claim 55reversibilitysupports2012Source 1needs review

The light-dependent effect on LOV-PvuII fusion enzyme activity was fully reversible over multiple photocycles.

The effect is fully reversible over multiple photocycles.
Claim 56reversibilitysupports2012Source 1needs review

The light-dependent effect on LOV-PvuII fusion enzyme activity was fully reversible over multiple photocycles.

The effect is fully reversible over multiple photocycles.
Claim 57reversibilitysupports2012Source 1needs review

The light-dependent effect on LOV-PvuII fusion enzyme activity was fully reversible over multiple photocycles.

The effect is fully reversible over multiple photocycles.
Claim 58reversibilitysupports2012Source 1needs review

The light-dependent effect on LOV-PvuII fusion enzyme activity was fully reversible over multiple photocycles.

The effect is fully reversible over multiple photocycles.
Claim 59reversibilitysupports2012Source 1needs review

The light-dependent effect on LOV-PvuII fusion enzyme activity was fully reversible over multiple photocycles.

The effect is fully reversible over multiple photocycles.
Claim 60reversibilitysupports2012Source 1needs review

The light-dependent effect on LOV-PvuII fusion enzyme activity was fully reversible over multiple photocycles.

The effect is fully reversible over multiple photocycles.
Claim 61reversibilitysupports2012Source 1needs review

The light-dependent effect on LOV-PvuII fusion enzyme activity was fully reversible over multiple photocycles.

The effect is fully reversible over multiple photocycles.
Claim 62reversibilitysupports2012Source 1needs review

The light-dependent effect on LOV-PvuII fusion enzyme activity was fully reversible over multiple photocycles.

The effect is fully reversible over multiple photocycles.
Claim 63reversibilitysupports2012Source 1needs review

The light-dependent effect on LOV-PvuII fusion enzyme activity was fully reversible over multiple photocycles.

The effect is fully reversible over multiple photocycles.
Claim 64reversibilitysupports2012Source 1needs review

The light-dependent effect on LOV-PvuII fusion enzyme activity was fully reversible over multiple photocycles.

The effect is fully reversible over multiple photocycles.
Claim 65reversibilitysupports2012Source 1needs review

The light-dependent effect on LOV-PvuII fusion enzyme activity was fully reversible over multiple photocycles.

The effect is fully reversible over multiple photocycles.
Claim 66reversibilitysupports2012Source 1needs review

The light-dependent effect on LOV-PvuII fusion enzyme activity was fully reversible over multiple photocycles.

The effect is fully reversible over multiple photocycles.
Claim 67reversibilitysupports2012Source 1needs review

The light-dependent effect on LOV-PvuII fusion enzyme activity was fully reversible over multiple photocycles.

The effect is fully reversible over multiple photocycles.
Claim 68reversibilitysupports2012Source 1needs review

The light-dependent effect on LOV-PvuII fusion enzyme activity was fully reversible over multiple photocycles.

The effect is fully reversible over multiple photocycles.

Approval Evidence

1 source4 linked approval claimsfirst-pass slug lov-pvuii-fusion-enzyme
Here, we have fused the light-sensitive LOV2 domain from Avena sativa phototropin1 to the restriction enzyme PvuII to generate a genetically encoded, light-controllable endonuclease.

Source:

activity modulationsupports

Analyzed LOV-PvuII fusion variants showed a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity between blue-light illumination and dark conditions.

By analyzing several LOV-PvuII fusion enzymes, variants were obtained that show a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity, when illuminated with blue light or kept in the dark.

Source:

engineering resultsupports

Fusion of the Avena sativa phototropin1 LOV2 domain to PvuII generated a genetically encoded light-controllable endonuclease.

Here, we have fused the light-sensitive LOV2 domain from Avena sativa phototropin1 to the restriction enzyme PvuII to generate a genetically encoded, light-controllable endonuclease.

Source:

mechanistic behaviorsupports

LOV-PvuII variants displayed bidirectional polarity in photoactivation depending on the fusion interface, with increased DNA cleavage activity occurring either in the dark state or in the blue-light photoexcited state.

Depending on the particular fusion interface, the LOV-PvuII variants obtained had a bidirectional polarity in photoactivation; i.e., increased DNA cleavage activity was observed either in the dark state, with a compact folded LOV domain, or in the blue light photoexcitation state, when the LOV domain is partially unfolded.

Source:

reversibilitysupports

The light-dependent effect on LOV-PvuII fusion enzyme activity was fully reversible over multiple photocycles.

The effect is fully reversible over multiple photocycles.

Source:

Comparisons

Source-backed strengths

The reported fusion strategy successfully generated a light-controllable endonuclease from defined components, Avena sativa phototropin1 LOV2 and PvuII. Analyzed variants showed about a 3-fold difference in DNA cleavage activity between blue-light illumination and dark conditions, and the system supported bidirectional photoactivation polarity depending on fusion design.

Source:

Here, we have fused the light-sensitive LOV2 domain from Avena sativa phototropin1 to the restriction enzyme PvuII to generate a genetically encoded, light-controllable endonuclease.

LOV-PvuII fusion enzyme and GFP-PHR-caspase8/Flag-CIB1N-caspase8 address a similar problem space because they share recombination.

Shared frame: same top-level item type; shared target processes: recombination; shared mechanisms: photocleavage; same primary input modality: light

Compared with PA-Cre 3.0

LOV-PvuII fusion enzyme and PA-Cre 3.0 address a similar problem space because they share recombination.

Shared frame: same top-level item type; shared target processes: recombination; shared mechanisms: photocleavage; same primary input modality: light

Compared with photocaged IPTG

LOV-PvuII fusion enzyme and photocaged IPTG address a similar problem space because they share recombination.

Shared frame: same top-level item type; shared target processes: recombination; shared mechanisms: photocleavage; same primary input modality: light

Ranked Citations

  1. 1.
    StructuralSource 1Bioconjugate Chemistry2012Claim 17Claim 17Claim 3

    Extracted from this source document.