Source 1primary paper2025MED
Toolkit/magnetic resonance imaging
magnetic resonance imaging
Also known as: MRI
Taxonomy: Technique Branch / Method. Workflows sit above the mechanism and technique branches rather than replacing them.
Summary
This study aimed to correlate micro-CT and MRI images of the middle and caudal abdominal regions with corresponding anatomical sections in Syrian hamsters (SHs).
Usefulness & Problems
Why this is useful
MRI was used to image the middle and caudal abdominal regions of Syrian hamsters and correlate those images with anatomical sections. The abstract states that clinically relevant structures identified in sections were discernible on MRI scans.; cross-sectional abdominal imaging in Syrian hamsters; discernment of clinically relevant abdominal structures
Source:
MRI was used to image the middle and caudal abdominal regions of Syrian hamsters and correlate those images with anatomical sections. The abstract states that clinically relevant structures identified in sections were discernible on MRI scans.
Source:
cross-sectional abdominal imaging in Syrian hamsters
Source:
discernment of clinically relevant abdominal structures
Problem solved
It provides a reference for interpreting cross-sectional abdominal images in Syrian hamsters, addressing the lack of focused rodent abdominal sectional imaging studies noted in the abstract.; provides sectional imaging reference data for Syrian hamster abdomen
Source:
It provides a reference for interpreting cross-sectional abdominal images in Syrian hamsters, addressing the lack of focused rodent abdominal sectional imaging studies noted in the abstract.
Source:
provides sectional imaging reference data for Syrian hamster abdomen
Problem links
MRI is a non-optical imaging modality and therefore directly avoids the core bottleneck of photon scattering in tissue. The gap description explicitly includes noninvasive diagnostic imaging as a target, making MRI a plausible alternative access strategy for deep tissue.
provides sectional imaging reference data for Syrian hamster abdomen
LiteratureIt provides a reference for interpreting cross-sectional abdominal images in Syrian hamsters, addressing the lack of focused rodent abdominal sectional imaging studies noted in the abstract.
Source:
It provides a reference for interpreting cross-sectional abdominal images in Syrian hamsters, addressing the lack of focused rodent abdominal sectional imaging studies noted in the abstract.
Published Workflows
Objective: Correlate micro-CT and MRI images of the middle and caudal abdominal regions with corresponding anatomical sections in Syrian hamsters to create an imaging interpretation reference.
Why it works: The study compares frozen anatomical sections with corresponding micro-CT and MRI images so that structures identified anatomically can be recognized on imaging.
correlation of imaging planes with corresponding anatomical sectionsmicro-computed tomographymagnetic resonance imaginganatomical section comparison
Stages
- 1.Anatomical section generation and identification(functional_characterization)
This stage provides the anatomical reference against which imaging findings are correlated.
Selection: Identify clinically relevant abdominal structures in corresponding anatomical sections.
- 2.Micro-CT and MRI correlation with anatomical sections(confirmatory_validation)
This stage tests whether the imaging modalities can recover the structures established in anatomical sections and thereby support image interpretation.
Selection: Determine whether clinically relevant structures identified in anatomical sections are discernible on micro-CT and MRI scans.
Steps
- 1.Use healthy male Syrian hamsters and obtain frozen anatomical sections
Generate corresponding anatomical material for sectional comparison.
Anatomical sections are needed as the reference before or during correlation with imaging findings.
- 2.Compare corresponding micro-CT and MRI images with anatomical sectionsimaging modalities being correlated to anatomy
Assess whether clinically relevant structures seen in anatomy are discernible on imaging.
The comparison step follows availability of anatomical sections because those sections provide the reference for interpreting the scans.
Taxonomy & Function
Primary hierarchy
Technique Branch
Method: A concrete measurement method used to characterize an engineered system.
Techniques
Functional AssayTarget processes
diagnosticInput: Magnetic
Implementation Constraints
cofactor dependency: cofactor requirement unknownencoding mode: genetically encodedimplementation constraint: context specific validationoperating role: sensor
The study used healthy male Syrian hamsters and corresponding frozen anatomical sections for image correlation. The abstract does not specify MRI sequence details.; requires comparison to corresponding anatomical sections in Syrian hamsters as described in the study
The abstract does not establish modality-specific superiority, quantitative diagnostic accuracy, or applicability beyond the studied healthy male animals.; abstract does not provide acquisition parameters or modality-specific performance differences versus micro-CT
Validation
Cell-freeBacteriaMammalianMouseHumanTherapeuticIndep. Replication
Supporting Sources
Ranked Claims
Clinically relevant abdominal structures identified in anatomical sections were discernible on micro-CT and MRI scans in Syrian hamsters.
Clinically relevant structures identified in anatomical sections were discernible on MCT and MRI scans.
The study aimed to correlate micro-CT and MRI images of the middle and caudal abdominal regions with corresponding anatomical sections in Syrian hamsters.
This study aimed to correlate micro-CT and MRI images of the middle and caudal abdominal regions with corresponding anatomical sections in Syrian hamsters (SHs)
Micro-CT and MRI have diagnostic value in Syrian hamsters and provide a reference for interpreting cross-sectional abdominal images in this species.
This study highlights the diagnostic value of MCT and MRI in SHs and provides a valuable reference for interpreting cross-sectional abdominal images in SHs.
Approval Evidence
1 source3 linked approval claimsfirst-pass slug magnetic-resonance-imaging
This study aimed to correlate micro-CT and MRI images of the middle and caudal abdominal regions with corresponding anatomical sections in Syrian hamsters (SHs).
Source:
observabilitysupports
Clinically relevant abdominal structures identified in anatomical sections were discernible on micro-CT and MRI scans in Syrian hamsters.
Clinically relevant structures identified in anatomical sections were discernible on MCT and MRI scans.
Source:
study objectivesupports
The study aimed to correlate micro-CT and MRI images of the middle and caudal abdominal regions with corresponding anatomical sections in Syrian hamsters.
This study aimed to correlate micro-CT and MRI images of the middle and caudal abdominal regions with corresponding anatomical sections in Syrian hamsters (SHs)
Source:
utilitysupports
Micro-CT and MRI have diagnostic value in Syrian hamsters and provide a reference for interpreting cross-sectional abdominal images in this species.
This study highlights the diagnostic value of MCT and MRI in SHs and provides a valuable reference for interpreting cross-sectional abdominal images in SHs.
Source:
Comparisons
Source-stated alternatives
The paper directly uses MRI alongside micro-CT rather than as a standalone alternative. Comparative anatomical context is also drawn from studies in rats, mice, guinea pigs, and rabbits.
Source:
The paper directly uses MRI alongside micro-CT rather than as a standalone alternative. Comparative anatomical context is also drawn from studies in rats, mice, guinea pigs, and rabbits.
Source-backed strengths
clinically relevant structures identified in anatomical sections were discernible on scans
Source:
clinically relevant structures identified in anatomical sections were discernible on scans
Compared with micro-computed tomography
The paper directly uses MRI alongside micro-CT rather than as a standalone alternative. Comparative anatomical context is also drawn from studies in rats, mice, guinea pigs, and rabbits.
Shared frame: source-stated alternative in extracted literature
Strengths here: clinically relevant structures identified in anatomical sections were discernible on scans.
Relative tradeoffs: abstract does not provide acquisition parameters or modality-specific performance differences versus micro-CT.
Source:
The paper directly uses MRI alongside micro-CT rather than as a standalone alternative. Comparative anatomical context is also drawn from studies in rats, mice, guinea pigs, and rabbits.
Ranked Citations
- 1.