Toolkit/molecular dynamics simulation

molecular dynamics simulation

Computational Method·Research·Since 2017

Also known as: MD, MD simulation, noninvasive molecular dynamics simulation technique

Taxonomy: Technique Branch / Method. Workflows sit above the mechanism and technique branches rather than replacing them.

Summary

Molecular dynamics simulation is a computational method for modeling atomistic conformational dynamics of proteins and analyzing residue fluctuations and vibrational behavior. In the cited studies, it was used as a noninvasive approach to validate dynamic behavior and to compare PAS-domain dynamics across functional groups.

Usefulness & Problems

Why this is useful

This method is useful for linking protein motion to biological function without perturbing the system experimentally. In the PAS-domain study, it enabled comparison of conserved-residue fluctuations and vibrational patterns across functional groups and supported inference of function-associated dynamic signatures.

Source:

the fluctuation of conserved residues in each biological function group was strongly correlated with the corresponding biological function

Source:

The result showed that the proteins with same function could be grouped by sequence similarity

Problem solved

It addresses the problem of characterizing protein structural dynamics and relating residue-level motion to functional divergence when static sequence or structure analysis alone is insufficient. The cited evidence specifically shows its use in distinguishing PAS functional groups by fluctuation and vibrational pattern differences.

Problem links

Many Molecules Can’t Easily Be Crystallized

Gap mapView gap

The gap explicitly calls for improved computational models to guide crystallization efforts, and molecular dynamics simulation is a directly relevant computational method for exploring molecular conformations and interactions. It could plausibly help generate hypotheses about structural states that influence crystal formation, even though crystallization-specific evidence is not provided.

Modeling Mechanical Systems is Hard

Gap mapView gap

This is a simulation method and therefore superficially relevant to modeling hard physical systems. But the supplied evidence is only for molecular-scale validation, not for complex mechanical systems or engineering-scale multiphysics models.

Taxonomy & Function

Implementation Constraints

cofactor dependency: cofactor requirement unknownencoding mode: genetically encodedimplementation constraint: context specific validationoperating role: builderswitch architecture: uncaging

The evidence indicates implementation as a noninvasive computational simulation technique applied to protein systems, including PAS domains and LOV-TAP. The supplied material does not specify software, force fields, hardware requirements, trajectory lengths, or input structure preparation details.

The supplied evidence is limited to computational analyses in PAS-domain proteins and a computer simulation study of LOV-TAP, with no direct evidence here for experimental benchmarking or broad cross-system validation. No quantitative details on simulation protocols, force fields, timescales, or predictive accuracy are provided in the supplied material.

Validation

Cell-freeBacteriaMammalianMouseHumanTherapeuticIndep. Replication

Supporting Sources

Ranked Claims

Claim 1conserved residue dynamicssupports2017Source 1needs review

Across the three PAS functional groups, residues conserved by sequence and structure analyses generally had lower fluctuation than other residues.

in all three functional groups, conserved amino acid residues identified by sequence and structure conservation analysis generally have a lower fluctuation than other residues
Claim 2conserved residue dynamicssupports2017Source 1needs review

Across the three PAS functional groups, residues conserved by sequence and structure analyses generally had lower fluctuation than other residues.

in all three functional groups, conserved amino acid residues identified by sequence and structure conservation analysis generally have a lower fluctuation than other residues
Claim 3conserved residue dynamicssupports2017Source 1needs review

Across the three PAS functional groups, residues conserved by sequence and structure analyses generally had lower fluctuation than other residues.

in all three functional groups, conserved amino acid residues identified by sequence and structure conservation analysis generally have a lower fluctuation than other residues
Claim 4conserved residue dynamicssupports2017Source 1needs review

Across the three PAS functional groups, residues conserved by sequence and structure analyses generally had lower fluctuation than other residues.

in all three functional groups, conserved amino acid residues identified by sequence and structure conservation analysis generally have a lower fluctuation than other residues
Claim 5conserved residue dynamicssupports2017Source 1needs review

Across the three PAS functional groups, residues conserved by sequence and structure analyses generally had lower fluctuation than other residues.

in all three functional groups, conserved amino acid residues identified by sequence and structure conservation analysis generally have a lower fluctuation than other residues
Claim 6conserved residue dynamicssupports2017Source 1needs review

Across the three PAS functional groups, residues conserved by sequence and structure analyses generally had lower fluctuation than other residues.

in all three functional groups, conserved amino acid residues identified by sequence and structure conservation analysis generally have a lower fluctuation than other residues
Claim 7conserved residue dynamicssupports2017Source 1needs review

Across the three PAS functional groups, residues conserved by sequence and structure analyses generally had lower fluctuation than other residues.

in all three functional groups, conserved amino acid residues identified by sequence and structure conservation analysis generally have a lower fluctuation than other residues
Claim 8conserved residue dynamicssupports2017Source 1needs review

Across the three PAS functional groups, residues conserved by sequence and structure analyses generally had lower fluctuation than other residues.

in all three functional groups, conserved amino acid residues identified by sequence and structure conservation analysis generally have a lower fluctuation than other residues
Claim 9conserved residue dynamicssupports2017Source 1needs review

Across the three PAS functional groups, residues conserved by sequence and structure analyses generally had lower fluctuation than other residues.

in all three functional groups, conserved amino acid residues identified by sequence and structure conservation analysis generally have a lower fluctuation than other residues
Claim 10conserved residue dynamicssupports2017Source 1needs review

Across the three PAS functional groups, residues conserved by sequence and structure analyses generally had lower fluctuation than other residues.

in all three functional groups, conserved amino acid residues identified by sequence and structure conservation analysis generally have a lower fluctuation than other residues
Claim 11dynamics difference across functional groupssupports2017Source 1needs review

Different PAS functional groups displayed statistically significant differences in vibrational patterns.

proteins in different functional groups displayed statistically significant difference in their vibrational patterns
Claim 12dynamics difference across functional groupssupports2017Source 1needs review

Different PAS functional groups displayed statistically significant differences in vibrational patterns.

proteins in different functional groups displayed statistically significant difference in their vibrational patterns
Claim 13dynamics difference across functional groupssupports2017Source 1needs review

Different PAS functional groups displayed statistically significant differences in vibrational patterns.

proteins in different functional groups displayed statistically significant difference in their vibrational patterns
Claim 14dynamics difference across functional groupssupports2017Source 1needs review

Different PAS functional groups displayed statistically significant differences in vibrational patterns.

proteins in different functional groups displayed statistically significant difference in their vibrational patterns
Claim 15dynamics difference across functional groupssupports2017Source 1needs review

Different PAS functional groups displayed statistically significant differences in vibrational patterns.

proteins in different functional groups displayed statistically significant difference in their vibrational patterns
Claim 16dynamics difference across functional groupssupports2017Source 1needs review

Different PAS functional groups displayed statistically significant differences in vibrational patterns.

proteins in different functional groups displayed statistically significant difference in their vibrational patterns
Claim 17dynamics difference across functional groupssupports2017Source 1needs review

Different PAS functional groups displayed statistically significant differences in vibrational patterns.

proteins in different functional groups displayed statistically significant difference in their vibrational patterns
Claim 18dynamics difference across functional groupssupports2017Source 1needs review

Different PAS functional groups displayed statistically significant differences in vibrational patterns.

proteins in different functional groups displayed statistically significant difference in their vibrational patterns
Claim 19dynamics difference across functional groupssupports2017Source 1needs review

Different PAS functional groups displayed statistically significant differences in vibrational patterns.

proteins in different functional groups displayed statistically significant difference in their vibrational patterns
Claim 20dynamics difference across functional groupssupports2017Source 1needs review

Different PAS functional groups displayed statistically significant differences in vibrational patterns.

proteins in different functional groups displayed statistically significant difference in their vibrational patterns
Claim 21functional groupingsupports2017Source 1needs review

Within the PAS domain superfamily, proteins with the same function could be grouped by sequence similarity.

The result showed that the proteins with same function could be grouped by sequence similarity
Claim 22functional groupingsupports2017Source 1needs review

Within the PAS domain superfamily, proteins with the same function could be grouped by sequence similarity.

The result showed that the proteins with same function could be grouped by sequence similarity
Claim 23functional groupingsupports2017Source 1needs review

Within the PAS domain superfamily, proteins with the same function could be grouped by sequence similarity.

The result showed that the proteins with same function could be grouped by sequence similarity
Claim 24functional groupingsupports2017Source 1needs review

Within the PAS domain superfamily, proteins with the same function could be grouped by sequence similarity.

The result showed that the proteins with same function could be grouped by sequence similarity
Claim 25functional groupingsupports2017Source 1needs review

Within the PAS domain superfamily, proteins with the same function could be grouped by sequence similarity.

The result showed that the proteins with same function could be grouped by sequence similarity
Claim 26functional groupingsupports2017Source 1needs review

Within the PAS domain superfamily, proteins with the same function could be grouped by sequence similarity.

The result showed that the proteins with same function could be grouped by sequence similarity
Claim 27functional groupingsupports2017Source 1needs review

Within the PAS domain superfamily, proteins with the same function could be grouped by sequence similarity.

The result showed that the proteins with same function could be grouped by sequence similarity
Claim 28functional groupingsupports2017Source 1needs review

Within the PAS domain superfamily, proteins with the same function could be grouped by sequence similarity.

The result showed that the proteins with same function could be grouped by sequence similarity
Claim 29functional groupingsupports2017Source 1needs review

Within the PAS domain superfamily, proteins with the same function could be grouped by sequence similarity.

The result showed that the proteins with same function could be grouped by sequence similarity
Claim 30functional groupingsupports2017Source 1needs review

Within the PAS domain superfamily, proteins with the same function could be grouped by sequence similarity.

The result showed that the proteins with same function could be grouped by sequence similarity
Claim 31function dynamics correlationsupports2017Source 1needs review

In each PAS biological function group, fluctuation of conserved residues was strongly correlated with the corresponding biological function.

the fluctuation of conserved residues in each biological function group was strongly correlated with the corresponding biological function
Claim 32function dynamics correlationsupports2017Source 1needs review

In each PAS biological function group, fluctuation of conserved residues was strongly correlated with the corresponding biological function.

the fluctuation of conserved residues in each biological function group was strongly correlated with the corresponding biological function
Claim 33function dynamics correlationsupports2017Source 1needs review

In each PAS biological function group, fluctuation of conserved residues was strongly correlated with the corresponding biological function.

the fluctuation of conserved residues in each biological function group was strongly correlated with the corresponding biological function
Claim 34function dynamics correlationsupports2017Source 1needs review

In each PAS biological function group, fluctuation of conserved residues was strongly correlated with the corresponding biological function.

the fluctuation of conserved residues in each biological function group was strongly correlated with the corresponding biological function
Claim 35function dynamics correlationsupports2017Source 1needs review

In each PAS biological function group, fluctuation of conserved residues was strongly correlated with the corresponding biological function.

the fluctuation of conserved residues in each biological function group was strongly correlated with the corresponding biological function
Claim 36function dynamics correlationsupports2017Source 1needs review

In each PAS biological function group, fluctuation of conserved residues was strongly correlated with the corresponding biological function.

the fluctuation of conserved residues in each biological function group was strongly correlated with the corresponding biological function
Claim 37function dynamics correlationsupports2017Source 1needs review

In each PAS biological function group, fluctuation of conserved residues was strongly correlated with the corresponding biological function.

the fluctuation of conserved residues in each biological function group was strongly correlated with the corresponding biological function
Claim 38function dynamics correlationsupports2017Source 1needs review

In each PAS biological function group, fluctuation of conserved residues was strongly correlated with the corresponding biological function.

the fluctuation of conserved residues in each biological function group was strongly correlated with the corresponding biological function
Claim 39function dynamics correlationsupports2017Source 1needs review

In each PAS biological function group, fluctuation of conserved residues was strongly correlated with the corresponding biological function.

the fluctuation of conserved residues in each biological function group was strongly correlated with the corresponding biological function
Claim 40function dynamics correlationsupports2017Source 1needs review

In each PAS biological function group, fluctuation of conserved residues was strongly correlated with the corresponding biological function.

the fluctuation of conserved residues in each biological function group was strongly correlated with the corresponding biological function
Claim 41sequence structure dynamics function connectionsupports2017Source 1needs review

The study suggests a direct connection in which protein sequences are related to functions through structural dynamics.

This research suggested a direct connection in which the protein sequences were related to various functions through structural dynamics
Claim 42sequence structure dynamics function connectionsupports2017Source 1needs review

The study suggests a direct connection in which protein sequences are related to functions through structural dynamics.

This research suggested a direct connection in which the protein sequences were related to various functions through structural dynamics
Claim 43sequence structure dynamics function connectionsupports2017Source 1needs review

The study suggests a direct connection in which protein sequences are related to functions through structural dynamics.

This research suggested a direct connection in which the protein sequences were related to various functions through structural dynamics
Claim 44sequence structure dynamics function connectionsupports2017Source 1needs review

The study suggests a direct connection in which protein sequences are related to functions through structural dynamics.

This research suggested a direct connection in which the protein sequences were related to various functions through structural dynamics
Claim 45sequence structure dynamics function connectionsupports2017Source 1needs review

The study suggests a direct connection in which protein sequences are related to functions through structural dynamics.

This research suggested a direct connection in which the protein sequences were related to various functions through structural dynamics
Claim 46sequence structure dynamics function connectionsupports2017Source 1needs review

The study suggests a direct connection in which protein sequences are related to functions through structural dynamics.

This research suggested a direct connection in which the protein sequences were related to various functions through structural dynamics
Claim 47sequence structure dynamics function connectionsupports2017Source 1needs review

The study suggests a direct connection in which protein sequences are related to functions through structural dynamics.

This research suggested a direct connection in which the protein sequences were related to various functions through structural dynamics
Claim 48sequence structure dynamics function connectionsupports2017Source 1needs review

The study suggests a direct connection in which protein sequences are related to functions through structural dynamics.

This research suggested a direct connection in which the protein sequences were related to various functions through structural dynamics
Claim 49sequence structure dynamics function connectionsupports2017Source 1needs review

The study suggests a direct connection in which protein sequences are related to functions through structural dynamics.

This research suggested a direct connection in which the protein sequences were related to various functions through structural dynamics
Claim 50sequence structure dynamics function connectionsupports2017Source 1needs review

The study suggests a direct connection in which protein sequences are related to functions through structural dynamics.

This research suggested a direct connection in which the protein sequences were related to various functions through structural dynamics
Claim 51sequence structure dynamics function connectionsupports2017Source 1needs review

The study suggests a direct connection in which protein sequences are related to functions through structural dynamics.

This research suggested a direct connection in which the protein sequences were related to various functions through structural dynamics
Claim 52sequence structure dynamics function connectionsupports2017Source 1needs review

The study suggests a direct connection in which protein sequences are related to functions through structural dynamics.

This research suggested a direct connection in which the protein sequences were related to various functions through structural dynamics
Claim 53sequence structure dynamics function connectionsupports2017Source 1needs review

The study suggests a direct connection in which protein sequences are related to functions through structural dynamics.

This research suggested a direct connection in which the protein sequences were related to various functions through structural dynamics
Claim 54sequence structure dynamics function connectionsupports2017Source 1needs review

The study suggests a direct connection in which protein sequences are related to functions through structural dynamics.

This research suggested a direct connection in which the protein sequences were related to various functions through structural dynamics
Claim 55sequence structure dynamics function connectionsupports2017Source 1needs review

The study suggests a direct connection in which protein sequences are related to functions through structural dynamics.

This research suggested a direct connection in which the protein sequences were related to various functions through structural dynamics
Claim 56sequence structure dynamics function connectionsupports2017Source 1needs review

The study suggests a direct connection in which protein sequences are related to functions through structural dynamics.

This research suggested a direct connection in which the protein sequences were related to various functions through structural dynamics
Claim 57sequence structure dynamics function connectionsupports2017Source 1needs review

The study suggests a direct connection in which protein sequences are related to functions through structural dynamics.

This research suggested a direct connection in which the protein sequences were related to various functions through structural dynamics
Claim 58compositionsupports2012Source 2needs review

LOV-TAP is an artificial protein construct in which AsLOV2-Jα is ligated to TrpR.

the artificial protein construct light-oxygen-voltage (LOV)-tryptophan-activated protein (TAP), in which the LOV-2-Jα photoswitch of phototropin1 from Avena sativa (AsLOV2-Jα) has been ligated to the tryptophan-repressor (TrpR) protein from Escherichia coli
Claim 59compositionsupports2012Source 2needs review

LOV-TAP is an artificial protein construct in which AsLOV2-Jα is ligated to TrpR.

the artificial protein construct light-oxygen-voltage (LOV)-tryptophan-activated protein (TAP), in which the LOV-2-Jα photoswitch of phototropin1 from Avena sativa (AsLOV2-Jα) has been ligated to the tryptophan-repressor (TrpR) protein from Escherichia coli
Claim 60compositionsupports2012Source 2needs review

LOV-TAP is an artificial protein construct in which AsLOV2-Jα is ligated to TrpR.

the artificial protein construct light-oxygen-voltage (LOV)-tryptophan-activated protein (TAP), in which the LOV-2-Jα photoswitch of phototropin1 from Avena sativa (AsLOV2-Jα) has been ligated to the tryptophan-repressor (TrpR) protein from Escherichia coli
Claim 61compositionsupports2012Source 2needs review

LOV-TAP is an artificial protein construct in which AsLOV2-Jα is ligated to TrpR.

the artificial protein construct light-oxygen-voltage (LOV)-tryptophan-activated protein (TAP), in which the LOV-2-Jα photoswitch of phototropin1 from Avena sativa (AsLOV2-Jα) has been ligated to the tryptophan-repressor (TrpR) protein from Escherichia coli
Claim 62compositionsupports2012Source 2needs review

LOV-TAP is an artificial protein construct in which AsLOV2-Jα is ligated to TrpR.

the artificial protein construct light-oxygen-voltage (LOV)-tryptophan-activated protein (TAP), in which the LOV-2-Jα photoswitch of phototropin1 from Avena sativa (AsLOV2-Jα) has been ligated to the tryptophan-repressor (TrpR) protein from Escherichia coli
Claim 63compositionsupports2012Source 2needs review

LOV-TAP is an artificial protein construct in which AsLOV2-Jα is ligated to TrpR.

the artificial protein construct light-oxygen-voltage (LOV)-tryptophan-activated protein (TAP), in which the LOV-2-Jα photoswitch of phototropin1 from Avena sativa (AsLOV2-Jα) has been ligated to the tryptophan-repressor (TrpR) protein from Escherichia coli
Claim 64compositionsupports2012Source 2needs review

LOV-TAP is an artificial protein construct in which AsLOV2-Jα is ligated to TrpR.

the artificial protein construct light-oxygen-voltage (LOV)-tryptophan-activated protein (TAP), in which the LOV-2-Jα photoswitch of phototropin1 from Avena sativa (AsLOV2-Jα) has been ligated to the tryptophan-repressor (TrpR) protein from Escherichia coli
Claim 65compositionsupports2012Source 2needs review

LOV-TAP is an artificial protein construct in which AsLOV2-Jα is ligated to TrpR.

the artificial protein construct light-oxygen-voltage (LOV)-tryptophan-activated protein (TAP), in which the LOV-2-Jα photoswitch of phototropin1 from Avena sativa (AsLOV2-Jα) has been ligated to the tryptophan-repressor (TrpR) protein from Escherichia coli
Claim 66compositionsupports2012Source 2needs review

LOV-TAP is an artificial protein construct in which AsLOV2-Jα is ligated to TrpR.

the artificial protein construct light-oxygen-voltage (LOV)-tryptophan-activated protein (TAP), in which the LOV-2-Jα photoswitch of phototropin1 from Avena sativa (AsLOV2-Jα) has been ligated to the tryptophan-repressor (TrpR) protein from Escherichia coli
Claim 67compositionsupports2012Source 2needs review

LOV-TAP is an artificial protein construct in which AsLOV2-Jα is ligated to TrpR.

the artificial protein construct light-oxygen-voltage (LOV)-tryptophan-activated protein (TAP), in which the LOV-2-Jα photoswitch of phototropin1 from Avena sativa (AsLOV2-Jα) has been ligated to the tryptophan-repressor (TrpR) protein from Escherichia coli
Claim 68mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

After photoexcitation, Cys450-FMN adduct formation in the AsLOV2-Jα binding pocket induces cleavage of the peripheral Jα-helix from the LOV core.

Cys450-FMN-adduct formation in the AsLOV2-Jα-binding pocket after photoexcitation induces the cleavage of the peripheral Jα-helix from the LOV core
Claim 69mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

After photoexcitation, Cys450-FMN adduct formation in the AsLOV2-Jα binding pocket induces cleavage of the peripheral Jα-helix from the LOV core.

Cys450-FMN-adduct formation in the AsLOV2-Jα-binding pocket after photoexcitation induces the cleavage of the peripheral Jα-helix from the LOV core
Claim 70mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

After photoexcitation, Cys450-FMN adduct formation in the AsLOV2-Jα binding pocket induces cleavage of the peripheral Jα-helix from the LOV core.

Cys450-FMN-adduct formation in the AsLOV2-Jα-binding pocket after photoexcitation induces the cleavage of the peripheral Jα-helix from the LOV core
Claim 71mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

After photoexcitation, Cys450-FMN adduct formation in the AsLOV2-Jα binding pocket induces cleavage of the peripheral Jα-helix from the LOV core.

Cys450-FMN-adduct formation in the AsLOV2-Jα-binding pocket after photoexcitation induces the cleavage of the peripheral Jα-helix from the LOV core
Claim 72mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

After photoexcitation, Cys450-FMN adduct formation in the AsLOV2-Jα binding pocket induces cleavage of the peripheral Jα-helix from the LOV core.

Cys450-FMN-adduct formation in the AsLOV2-Jα-binding pocket after photoexcitation induces the cleavage of the peripheral Jα-helix from the LOV core
Claim 73mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

After photoexcitation, Cys450-FMN adduct formation in the AsLOV2-Jα binding pocket induces cleavage of the peripheral Jα-helix from the LOV core.

Cys450-FMN-adduct formation in the AsLOV2-Jα-binding pocket after photoexcitation induces the cleavage of the peripheral Jα-helix from the LOV core
Claim 74mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

After photoexcitation, Cys450-FMN adduct formation in the AsLOV2-Jα binding pocket induces cleavage of the peripheral Jα-helix from the LOV core.

Cys450-FMN-adduct formation in the AsLOV2-Jα-binding pocket after photoexcitation induces the cleavage of the peripheral Jα-helix from the LOV core
Claim 75mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

After photoexcitation, Cys450-FMN adduct formation in the AsLOV2-Jα binding pocket induces cleavage of the peripheral Jα-helix from the LOV core.

Cys450-FMN-adduct formation in the AsLOV2-Jα-binding pocket after photoexcitation induces the cleavage of the peripheral Jα-helix from the LOV core
Claim 76mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

After photoexcitation, Cys450-FMN adduct formation in the AsLOV2-Jα binding pocket induces cleavage of the peripheral Jα-helix from the LOV core.

Cys450-FMN-adduct formation in the AsLOV2-Jα-binding pocket after photoexcitation induces the cleavage of the peripheral Jα-helix from the LOV core
Claim 77mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

After photoexcitation, Cys450-FMN adduct formation in the AsLOV2-Jα binding pocket induces cleavage of the peripheral Jα-helix from the LOV core.

Cys450-FMN-adduct formation in the AsLOV2-Jα-binding pocket after photoexcitation induces the cleavage of the peripheral Jα-helix from the LOV core
Claim 78mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

In the dark state, the AsLOV2-Jα photoswitch exerts a repulsive electrostatic force on the DNA surface, leading to distortion of the hairpin region and disruption of LOV-TAP from DNA.

in the dark state the AsLOV2-Jα photoswitch remains inactive and exerts a repulsive electrostatic force on the DNA surface. This leads to a distortion of the hairpin region, which finally relieves its tension by causing the disruption of LOV-TAP from the DNA.
Claim 79mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

In the dark state, the AsLOV2-Jα photoswitch exerts a repulsive electrostatic force on the DNA surface, leading to distortion of the hairpin region and disruption of LOV-TAP from DNA.

in the dark state the AsLOV2-Jα photoswitch remains inactive and exerts a repulsive electrostatic force on the DNA surface. This leads to a distortion of the hairpin region, which finally relieves its tension by causing the disruption of LOV-TAP from the DNA.
Claim 80mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

In the dark state, the AsLOV2-Jα photoswitch exerts a repulsive electrostatic force on the DNA surface, leading to distortion of the hairpin region and disruption of LOV-TAP from DNA.

in the dark state the AsLOV2-Jα photoswitch remains inactive and exerts a repulsive electrostatic force on the DNA surface. This leads to a distortion of the hairpin region, which finally relieves its tension by causing the disruption of LOV-TAP from the DNA.
Claim 81mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

In the dark state, the AsLOV2-Jα photoswitch exerts a repulsive electrostatic force on the DNA surface, leading to distortion of the hairpin region and disruption of LOV-TAP from DNA.

in the dark state the AsLOV2-Jα photoswitch remains inactive and exerts a repulsive electrostatic force on the DNA surface. This leads to a distortion of the hairpin region, which finally relieves its tension by causing the disruption of LOV-TAP from the DNA.
Claim 82mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

In the dark state, the AsLOV2-Jα photoswitch exerts a repulsive electrostatic force on the DNA surface, leading to distortion of the hairpin region and disruption of LOV-TAP from DNA.

in the dark state the AsLOV2-Jα photoswitch remains inactive and exerts a repulsive electrostatic force on the DNA surface. This leads to a distortion of the hairpin region, which finally relieves its tension by causing the disruption of LOV-TAP from the DNA.
Claim 83mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

In the dark state, the AsLOV2-Jα photoswitch exerts a repulsive electrostatic force on the DNA surface, leading to distortion of the hairpin region and disruption of LOV-TAP from DNA.

in the dark state the AsLOV2-Jα photoswitch remains inactive and exerts a repulsive electrostatic force on the DNA surface. This leads to a distortion of the hairpin region, which finally relieves its tension by causing the disruption of LOV-TAP from the DNA.
Claim 84mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

In the dark state, the AsLOV2-Jα photoswitch exerts a repulsive electrostatic force on the DNA surface, leading to distortion of the hairpin region and disruption of LOV-TAP from DNA.

in the dark state the AsLOV2-Jα photoswitch remains inactive and exerts a repulsive electrostatic force on the DNA surface. This leads to a distortion of the hairpin region, which finally relieves its tension by causing the disruption of LOV-TAP from the DNA.
Claim 85mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

In the dark state, the AsLOV2-Jα photoswitch exerts a repulsive electrostatic force on the DNA surface, leading to distortion of the hairpin region and disruption of LOV-TAP from DNA.

in the dark state the AsLOV2-Jα photoswitch remains inactive and exerts a repulsive electrostatic force on the DNA surface. This leads to a distortion of the hairpin region, which finally relieves its tension by causing the disruption of LOV-TAP from the DNA.
Claim 86mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

In the dark state, the AsLOV2-Jα photoswitch exerts a repulsive electrostatic force on the DNA surface, leading to distortion of the hairpin region and disruption of LOV-TAP from DNA.

in the dark state the AsLOV2-Jα photoswitch remains inactive and exerts a repulsive electrostatic force on the DNA surface. This leads to a distortion of the hairpin region, which finally relieves its tension by causing the disruption of LOV-TAP from the DNA.
Claim 87mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

In the dark state, the AsLOV2-Jα photoswitch exerts a repulsive electrostatic force on the DNA surface, leading to distortion of the hairpin region and disruption of LOV-TAP from DNA.

in the dark state the AsLOV2-Jα photoswitch remains inactive and exerts a repulsive electrostatic force on the DNA surface. This leads to a distortion of the hairpin region, which finally relieves its tension by causing the disruption of LOV-TAP from the DNA.
Claim 88mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

Light activation changes the polarity of the LOV photoswitch and promotes electrostatic attraction of LOV-TAP onto the DNA surface.

causing a change of its polarity and electrostatic attraction of the photoswitch onto the DNA surface
Claim 89mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

Light activation changes the polarity of the LOV photoswitch and promotes electrostatic attraction of LOV-TAP onto the DNA surface.

causing a change of its polarity and electrostatic attraction of the photoswitch onto the DNA surface
Claim 90mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

Light activation changes the polarity of the LOV photoswitch and promotes electrostatic attraction of LOV-TAP onto the DNA surface.

causing a change of its polarity and electrostatic attraction of the photoswitch onto the DNA surface
Claim 91mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

Light activation changes the polarity of the LOV photoswitch and promotes electrostatic attraction of LOV-TAP onto the DNA surface.

causing a change of its polarity and electrostatic attraction of the photoswitch onto the DNA surface
Claim 92mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

Light activation changes the polarity of the LOV photoswitch and promotes electrostatic attraction of LOV-TAP onto the DNA surface.

causing a change of its polarity and electrostatic attraction of the photoswitch onto the DNA surface
Claim 93mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

Light activation changes the polarity of the LOV photoswitch and promotes electrostatic attraction of LOV-TAP onto the DNA surface.

causing a change of its polarity and electrostatic attraction of the photoswitch onto the DNA surface
Claim 94mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

Light activation changes the polarity of the LOV photoswitch and promotes electrostatic attraction of LOV-TAP onto the DNA surface.

causing a change of its polarity and electrostatic attraction of the photoswitch onto the DNA surface
Claim 95mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

Light activation changes the polarity of the LOV photoswitch and promotes electrostatic attraction of LOV-TAP onto the DNA surface.

causing a change of its polarity and electrostatic attraction of the photoswitch onto the DNA surface
Claim 96mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

Light activation changes the polarity of the LOV photoswitch and promotes electrostatic attraction of LOV-TAP onto the DNA surface.

causing a change of its polarity and electrostatic attraction of the photoswitch onto the DNA surface
Claim 97mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

Light activation changes the polarity of the LOV photoswitch and promotes electrostatic attraction of LOV-TAP onto the DNA surface.

causing a change of its polarity and electrostatic attraction of the photoswitch onto the DNA surface
Claim 98mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

Unfolding and flexibilization of the interdomain hairpin-like helix-loop-helix region enables condensation of LOV-TAP onto the DNA surface.

This goes along with the flexibilization through unfolding of a hairpin-like helix-loop-helix region interlinking the AsLOV2-Jα- and TrpR-domains, ultimately enabling the condensation of LOV-TAP onto the DNA surface.
Claim 99mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

Unfolding and flexibilization of the interdomain hairpin-like helix-loop-helix region enables condensation of LOV-TAP onto the DNA surface.

This goes along with the flexibilization through unfolding of a hairpin-like helix-loop-helix region interlinking the AsLOV2-Jα- and TrpR-domains, ultimately enabling the condensation of LOV-TAP onto the DNA surface.
Claim 100mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

Unfolding and flexibilization of the interdomain hairpin-like helix-loop-helix region enables condensation of LOV-TAP onto the DNA surface.

This goes along with the flexibilization through unfolding of a hairpin-like helix-loop-helix region interlinking the AsLOV2-Jα- and TrpR-domains, ultimately enabling the condensation of LOV-TAP onto the DNA surface.
Claim 101mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

Unfolding and flexibilization of the interdomain hairpin-like helix-loop-helix region enables condensation of LOV-TAP onto the DNA surface.

This goes along with the flexibilization through unfolding of a hairpin-like helix-loop-helix region interlinking the AsLOV2-Jα- and TrpR-domains, ultimately enabling the condensation of LOV-TAP onto the DNA surface.
Claim 102mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

Unfolding and flexibilization of the interdomain hairpin-like helix-loop-helix region enables condensation of LOV-TAP onto the DNA surface.

This goes along with the flexibilization through unfolding of a hairpin-like helix-loop-helix region interlinking the AsLOV2-Jα- and TrpR-domains, ultimately enabling the condensation of LOV-TAP onto the DNA surface.
Claim 103mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

Unfolding and flexibilization of the interdomain hairpin-like helix-loop-helix region enables condensation of LOV-TAP onto the DNA surface.

This goes along with the flexibilization through unfolding of a hairpin-like helix-loop-helix region interlinking the AsLOV2-Jα- and TrpR-domains, ultimately enabling the condensation of LOV-TAP onto the DNA surface.
Claim 104mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

Unfolding and flexibilization of the interdomain hairpin-like helix-loop-helix region enables condensation of LOV-TAP onto the DNA surface.

This goes along with the flexibilization through unfolding of a hairpin-like helix-loop-helix region interlinking the AsLOV2-Jα- and TrpR-domains, ultimately enabling the condensation of LOV-TAP onto the DNA surface.
Claim 105mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

Unfolding and flexibilization of the interdomain hairpin-like helix-loop-helix region enables condensation of LOV-TAP onto the DNA surface.

This goes along with the flexibilization through unfolding of a hairpin-like helix-loop-helix region interlinking the AsLOV2-Jα- and TrpR-domains, ultimately enabling the condensation of LOV-TAP onto the DNA surface.
Claim 106mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

Unfolding and flexibilization of the interdomain hairpin-like helix-loop-helix region enables condensation of LOV-TAP onto the DNA surface.

This goes along with the flexibilization through unfolding of a hairpin-like helix-loop-helix region interlinking the AsLOV2-Jα- and TrpR-domains, ultimately enabling the condensation of LOV-TAP onto the DNA surface.
Claim 107mechanismsupports2012Source 2needs review

Unfolding and flexibilization of the interdomain hairpin-like helix-loop-helix region enables condensation of LOV-TAP onto the DNA surface.

This goes along with the flexibilization through unfolding of a hairpin-like helix-loop-helix region interlinking the AsLOV2-Jα- and TrpR-domains, ultimately enabling the condensation of LOV-TAP onto the DNA surface.

Approval Evidence

2 sources1 linked approval claimfirst-pass slug molecular-dynamics-simulation
validated by molecular dynamics (MD) simulation

Source:

using the noninvasive molecular dynamics simulation technique

Source:

sequence structure dynamics function connectionsupports

The study suggests a direct connection in which protein sequences are related to functions through structural dynamics.

This research suggested a direct connection in which the protein sequences were related to various functions through structural dynamics

Source:

Comparisons

Source-backed strengths

The cited literature supports that MD can detect lower fluctuations in residues conserved by sequence and structure analyses and identify statistically significant differences in vibrational patterns among PAS functional groups. It also supported a strong correlation between conserved-residue fluctuation and biological function within each PAS function group.

molecular dynamics simulation and free-energy calculations address a similar problem space.

Shared frame: same top-level item type

Strengths here: appears more independently replicated; looks easier to implement in practice.

Compared with mathematical model

molecular dynamics simulation and mathematical model address a similar problem space.

Shared frame: same top-level item type

Strengths here: appears more independently replicated; looks easier to implement in practice.

Compared with SwiftLib

molecular dynamics simulation and SwiftLib address a similar problem space.

Shared frame: same top-level item type

Strengths here: appears more independently replicated; looks easier to implement in practice.

Ranked Citations

  1. 1.
    StructuralSource 1Protein Science2017Claim 7Claim 10Claim 7

    Extracted from this source document.

  2. 2.
    StructuralSource 2Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics2012Claim 67Claim 65Claim 65

    Extracted from this source document.