Toolkit/nf-core/crisprseq
nf-core/crisprseq
Also known as: nf-core/crisprseq pipeline
Taxonomy: Technique Branch / Method. Workflows sit above the mechanism and technique branches rather than replacing them.
Summary
Here, we introduce nf-core/crisprseq, a Nextflow DSL2 pipeline for the assessment of CRISPR gene editing and screening assays. The workflow is written in a modularized fashion to allow the easy incorporation of new steps.
Usefulness & Problems
No literature-backed usefulness or problem-fit explainer has been materialized for this record yet.
Published Workflows
Objective: Provide a generic, modular computational workflow for assessment of CRISPR gene editing and screening assays across a broad spectrum of CRISPR designs.
Why it works: The abstract states that the workflow is modularized to allow easy incorporation of new steps, which is presented as enabling generic analysis across a broad spectrum of CRISPR designs.
Taxonomy & Function
Primary hierarchy
Technique Branch
Method: A concrete computational method used to design, rank, or analyze an engineered system.
Mechanisms
No mechanism tags yet.
Target processes
editingrecombinationselectionValidation
Supporting Sources
Ranked Claims
nf-core/crisprseq is presented as the first generic pipeline enabling analysis of a broad spectrum of CRISPR designs.
The workflow is modularized to allow easy incorporation of new steps.
The paper introduces nf-core/crisprseq as a Nextflow DSL2 pipeline for assessment of CRISPR gene editing and screening assays.
Approval Evidence
Here, we introduce nf-core/crisprseq, a Nextflow DSL2 pipeline for the assessment of CRISPR gene editing and screening assays. The workflow is written in a modularized fashion to allow the easy incorporation of new steps.
Source:
nf-core/crisprseq is presented as the first generic pipeline enabling analysis of a broad spectrum of CRISPR designs.
Source:
The workflow is modularized to allow easy incorporation of new steps.
Source:
The paper introduces nf-core/crisprseq as a Nextflow DSL2 pipeline for assessment of CRISPR gene editing and screening assays.
Source:
Comparisons
No literature-backed comparison notes have been materialized for this record yet.
Ranked Citations
- 1.