Toolkit/oligomerizing CRY2 component

oligomerizing CRY2 component

Construct Pattern·Research·Since 2016

Taxonomy: Mechanism Branch / Architecture. Workflows sit above the mechanism and technique branches rather than replacing them.

Summary

The oligomerizing CRY2 component is a modified CRY2-based optogenetic construct tested in Drosophila melanogaster as a tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins. The available evidence indicates that it was evaluated in the context of adapting CRY2/CIB optogenetic components to Drosophila-specific constructs.

Usefulness & Problems

Why this is useful

This construct is useful as a light-responsive module for perturbing protein function in Drosophila. The cited work specifically positions the oligomerizing CRY2 variant as a candidate tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins, potentially enabling temporal and spatial control when integrated into CRY2/CIB-based designs.

Problem solved

It addresses the problem of achieving optogenetic negative regulation of specific proteins in Drosophila. More specifically, the source describes efforts to adapt the CRY2/CIB system into Drosophila-specific vectors, indicating a need for organism-compatible light-controlled protein regulation tools.

Taxonomy & Function

Primary hierarchy

Mechanism Branch

Architecture: A reusable architecture pattern for arranging parts into an engineered system.

Techniques

No technique tags yet.

Target processes

No target processes tagged yet.

Implementation Constraints

cofactor dependency: cofactor requirement unknownencoding mode: genetically encodedimplementation constraint: context specific validationoperating role: actuatorswitch architecture: recruitment

The source indicates that CRY2 and CIB constructs were adapted into Drosophila-specific vectors, which is the main practical implementation detail available. Blue light is implicated in CRY2/CIB control in the same study context, and fusion of target proteins to CRY2 is discussed, but the exact design of the oligomerizing CRY2 construct is not described in the provided evidence.

The evidence does not report quantitative data on light response, reversibility, dynamic range, kinetics, or target specificity for this construct. It also does not identify the exact CRY2 variant, fusion architecture, illumination parameters, or the targeted proteins used for negative regulation.

Validation

Cell-freeBacteriaMammalianMouseHumanTherapeuticIndep. Replication

Supporting Sources

Ranked Claims

Claim 1engineering activitysupports2016Source 1needs review

The authors attempted to adapt the CRY2/CIB system to Drosophila using CRY2 and CIB constructs in Drosophila-specific vectors.

Using cloning techniques to generate CRY2 and CIB constructs in Drosophila specific vectors, we have attempted to adapt the CRY2/CIB system to Drosophila.
Claim 2engineering activitysupports2016Source 1needs review

The authors attempted to adapt the CRY2/CIB system to Drosophila using CRY2 and CIB constructs in Drosophila-specific vectors.

Using cloning techniques to generate CRY2 and CIB constructs in Drosophila specific vectors, we have attempted to adapt the CRY2/CIB system to Drosophila.
Claim 3engineering activitysupports2016Source 1needs review

The authors attempted to adapt the CRY2/CIB system to Drosophila using CRY2 and CIB constructs in Drosophila-specific vectors.

Using cloning techniques to generate CRY2 and CIB constructs in Drosophila specific vectors, we have attempted to adapt the CRY2/CIB system to Drosophila.
Claim 4engineering activitysupports2016Source 1needs review

The authors attempted to adapt the CRY2/CIB system to Drosophila using CRY2 and CIB constructs in Drosophila-specific vectors.

Using cloning techniques to generate CRY2 and CIB constructs in Drosophila specific vectors, we have attempted to adapt the CRY2/CIB system to Drosophila.
Claim 5engineering activitysupports2016Source 1needs review

The authors attempted to adapt the CRY2/CIB system to Drosophila using CRY2 and CIB constructs in Drosophila-specific vectors.

Using cloning techniques to generate CRY2 and CIB constructs in Drosophila specific vectors, we have attempted to adapt the CRY2/CIB system to Drosophila.
Claim 6engineering activitysupports2016Source 1needs review

The authors attempted to adapt the CRY2/CIB system to Drosophila using CRY2 and CIB constructs in Drosophila-specific vectors.

Using cloning techniques to generate CRY2 and CIB constructs in Drosophila specific vectors, we have attempted to adapt the CRY2/CIB system to Drosophila.
Claim 7engineering activitysupports2016Source 1needs review

The authors attempted to adapt the CRY2/CIB system to Drosophila using CRY2 and CIB constructs in Drosophila-specific vectors.

Using cloning techniques to generate CRY2 and CIB constructs in Drosophila specific vectors, we have attempted to adapt the CRY2/CIB system to Drosophila.
Claim 8engineering activitysupports2016Source 1needs review

The authors attempted to adapt the CRY2/CIB system to Drosophila using CRY2 and CIB constructs in Drosophila-specific vectors.

Using cloning techniques to generate CRY2 and CIB constructs in Drosophila specific vectors, we have attempted to adapt the CRY2/CIB system to Drosophila.
Claim 9engineering activitysupports2016Source 1needs review

The authors attempted to adapt the CRY2/CIB system to Drosophila using CRY2 and CIB constructs in Drosophila-specific vectors.

Using cloning techniques to generate CRY2 and CIB constructs in Drosophila specific vectors, we have attempted to adapt the CRY2/CIB system to Drosophila.
Claim 10engineering activitysupports2016Source 1needs review

The authors attempted to adapt the CRY2/CIB system to Drosophila using CRY2 and CIB constructs in Drosophila-specific vectors.

Using cloning techniques to generate CRY2 and CIB constructs in Drosophila specific vectors, we have attempted to adapt the CRY2/CIB system to Drosophila.
Claim 11intended functionsupports2016Source 1needs review

An oligomerizing version of CRY2 was tested as a tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

We tested an oligomerizing version of the CRY2 component as a tool for the negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.
Claim 12intended functionsupports2016Source 1needs review

An oligomerizing version of CRY2 was tested as a tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

We tested an oligomerizing version of the CRY2 component as a tool for the negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.
Claim 13intended functionsupports2016Source 1needs review

An oligomerizing version of CRY2 was tested as a tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

We tested an oligomerizing version of the CRY2 component as a tool for the negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.
Claim 14intended functionsupports2016Source 1needs review

An oligomerizing version of CRY2 was tested as a tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

We tested an oligomerizing version of the CRY2 component as a tool for the negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.
Claim 15intended functionsupports2016Source 1needs review

An oligomerizing version of CRY2 was tested as a tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

We tested an oligomerizing version of the CRY2 component as a tool for the negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.
Claim 16intended functionsupports2016Source 1needs review

An oligomerizing version of CRY2 was tested as a tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

We tested an oligomerizing version of the CRY2 component as a tool for the negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.
Claim 17intended functionsupports2016Source 1needs review

An oligomerizing version of CRY2 was tested as a tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

We tested an oligomerizing version of the CRY2 component as a tool for the negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.
Claim 18intended functionsupports2016Source 1needs review

An oligomerizing version of CRY2 was tested as a tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

We tested an oligomerizing version of the CRY2 component as a tool for the negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.
Claim 19intended functionsupports2016Source 1needs review

An oligomerizing version of CRY2 was tested as a tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

We tested an oligomerizing version of the CRY2 component as a tool for the negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.
Claim 20intended functionsupports2016Source 1needs review

An oligomerizing version of CRY2 was tested as a tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

We tested an oligomerizing version of the CRY2 component as a tool for the negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.
Claim 21intended functionsupports2016Source 1needs review

An oligomerizing version of CRY2 was tested as a tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

We tested an oligomerizing version of the CRY2 component as a tool for the negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.
Claim 22intended functionsupports2016Source 1needs review

An oligomerizing version of CRY2 was tested as a tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

We tested an oligomerizing version of the CRY2 component as a tool for the negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.
Claim 23intended functionsupports2016Source 1needs review

An oligomerizing version of CRY2 was tested as a tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

We tested an oligomerizing version of the CRY2 component as a tool for the negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.
Claim 24intended functionsupports2016Source 1needs review

An oligomerizing version of CRY2 was tested as a tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

We tested an oligomerizing version of the CRY2 component as a tool for the negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.
Claim 25intended functionsupports2016Source 1needs review

An oligomerizing version of CRY2 was tested as a tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

We tested an oligomerizing version of the CRY2 component as a tool for the negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.
Claim 26intended functionsupports2016Source 1needs review

An oligomerizing version of CRY2 was tested as a tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

We tested an oligomerizing version of the CRY2 component as a tool for the negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.
Claim 27intended functionsupports2016Source 1needs review

An oligomerizing version of CRY2 was tested as a tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

We tested an oligomerizing version of the CRY2 component as a tool for the negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.
Claim 28intended functionsupports2016Source 1needs review

An oligomerizing version of CRY2 was tested as a tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

We tested an oligomerizing version of the CRY2 component as a tool for the negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.
Claim 29intended functionsupports2016Source 1needs review

An oligomerizing version of CRY2 was tested as a tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

We tested an oligomerizing version of the CRY2 component as a tool for the negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.
Claim 30intended functionsupports2016Source 1needs review

An oligomerizing version of CRY2 was tested as a tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

We tested an oligomerizing version of the CRY2 component as a tool for the negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.
Claim 31intended functionsupports2016Source 1needs review

An oligomerizing version of CRY2 was tested as a tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

We tested an oligomerizing version of the CRY2 component as a tool for the negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.
Claim 32intended functionsupports2016Source 1needs review

An oligomerizing version of CRY2 was tested as a tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

We tested an oligomerizing version of the CRY2 component as a tool for the negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.
Claim 33intended functionsupports2016Source 1needs review

An oligomerizing version of CRY2 was tested as a tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

We tested an oligomerizing version of the CRY2 component as a tool for the negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.
Claim 34intended functionsupports2016Source 1needs review

An oligomerizing version of CRY2 was tested as a tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

We tested an oligomerizing version of the CRY2 component as a tool for the negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.
Claim 35intended functionsupports2016Source 1needs review

An oligomerizing version of CRY2 was tested as a tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

We tested an oligomerizing version of the CRY2 component as a tool for the negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.
Claim 36intended functionsupports2016Source 1needs review

An oligomerizing version of CRY2 was tested as a tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

We tested an oligomerizing version of the CRY2 component as a tool for the negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.
Claim 37intended functionsupports2016Source 1needs review

An oligomerizing version of CRY2 was tested as a tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

We tested an oligomerizing version of the CRY2 component as a tool for the negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.
Claim 38intended functionneutral2016Source 1needs review

If Rho1 is successfully fused to CRY2, blue light could spatially and temporally control recruitment of CRY2 to membrane-anchored CIB and thereby affect downstream events.

If Drosophila Rho1 proteins are successfully adapted to CRY2 components, upon blue light stimulation the recruitment of CRY2 to a CIB component anchored in the membrane could be spatially and temporally controlled to affect subsequent downstream events.
Claim 39intended functionneutral2016Source 1needs review

If Rho1 is successfully fused to CRY2, blue light could spatially and temporally control recruitment of CRY2 to membrane-anchored CIB and thereby affect downstream events.

If Drosophila Rho1 proteins are successfully adapted to CRY2 components, upon blue light stimulation the recruitment of CRY2 to a CIB component anchored in the membrane could be spatially and temporally controlled to affect subsequent downstream events.
Claim 40intended functionneutral2016Source 1needs review

If Rho1 is successfully fused to CRY2, blue light could spatially and temporally control recruitment of CRY2 to membrane-anchored CIB and thereby affect downstream events.

If Drosophila Rho1 proteins are successfully adapted to CRY2 components, upon blue light stimulation the recruitment of CRY2 to a CIB component anchored in the membrane could be spatially and temporally controlled to affect subsequent downstream events.
Claim 41intended functionneutral2016Source 1needs review

If Rho1 is successfully fused to CRY2, blue light could spatially and temporally control recruitment of CRY2 to membrane-anchored CIB and thereby affect downstream events.

If Drosophila Rho1 proteins are successfully adapted to CRY2 components, upon blue light stimulation the recruitment of CRY2 to a CIB component anchored in the membrane could be spatially and temporally controlled to affect subsequent downstream events.
Claim 42intended functionneutral2016Source 1needs review

If Rho1 is successfully fused to CRY2, blue light could spatially and temporally control recruitment of CRY2 to membrane-anchored CIB and thereby affect downstream events.

If Drosophila Rho1 proteins are successfully adapted to CRY2 components, upon blue light stimulation the recruitment of CRY2 to a CIB component anchored in the membrane could be spatially and temporally controlled to affect subsequent downstream events.
Claim 43intended functionneutral2016Source 1needs review

If Rho1 is successfully fused to CRY2, blue light could spatially and temporally control recruitment of CRY2 to membrane-anchored CIB and thereby affect downstream events.

If Drosophila Rho1 proteins are successfully adapted to CRY2 components, upon blue light stimulation the recruitment of CRY2 to a CIB component anchored in the membrane could be spatially and temporally controlled to affect subsequent downstream events.
Claim 44intended functionneutral2016Source 1needs review

If Rho1 is successfully fused to CRY2, blue light could spatially and temporally control recruitment of CRY2 to membrane-anchored CIB and thereby affect downstream events.

If Drosophila Rho1 proteins are successfully adapted to CRY2 components, upon blue light stimulation the recruitment of CRY2 to a CIB component anchored in the membrane could be spatially and temporally controlled to affect subsequent downstream events.
Claim 45intended functionneutral2016Source 1needs review

If Rho1 is successfully fused to CRY2, blue light could spatially and temporally control recruitment of CRY2 to membrane-anchored CIB and thereby affect downstream events.

If Drosophila Rho1 proteins are successfully adapted to CRY2 components, upon blue light stimulation the recruitment of CRY2 to a CIB component anchored in the membrane could be spatially and temporally controlled to affect subsequent downstream events.
Claim 46intended functionneutral2016Source 1needs review

If Rho1 is successfully fused to CRY2, blue light could spatially and temporally control recruitment of CRY2 to membrane-anchored CIB and thereby affect downstream events.

If Drosophila Rho1 proteins are successfully adapted to CRY2 components, upon blue light stimulation the recruitment of CRY2 to a CIB component anchored in the membrane could be spatially and temporally controlled to affect subsequent downstream events.
Claim 47intended functionneutral2016Source 1needs review

If Rho1 is successfully fused to CRY2, blue light could spatially and temporally control recruitment of CRY2 to membrane-anchored CIB and thereby affect downstream events.

If Drosophila Rho1 proteins are successfully adapted to CRY2 components, upon blue light stimulation the recruitment of CRY2 to a CIB component anchored in the membrane could be spatially and temporally controlled to affect subsequent downstream events.
Claim 48intended functionneutral2016Source 1needs review

If Rho1 is successfully fused to CRY2, blue light could spatially and temporally control recruitment of CRY2 to membrane-anchored CIB and thereby affect downstream events.

If Drosophila Rho1 proteins are successfully adapted to CRY2 components, upon blue light stimulation the recruitment of CRY2 to a CIB component anchored in the membrane could be spatially and temporally controlled to affect subsequent downstream events.
Claim 49intended functionneutral2016Source 1needs review

If Rho1 is successfully fused to CRY2, blue light could spatially and temporally control recruitment of CRY2 to membrane-anchored CIB and thereby affect downstream events.

If Drosophila Rho1 proteins are successfully adapted to CRY2 components, upon blue light stimulation the recruitment of CRY2 to a CIB component anchored in the membrane could be spatially and temporally controlled to affect subsequent downstream events.
Claim 50intended functionneutral2016Source 1needs review

If Rho1 is successfully fused to CRY2, blue light could spatially and temporally control recruitment of CRY2 to membrane-anchored CIB and thereby affect downstream events.

If Drosophila Rho1 proteins are successfully adapted to CRY2 components, upon blue light stimulation the recruitment of CRY2 to a CIB component anchored in the membrane could be spatially and temporally controlled to affect subsequent downstream events.
Claim 51intended functionneutral2016Source 1needs review

If Rho1 is successfully fused to CRY2, blue light could spatially and temporally control recruitment of CRY2 to membrane-anchored CIB and thereby affect downstream events.

If Drosophila Rho1 proteins are successfully adapted to CRY2 components, upon blue light stimulation the recruitment of CRY2 to a CIB component anchored in the membrane could be spatially and temporally controlled to affect subsequent downstream events.
Claim 52intended functionneutral2016Source 1needs review

If Rho1 is successfully fused to CRY2, blue light could spatially and temporally control recruitment of CRY2 to membrane-anchored CIB and thereby affect downstream events.

If Drosophila Rho1 proteins are successfully adapted to CRY2 components, upon blue light stimulation the recruitment of CRY2 to a CIB component anchored in the membrane could be spatially and temporally controlled to affect subsequent downstream events.
Claim 53intended functionneutral2016Source 1needs review

If Rho1 is successfully fused to CRY2, blue light could spatially and temporally control recruitment of CRY2 to membrane-anchored CIB and thereby affect downstream events.

If Drosophila Rho1 proteins are successfully adapted to CRY2 components, upon blue light stimulation the recruitment of CRY2 to a CIB component anchored in the membrane could be spatially and temporally controlled to affect subsequent downstream events.
Claim 54intended functionneutral2016Source 1needs review

If Rho1 is successfully fused to CRY2, blue light could spatially and temporally control recruitment of CRY2 to membrane-anchored CIB and thereby affect downstream events.

If Drosophila Rho1 proteins are successfully adapted to CRY2 components, upon blue light stimulation the recruitment of CRY2 to a CIB component anchored in the membrane could be spatially and temporally controlled to affect subsequent downstream events.
Claim 55intended functionneutral2016Source 1needs review

If Rho1 is successfully fused to CRY2, blue light could spatially and temporally control recruitment of CRY2 to membrane-anchored CIB and thereby affect downstream events.

If Drosophila Rho1 proteins are successfully adapted to CRY2 components, upon blue light stimulation the recruitment of CRY2 to a CIB component anchored in the membrane could be spatially and temporally controlled to affect subsequent downstream events.
Claim 56intended functionneutral2016Source 1needs review

If Rho1 is successfully fused to CRY2, blue light could spatially and temporally control recruitment of CRY2 to membrane-anchored CIB and thereby affect downstream events.

If Drosophila Rho1 proteins are successfully adapted to CRY2 components, upon blue light stimulation the recruitment of CRY2 to a CIB component anchored in the membrane could be spatially and temporally controlled to affect subsequent downstream events.
Claim 57intended functionneutral2016Source 1needs review

If Rho1 is successfully fused to CRY2, blue light could spatially and temporally control recruitment of CRY2 to membrane-anchored CIB and thereby affect downstream events.

If Drosophila Rho1 proteins are successfully adapted to CRY2 components, upon blue light stimulation the recruitment of CRY2 to a CIB component anchored in the membrane could be spatially and temporally controlled to affect subsequent downstream events.
Claim 58negative resultcontradicts2016Source 1needs review

The authors were unable to repeat in Drosophila the clustering results previously observed in yeast for the oligomerizing CRY2 component.

Although we were unable to repeat the clustering results observed in yeast
Claim 59negative resultcontradicts2016Source 1needs review

The authors were unable to repeat in Drosophila the clustering results previously observed in yeast for the oligomerizing CRY2 component.

Although we were unable to repeat the clustering results observed in yeast
Claim 60negative resultcontradicts2016Source 1needs review

The authors were unable to repeat in Drosophila the clustering results previously observed in yeast for the oligomerizing CRY2 component.

Although we were unable to repeat the clustering results observed in yeast
Claim 61negative resultcontradicts2016Source 1needs review

The authors were unable to repeat in Drosophila the clustering results previously observed in yeast for the oligomerizing CRY2 component.

Although we were unable to repeat the clustering results observed in yeast
Claim 62negative resultcontradicts2016Source 1needs review

The authors were unable to repeat in Drosophila the clustering results previously observed in yeast for the oligomerizing CRY2 component.

Although we were unable to repeat the clustering results observed in yeast
Claim 63negative resultcontradicts2016Source 1needs review

The authors were unable to repeat in Drosophila the clustering results previously observed in yeast for the oligomerizing CRY2 component.

Although we were unable to repeat the clustering results observed in yeast
Claim 64negative resultcontradicts2016Source 1needs review

The authors were unable to repeat in Drosophila the clustering results previously observed in yeast for the oligomerizing CRY2 component.

Although we were unable to repeat the clustering results observed in yeast
Claim 65negative resultcontradicts2016Source 1needs review

The authors were unable to repeat in Drosophila the clustering results previously observed in yeast for the oligomerizing CRY2 component.

Although we were unable to repeat the clustering results observed in yeast
Claim 66negative resultcontradicts2016Source 1needs review

The authors were unable to repeat in Drosophila the clustering results previously observed in yeast for the oligomerizing CRY2 component.

Although we were unable to repeat the clustering results observed in yeast
Claim 67negative resultcontradicts2016Source 1needs review

The authors were unable to repeat in Drosophila the clustering results previously observed in yeast for the oligomerizing CRY2 component.

Although we were unable to repeat the clustering results observed in yeast
Claim 68negative resultcontradicts2016Source 1needs review

The authors were unable to repeat in Drosophila the clustering results previously observed in yeast for the oligomerizing CRY2 component.

Although we were unable to repeat the clustering results observed in yeast
Claim 69negative resultcontradicts2016Source 1needs review

The authors were unable to repeat in Drosophila the clustering results previously observed in yeast for the oligomerizing CRY2 component.

Although we were unable to repeat the clustering results observed in yeast
Claim 70negative resultcontradicts2016Source 1needs review

The authors were unable to repeat in Drosophila the clustering results previously observed in yeast for the oligomerizing CRY2 component.

Although we were unable to repeat the clustering results observed in yeast
Claim 71negative resultcontradicts2016Source 1needs review

The authors were unable to repeat in Drosophila the clustering results previously observed in yeast for the oligomerizing CRY2 component.

Although we were unable to repeat the clustering results observed in yeast
Claim 72negative resultcontradicts2016Source 1needs review

The authors were unable to repeat in Drosophila the clustering results previously observed in yeast for the oligomerizing CRY2 component.

Although we were unable to repeat the clustering results observed in yeast
Claim 73negative resultcontradicts2016Source 1needs review

The authors were unable to repeat in Drosophila the clustering results previously observed in yeast for the oligomerizing CRY2 component.

Although we were unable to repeat the clustering results observed in yeast
Claim 74negative resultcontradicts2016Source 1needs review

The authors were unable to repeat in Drosophila the clustering results previously observed in yeast for the oligomerizing CRY2 component.

Although we were unable to repeat the clustering results observed in yeast
Claim 75negative resultcontradicts2016Source 1needs review

The authors were unable to repeat in Drosophila the clustering results previously observed in yeast for the oligomerizing CRY2 component.

Although we were unable to repeat the clustering results observed in yeast
Claim 76negative resultcontradicts2016Source 1needs review

The authors were unable to repeat in Drosophila the clustering results previously observed in yeast for the oligomerizing CRY2 component.

Although we were unable to repeat the clustering results observed in yeast
Claim 77negative resultcontradicts2016Source 1needs review

The authors were unable to repeat in Drosophila the clustering results previously observed in yeast for the oligomerizing CRY2 component.

Although we were unable to repeat the clustering results observed in yeast
Claim 78negative resultcontradicts2016Source 1needs review

The authors were unable to repeat in Drosophila the clustering results previously observed in yeast for the oligomerizing CRY2 component.

Although we were unable to repeat the clustering results observed in yeast
Claim 79negative resultcontradicts2016Source 1needs review

The authors were unable to repeat in Drosophila the clustering results previously observed in yeast for the oligomerizing CRY2 component.

Although we were unable to repeat the clustering results observed in yeast
Claim 80negative resultcontradicts2016Source 1needs review

The authors were unable to repeat in Drosophila the clustering results previously observed in yeast for the oligomerizing CRY2 component.

Although we were unable to repeat the clustering results observed in yeast
Claim 81negative resultcontradicts2016Source 1needs review

The authors were unable to repeat in Drosophila the clustering results previously observed in yeast for the oligomerizing CRY2 component.

Although we were unable to repeat the clustering results observed in yeast
Claim 82negative resultcontradicts2016Source 1needs review

The authors were unable to repeat in Drosophila the clustering results previously observed in yeast for the oligomerizing CRY2 component.

Although we were unable to repeat the clustering results observed in yeast
Claim 83negative resultcontradicts2016Source 1needs review

The authors were unable to repeat in Drosophila the clustering results previously observed in yeast for the oligomerizing CRY2 component.

Although we were unable to repeat the clustering results observed in yeast
Claim 84negative resultcontradicts2016Source 1needs review

The authors were unable to repeat in Drosophila the clustering results previously observed in yeast for the oligomerizing CRY2 component.

Although we were unable to repeat the clustering results observed in yeast
Claim 85process observationsupports2016Source 1needs review

The light activation protocol was sensitive to inadvertent light stimulation during preparation for imaging.

discovered the sensitivity of the system to inadvertent light stimulation during preparation for imaging
Claim 86process observationsupports2016Source 1needs review

The light activation protocol was sensitive to inadvertent light stimulation during preparation for imaging.

discovered the sensitivity of the system to inadvertent light stimulation during preparation for imaging
Claim 87process observationsupports2016Source 1needs review

The light activation protocol was sensitive to inadvertent light stimulation during preparation for imaging.

discovered the sensitivity of the system to inadvertent light stimulation during preparation for imaging
Claim 88process observationsupports2016Source 1needs review

The light activation protocol was sensitive to inadvertent light stimulation during preparation for imaging.

discovered the sensitivity of the system to inadvertent light stimulation during preparation for imaging
Claim 89process observationsupports2016Source 1needs review

The light activation protocol was sensitive to inadvertent light stimulation during preparation for imaging.

discovered the sensitivity of the system to inadvertent light stimulation during preparation for imaging
Claim 90process observationsupports2016Source 1needs review

The light activation protocol was sensitive to inadvertent light stimulation during preparation for imaging.

discovered the sensitivity of the system to inadvertent light stimulation during preparation for imaging
Claim 91process observationsupports2016Source 1needs review

The light activation protocol was sensitive to inadvertent light stimulation during preparation for imaging.

discovered the sensitivity of the system to inadvertent light stimulation during preparation for imaging
Claim 92process observationsupports2016Source 1needs review

The light activation protocol was sensitive to inadvertent light stimulation during preparation for imaging.

discovered the sensitivity of the system to inadvertent light stimulation during preparation for imaging
Claim 93process observationsupports2016Source 1needs review

The light activation protocol was sensitive to inadvertent light stimulation during preparation for imaging.

discovered the sensitivity of the system to inadvertent light stimulation during preparation for imaging
Claim 94process observationsupports2016Source 1needs review

The light activation protocol was sensitive to inadvertent light stimulation during preparation for imaging.

discovered the sensitivity of the system to inadvertent light stimulation during preparation for imaging
Claim 95progress statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Germline transformants of the CIBN component had been generated, while CRY2 germline transformants were still in progress.

Thus far, germline transformants of the CIBN component have been generated, and work will continue to generate the CRY2 germline transformants.
Claim 96progress statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Germline transformants of the CIBN component had been generated, while CRY2 germline transformants were still in progress.

Thus far, germline transformants of the CIBN component have been generated, and work will continue to generate the CRY2 germline transformants.
Claim 97progress statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Germline transformants of the CIBN component had been generated, while CRY2 germline transformants were still in progress.

Thus far, germline transformants of the CIBN component have been generated, and work will continue to generate the CRY2 germline transformants.
Claim 98progress statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Germline transformants of the CIBN component had been generated, while CRY2 germline transformants were still in progress.

Thus far, germline transformants of the CIBN component have been generated, and work will continue to generate the CRY2 germline transformants.
Claim 99progress statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Germline transformants of the CIBN component had been generated, while CRY2 germline transformants were still in progress.

Thus far, germline transformants of the CIBN component have been generated, and work will continue to generate the CRY2 germline transformants.
Claim 100progress statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Germline transformants of the CIBN component had been generated, while CRY2 germline transformants were still in progress.

Thus far, germline transformants of the CIBN component have been generated, and work will continue to generate the CRY2 germline transformants.
Claim 101progress statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Germline transformants of the CIBN component had been generated, while CRY2 germline transformants were still in progress.

Thus far, germline transformants of the CIBN component have been generated, and work will continue to generate the CRY2 germline transformants.
Claim 102progress statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Germline transformants of the CIBN component had been generated, while CRY2 germline transformants were still in progress.

Thus far, germline transformants of the CIBN component have been generated, and work will continue to generate the CRY2 germline transformants.
Claim 103progress statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Germline transformants of the CIBN component had been generated, while CRY2 germline transformants were still in progress.

Thus far, germline transformants of the CIBN component have been generated, and work will continue to generate the CRY2 germline transformants.
Claim 104progress statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Germline transformants of the CIBN component had been generated, while CRY2 germline transformants were still in progress.

Thus far, germline transformants of the CIBN component have been generated, and work will continue to generate the CRY2 germline transformants.
Claim 105progress statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Germline transformants of the CIBN component had been generated, while CRY2 germline transformants were still in progress.

Thus far, germline transformants of the CIBN component have been generated, and work will continue to generate the CRY2 germline transformants.
Claim 106progress statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Germline transformants of the CIBN component had been generated, while CRY2 germline transformants were still in progress.

Thus far, germline transformants of the CIBN component have been generated, and work will continue to generate the CRY2 germline transformants.
Claim 107progress statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Germline transformants of the CIBN component had been generated, while CRY2 germline transformants were still in progress.

Thus far, germline transformants of the CIBN component have been generated, and work will continue to generate the CRY2 germline transformants.
Claim 108progress statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Germline transformants of the CIBN component had been generated, while CRY2 germline transformants were still in progress.

Thus far, germline transformants of the CIBN component have been generated, and work will continue to generate the CRY2 germline transformants.
Claim 109progress statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Germline transformants of the CIBN component had been generated, while CRY2 germline transformants were still in progress.

Thus far, germline transformants of the CIBN component have been generated, and work will continue to generate the CRY2 germline transformants.
Claim 110progress statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Germline transformants of the CIBN component had been generated, while CRY2 germline transformants were still in progress.

Thus far, germline transformants of the CIBN component have been generated, and work will continue to generate the CRY2 germline transformants.
Claim 111progress statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Germline transformants of the CIBN component had been generated, while CRY2 germline transformants were still in progress.

Thus far, germline transformants of the CIBN component have been generated, and work will continue to generate the CRY2 germline transformants.
Claim 112progress statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Germline transformants of the CIBN component had been generated, while CRY2 germline transformants were still in progress.

Thus far, germline transformants of the CIBN component have been generated, and work will continue to generate the CRY2 germline transformants.
Claim 113progress statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Germline transformants of the CIBN component had been generated, while CRY2 germline transformants were still in progress.

Thus far, germline transformants of the CIBN component have been generated, and work will continue to generate the CRY2 germline transformants.
Claim 114progress statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Germline transformants of the CIBN component had been generated, while CRY2 germline transformants were still in progress.

Thus far, germline transformants of the CIBN component have been generated, and work will continue to generate the CRY2 germline transformants.
Claim 115property statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Blue light stimuli can selectively initiate protein-protein interactions in genetically encoded light-sensitive protein systems.

using blue light stimuli to selectively initiate protein-protein interactions
Claim 116property statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Blue light stimuli can selectively initiate protein-protein interactions in genetically encoded light-sensitive protein systems.

using blue light stimuli to selectively initiate protein-protein interactions
Claim 117property statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Blue light stimuli can selectively initiate protein-protein interactions in genetically encoded light-sensitive protein systems.

using blue light stimuli to selectively initiate protein-protein interactions
Claim 118property statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Blue light stimuli can selectively initiate protein-protein interactions in genetically encoded light-sensitive protein systems.

using blue light stimuli to selectively initiate protein-protein interactions
Claim 119property statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Blue light stimuli can selectively initiate protein-protein interactions in genetically encoded light-sensitive protein systems.

using blue light stimuli to selectively initiate protein-protein interactions
Claim 120property statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Blue light stimuli can selectively initiate protein-protein interactions in genetically encoded light-sensitive protein systems.

using blue light stimuli to selectively initiate protein-protein interactions
Claim 121property statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Blue light stimuli can selectively initiate protein-protein interactions in genetically encoded light-sensitive protein systems.

using blue light stimuli to selectively initiate protein-protein interactions
Claim 122property statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Blue light stimuli can selectively initiate protein-protein interactions in genetically encoded light-sensitive protein systems.

using blue light stimuli to selectively initiate protein-protein interactions
Claim 123property statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Blue light stimuli can selectively initiate protein-protein interactions in genetically encoded light-sensitive protein systems.

using blue light stimuli to selectively initiate protein-protein interactions
Claim 124property statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Blue light stimuli can selectively initiate protein-protein interactions in genetically encoded light-sensitive protein systems.

using blue light stimuli to selectively initiate protein-protein interactions
Claim 125property statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

The CRY2/CIB module offers a genetically encoded mechanism to study protein roles in a tissue-specific manner during development.

the CRY2/CIB module, offers a powerful genetically encoded mechanism by which to study the role of proteins in a tissue-specific manner during various stages of development
Claim 126property statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

The CRY2/CIB module offers a genetically encoded mechanism to study protein roles in a tissue-specific manner during development.

the CRY2/CIB module, offers a powerful genetically encoded mechanism by which to study the role of proteins in a tissue-specific manner during various stages of development
Claim 127property statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

The CRY2/CIB module offers a genetically encoded mechanism to study protein roles in a tissue-specific manner during development.

the CRY2/CIB module, offers a powerful genetically encoded mechanism by which to study the role of proteins in a tissue-specific manner during various stages of development
Claim 128property statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

The CRY2/CIB module offers a genetically encoded mechanism to study protein roles in a tissue-specific manner during development.

the CRY2/CIB module, offers a powerful genetically encoded mechanism by which to study the role of proteins in a tissue-specific manner during various stages of development
Claim 129property statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

The CRY2/CIB module offers a genetically encoded mechanism to study protein roles in a tissue-specific manner during development.

the CRY2/CIB module, offers a powerful genetically encoded mechanism by which to study the role of proteins in a tissue-specific manner during various stages of development
Claim 130property statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

The CRY2/CIB module offers a genetically encoded mechanism to study protein roles in a tissue-specific manner during development.

the CRY2/CIB module, offers a powerful genetically encoded mechanism by which to study the role of proteins in a tissue-specific manner during various stages of development
Claim 131property statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

The CRY2/CIB module offers a genetically encoded mechanism to study protein roles in a tissue-specific manner during development.

the CRY2/CIB module, offers a powerful genetically encoded mechanism by which to study the role of proteins in a tissue-specific manner during various stages of development
Claim 132property statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

The CRY2/CIB module offers a genetically encoded mechanism to study protein roles in a tissue-specific manner during development.

the CRY2/CIB module, offers a powerful genetically encoded mechanism by which to study the role of proteins in a tissue-specific manner during various stages of development
Claim 133property statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

The CRY2/CIB module offers a genetically encoded mechanism to study protein roles in a tissue-specific manner during development.

the CRY2/CIB module, offers a powerful genetically encoded mechanism by which to study the role of proteins in a tissue-specific manner during various stages of development
Claim 134property statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

The CRY2/CIB module offers a genetically encoded mechanism to study protein roles in a tissue-specific manner during development.

the CRY2/CIB module, offers a powerful genetically encoded mechanism by which to study the role of proteins in a tissue-specific manner during various stages of development

Approval Evidence

1 source2 linked approval claimsfirst-pass slug oligomerizing-cry2-component
We tested an oligomerizing version of the CRY2 component as a tool for the negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

Source:

intended functionsupports

An oligomerizing version of CRY2 was tested as a tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

We tested an oligomerizing version of the CRY2 component as a tool for the negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

Source:

negative resultcontradicts

The authors were unable to repeat in Drosophila the clustering results previously observed in yeast for the oligomerizing CRY2 component.

Although we were unable to repeat the clustering results observed in yeast

Source:

Comparisons

Source-backed strengths

The main demonstrated strength is that an oligomerizing CRY2 version was tested in the Drosophila context rather than only proposed in principle. The broader source also supports compatibility of CRY2/CIB-based construct adaptation to Drosophila-specific vectors, but no quantitative performance metrics are provided for the oligomerizing variant itself.

Source:

Using cloning techniques to generate CRY2 and CIB constructs in Drosophila specific vectors, we have attempted to adapt the CRY2/CIB system to Drosophila.

oligomerizing CRY2 component and optogenetic Amyloid-b2 peptide address a similar problem space.

Shared frame: same top-level item type; shared mechanisms: oligomerization

Strengths here: looks easier to implement in practice.

oligomerizing CRY2 component and optogenetic zebrafish ALS model address a similar problem space.

Shared frame: same top-level item type; shared mechanisms: oligomerization

Strengths here: looks easier to implement in practice.

Compared with Q-PAS1

oligomerizing CRY2 component and Q-PAS1 address a similar problem space.

Shared frame: shared mechanisms: oligomerization

Ranked Citations

  1. 1.
    StructuralSource 1DukeSpace (Duke University)2016Claim 10Claim 10Claim 10

    Seeded from load plan for claim c5. Extracted from this source document.