Toolkit/oligomerizing CRY2 component

oligomerizing CRY2 component

Construct Pattern·Research·Since 2016

Taxonomy: Mechanism Branch / Architecture. Workflows sit above the mechanism and technique branches rather than replacing them.

Summary

The oligomerizing CRY2 component is a modified CRY2-based optogenetic construct tested in Drosophila melanogaster as a tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins. The available evidence indicates that it was evaluated in the context of adapting CRY2/CIB optogenetic components to Drosophila-specific constructs.

Usefulness & Problems

Why this is useful

This construct is useful as a light-responsive module for perturbing protein function in Drosophila. The cited work specifically positions the oligomerizing CRY2 variant as a candidate tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins, potentially enabling temporal and spatial control when integrated into CRY2/CIB-based designs.

Problem solved

It addresses the problem of achieving optogenetic negative regulation of specific proteins in Drosophila. More specifically, the source describes efforts to adapt the CRY2/CIB system into Drosophila-specific vectors, indicating a need for organism-compatible light-controlled protein regulation tools.

Taxonomy & Function

Primary hierarchy

Mechanism Branch

Architecture: A reusable architecture pattern for arranging parts into an engineered system.

Mechanisms

Oligomerization

Techniques

No technique tags yet.

Target processes

No target processes tagged yet.

Implementation Constraints

cofactor dependency: cofactor requirement unknownencoding mode: genetically encodedimplementation constraint: context specific validationoperating role: actuatorswitch architecture: recruitment

The source indicates that CRY2 and CIB constructs were adapted into Drosophila-specific vectors, which is the main practical implementation detail available. Blue light is implicated in CRY2/CIB control in the same study context, and fusion of target proteins to CRY2 is discussed, but the exact design of the oligomerizing CRY2 construct is not described in the provided evidence.

The evidence does not report quantitative data on light response, reversibility, dynamic range, kinetics, or target specificity for this construct. It also does not identify the exact CRY2 variant, fusion architecture, illumination parameters, or the targeted proteins used for negative regulation.

Validation

Cell-freeBacteriaMammalianMouseHumanTherapeuticIndep. Replication

Supporting Sources

Ranked Claims

Claim 1engineering activitysupports2016Source 1needs review

The authors attempted to adapt the CRY2/CIB system to Drosophila using CRY2 and CIB constructs in Drosophila-specific vectors.

Using cloning techniques to generate CRY2 and CIB constructs in Drosophila specific vectors, we have attempted to adapt the CRY2/CIB system to Drosophila.
Claim 2engineering activitysupports2016Source 1needs review

The authors attempted to adapt the CRY2/CIB system to Drosophila using CRY2 and CIB constructs in Drosophila-specific vectors.

Using cloning techniques to generate CRY2 and CIB constructs in Drosophila specific vectors, we have attempted to adapt the CRY2/CIB system to Drosophila.
Claim 3engineering activitysupports2016Source 1needs review

The authors attempted to adapt the CRY2/CIB system to Drosophila using CRY2 and CIB constructs in Drosophila-specific vectors.

Using cloning techniques to generate CRY2 and CIB constructs in Drosophila specific vectors, we have attempted to adapt the CRY2/CIB system to Drosophila.
Claim 4engineering activitysupports2016Source 1needs review

The authors attempted to adapt the CRY2/CIB system to Drosophila using CRY2 and CIB constructs in Drosophila-specific vectors.

Using cloning techniques to generate CRY2 and CIB constructs in Drosophila specific vectors, we have attempted to adapt the CRY2/CIB system to Drosophila.
Claim 5engineering activitysupports2016Source 1needs review

The authors attempted to adapt the CRY2/CIB system to Drosophila using CRY2 and CIB constructs in Drosophila-specific vectors.

Using cloning techniques to generate CRY2 and CIB constructs in Drosophila specific vectors, we have attempted to adapt the CRY2/CIB system to Drosophila.
Claim 6engineering activitysupports2016Source 1needs review

The authors attempted to adapt the CRY2/CIB system to Drosophila using CRY2 and CIB constructs in Drosophila-specific vectors.

Using cloning techniques to generate CRY2 and CIB constructs in Drosophila specific vectors, we have attempted to adapt the CRY2/CIB system to Drosophila.
Claim 7intended functionsupports2016Source 1needs review

An oligomerizing version of CRY2 was tested as a tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

We tested an oligomerizing version of the CRY2 component as a tool for the negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.
Claim 8intended functionsupports2016Source 1needs review

An oligomerizing version of CRY2 was tested as a tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

We tested an oligomerizing version of the CRY2 component as a tool for the negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.
Claim 9intended functionsupports2016Source 1needs review

An oligomerizing version of CRY2 was tested as a tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

We tested an oligomerizing version of the CRY2 component as a tool for the negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.
Claim 10intended functionsupports2016Source 1needs review

An oligomerizing version of CRY2 was tested as a tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

We tested an oligomerizing version of the CRY2 component as a tool for the negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.
Claim 11intended functionsupports2016Source 1needs review

An oligomerizing version of CRY2 was tested as a tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

We tested an oligomerizing version of the CRY2 component as a tool for the negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.
Claim 12intended functionsupports2016Source 1needs review

An oligomerizing version of CRY2 was tested as a tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

We tested an oligomerizing version of the CRY2 component as a tool for the negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.
Claim 13intended functionsupports2016Source 1needs review

An oligomerizing version of CRY2 was tested as a tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

We tested an oligomerizing version of the CRY2 component as a tool for the negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.
Claim 14intended functionneutral2016Source 1needs review

If Rho1 is successfully fused to CRY2, blue light could spatially and temporally control recruitment of CRY2 to membrane-anchored CIB and thereby affect downstream events.

If Drosophila Rho1 proteins are successfully adapted to CRY2 components, upon blue light stimulation the recruitment of CRY2 to a CIB component anchored in the membrane could be spatially and temporally controlled to affect subsequent downstream events.
Claim 15intended functionneutral2016Source 1needs review

If Rho1 is successfully fused to CRY2, blue light could spatially and temporally control recruitment of CRY2 to membrane-anchored CIB and thereby affect downstream events.

If Drosophila Rho1 proteins are successfully adapted to CRY2 components, upon blue light stimulation the recruitment of CRY2 to a CIB component anchored in the membrane could be spatially and temporally controlled to affect subsequent downstream events.
Claim 16intended functionneutral2016Source 1needs review

If Rho1 is successfully fused to CRY2, blue light could spatially and temporally control recruitment of CRY2 to membrane-anchored CIB and thereby affect downstream events.

If Drosophila Rho1 proteins are successfully adapted to CRY2 components, upon blue light stimulation the recruitment of CRY2 to a CIB component anchored in the membrane could be spatially and temporally controlled to affect subsequent downstream events.
Claim 17intended functionneutral2016Source 1needs review

If Rho1 is successfully fused to CRY2, blue light could spatially and temporally control recruitment of CRY2 to membrane-anchored CIB and thereby affect downstream events.

If Drosophila Rho1 proteins are successfully adapted to CRY2 components, upon blue light stimulation the recruitment of CRY2 to a CIB component anchored in the membrane could be spatially and temporally controlled to affect subsequent downstream events.
Claim 18intended functionneutral2016Source 1needs review

If Rho1 is successfully fused to CRY2, blue light could spatially and temporally control recruitment of CRY2 to membrane-anchored CIB and thereby affect downstream events.

If Drosophila Rho1 proteins are successfully adapted to CRY2 components, upon blue light stimulation the recruitment of CRY2 to a CIB component anchored in the membrane could be spatially and temporally controlled to affect subsequent downstream events.
Claim 19intended functionneutral2016Source 1needs review

If Rho1 is successfully fused to CRY2, blue light could spatially and temporally control recruitment of CRY2 to membrane-anchored CIB and thereby affect downstream events.

If Drosophila Rho1 proteins are successfully adapted to CRY2 components, upon blue light stimulation the recruitment of CRY2 to a CIB component anchored in the membrane could be spatially and temporally controlled to affect subsequent downstream events.
Claim 20intended functionneutral2016Source 1needs review

If Rho1 is successfully fused to CRY2, blue light could spatially and temporally control recruitment of CRY2 to membrane-anchored CIB and thereby affect downstream events.

If Drosophila Rho1 proteins are successfully adapted to CRY2 components, upon blue light stimulation the recruitment of CRY2 to a CIB component anchored in the membrane could be spatially and temporally controlled to affect subsequent downstream events.
Claim 21negative resultcontradicts2016Source 1needs review

The authors were unable to repeat in Drosophila the clustering results previously observed in yeast for the oligomerizing CRY2 component.

Although we were unable to repeat the clustering results observed in yeast
Claim 22negative resultcontradicts2016Source 1needs review

The authors were unable to repeat in Drosophila the clustering results previously observed in yeast for the oligomerizing CRY2 component.

Although we were unable to repeat the clustering results observed in yeast
Claim 23negative resultcontradicts2016Source 1needs review

The authors were unable to repeat in Drosophila the clustering results previously observed in yeast for the oligomerizing CRY2 component.

Although we were unable to repeat the clustering results observed in yeast
Claim 24negative resultcontradicts2016Source 1needs review

The authors were unable to repeat in Drosophila the clustering results previously observed in yeast for the oligomerizing CRY2 component.

Although we were unable to repeat the clustering results observed in yeast
Claim 25negative resultcontradicts2016Source 1needs review

The authors were unable to repeat in Drosophila the clustering results previously observed in yeast for the oligomerizing CRY2 component.

Although we were unable to repeat the clustering results observed in yeast
Claim 26negative resultcontradicts2016Source 1needs review

The authors were unable to repeat in Drosophila the clustering results previously observed in yeast for the oligomerizing CRY2 component.

Although we were unable to repeat the clustering results observed in yeast
Claim 27negative resultcontradicts2016Source 1needs review

The authors were unable to repeat in Drosophila the clustering results previously observed in yeast for the oligomerizing CRY2 component.

Although we were unable to repeat the clustering results observed in yeast
Claim 28process observationsupports2016Source 1needs review

The light activation protocol was sensitive to inadvertent light stimulation during preparation for imaging.

discovered the sensitivity of the system to inadvertent light stimulation during preparation for imaging
Claim 29process observationsupports2016Source 1needs review

The light activation protocol was sensitive to inadvertent light stimulation during preparation for imaging.

discovered the sensitivity of the system to inadvertent light stimulation during preparation for imaging
Claim 30process observationsupports2016Source 1needs review

The light activation protocol was sensitive to inadvertent light stimulation during preparation for imaging.

discovered the sensitivity of the system to inadvertent light stimulation during preparation for imaging
Claim 31process observationsupports2016Source 1needs review

The light activation protocol was sensitive to inadvertent light stimulation during preparation for imaging.

discovered the sensitivity of the system to inadvertent light stimulation during preparation for imaging
Claim 32process observationsupports2016Source 1needs review

The light activation protocol was sensitive to inadvertent light stimulation during preparation for imaging.

discovered the sensitivity of the system to inadvertent light stimulation during preparation for imaging
Claim 33process observationsupports2016Source 1needs review

The light activation protocol was sensitive to inadvertent light stimulation during preparation for imaging.

discovered the sensitivity of the system to inadvertent light stimulation during preparation for imaging
Claim 34progress statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Germline transformants of the CIBN component had been generated, while CRY2 germline transformants were still in progress.

Thus far, germline transformants of the CIBN component have been generated, and work will continue to generate the CRY2 germline transformants.
Claim 35progress statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Germline transformants of the CIBN component had been generated, while CRY2 germline transformants were still in progress.

Thus far, germline transformants of the CIBN component have been generated, and work will continue to generate the CRY2 germline transformants.
Claim 36progress statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Germline transformants of the CIBN component had been generated, while CRY2 germline transformants were still in progress.

Thus far, germline transformants of the CIBN component have been generated, and work will continue to generate the CRY2 germline transformants.
Claim 37progress statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Germline transformants of the CIBN component had been generated, while CRY2 germline transformants were still in progress.

Thus far, germline transformants of the CIBN component have been generated, and work will continue to generate the CRY2 germline transformants.
Claim 38progress statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Germline transformants of the CIBN component had been generated, while CRY2 germline transformants were still in progress.

Thus far, germline transformants of the CIBN component have been generated, and work will continue to generate the CRY2 germline transformants.
Claim 39progress statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Germline transformants of the CIBN component had been generated, while CRY2 germline transformants were still in progress.

Thus far, germline transformants of the CIBN component have been generated, and work will continue to generate the CRY2 germline transformants.
Claim 40progress statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Germline transformants of the CIBN component had been generated, while CRY2 germline transformants were still in progress.

Thus far, germline transformants of the CIBN component have been generated, and work will continue to generate the CRY2 germline transformants.
Claim 41property statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Blue light stimuli can selectively initiate protein-protein interactions in genetically encoded light-sensitive protein systems.

using blue light stimuli to selectively initiate protein-protein interactions
Claim 42property statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Blue light stimuli can selectively initiate protein-protein interactions in genetically encoded light-sensitive protein systems.

using blue light stimuli to selectively initiate protein-protein interactions
Claim 43property statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Blue light stimuli can selectively initiate protein-protein interactions in genetically encoded light-sensitive protein systems.

using blue light stimuli to selectively initiate protein-protein interactions
Claim 44property statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Blue light stimuli can selectively initiate protein-protein interactions in genetically encoded light-sensitive protein systems.

using blue light stimuli to selectively initiate protein-protein interactions
Claim 45property statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Blue light stimuli can selectively initiate protein-protein interactions in genetically encoded light-sensitive protein systems.

using blue light stimuli to selectively initiate protein-protein interactions
Claim 46property statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

Blue light stimuli can selectively initiate protein-protein interactions in genetically encoded light-sensitive protein systems.

using blue light stimuli to selectively initiate protein-protein interactions
Claim 47property statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

The CRY2/CIB module offers a genetically encoded mechanism to study protein roles in a tissue-specific manner during development.

the CRY2/CIB module, offers a powerful genetically encoded mechanism by which to study the role of proteins in a tissue-specific manner during various stages of development
Claim 48property statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

The CRY2/CIB module offers a genetically encoded mechanism to study protein roles in a tissue-specific manner during development.

the CRY2/CIB module, offers a powerful genetically encoded mechanism by which to study the role of proteins in a tissue-specific manner during various stages of development
Claim 49property statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

The CRY2/CIB module offers a genetically encoded mechanism to study protein roles in a tissue-specific manner during development.

the CRY2/CIB module, offers a powerful genetically encoded mechanism by which to study the role of proteins in a tissue-specific manner during various stages of development
Claim 50property statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

The CRY2/CIB module offers a genetically encoded mechanism to study protein roles in a tissue-specific manner during development.

the CRY2/CIB module, offers a powerful genetically encoded mechanism by which to study the role of proteins in a tissue-specific manner during various stages of development
Claim 51property statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

The CRY2/CIB module offers a genetically encoded mechanism to study protein roles in a tissue-specific manner during development.

the CRY2/CIB module, offers a powerful genetically encoded mechanism by which to study the role of proteins in a tissue-specific manner during various stages of development
Claim 52property statementsupports2016Source 1needs review

The CRY2/CIB module offers a genetically encoded mechanism to study protein roles in a tissue-specific manner during development.

the CRY2/CIB module, offers a powerful genetically encoded mechanism by which to study the role of proteins in a tissue-specific manner during various stages of development

Approval Evidence

1 source2 linked approval claimsfirst-pass slug oligomerizing-cry2-component
We tested an oligomerizing version of the CRY2 component as a tool for the negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

Source:

intended functionsupports

An oligomerizing version of CRY2 was tested as a tool for negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

We tested an oligomerizing version of the CRY2 component as a tool for the negative regulation of targeted proteins in Drosophila.

Source:

negative resultcontradicts

The authors were unable to repeat in Drosophila the clustering results previously observed in yeast for the oligomerizing CRY2 component.

Although we were unable to repeat the clustering results observed in yeast

Source:

Comparisons

Source-backed strengths

The main demonstrated strength is that an oligomerizing CRY2 version was tested in the Drosophila context rather than only proposed in principle. The broader source also supports compatibility of CRY2/CIB-based construct adaptation to Drosophila-specific vectors, but no quantitative performance metrics are provided for the oligomerizing variant itself.

Source:

Using cloning techniques to generate CRY2 and CIB constructs in Drosophila specific vectors, we have attempted to adapt the CRY2/CIB system to Drosophila.

oligomerizing CRY2 component and mixed quinoline-pyridine aromatic oligoamide helical foldamers address a similar problem space.

Shared frame: same top-level item type; shared mechanisms: oligomerization

oligomerizing CRY2 component and optogenetic Amyloid-b2 peptide address a similar problem space.

Shared frame: same top-level item type; shared mechanisms: oligomerization

Strengths here: looks easier to implement in practice.

oligomerizing CRY2 component and optogenetic zebrafish ALS model address a similar problem space.

Shared frame: same top-level item type; shared mechanisms: oligomerization

Strengths here: looks easier to implement in practice.

Ranked Citations

  1. 1.
    StructuralSource 1DukeSpace (Duke University)2016Claim 1Claim 2Claim 3

    Seeded from load plan for claim c5. Extracted from this source document.