Toolkit/Opto-Rho1DN

Opto-Rho1DN

Multi-Component Switch·Research·Since 2021

Also known as: CIBN-pmGFP, CRY2-Rho1DN

Taxonomy: Mechanism Branch / Architecture. Workflows sit above the mechanism and technique branches rather than replacing them.

Summary

Opto-Rho1DN is a multi-component optogenetic switch that inhibits Rho1 by light-dependent recruitment of a dominant-negative Rho1 construct to the plasma membrane. The listed components are CIBN-pmGFP and CRY2-Rho1DN.

Usefulness & Problems

Why this is useful

This system enables acute optical inhibition of Rho1-linked actomyosin function during Drosophila mesoderm invagination. It is useful for perturbing protein localization with light rather than relying on constitutive genetic inhibition.

Source:

Taken together, our results indicate that Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially- and temporally-confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.

Source:

our results indicate that Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially- and temporally-confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly

Source:

Taken together, our results indicate that Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially- and temporally-confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.

Problem solved

It addresses the need for temporally controlled inhibition of Rho1 during morphogenesis. The cited study used optogenetic acute inhibition of actomyosin to test stage-specific mechanical requirements during mesoderm invagination.

Taxonomy & Function

Primary hierarchy

Mechanism Branch

Architecture: A composed arrangement of multiple parts that instantiates one or more mechanisms.

Techniques

No technique tags yet.

Target processes

localization

Input: Light

Implementation Constraints

The system is described as comprising CIBN-pmGFP and CRY2-Rho1DN, indicating a two-component construct design based on membrane-anchored CIBN and a CRY2-fused dominant-negative Rho1 cargo. The evidence supports plasma membrane recruitment under light, but it does not provide illumination parameters, expression strategy, or cofactor requirements.

The supplied evidence does not report quantitative performance metrics such as recruitment kinetics, dynamic range, reversibility, or wavelength dependence. Independent replication, use outside the reported Drosophila context, and direct biochemical characterization are not documented in the provided material.

Validation

Cell-freeBacteriaMammalianMouseHumanTherapeuticIndep. Replication

Supporting Sources

Ranked Claims

Claim 1comparative observationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Comparison between wild-type and snail mutants indicates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination.

comparison between wild-type and snail mutants that fail to specify the mesoderm demonstrates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination.
Claim 2comparative observationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Comparison between wild-type and snail mutants indicates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination.

comparison between wild-type and snail mutants that fail to specify the mesoderm demonstrates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination.
Claim 3comparative observationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Comparison between wild-type and snail mutants indicates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination.

comparison between wild-type and snail mutants that fail to specify the mesoderm demonstrates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination.
Claim 4comparative observationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Comparison between wild-type and snail mutants indicates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination.

comparison between wild-type and snail mutants that fail to specify the mesoderm demonstrates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination.
Claim 5comparative observationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Comparison between wild-type and snail mutants indicates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination.

comparison between wild-type and snail mutants that fail to specify the mesoderm demonstrates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination.
Claim 6comparative observationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Comparison between wild-type and snail mutants indicates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination.

comparison between wild-type and snail mutants that fail to specify the mesoderm demonstrates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination.
Claim 7comparative observationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Comparison between wild-type and snail mutants indicates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination.

comparison between wild-type and snail mutants that fail to specify the mesoderm demonstrates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination.
Claim 8comparative observationsupports2021Source 3needs review

The lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination, based on comparison between wild-type and snail mutants.

comparison between wild-type and snail mutants that fail to specify the mesoderm demonstrates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination
Claim 9comparative observationsupports2021Source 3needs review

The lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination, based on comparison between wild-type and snail mutants.

comparison between wild-type and snail mutants that fail to specify the mesoderm demonstrates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination
Claim 10comparative observationsupports2021Source 3needs review

The lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination, based on comparison between wild-type and snail mutants.

comparison between wild-type and snail mutants that fail to specify the mesoderm demonstrates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination
Claim 11comparative observationsupports2021Source 3needs review

The lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination, based on comparison between wild-type and snail mutants.

comparison between wild-type and snail mutants that fail to specify the mesoderm demonstrates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination
Claim 12comparative observationsupports2021Source 3needs review

The lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination, based on comparison between wild-type and snail mutants.

comparison between wild-type and snail mutants that fail to specify the mesoderm demonstrates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination
Claim 13comparative observationsupports2021Source 3needs review

The lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination, based on comparison between wild-type and snail mutants.

comparison between wild-type and snail mutants that fail to specify the mesoderm demonstrates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination
Claim 14comparative observationsupports2021Source 3needs review

The lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination, based on comparison between wild-type and snail mutants.

comparison between wild-type and snail mutants that fail to specify the mesoderm demonstrates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination
Claim 15mechanismsupports2021Source 2needs review

Optogenetic-mediated acute inhibition of actomyosin during Drosophila mesoderm invagination shows that actomyosin contractility is required to prevent tissue relaxation during the early priming stage but is dispensable for the folding step after a stereotyped transitional configuration.

By optogenetic-mediated acute inhibition of actomyosin, we find that during Drosophila mesoderm invagination, actomyosin contractility is critical to prevent tissue relaxation during the early, 'priming' stage of folding but is dispensable for the actual folding step after the tissue passes through a stereotyped transitional configuration.
Claim 16mechanismsupports2021Source 2needs review

Optogenetic-mediated acute inhibition of actomyosin during Drosophila mesoderm invagination shows that actomyosin contractility is required to prevent tissue relaxation during the early priming stage but is dispensable for the folding step after a stereotyped transitional configuration.

By optogenetic-mediated acute inhibition of actomyosin, we find that during Drosophila mesoderm invagination, actomyosin contractility is critical to prevent tissue relaxation during the early, 'priming' stage of folding but is dispensable for the actual folding step after the tissue passes through a stereotyped transitional configuration.
Claim 17mechanismsupports2021Source 2needs review

Optogenetic-mediated acute inhibition of actomyosin during Drosophila mesoderm invagination shows that actomyosin contractility is required to prevent tissue relaxation during the early priming stage but is dispensable for the folding step after a stereotyped transitional configuration.

By optogenetic-mediated acute inhibition of actomyosin, we find that during Drosophila mesoderm invagination, actomyosin contractility is critical to prevent tissue relaxation during the early, 'priming' stage of folding but is dispensable for the actual folding step after the tissue passes through a stereotyped transitional configuration.
Claim 18mechanismsupports2021Source 2needs review

Optogenetic-mediated acute inhibition of actomyosin during Drosophila mesoderm invagination shows that actomyosin contractility is required to prevent tissue relaxation during the early priming stage but is dispensable for the folding step after a stereotyped transitional configuration.

By optogenetic-mediated acute inhibition of actomyosin, we find that during Drosophila mesoderm invagination, actomyosin contractility is critical to prevent tissue relaxation during the early, 'priming' stage of folding but is dispensable for the actual folding step after the tissue passes through a stereotyped transitional configuration.
Claim 19mechanismsupports2021Source 2needs review

Optogenetic-mediated acute inhibition of actomyosin during Drosophila mesoderm invagination shows that actomyosin contractility is required to prevent tissue relaxation during the early priming stage but is dispensable for the folding step after a stereotyped transitional configuration.

By optogenetic-mediated acute inhibition of actomyosin, we find that during Drosophila mesoderm invagination, actomyosin contractility is critical to prevent tissue relaxation during the early, 'priming' stage of folding but is dispensable for the actual folding step after the tissue passes through a stereotyped transitional configuration.
Claim 20mechanismsupports2021Source 2needs review

Optogenetic-mediated acute inhibition of actomyosin during Drosophila mesoderm invagination shows that actomyosin contractility is required to prevent tissue relaxation during the early priming stage but is dispensable for the folding step after a stereotyped transitional configuration.

By optogenetic-mediated acute inhibition of actomyosin, we find that during Drosophila mesoderm invagination, actomyosin contractility is critical to prevent tissue relaxation during the early, 'priming' stage of folding but is dispensable for the actual folding step after the tissue passes through a stereotyped transitional configuration.
Claim 21mechanismsupports2021Source 2needs review

Optogenetic-mediated acute inhibition of actomyosin during Drosophila mesoderm invagination shows that actomyosin contractility is required to prevent tissue relaxation during the early priming stage but is dispensable for the folding step after a stereotyped transitional configuration.

By optogenetic-mediated acute inhibition of actomyosin, we find that during Drosophila mesoderm invagination, actomyosin contractility is critical to prevent tissue relaxation during the early, 'priming' stage of folding but is dispensable for the actual folding step after the tissue passes through a stereotyped transitional configuration.
Claim 22mechanismsupports2021Source 1needs review

Optogenetic-mediated acute inhibition of actomyosin during Drosophila mesoderm invagination shows that actomyosin contractility is required to prevent tissue relaxation during the early priming stage but is dispensable for the later folding step after a transitional configuration.

By optogenetic-mediated acute inhibition of actomyosin, we find that during Drosophila mesoderm invagination, actomyosin contractility is critical to prevent tissue relaxation during the early, ‘priming’ stage of folding but is dispensable for the actual folding step after the tissue passes through a stereotyped transitional configuration.
Claim 23mechanismsupports2021Source 1needs review

Optogenetic-mediated acute inhibition of actomyosin during Drosophila mesoderm invagination shows that actomyosin contractility is required to prevent tissue relaxation during the early priming stage but is dispensable for the later folding step after a transitional configuration.

By optogenetic-mediated acute inhibition of actomyosin, we find that during Drosophila mesoderm invagination, actomyosin contractility is critical to prevent tissue relaxation during the early, ‘priming’ stage of folding but is dispensable for the actual folding step after the tissue passes through a stereotyped transitional configuration.
Claim 24mechanismsupports2021Source 1needs review

Optogenetic-mediated acute inhibition of actomyosin during Drosophila mesoderm invagination shows that actomyosin contractility is required to prevent tissue relaxation during the early priming stage but is dispensable for the later folding step after a transitional configuration.

By optogenetic-mediated acute inhibition of actomyosin, we find that during Drosophila mesoderm invagination, actomyosin contractility is critical to prevent tissue relaxation during the early, ‘priming’ stage of folding but is dispensable for the actual folding step after the tissue passes through a stereotyped transitional configuration.
Claim 25mechanismsupports2021Source 1needs review

Optogenetic-mediated acute inhibition of actomyosin during Drosophila mesoderm invagination shows that actomyosin contractility is required to prevent tissue relaxation during the early priming stage but is dispensable for the later folding step after a transitional configuration.

By optogenetic-mediated acute inhibition of actomyosin, we find that during Drosophila mesoderm invagination, actomyosin contractility is critical to prevent tissue relaxation during the early, ‘priming’ stage of folding but is dispensable for the actual folding step after the tissue passes through a stereotyped transitional configuration.
Claim 26mechanismsupports2021Source 1needs review

Optogenetic-mediated acute inhibition of actomyosin during Drosophila mesoderm invagination shows that actomyosin contractility is required to prevent tissue relaxation during the early priming stage but is dispensable for the later folding step after a transitional configuration.

By optogenetic-mediated acute inhibition of actomyosin, we find that during Drosophila mesoderm invagination, actomyosin contractility is critical to prevent tissue relaxation during the early, ‘priming’ stage of folding but is dispensable for the actual folding step after the tissue passes through a stereotyped transitional configuration.
Claim 27mechanismsupports2021Source 1needs review

Optogenetic-mediated acute inhibition of actomyosin during Drosophila mesoderm invagination shows that actomyosin contractility is required to prevent tissue relaxation during the early priming stage but is dispensable for the later folding step after a transitional configuration.

By optogenetic-mediated acute inhibition of actomyosin, we find that during Drosophila mesoderm invagination, actomyosin contractility is critical to prevent tissue relaxation during the early, ‘priming’ stage of folding but is dispensable for the actual folding step after the tissue passes through a stereotyped transitional configuration.
Claim 28mechanismsupports2021Source 1needs review

Optogenetic-mediated acute inhibition of actomyosin during Drosophila mesoderm invagination shows that actomyosin contractility is required to prevent tissue relaxation during the early priming stage but is dispensable for the later folding step after a transitional configuration.

By optogenetic-mediated acute inhibition of actomyosin, we find that during Drosophila mesoderm invagination, actomyosin contractility is critical to prevent tissue relaxation during the early, ‘priming’ stage of folding but is dispensable for the actual folding step after the tissue passes through a stereotyped transitional configuration.
Claim 29mechanistic inferencesupports2021Source 3needs review

The binary response to acute actomyosin inhibition suggests that the Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.

This binary response suggests that Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.
Claim 30mechanistic inferencesupports2021Source 3needs review

The binary response to acute actomyosin inhibition suggests that the Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.

This binary response suggests that Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.
Claim 31mechanistic inferencesupports2021Source 3needs review

The binary response to acute actomyosin inhibition suggests that the Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.

This binary response suggests that Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.
Claim 32mechanistic inferencesupports2021Source 3needs review

The binary response to acute actomyosin inhibition suggests that the Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.

This binary response suggests that Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.
Claim 33mechanistic inferencesupports2021Source 3needs review

The binary response to acute actomyosin inhibition suggests that the Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.

This binary response suggests that Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.
Claim 34mechanistic inferencesupports2021Source 3needs review

The binary response to acute actomyosin inhibition suggests that the Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.

This binary response suggests that Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.
Claim 35mechanistic inferencesupports2021Source 3needs review

The binary response to acute actomyosin inhibition suggests that the Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.

This binary response suggests that Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.
Claim 36mechanistic modelsupports2021Source 2needs review

The binary response to actomyosin inhibition suggests that the Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.

This binary response suggests that Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.
Claim 37mechanistic modelsupports2021Source 2needs review

The binary response to actomyosin inhibition suggests that the Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.

This binary response suggests that Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.
Claim 38mechanistic modelsupports2021Source 2needs review

The binary response to actomyosin inhibition suggests that the Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.

This binary response suggests that Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.
Claim 39mechanistic modelsupports2021Source 2needs review

The binary response to actomyosin inhibition suggests that the Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.

This binary response suggests that Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.
Claim 40mechanistic modelsupports2021Source 2needs review

The binary response to actomyosin inhibition suggests that the Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.

This binary response suggests that Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.
Claim 41mechanistic modelsupports2021Source 2needs review

The binary response to actomyosin inhibition suggests that the Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.

This binary response suggests that Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.
Claim 42mechanistic modelsupports2021Source 2needs review

The binary response to actomyosin inhibition suggests that the Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.

This binary response suggests that Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.
Claim 43modeling resultsupports2021Source 2needs review

Computer modeling recapitulated the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition using a simulated epithelium with mesoderm apical constriction and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.

Computer modeling analysis demonstrates that the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition can be recapitulated in the simulated epithelium that undergoes buckling-like deformation jointly mediated by apical constriction in the mesoderm and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.
Claim 44modeling resultsupports2021Source 2needs review

Computer modeling recapitulated the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition using a simulated epithelium with mesoderm apical constriction and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.

Computer modeling analysis demonstrates that the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition can be recapitulated in the simulated epithelium that undergoes buckling-like deformation jointly mediated by apical constriction in the mesoderm and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.
Claim 45modeling resultsupports2021Source 2needs review

Computer modeling recapitulated the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition using a simulated epithelium with mesoderm apical constriction and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.

Computer modeling analysis demonstrates that the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition can be recapitulated in the simulated epithelium that undergoes buckling-like deformation jointly mediated by apical constriction in the mesoderm and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.
Claim 46modeling resultsupports2021Source 2needs review

Computer modeling recapitulated the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition using a simulated epithelium with mesoderm apical constriction and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.

Computer modeling analysis demonstrates that the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition can be recapitulated in the simulated epithelium that undergoes buckling-like deformation jointly mediated by apical constriction in the mesoderm and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.
Claim 47modeling resultsupports2021Source 2needs review

Computer modeling recapitulated the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition using a simulated epithelium with mesoderm apical constriction and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.

Computer modeling analysis demonstrates that the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition can be recapitulated in the simulated epithelium that undergoes buckling-like deformation jointly mediated by apical constriction in the mesoderm and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.
Claim 48modeling resultsupports2021Source 2needs review

Computer modeling recapitulated the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition using a simulated epithelium with mesoderm apical constriction and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.

Computer modeling analysis demonstrates that the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition can be recapitulated in the simulated epithelium that undergoes buckling-like deformation jointly mediated by apical constriction in the mesoderm and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.
Claim 49modeling resultsupports2021Source 2needs review

Computer modeling recapitulated the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition using a simulated epithelium with mesoderm apical constriction and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.

Computer modeling analysis demonstrates that the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition can be recapitulated in the simulated epithelium that undergoes buckling-like deformation jointly mediated by apical constriction in the mesoderm and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.
Claim 50model recapitulationsupports2021Source 3needs review

Computer modeling recapitulated the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition using a simulated epithelium with mesoderm apical constriction and in-plane compression from apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.

Computer modeling analysis demonstrates that the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition can be recapitulated in the simulated epithelium that undergoes buckling-like deformation jointly mediated by apical constriction in the mesoderm and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.
Claim 51model recapitulationsupports2021Source 3needs review

Computer modeling recapitulated the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition using a simulated epithelium with mesoderm apical constriction and in-plane compression from apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.

Computer modeling analysis demonstrates that the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition can be recapitulated in the simulated epithelium that undergoes buckling-like deformation jointly mediated by apical constriction in the mesoderm and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.
Claim 52model recapitulationsupports2021Source 3needs review

Computer modeling recapitulated the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition using a simulated epithelium with mesoderm apical constriction and in-plane compression from apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.

Computer modeling analysis demonstrates that the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition can be recapitulated in the simulated epithelium that undergoes buckling-like deformation jointly mediated by apical constriction in the mesoderm and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.
Claim 53model recapitulationsupports2021Source 3needs review

Computer modeling recapitulated the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition using a simulated epithelium with mesoderm apical constriction and in-plane compression from apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.

Computer modeling analysis demonstrates that the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition can be recapitulated in the simulated epithelium that undergoes buckling-like deformation jointly mediated by apical constriction in the mesoderm and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.
Claim 54model recapitulationsupports2021Source 3needs review

Computer modeling recapitulated the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition using a simulated epithelium with mesoderm apical constriction and in-plane compression from apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.

Computer modeling analysis demonstrates that the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition can be recapitulated in the simulated epithelium that undergoes buckling-like deformation jointly mediated by apical constriction in the mesoderm and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.
Claim 55model recapitulationsupports2021Source 3needs review

Computer modeling recapitulated the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition using a simulated epithelium with mesoderm apical constriction and in-plane compression from apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.

Computer modeling analysis demonstrates that the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition can be recapitulated in the simulated epithelium that undergoes buckling-like deformation jointly mediated by apical constriction in the mesoderm and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.
Claim 56model recapitulationsupports2021Source 3needs review

Computer modeling recapitulated the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition using a simulated epithelium with mesoderm apical constriction and in-plane compression from apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.

Computer modeling analysis demonstrates that the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition can be recapitulated in the simulated epithelium that undergoes buckling-like deformation jointly mediated by apical constriction in the mesoderm and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.
Claim 57model recapitulationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Computer modeling recapitulated the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition using a simulated epithelium with mesoderm apical constriction and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.

Computer modeling analysis demonstrates that the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition can be recapitulated in the simulated epithelium that undergoes buckling-like deformation jointly mediated by apical constriction in the mesoderm and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.
Claim 58model recapitulationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Computer modeling recapitulated the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition using a simulated epithelium with mesoderm apical constriction and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.

Computer modeling analysis demonstrates that the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition can be recapitulated in the simulated epithelium that undergoes buckling-like deformation jointly mediated by apical constriction in the mesoderm and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.
Claim 59model recapitulationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Computer modeling recapitulated the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition using a simulated epithelium with mesoderm apical constriction and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.

Computer modeling analysis demonstrates that the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition can be recapitulated in the simulated epithelium that undergoes buckling-like deformation jointly mediated by apical constriction in the mesoderm and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.
Claim 60model recapitulationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Computer modeling recapitulated the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition using a simulated epithelium with mesoderm apical constriction and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.

Computer modeling analysis demonstrates that the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition can be recapitulated in the simulated epithelium that undergoes buckling-like deformation jointly mediated by apical constriction in the mesoderm and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.
Claim 61model recapitulationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Computer modeling recapitulated the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition using a simulated epithelium with mesoderm apical constriction and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.

Computer modeling analysis demonstrates that the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition can be recapitulated in the simulated epithelium that undergoes buckling-like deformation jointly mediated by apical constriction in the mesoderm and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.
Claim 62model recapitulationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Computer modeling recapitulated the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition using a simulated epithelium with mesoderm apical constriction and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.

Computer modeling analysis demonstrates that the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition can be recapitulated in the simulated epithelium that undergoes buckling-like deformation jointly mediated by apical constriction in the mesoderm and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.
Claim 63model recapitulationsupports2021Source 1needs review

Computer modeling recapitulated the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition using a simulated epithelium with mesoderm apical constriction and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.

Computer modeling analysis demonstrates that the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition can be recapitulated in the simulated epithelium that undergoes buckling-like deformation jointly mediated by apical constriction in the mesoderm and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.
Claim 64observationsupports2021Source 2needs review

Comparison between wild-type and snail mutants indicates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination.

comparison between wild-type and snail mutants that fail to specify the mesoderm demonstrates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination.
Claim 65observationsupports2021Source 2needs review

Comparison between wild-type and snail mutants indicates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination.

comparison between wild-type and snail mutants that fail to specify the mesoderm demonstrates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination.
Claim 66observationsupports2021Source 2needs review

Comparison between wild-type and snail mutants indicates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination.

comparison between wild-type and snail mutants that fail to specify the mesoderm demonstrates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination.
Claim 67observationsupports2021Source 2needs review

Comparison between wild-type and snail mutants indicates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination.

comparison between wild-type and snail mutants that fail to specify the mesoderm demonstrates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination.
Claim 68observationsupports2021Source 2needs review

Comparison between wild-type and snail mutants indicates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination.

comparison between wild-type and snail mutants that fail to specify the mesoderm demonstrates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination.
Claim 69observationsupports2021Source 2needs review

Comparison between wild-type and snail mutants indicates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination.

comparison between wild-type and snail mutants that fail to specify the mesoderm demonstrates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination.
Claim 70observationsupports2021Source 2needs review

Comparison between wild-type and snail mutants indicates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination.

comparison between wild-type and snail mutants that fail to specify the mesoderm demonstrates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination.
Claim 71stage dependent requirementsupports2021Source 3needs review

During Drosophila mesoderm invagination, actomyosin contractility is required to prevent tissue relaxation during the early priming stage but is dispensable for the later folding step after a stereotyped transitional configuration.

during Drosophila mesoderm invagination, actomyosin contractility is critical to prevent tissue relaxation during the early, ‘priming’ stage of folding but is dispensable for the actual folding step after the tissue passes through a stereotyped transitional configuration
Claim 72stage dependent requirementsupports2021Source 3needs review

During Drosophila mesoderm invagination, actomyosin contractility is required to prevent tissue relaxation during the early priming stage but is dispensable for the later folding step after a stereotyped transitional configuration.

during Drosophila mesoderm invagination, actomyosin contractility is critical to prevent tissue relaxation during the early, ‘priming’ stage of folding but is dispensable for the actual folding step after the tissue passes through a stereotyped transitional configuration
Claim 73stage dependent requirementsupports2021Source 3needs review

During Drosophila mesoderm invagination, actomyosin contractility is required to prevent tissue relaxation during the early priming stage but is dispensable for the later folding step after a stereotyped transitional configuration.

during Drosophila mesoderm invagination, actomyosin contractility is critical to prevent tissue relaxation during the early, ‘priming’ stage of folding but is dispensable for the actual folding step after the tissue passes through a stereotyped transitional configuration
Claim 74stage dependent requirementsupports2021Source 3needs review

During Drosophila mesoderm invagination, actomyosin contractility is required to prevent tissue relaxation during the early priming stage but is dispensable for the later folding step after a stereotyped transitional configuration.

during Drosophila mesoderm invagination, actomyosin contractility is critical to prevent tissue relaxation during the early, ‘priming’ stage of folding but is dispensable for the actual folding step after the tissue passes through a stereotyped transitional configuration
Claim 75stage dependent requirementsupports2021Source 3needs review

During Drosophila mesoderm invagination, actomyosin contractility is required to prevent tissue relaxation during the early priming stage but is dispensable for the later folding step after a stereotyped transitional configuration.

during Drosophila mesoderm invagination, actomyosin contractility is critical to prevent tissue relaxation during the early, ‘priming’ stage of folding but is dispensable for the actual folding step after the tissue passes through a stereotyped transitional configuration
Claim 76stage dependent requirementsupports2021Source 3needs review

During Drosophila mesoderm invagination, actomyosin contractility is required to prevent tissue relaxation during the early priming stage but is dispensable for the later folding step after a stereotyped transitional configuration.

during Drosophila mesoderm invagination, actomyosin contractility is critical to prevent tissue relaxation during the early, ‘priming’ stage of folding but is dispensable for the actual folding step after the tissue passes through a stereotyped transitional configuration
Claim 77stage dependent requirementsupports2021Source 3needs review

During Drosophila mesoderm invagination, actomyosin contractility is required to prevent tissue relaxation during the early priming stage but is dispensable for the later folding step after a stereotyped transitional configuration.

during Drosophila mesoderm invagination, actomyosin contractility is critical to prevent tissue relaxation during the early, ‘priming’ stage of folding but is dispensable for the actual folding step after the tissue passes through a stereotyped transitional configuration
Claim 78state propertysupports2021Source 1needs review

The binary response to actomyosin inhibition suggests that the Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.

This binary response suggests that Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.
Claim 79state propertysupports2021Source 1needs review

The binary response to actomyosin inhibition suggests that the Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.

This binary response suggests that Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.
Claim 80state propertysupports2021Source 1needs review

The binary response to actomyosin inhibition suggests that the Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.

This binary response suggests that Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.
Claim 81state propertysupports2021Source 1needs review

The binary response to actomyosin inhibition suggests that the Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.

This binary response suggests that Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.
Claim 82state propertysupports2021Source 1needs review

The binary response to actomyosin inhibition suggests that the Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.

This binary response suggests that Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.
Claim 83state propertysupports2021Source 1needs review

The binary response to actomyosin inhibition suggests that the Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.

This binary response suggests that Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.
Claim 84state propertysupports2021Source 1needs review

The binary response to actomyosin inhibition suggests that the Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.

This binary response suggests that Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.
Claim 85tool functionsupports2021Source 2needs review

Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially and temporally confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.

Taken together, our results indicate that Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially- and temporally-confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.
Claim 86tool functionsupports2021Source 2needs review

Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially and temporally confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.

Taken together, our results indicate that Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially- and temporally-confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.
Claim 87tool functionsupports2021Source 1needs review

Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially and temporally confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.

Taken together, our results indicate that Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially- and temporally-confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.
Claim 88tool functionsupports2021Source 3needs review

Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially and temporally confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.

our results indicate that Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially- and temporally-confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly
Claim 89tool functionsupports2021Source 1needs review

Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially and temporally confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.

Taken together, our results indicate that Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially- and temporally-confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.
Claim 90tool functionsupports2021Source 3needs review

Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially and temporally confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.

our results indicate that Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially- and temporally-confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly
Claim 91tool functionsupports2021Source 2needs review

Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially and temporally confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.

Taken together, our results indicate that Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially- and temporally-confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.
Claim 92tool functionsupports2021Source 2needs review

Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially and temporally confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.

Taken together, our results indicate that Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially- and temporally-confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.
Claim 93tool functionsupports2021Source 1needs review

Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially and temporally confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.

Taken together, our results indicate that Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially- and temporally-confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.
Claim 94tool functionsupports2021Source 3needs review

Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially and temporally confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.

our results indicate that Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially- and temporally-confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly
Claim 95tool functionsupports2021Source 1needs review

Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially and temporally confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.

Taken together, our results indicate that Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially- and temporally-confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.
Claim 96tool functionsupports2021Source 3needs review

Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially and temporally confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.

our results indicate that Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially- and temporally-confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly
Claim 97tool functionsupports2021Source 3needs review

Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially and temporally confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.

our results indicate that Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially- and temporally-confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly
Claim 98tool functionsupports2021Source 2needs review

Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially and temporally confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.

Taken together, our results indicate that Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially- and temporally-confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.
Claim 99tool functionsupports2021Source 2needs review

Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially and temporally confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.

Taken together, our results indicate that Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially- and temporally-confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.
Claim 100tool functionsupports2021Source 1needs review

Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially and temporally confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.

Taken together, our results indicate that Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially- and temporally-confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.
Claim 101tool functionsupports2021Source 3needs review

Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially and temporally confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.

our results indicate that Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially- and temporally-confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly
Claim 102tool functionsupports2021Source 1needs review

Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially and temporally confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.

Taken together, our results indicate that Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially- and temporally-confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.
Claim 103tool functionsupports2021Source 3needs review

Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially and temporally confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.

our results indicate that Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially- and temporally-confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly
Claim 104tool functionsupports2021Source 1needs review

Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially and temporally confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.

Taken together, our results indicate that Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially- and temporally-confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.
Claim 105tool functionsupports2021Source 2needs review

Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially and temporally confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.

Taken together, our results indicate that Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially- and temporally-confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.

Approval Evidence

3 sources15 linked approval claimsfirst-pass slug opto-rho1dn
we generated an optogenetic tool, ‘Opto-Rho1DN,’ to inhibit Rho1 through light-dependent plasma membrane recruitment of a dominant negative form of Rho1 (Rho1DN).

Source:

we generated an optogenetic tool, 'Opto-Rho1DN,' to inhibit Rho1 through light-dependent plasma membrane recruitment of a dominant negative form of Rho1 (Rho1DN).

Source:

we generated an optogenetic tool, ‘Opto-Rho1DN,’ to inhibit Rho1 through light-dependent plasma membrane recruitment of a dominant negative form of Rho1 (Rho1DN)

Source:

comparative observationsupports

Comparison between wild-type and snail mutants indicates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination.

comparison between wild-type and snail mutants that fail to specify the mesoderm demonstrates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination.

Source:

comparative observationsupports

The lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination, based on comparison between wild-type and snail mutants.

comparison between wild-type and snail mutants that fail to specify the mesoderm demonstrates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination

Source:

mechanismsupports

Optogenetic-mediated acute inhibition of actomyosin during Drosophila mesoderm invagination shows that actomyosin contractility is required to prevent tissue relaxation during the early priming stage but is dispensable for the folding step after a stereotyped transitional configuration.

By optogenetic-mediated acute inhibition of actomyosin, we find that during Drosophila mesoderm invagination, actomyosin contractility is critical to prevent tissue relaxation during the early, 'priming' stage of folding but is dispensable for the actual folding step after the tissue passes through a stereotyped transitional configuration.

Source:

mechanismsupports

Optogenetic-mediated acute inhibition of actomyosin during Drosophila mesoderm invagination shows that actomyosin contractility is required to prevent tissue relaxation during the early priming stage but is dispensable for the later folding step after a transitional configuration.

By optogenetic-mediated acute inhibition of actomyosin, we find that during Drosophila mesoderm invagination, actomyosin contractility is critical to prevent tissue relaxation during the early, ‘priming’ stage of folding but is dispensable for the actual folding step after the tissue passes through a stereotyped transitional configuration.

Source:

mechanistic inferencesupports

The binary response to acute actomyosin inhibition suggests that the Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.

This binary response suggests that Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.

Source:

mechanistic modelsupports

The binary response to actomyosin inhibition suggests that the Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.

This binary response suggests that Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.

Source:

modeling resultsupports

Computer modeling recapitulated the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition using a simulated epithelium with mesoderm apical constriction and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.

Computer modeling analysis demonstrates that the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition can be recapitulated in the simulated epithelium that undergoes buckling-like deformation jointly mediated by apical constriction in the mesoderm and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.

Source:

model recapitulationsupports

Computer modeling recapitulated the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition using a simulated epithelium with mesoderm apical constriction and in-plane compression from apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.

Computer modeling analysis demonstrates that the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition can be recapitulated in the simulated epithelium that undergoes buckling-like deformation jointly mediated by apical constriction in the mesoderm and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.

Source:

model recapitulationsupports

Computer modeling recapitulated the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition using a simulated epithelium with mesoderm apical constriction and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.

Computer modeling analysis demonstrates that the binary tissue response to actomyosin inhibition can be recapitulated in the simulated epithelium that undergoes buckling-like deformation jointly mediated by apical constriction in the mesoderm and in-plane compression generated by apicobasal shrinkage of the surrounding ectoderm.

Source:

observationsupports

Comparison between wild-type and snail mutants indicates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination.

comparison between wild-type and snail mutants that fail to specify the mesoderm demonstrates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination.

Source:

stage dependent requirementsupports

During Drosophila mesoderm invagination, actomyosin contractility is required to prevent tissue relaxation during the early priming stage but is dispensable for the later folding step after a stereotyped transitional configuration.

during Drosophila mesoderm invagination, actomyosin contractility is critical to prevent tissue relaxation during the early, ‘priming’ stage of folding but is dispensable for the actual folding step after the tissue passes through a stereotyped transitional configuration

Source:

state propertysupports

The binary response to actomyosin inhibition suggests that the Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.

This binary response suggests that Drosophila mesoderm is mechanically bistable during gastrulation.

Source:

tool functionsupports

Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially and temporally confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.

Taken together, our results indicate that Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially- and temporally-confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.

Source:

tool functionsupports

Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially and temporally confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.

Taken together, our results indicate that Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially- and temporally-confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.

Source:

tool functionsupports

Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially and temporally confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly.

our results indicate that Opto-Rho1DN is an effective tool for spatially- and temporally-confined inactivation of apical actomyosin contractility through simultaneous myosin inactivation and actin disassembly

Source:

Comparisons

Source-backed strengths

The evidence states that Opto-Rho1DN was generated specifically for light-dependent plasma membrane recruitment of dominant-negative Rho1, providing an acute optogenetic inhibition strategy. In the associated study context, optogenetic acute inhibition revealed that actomyosin contractility is required during an early priming stage but becomes dispensable after a transitional configuration in later folding.

Source:

comparison between wild-type and snail mutants that fail to specify the mesoderm demonstrates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination.

Source:

comparison between wild-type and snail mutants that fail to specify the mesoderm demonstrates that the lateral ectoderm undergoes apicobasal shrinkage during gastrulation independently of mesoderm invagination

Ranked Citations

  1. 1.

    Extracted from this source document.

  2. 2.

    Extracted from this source document.

  3. 3.

    Extracted from this source document.