Toolkit/p160 nuclear receptor coactivator family

p160 nuclear receptor coactivator family

Construct Pattern·Research·Since 2001

Also known as: p/CIP/A1B1/ACTR/RAC/TRAM-1, SRC-1/NCOA1, TIF2/GRIP1

Taxonomy: Mechanism Branch / Architecture. Workflows sit above the mechanism and technique branches rather than replacing them.

Summary

Several insights into the mechanisms by which coactivator complexes are recruited to nuclear receptors in a ligand-dependent manner have been provided by the initial identification of the p160 family of nuclear receptor coactivators... members of the p160 family have been suggested to function as coactivators, at least in part, by serving as adapter molecules that recruit CBP and/or p300 complexes to promoter-bound nuclear receptors in a ligand-dependent manner.

Usefulness & Problems

Why this is useful

The p160 family is described as a set of nuclear receptor coactivators that bind liganded receptors and help recruit additional coactivator machinery. Their central receptor-interaction region and C-terminal activation domains support this adapter role.; adapter-mediated recruitment of coactivator complexes to nuclear receptors; studying ligand-dependent transcriptional activation mechanisms

Source:

The p160 family is described as a set of nuclear receptor coactivators that bind liganded receptors and help recruit additional coactivator machinery. Their central receptor-interaction region and C-terminal activation domains support this adapter role.

Source:

adapter-mediated recruitment of coactivator complexes to nuclear receptors

Source:

studying ligand-dependent transcriptional activation mechanisms

Problem solved

They help bridge receptor binding to chromatin-modifying and transcription-promoting complexes. This addresses how ligand binding is converted into promoter activation.; links liganded nuclear receptors to downstream coactivator complexes such as CBP/p300

Source:

They help bridge receptor binding to chromatin-modifying and transcription-promoting complexes. This addresses how ligand binding is converted into promoter activation.

Source:

links liganded nuclear receptors to downstream coactivator complexes such as CBP/p300

Problem links

links liganded nuclear receptors to downstream coactivator complexes such as CBP/p300

Literature

They help bridge receptor binding to chromatin-modifying and transcription-promoting complexes. This addresses how ligand binding is converted into promoter activation.

Source:

They help bridge receptor binding to chromatin-modifying and transcription-promoting complexes. This addresses how ligand binding is converted into promoter activation.

Taxonomy & Function

Primary hierarchy

Mechanism Branch

Architecture: A reusable architecture pattern for arranging parts into an engineered system.

Techniques

No technique tags yet.

Target processes

transcription

Input: Chemical

Implementation Constraints

cofactor dependency: cofactor requirement unknownencoding mode: genetically encodedimplementation constraint: context specific validationoperating role: regulatorswitch architecture: recruitment

Use depends on liganded nuclear receptors, intact receptor-binding domains, and access to associated factors such as CBP/p300 or methyltransferase-containing complexes. The review frames them as parts of larger multiprotein assemblies rather than standalone effectors.; requires ligand-dependent receptor engagement through the ligand binding domain; depends on associated coactivator complexes for full transcriptional effects

They do not by themselves explain all receptor specificity or all activation outcomes, because multiple factors act sequentially and combinatorially. The review also notes promoter- and cell-specific usage of different coregulatory complexes.; the number of potential coregulators exceeds the capacity for direct interaction by a single receptor; specificity appears promoter- and cell-dependent

Validation

Cell-freeBacteriaMammalianMouseHumanTherapeuticIndep. Replication

Supporting Sources

Ranked Claims

Claim 1mechanistic summarysupports2001Source 1needs review

CBP/p300 acetyltransferase activity is described as directly required for enhanced transcription on chromatinized templates.

Claim 2mechanistic summarysupports2001Source 1needs review

Ligand-dependent exchange of corepressors for coactivators is presented as the basic mechanism by which nuclear receptors switch from gene repression to activation.

Claim 3mechanistic summarysupports2001Source 1needs review

Nuclear receptor transcriptional activation is described as involving multiple factors acting sequentially and/or combinatorially to reorganize chromatin and recruit basal transcription machinery.

Claim 4mechanistic summarysupports2001Source 1needs review

p160-family coactivators are described as adapter molecules that recruit CBP and/or p300 complexes to promoter-bound nuclear receptors in a ligand-dependent manner.

Claim 5mechanistic summarysupports2001Source 1needs review

Two major coactivator function classes emphasized in the review are ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling complexes and histone acetyltransferase-containing factors.

Claim 6structure function summarysupports2001Source 1needs review

The LXXLL motif is described as necessary and sufficient for ligand-dependent interaction with nuclear receptor ligand binding domains, with specificity further influenced by additional residues and ligand-induced receptor conformation.

Approval Evidence

1 source2 linked approval claimsfirst-pass slug p160-nuclear-receptor-coactivator-family
Several insights into the mechanisms by which coactivator complexes are recruited to nuclear receptors in a ligand-dependent manner have been provided by the initial identification of the p160 family of nuclear receptor coactivators... members of the p160 family have been suggested to function as coactivators, at least in part, by serving as adapter molecules that recruit CBP and/or p300 complexes to promoter-bound nuclear receptors in a ligand-dependent manner.

Source:

mechanistic summarysupports

Nuclear receptor transcriptional activation is described as involving multiple factors acting sequentially and/or combinatorially to reorganize chromatin and recruit basal transcription machinery.

Source:

mechanistic summarysupports

p160-family coactivators are described as adapter molecules that recruit CBP and/or p300 complexes to promoter-bound nuclear receptors in a ligand-dependent manner.

Source:

Comparisons

Source-stated alternatives

The review contrasts p160-family recruitment with other coactivator assemblies such as CBP/p300-associated factors and Mediator-like complexes, and with corepressor complexes used during repression.

Source:

The review contrasts p160-family recruitment with other coactivator assemblies such as CBP/p300-associated factors and Mediator-like complexes, and with corepressor complexes used during repression.

Source-backed strengths

common domain structure supports receptor interaction and downstream coactivator recruitment; contains LXXLL motifs central to ligand-dependent receptor binding

Source:

common domain structure supports receptor interaction and downstream coactivator recruitment

Source:

contains LXXLL motifs central to ligand-dependent receptor binding

The review contrasts p160-family recruitment with other coactivator assemblies such as CBP/p300-associated factors and Mediator-like complexes, and with corepressor complexes used during repression.

Shared frame: source-stated alternative in extracted literature

Strengths here: common domain structure supports receptor interaction and downstream coactivator recruitment; contains LXXLL motifs central to ligand-dependent receptor binding.

Relative tradeoffs: the number of potential coregulators exceeds the capacity for direct interaction by a single receptor; specificity appears promoter- and cell-dependent.

Source:

The review contrasts p160-family recruitment with other coactivator assemblies such as CBP/p300-associated factors and Mediator-like complexes, and with corepressor complexes used during repression.

Ranked Citations

  1. 1.
    StructuralSource 1Journal of Biological Chemistry2001Claim 1Claim 2Claim 3

    Seeded from load plan for claim cl2. Extracted from this source document.