Toolkit/photo-sensitive circular gRNAs

photo-sensitive circular gRNAs

RNA Element·Research·Since 2022

Also known as: circular gRNA, cyclically caged guide RNAs

Taxonomy: Mechanism Branch / Component. Workflows sit above the mechanism and technique branches rather than replacing them.

Summary

Photo-sensitive circular gRNAs are cyclically caged guide RNAs that enable light-activated CRISPR/Cas9- and Cpf1-mediated genome editing. They are designed for spatiotemporal control of editing and are activated by photocleavage of the circularized guide.

Usefulness & Problems

Why this is useful

This tool is useful for controlling when and where CRISPR editing occurs using light. The cited work presents it as an improved method for precise spatiotemporal manipulation of gene editing and reports efficient editing with CRISPR/Cas9 and Cpf1.

Source:

Together, our work provides a significantly improved method to precisely manipulate where and when genes are edited.

Source:

we reported a spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9 and Cpf1-mediated editing with photo-sensitive circular gRNAs

Problem solved

It addresses the problem of limited temporal and spatial precision in genome editing. The reported design also reduces unwanted activity before activation, as a bow-knot-type gRNA showed no background editing without light irradiation.

Source:

Together, our work provides a significantly improved method to precisely manipulate where and when genes are edited.

Problem links

Need controllable genome or transcript editing

Derived

Photo-sensitive circular gRNAs are cyclically caged guide RNAs designed to enable light-controlled CRISPR/Cas9- and Cpf1-mediated genome editing. They support spatiotemporal regulation of editing and can be activated by photocleavage of the circularized guide.

Need precise spatiotemporal control with light input

Derived

Photo-sensitive circular gRNAs are cyclically caged guide RNAs designed to enable light-controlled CRISPR/Cas9- and Cpf1-mediated genome editing. They support spatiotemporal regulation of editing and can be activated by photocleavage of the circularized guide.

Taxonomy & Function

Primary hierarchy

Mechanism Branch

Component: A low-level RNA part used inside a larger architecture that realizes a mechanism.

Techniques

No technique tags yet.

Target processes

editing

Input: Light

Implementation Constraints

cofactor dependency: cofactor requirement unknownencoding mode: genetically encodedimplementation constraint: context specific validationimplementation constraint: spectral hardware requirementoperating role: regulatorswitch architecture: cleavage

Implementation involves circularized, photo-sensitive guide RNAs used with CRISPR/Cas9 or Cpf1 systems. The evidence supports covalent cyclization and chemical modification conceptually, but it does not provide construct architecture, delivery method, or cofactor requirements.

The supplied evidence does not specify the photocleavable chemistry, illumination wavelength, activation kinetics, or quantitative editing efficiencies. Validation is currently supported by a single cited study, with embryo editing mentioned only for MSTN.

Validation

Cell-freeBacteriaMammalianMouseHumanTherapeuticIndep. Replication

Supporting Sources

Ranked Claims

Claim 1application scopesupports2022Source 1needs review

The method is presented as an improved way to precisely manipulate where and when genes are edited.

Together, our work provides a significantly improved method to precisely manipulate where and when genes are edited.
Claim 2application scopesupports2022Source 1needs review

The method is presented as an improved way to precisely manipulate where and when genes are edited.

Together, our work provides a significantly improved method to precisely manipulate where and when genes are edited.
Claim 3application scopesupports2022Source 1needs review

The method is presented as an improved way to precisely manipulate where and when genes are edited.

Together, our work provides a significantly improved method to precisely manipulate where and when genes are edited.
Claim 4application scopesupports2022Source 1needs review

The method is presented as an improved way to precisely manipulate where and when genes are edited.

Together, our work provides a significantly improved method to precisely manipulate where and when genes are edited.
Claim 5application scopesupports2022Source 1needs review

The method is presented as an improved way to precisely manipulate where and when genes are edited.

Together, our work provides a significantly improved method to precisely manipulate where and when genes are edited.
Claim 6application scopesupports2022Source 1needs review

The method is presented as an improved way to precisely manipulate where and when genes are edited.

Together, our work provides a significantly improved method to precisely manipulate where and when genes are edited.
Claim 7application scopesupports2022Source 1needs review

The method is presented as an improved way to precisely manipulate where and when genes are edited.

Together, our work provides a significantly improved method to precisely manipulate where and when genes are edited.
Claim 8application scopesupports2022Source 1needs review

The method is presented as an improved way to precisely manipulate where and when genes are edited.

Together, our work provides a significantly improved method to precisely manipulate where and when genes are edited.
Claim 9application scopesupports2022Source 1needs review

The method is presented as an improved way to precisely manipulate where and when genes are edited.

Together, our work provides a significantly improved method to precisely manipulate where and when genes are edited.
Claim 10application scopesupports2022Source 1needs review

The method is presented as an improved way to precisely manipulate where and when genes are edited.

Together, our work provides a significantly improved method to precisely manipulate where and when genes are edited.
Claim 11application scopesupports2022Source 1needs review

The method is presented as an improved way to precisely manipulate where and when genes are edited.

Together, our work provides a significantly improved method to precisely manipulate where and when genes are edited.
Claim 12application scopesupports2022Source 1needs review

The method is presented as an improved way to precisely manipulate where and when genes are edited.

Together, our work provides a significantly improved method to precisely manipulate where and when genes are edited.
Claim 13application scopesupports2022Source 1needs review

The method is presented as an improved way to precisely manipulate where and when genes are edited.

Together, our work provides a significantly improved method to precisely manipulate where and when genes are edited.
Claim 14application scopesupports2022Source 1needs review

The method is presented as an improved way to precisely manipulate where and when genes are edited.

Together, our work provides a significantly improved method to precisely manipulate where and when genes are edited.
Claim 15application scopesupports2022Source 1needs review

The method is presented as an improved way to precisely manipulate where and when genes are edited.

Together, our work provides a significantly improved method to precisely manipulate where and when genes are edited.
Claim 16application scopesupports2022Source 1needs review

The method is presented as an improved way to precisely manipulate where and when genes are edited.

Together, our work provides a significantly improved method to precisely manipulate where and when genes are edited.
Claim 17application scopesupports2022Source 1needs review

The method is presented as an improved way to precisely manipulate where and when genes are edited.

Together, our work provides a significantly improved method to precisely manipulate where and when genes are edited.
Claim 18background activitysupports2022Source 1needs review

A bow-knot-type gRNA showed no background editing in the absence of light irradiation.

a new bow-knot-type gRNA showed no background editing in the absence of light irradiation
Claim 19background activitysupports2022Source 1needs review

A bow-knot-type gRNA showed no background editing in the absence of light irradiation.

a new bow-knot-type gRNA showed no background editing in the absence of light irradiation
Claim 20background activitysupports2022Source 1needs review

A bow-knot-type gRNA showed no background editing in the absence of light irradiation.

a new bow-knot-type gRNA showed no background editing in the absence of light irradiation
Claim 21background activitysupports2022Source 1needs review

A bow-knot-type gRNA showed no background editing in the absence of light irradiation.

a new bow-knot-type gRNA showed no background editing in the absence of light irradiation
Claim 22background activitysupports2022Source 1needs review

A bow-knot-type gRNA showed no background editing in the absence of light irradiation.

a new bow-knot-type gRNA showed no background editing in the absence of light irradiation
Claim 23background activitysupports2022Source 1needs review

A bow-knot-type gRNA showed no background editing in the absence of light irradiation.

a new bow-knot-type gRNA showed no background editing in the absence of light irradiation
Claim 24background activitysupports2022Source 1needs review

A bow-knot-type gRNA showed no background editing in the absence of light irradiation.

a new bow-knot-type gRNA showed no background editing in the absence of light irradiation
Claim 25background activitysupports2022Source 1needs review

A bow-knot-type gRNA showed no background editing in the absence of light irradiation.

a new bow-knot-type gRNA showed no background editing in the absence of light irradiation
Claim 26background activitysupports2022Source 1needs review

A bow-knot-type gRNA showed no background editing in the absence of light irradiation.

a new bow-knot-type gRNA showed no background editing in the absence of light irradiation
Claim 27background activitysupports2022Source 1needs review

A bow-knot-type gRNA showed no background editing in the absence of light irradiation.

a new bow-knot-type gRNA showed no background editing in the absence of light irradiation
Claim 28embryo editingsupports2022Source 1needs review

Light-mediated MSTN gene editing was achieved in embryos.

We have also achieved light-mediated MSTN gene editing in embryos
Claim 29embryo editingsupports2022Source 1needs review

Light-mediated MSTN gene editing was achieved in embryos.

We have also achieved light-mediated MSTN gene editing in embryos
Claim 30embryo editingsupports2022Source 1needs review

Light-mediated MSTN gene editing was achieved in embryos.

We have also achieved light-mediated MSTN gene editing in embryos
Claim 31embryo editingsupports2022Source 1needs review

Light-mediated MSTN gene editing was achieved in embryos.

We have also achieved light-mediated MSTN gene editing in embryos
Claim 32embryo editingsupports2022Source 1needs review

Light-mediated MSTN gene editing was achieved in embryos.

We have also achieved light-mediated MSTN gene editing in embryos
Claim 33embryo editingsupports2022Source 1needs review

Light-mediated MSTN gene editing was achieved in embryos.

We have also achieved light-mediated MSTN gene editing in embryos
Claim 34embryo editingsupports2022Source 1needs review

Light-mediated MSTN gene editing was achieved in embryos.

We have also achieved light-mediated MSTN gene editing in embryos
Claim 35embryo editingsupports2022Source 1needs review

Light-mediated MSTN gene editing was achieved in embryos.

We have also achieved light-mediated MSTN gene editing in embryos
Claim 36embryo editingsupports2022Source 1needs review

Light-mediated MSTN gene editing was achieved in embryos.

We have also achieved light-mediated MSTN gene editing in embryos
Claim 37embryo editingsupports2022Source 1needs review

Light-mediated MSTN gene editing was achieved in embryos.

We have also achieved light-mediated MSTN gene editing in embryos
Claim 38embryo editingsupports2022Source 1needs review

Light-mediated MSTN gene editing was achieved in embryos.

We have also achieved light-mediated MSTN gene editing in embryos
Claim 39embryo editingsupports2022Source 1needs review

Light-mediated MSTN gene editing was achieved in embryos.

We have also achieved light-mediated MSTN gene editing in embryos
Claim 40embryo editingsupports2022Source 1needs review

Light-mediated MSTN gene editing was achieved in embryos.

We have also achieved light-mediated MSTN gene editing in embryos
Claim 41embryo editingsupports2022Source 1needs review

Light-mediated MSTN gene editing was achieved in embryos.

We have also achieved light-mediated MSTN gene editing in embryos
Claim 42embryo editingsupports2022Source 1needs review

Light-mediated MSTN gene editing was achieved in embryos.

We have also achieved light-mediated MSTN gene editing in embryos
Claim 43embryo editingsupports2022Source 1needs review

Light-mediated MSTN gene editing was achieved in embryos.

We have also achieved light-mediated MSTN gene editing in embryos
Claim 44embryo editingsupports2022Source 1needs review

Light-mediated MSTN gene editing was achieved in embryos.

We have also achieved light-mediated MSTN gene editing in embryos
Claim 45engineering method advantagesupports2022Source 1needs review

The circular gRNA approach uses only two or three pre-installed photolabile substituents followed by simple covalent cyclization and is described as a more robust synthesis approach than heavily modified gRNAs.

This approach relies on only two or three pre-installed photolabile substituents followed by a simple covalent cyclization, which provides a robust synthesize approach in comparison to heavily modified gRNAs.
Claim 46engineering method advantagesupports2022Source 1needs review

The circular gRNA approach uses only two or three pre-installed photolabile substituents followed by simple covalent cyclization and is described as a more robust synthesis approach than heavily modified gRNAs.

This approach relies on only two or three pre-installed photolabile substituents followed by a simple covalent cyclization, which provides a robust synthesize approach in comparison to heavily modified gRNAs.
Claim 47engineering method advantagesupports2022Source 1needs review

The circular gRNA approach uses only two or three pre-installed photolabile substituents followed by simple covalent cyclization and is described as a more robust synthesis approach than heavily modified gRNAs.

This approach relies on only two or three pre-installed photolabile substituents followed by a simple covalent cyclization, which provides a robust synthesize approach in comparison to heavily modified gRNAs.
Claim 48engineering method advantagesupports2022Source 1needs review

The circular gRNA approach uses only two or three pre-installed photolabile substituents followed by simple covalent cyclization and is described as a more robust synthesis approach than heavily modified gRNAs.

This approach relies on only two or three pre-installed photolabile substituents followed by a simple covalent cyclization, which provides a robust synthesize approach in comparison to heavily modified gRNAs.
Claim 49engineering method advantagesupports2022Source 1needs review

The circular gRNA approach uses only two or three pre-installed photolabile substituents followed by simple covalent cyclization and is described as a more robust synthesis approach than heavily modified gRNAs.

This approach relies on only two or three pre-installed photolabile substituents followed by a simple covalent cyclization, which provides a robust synthesize approach in comparison to heavily modified gRNAs.
Claim 50engineering method advantagesupports2022Source 1needs review

The circular gRNA approach uses only two or three pre-installed photolabile substituents followed by simple covalent cyclization and is described as a more robust synthesis approach than heavily modified gRNAs.

This approach relies on only two or three pre-installed photolabile substituents followed by a simple covalent cyclization, which provides a robust synthesize approach in comparison to heavily modified gRNAs.
Claim 51engineering method advantagesupports2022Source 1needs review

The circular gRNA approach uses only two or three pre-installed photolabile substituents followed by simple covalent cyclization and is described as a more robust synthesis approach than heavily modified gRNAs.

This approach relies on only two or three pre-installed photolabile substituents followed by a simple covalent cyclization, which provides a robust synthesize approach in comparison to heavily modified gRNAs.
Claim 52engineering method advantagesupports2022Source 1needs review

The circular gRNA approach uses only two or three pre-installed photolabile substituents followed by simple covalent cyclization and is described as a more robust synthesis approach than heavily modified gRNAs.

This approach relies on only two or three pre-installed photolabile substituents followed by a simple covalent cyclization, which provides a robust synthesize approach in comparison to heavily modified gRNAs.
Claim 53engineering method advantagesupports2022Source 1needs review

The circular gRNA approach uses only two or three pre-installed photolabile substituents followed by simple covalent cyclization and is described as a more robust synthesis approach than heavily modified gRNAs.

This approach relies on only two or three pre-installed photolabile substituents followed by a simple covalent cyclization, which provides a robust synthesize approach in comparison to heavily modified gRNAs.
Claim 54engineering method advantagesupports2022Source 1needs review

The circular gRNA approach uses only two or three pre-installed photolabile substituents followed by simple covalent cyclization and is described as a more robust synthesis approach than heavily modified gRNAs.

This approach relies on only two or three pre-installed photolabile substituents followed by a simple covalent cyclization, which provides a robust synthesize approach in comparison to heavily modified gRNAs.
Claim 55engineering method advantagesupports2022Source 1needs review

The circular gRNA approach uses only two or three pre-installed photolabile substituents followed by simple covalent cyclization and is described as a more robust synthesis approach than heavily modified gRNAs.

This approach relies on only two or three pre-installed photolabile substituents followed by a simple covalent cyclization, which provides a robust synthesize approach in comparison to heavily modified gRNAs.
Claim 56engineering method advantagesupports2022Source 1needs review

The circular gRNA approach uses only two or three pre-installed photolabile substituents followed by simple covalent cyclization and is described as a more robust synthesis approach than heavily modified gRNAs.

This approach relies on only two or three pre-installed photolabile substituents followed by a simple covalent cyclization, which provides a robust synthesize approach in comparison to heavily modified gRNAs.
Claim 57engineering method advantagesupports2022Source 1needs review

The circular gRNA approach uses only two or three pre-installed photolabile substituents followed by simple covalent cyclization and is described as a more robust synthesis approach than heavily modified gRNAs.

This approach relies on only two or three pre-installed photolabile substituents followed by a simple covalent cyclization, which provides a robust synthesize approach in comparison to heavily modified gRNAs.
Claim 58engineering method advantagesupports2022Source 1needs review

The circular gRNA approach uses only two or three pre-installed photolabile substituents followed by simple covalent cyclization and is described as a more robust synthesis approach than heavily modified gRNAs.

This approach relies on only two or three pre-installed photolabile substituents followed by a simple covalent cyclization, which provides a robust synthesize approach in comparison to heavily modified gRNAs.
Claim 59engineering method advantagesupports2022Source 1needs review

The circular gRNA approach uses only two or three pre-installed photolabile substituents followed by simple covalent cyclization and is described as a more robust synthesis approach than heavily modified gRNAs.

This approach relies on only two or three pre-installed photolabile substituents followed by a simple covalent cyclization, which provides a robust synthesize approach in comparison to heavily modified gRNAs.
Claim 60engineering method advantagesupports2022Source 1needs review

The circular gRNA approach uses only two or three pre-installed photolabile substituents followed by simple covalent cyclization and is described as a more robust synthesis approach than heavily modified gRNAs.

This approach relies on only two or three pre-installed photolabile substituents followed by a simple covalent cyclization, which provides a robust synthesize approach in comparison to heavily modified gRNAs.
Claim 61engineering method advantagesupports2022Source 1needs review

The circular gRNA approach uses only two or three pre-installed photolabile substituents followed by simple covalent cyclization and is described as a more robust synthesis approach than heavily modified gRNAs.

This approach relies on only two or three pre-installed photolabile substituents followed by a simple covalent cyclization, which provides a robust synthesize approach in comparison to heavily modified gRNAs.
Claim 62functional capabilitysupports2022Source 1needs review

Photo-sensitive circular gRNAs enable spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9- and Cpf1-mediated editing.

we reported a spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9 and Cpf1-mediated editing with photo-sensitive circular gRNAs
Claim 63functional capabilitysupports2022Source 1needs review

Photo-sensitive circular gRNAs enable spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9- and Cpf1-mediated editing.

we reported a spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9 and Cpf1-mediated editing with photo-sensitive circular gRNAs
Claim 64functional capabilitysupports2022Source 1needs review

Photo-sensitive circular gRNAs enable spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9- and Cpf1-mediated editing.

we reported a spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9 and Cpf1-mediated editing with photo-sensitive circular gRNAs
Claim 65functional capabilitysupports2022Source 1needs review

Photo-sensitive circular gRNAs enable spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9- and Cpf1-mediated editing.

we reported a spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9 and Cpf1-mediated editing with photo-sensitive circular gRNAs
Claim 66functional capabilitysupports2022Source 1needs review

Photo-sensitive circular gRNAs enable spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9- and Cpf1-mediated editing.

we reported a spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9 and Cpf1-mediated editing with photo-sensitive circular gRNAs
Claim 67functional capabilitysupports2022Source 1needs review

Photo-sensitive circular gRNAs enable spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9- and Cpf1-mediated editing.

we reported a spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9 and Cpf1-mediated editing with photo-sensitive circular gRNAs
Claim 68functional capabilitysupports2022Source 1needs review

Photo-sensitive circular gRNAs enable spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9- and Cpf1-mediated editing.

we reported a spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9 and Cpf1-mediated editing with photo-sensitive circular gRNAs
Claim 69functional capabilitysupports2022Source 1needs review

Photo-sensitive circular gRNAs enable spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9- and Cpf1-mediated editing.

we reported a spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9 and Cpf1-mediated editing with photo-sensitive circular gRNAs
Claim 70functional capabilitysupports2022Source 1needs review

Photo-sensitive circular gRNAs enable spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9- and Cpf1-mediated editing.

we reported a spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9 and Cpf1-mediated editing with photo-sensitive circular gRNAs
Claim 71functional capabilitysupports2022Source 1needs review

Photo-sensitive circular gRNAs enable spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9- and Cpf1-mediated editing.

we reported a spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9 and Cpf1-mediated editing with photo-sensitive circular gRNAs
Claim 72functional capabilitysupports2022Source 1needs review

Photo-sensitive circular gRNAs enable spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9- and Cpf1-mediated editing.

we reported a spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9 and Cpf1-mediated editing with photo-sensitive circular gRNAs
Claim 73functional capabilitysupports2022Source 1needs review

Photo-sensitive circular gRNAs enable spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9- and Cpf1-mediated editing.

we reported a spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9 and Cpf1-mediated editing with photo-sensitive circular gRNAs
Claim 74functional capabilitysupports2022Source 1needs review

Photo-sensitive circular gRNAs enable spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9- and Cpf1-mediated editing.

we reported a spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9 and Cpf1-mediated editing with photo-sensitive circular gRNAs
Claim 75functional capabilitysupports2022Source 1needs review

Photo-sensitive circular gRNAs enable spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9- and Cpf1-mediated editing.

we reported a spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9 and Cpf1-mediated editing with photo-sensitive circular gRNAs
Claim 76functional capabilitysupports2022Source 1needs review

Photo-sensitive circular gRNAs enable spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9- and Cpf1-mediated editing.

we reported a spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9 and Cpf1-mediated editing with photo-sensitive circular gRNAs
Claim 77functional capabilitysupports2022Source 1needs review

Photo-sensitive circular gRNAs enable spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9- and Cpf1-mediated editing.

we reported a spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9 and Cpf1-mediated editing with photo-sensitive circular gRNAs
Claim 78functional capabilitysupports2022Source 1needs review

Photo-sensitive circular gRNAs enable spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9- and Cpf1-mediated editing.

we reported a spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9 and Cpf1-mediated editing with photo-sensitive circular gRNAs
Claim 79light gated editingsupports2022Source 1needs review

In established cells stably expressing Cas9, circular gRNA together with light irradiation directs precise cleavage of GFP and VEGFA within a pre-defined cutting region.

In established cells stably expressing Cas9, the circular gRNA in coordination with light irradiation could direct a precise cleavage of GFP and VEGFA within a pre-defined cutting region.
Claim 80light gated editingsupports2022Source 1needs review

In established cells stably expressing Cas9, circular gRNA together with light irradiation directs precise cleavage of GFP and VEGFA within a pre-defined cutting region.

In established cells stably expressing Cas9, the circular gRNA in coordination with light irradiation could direct a precise cleavage of GFP and VEGFA within a pre-defined cutting region.
Claim 81light gated editingsupports2022Source 1needs review

In established cells stably expressing Cas9, circular gRNA together with light irradiation directs precise cleavage of GFP and VEGFA within a pre-defined cutting region.

In established cells stably expressing Cas9, the circular gRNA in coordination with light irradiation could direct a precise cleavage of GFP and VEGFA within a pre-defined cutting region.
Claim 82light gated editingsupports2022Source 1needs review

In established cells stably expressing Cas9, circular gRNA together with light irradiation directs precise cleavage of GFP and VEGFA within a pre-defined cutting region.

In established cells stably expressing Cas9, the circular gRNA in coordination with light irradiation could direct a precise cleavage of GFP and VEGFA within a pre-defined cutting region.
Claim 83light gated editingsupports2022Source 1needs review

In established cells stably expressing Cas9, circular gRNA together with light irradiation directs precise cleavage of GFP and VEGFA within a pre-defined cutting region.

In established cells stably expressing Cas9, the circular gRNA in coordination with light irradiation could direct a precise cleavage of GFP and VEGFA within a pre-defined cutting region.
Claim 84light gated editingsupports2022Source 1needs review

In established cells stably expressing Cas9, circular gRNA together with light irradiation directs precise cleavage of GFP and VEGFA within a pre-defined cutting region.

In established cells stably expressing Cas9, the circular gRNA in coordination with light irradiation could direct a precise cleavage of GFP and VEGFA within a pre-defined cutting region.
Claim 85light gated editingsupports2022Source 1needs review

In established cells stably expressing Cas9, circular gRNA together with light irradiation directs precise cleavage of GFP and VEGFA within a pre-defined cutting region.

In established cells stably expressing Cas9, the circular gRNA in coordination with light irradiation could direct a precise cleavage of GFP and VEGFA within a pre-defined cutting region.
Claim 86light gated editingsupports2022Source 1needs review

In established cells stably expressing Cas9, circular gRNA together with light irradiation directs precise cleavage of GFP and VEGFA within a pre-defined cutting region.

In established cells stably expressing Cas9, the circular gRNA in coordination with light irradiation could direct a precise cleavage of GFP and VEGFA within a pre-defined cutting region.
Claim 87light gated editingsupports2022Source 1needs review

In established cells stably expressing Cas9, circular gRNA together with light irradiation directs precise cleavage of GFP and VEGFA within a pre-defined cutting region.

In established cells stably expressing Cas9, the circular gRNA in coordination with light irradiation could direct a precise cleavage of GFP and VEGFA within a pre-defined cutting region.
Claim 88light gated editingsupports2022Source 1needs review

In established cells stably expressing Cas9, circular gRNA together with light irradiation directs precise cleavage of GFP and VEGFA within a pre-defined cutting region.

In established cells stably expressing Cas9, the circular gRNA in coordination with light irradiation could direct a precise cleavage of GFP and VEGFA within a pre-defined cutting region.
Claim 89light gated editingsupports2022Source 1needs review

In established cells stably expressing Cas9, circular gRNA together with light irradiation directs precise cleavage of GFP and VEGFA within a pre-defined cutting region.

In established cells stably expressing Cas9, the circular gRNA in coordination with light irradiation could direct a precise cleavage of GFP and VEGFA within a pre-defined cutting region.
Claim 90light gated editingsupports2022Source 1needs review

In established cells stably expressing Cas9, circular gRNA together with light irradiation directs precise cleavage of GFP and VEGFA within a pre-defined cutting region.

In established cells stably expressing Cas9, the circular gRNA in coordination with light irradiation could direct a precise cleavage of GFP and VEGFA within a pre-defined cutting region.
Claim 91light gated editingsupports2022Source 1needs review

In established cells stably expressing Cas9, circular gRNA together with light irradiation directs precise cleavage of GFP and VEGFA within a pre-defined cutting region.

In established cells stably expressing Cas9, the circular gRNA in coordination with light irradiation could direct a precise cleavage of GFP and VEGFA within a pre-defined cutting region.
Claim 92light gated editingsupports2022Source 1needs review

In established cells stably expressing Cas9, circular gRNA together with light irradiation directs precise cleavage of GFP and VEGFA within a pre-defined cutting region.

In established cells stably expressing Cas9, the circular gRNA in coordination with light irradiation could direct a precise cleavage of GFP and VEGFA within a pre-defined cutting region.
Claim 93light gated editingsupports2022Source 1needs review

In established cells stably expressing Cas9, circular gRNA together with light irradiation directs precise cleavage of GFP and VEGFA within a pre-defined cutting region.

In established cells stably expressing Cas9, the circular gRNA in coordination with light irradiation could direct a precise cleavage of GFP and VEGFA within a pre-defined cutting region.
Claim 94light gated editingsupports2022Source 1needs review

In established cells stably expressing Cas9, circular gRNA together with light irradiation directs precise cleavage of GFP and VEGFA within a pre-defined cutting region.

In established cells stably expressing Cas9, the circular gRNA in coordination with light irradiation could direct a precise cleavage of GFP and VEGFA within a pre-defined cutting region.
Claim 95light gated editingsupports2022Source 1needs review

In established cells stably expressing Cas9, circular gRNA together with light irradiation directs precise cleavage of GFP and VEGFA within a pre-defined cutting region.

In established cells stably expressing Cas9, the circular gRNA in coordination with light irradiation could direct a precise cleavage of GFP and VEGFA within a pre-defined cutting region.

Approval Evidence

1 source5 linked approval claimsfirst-pass slug photo-sensitive-circular-grnas
we reported a spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9 and Cpf1-mediated editing with photo-sensitive circular gRNAs

Source:

application scopesupports

The method is presented as an improved way to precisely manipulate where and when genes are edited.

Together, our work provides a significantly improved method to precisely manipulate where and when genes are edited.

Source:

embryo editingsupports

Light-mediated MSTN gene editing was achieved in embryos.

We have also achieved light-mediated MSTN gene editing in embryos

Source:

engineering method advantagesupports

The circular gRNA approach uses only two or three pre-installed photolabile substituents followed by simple covalent cyclization and is described as a more robust synthesis approach than heavily modified gRNAs.

This approach relies on only two or three pre-installed photolabile substituents followed by a simple covalent cyclization, which provides a robust synthesize approach in comparison to heavily modified gRNAs.

Source:

functional capabilitysupports

Photo-sensitive circular gRNAs enable spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9- and Cpf1-mediated editing.

we reported a spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9 and Cpf1-mediated editing with photo-sensitive circular gRNAs

Source:

light gated editingsupports

In established cells stably expressing Cas9, circular gRNA together with light irradiation directs precise cleavage of GFP and VEGFA within a pre-defined cutting region.

In established cells stably expressing Cas9, the circular gRNA in coordination with light irradiation could direct a precise cleavage of GFP and VEGFA within a pre-defined cutting region.

Source:

Comparisons

Source-backed strengths

Reported strengths include spatiotemporal and efficient CRISPR/Cas9- and Cpf1-mediated editing. The source also states that a bow-knot-type gRNA had no detectable background editing in the absence of light and that light-mediated MSTN gene editing was achieved in embryos.

Source:

This approach relies on only two or three pre-installed photolabile substituents followed by a simple covalent cyclization, which provides a robust synthesize approach in comparison to heavily modified gRNAs.

photo-sensitive circular gRNAs and auxiliary photocleavable oligodeoxyribonucleotides complementary to crRNA address a similar problem space because they share editing.

Shared frame: same top-level item type; shared target processes: editing; shared mechanisms: photocleavage; same primary input modality: light

Compared with caged guide RNA

photo-sensitive circular gRNAs and caged guide RNA address a similar problem space because they share editing.

Shared frame: same top-level item type; shared target processes: editing; shared mechanisms: photocleavage; same primary input modality: light

photo-sensitive circular gRNAs and light-controlled crRNA address a similar problem space because they share editing.

Shared frame: same top-level item type; shared target processes: editing; shared mechanisms: photocleavage; same primary input modality: light

Ranked Citations

  1. 1.

    Extracted from this source document.