Toolkit/protein conformational switch

protein conformational switch

Multi-Component Switch·Research·Since 2010

Also known as: molecular switch

Taxonomy: Mechanism Branch / Architecture. Workflows sit above the mechanism and technique branches rather than replacing them.

Summary

A protein conformational switch is an engineered protein system in which a signaling event induces a conformational change. Reported uses include reagent-free biosensing and regulation of biological function.

Usefulness & Problems

Why this is useful

This tool class is useful because it converts signaling events directly into protein structural changes, enabling reagent-free biosensors and proteins with regulated activity. The cited literature frames these switches as a way to endow proteins that previously lacked switching behavior with controllable responses.

Source:

Proteins that switch conformations in response to a signaling event (e.g., ligand binding or chemical modification) present a unique solution to the design of reagent-free biosensors as well as molecules whose biological functions are regulated in useful ways.

Problem solved

It addresses the problem of creating proteins that respond to signaling inputs with a functional structural transition. This supports biosensing and functional regulation without requiring added reagents, according to the cited review.

Source:

Proteins that switch conformations in response to a signaling event (e.g., ligand binding or chemical modification) present a unique solution to the design of reagent-free biosensors as well as molecules whose biological functions are regulated in useful ways.

Problem links

Need conditional control of signaling activity

Derived

A protein conformational switch is an engineered molecular switch in which a signaling event induces a protein conformational change. Reported applications include reagent-free biosensing and regulation of biological function.

Taxonomy & Function

Primary hierarchy

Mechanism Branch

Architecture: A composed arrangement of multiple parts that instantiates one or more mechanisms.

Target processes

signaling

Input: Chemical

Implementation Constraints

cofactor dependency: cofactor requirement unknownencoding mode: genetically encodedimplementation constraint: context specific validationimplementation constraint: multi component delivery burdenoperating role: sensorswitch architecture: multi componentswitch architecture: uncaging

The available evidence indicates that switching properties have been introduced into binding proteins by exploiting natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins, and creating new switching mechanisms. No specific construct architecture, cofactor requirement, expression system, or delivery method is described in the supplied evidence.

The provided evidence is high-level and does not specify particular protein scaffolds, ligands, dynamic range, kinetics, or validation assays. It also does not document a specific implementation, organism, or independent replication for any one switch design.

Validation

Cell-freeBacteriaMammalianMouseHumanTherapeuticIndep. Replication

Supporting Sources

Ranked Claims

Claim 1application scopesupports2010Source 1needs review

Proteins engineered to switch conformation in response to signaling events can serve as reagent-free biosensors and as molecules with regulated biological functions.

Proteins that switch conformations in response to a signaling event (e.g., ligand binding or chemical modification) present a unique solution to the design of reagent-free biosensors as well as molecules whose biological functions are regulated in useful ways.
Claim 2application scopesupports2010Source 1needs review

Proteins engineered to switch conformation in response to signaling events can serve as reagent-free biosensors and as molecules with regulated biological functions.

Proteins that switch conformations in response to a signaling event (e.g., ligand binding or chemical modification) present a unique solution to the design of reagent-free biosensors as well as molecules whose biological functions are regulated in useful ways.
Claim 3application scopesupports2010Source 1needs review

Proteins engineered to switch conformation in response to signaling events can serve as reagent-free biosensors and as molecules with regulated biological functions.

Proteins that switch conformations in response to a signaling event (e.g., ligand binding or chemical modification) present a unique solution to the design of reagent-free biosensors as well as molecules whose biological functions are regulated in useful ways.
Claim 4application scopesupports2010Source 1needs review

Proteins engineered to switch conformation in response to signaling events can serve as reagent-free biosensors and as molecules with regulated biological functions.

Proteins that switch conformations in response to a signaling event (e.g., ligand binding or chemical modification) present a unique solution to the design of reagent-free biosensors as well as molecules whose biological functions are regulated in useful ways.
Claim 5application scopesupports2010Source 1needs review

Proteins engineered to switch conformation in response to signaling events can serve as reagent-free biosensors and as molecules with regulated biological functions.

Proteins that switch conformations in response to a signaling event (e.g., ligand binding or chemical modification) present a unique solution to the design of reagent-free biosensors as well as molecules whose biological functions are regulated in useful ways.
Claim 6application scopesupports2010Source 1needs review

Proteins engineered to switch conformation in response to signaling events can serve as reagent-free biosensors and as molecules with regulated biological functions.

Proteins that switch conformations in response to a signaling event (e.g., ligand binding or chemical modification) present a unique solution to the design of reagent-free biosensors as well as molecules whose biological functions are regulated in useful ways.
Claim 7application scopesupports2010Source 1needs review

Proteins engineered to switch conformation in response to signaling events can serve as reagent-free biosensors and as molecules with regulated biological functions.

Proteins that switch conformations in response to a signaling event (e.g., ligand binding or chemical modification) present a unique solution to the design of reagent-free biosensors as well as molecules whose biological functions are regulated in useful ways.
Claim 8application scopesupports2010Source 1needs review

Proteins engineered to switch conformation in response to signaling events can serve as reagent-free biosensors and as molecules with regulated biological functions.

Proteins that switch conformations in response to a signaling event (e.g., ligand binding or chemical modification) present a unique solution to the design of reagent-free biosensors as well as molecules whose biological functions are regulated in useful ways.
Claim 9application scopesupports2010Source 1needs review

Proteins engineered to switch conformation in response to signaling events can serve as reagent-free biosensors and as molecules with regulated biological functions.

Proteins that switch conformations in response to a signaling event (e.g., ligand binding or chemical modification) present a unique solution to the design of reagent-free biosensors as well as molecules whose biological functions are regulated in useful ways.
Claim 10application scopesupports2010Source 1needs review

Proteins engineered to switch conformation in response to signaling events can serve as reagent-free biosensors and as molecules with regulated biological functions.

Proteins that switch conformations in response to a signaling event (e.g., ligand binding or chemical modification) present a unique solution to the design of reagent-free biosensors as well as molecules whose biological functions are regulated in useful ways.
Claim 11application scopesupports2010Source 1needs review

Proteins engineered to switch conformation in response to signaling events can serve as reagent-free biosensors and as molecules with regulated biological functions.

Proteins that switch conformations in response to a signaling event (e.g., ligand binding or chemical modification) present a unique solution to the design of reagent-free biosensors as well as molecules whose biological functions are regulated in useful ways.
Claim 12application scopesupports2010Source 1needs review

Proteins engineered to switch conformation in response to signaling events can serve as reagent-free biosensors and as molecules with regulated biological functions.

Proteins that switch conformations in response to a signaling event (e.g., ligand binding or chemical modification) present a unique solution to the design of reagent-free biosensors as well as molecules whose biological functions are regulated in useful ways.
Claim 13application scopesupports2010Source 1needs review

Proteins engineered to switch conformation in response to signaling events can serve as reagent-free biosensors and as molecules with regulated biological functions.

Proteins that switch conformations in response to a signaling event (e.g., ligand binding or chemical modification) present a unique solution to the design of reagent-free biosensors as well as molecules whose biological functions are regulated in useful ways.
Claim 14application scopesupports2010Source 1needs review

Proteins engineered to switch conformation in response to signaling events can serve as reagent-free biosensors and as molecules with regulated biological functions.

Proteins that switch conformations in response to a signaling event (e.g., ligand binding or chemical modification) present a unique solution to the design of reagent-free biosensors as well as molecules whose biological functions are regulated in useful ways.
Claim 15application scopesupports2010Source 1needs review

Proteins engineered to switch conformation in response to signaling events can serve as reagent-free biosensors and as molecules with regulated biological functions.

Proteins that switch conformations in response to a signaling event (e.g., ligand binding or chemical modification) present a unique solution to the design of reagent-free biosensors as well as molecules whose biological functions are regulated in useful ways.
Claim 16application scopesupports2010Source 1needs review

Proteins engineered to switch conformation in response to signaling events can serve as reagent-free biosensors and as molecules with regulated biological functions.

Proteins that switch conformations in response to a signaling event (e.g., ligand binding or chemical modification) present a unique solution to the design of reagent-free biosensors as well as molecules whose biological functions are regulated in useful ways.
Claim 17application scopesupports2010Source 1needs review

Proteins engineered to switch conformation in response to signaling events can serve as reagent-free biosensors and as molecules with regulated biological functions.

Proteins that switch conformations in response to a signaling event (e.g., ligand binding or chemical modification) present a unique solution to the design of reagent-free biosensors as well as molecules whose biological functions are regulated in useful ways.
Claim 18application scopesupports2010Source 1needs review

Proteins engineered to switch conformation in response to signaling events can serve as reagent-free biosensors and as molecules with regulated biological functions.

Proteins that switch conformations in response to a signaling event (e.g., ligand binding or chemical modification) present a unique solution to the design of reagent-free biosensors as well as molecules whose biological functions are regulated in useful ways.
Claim 19application scopesupports2010Source 1needs review

Proteins engineered to switch conformation in response to signaling events can serve as reagent-free biosensors and as molecules with regulated biological functions.

Proteins that switch conformations in response to a signaling event (e.g., ligand binding or chemical modification) present a unique solution to the design of reagent-free biosensors as well as molecules whose biological functions are regulated in useful ways.
Claim 20application scopesupports2010Source 1needs review

Proteins engineered to switch conformation in response to signaling events can serve as reagent-free biosensors and as molecules with regulated biological functions.

Proteins that switch conformations in response to a signaling event (e.g., ligand binding or chemical modification) present a unique solution to the design of reagent-free biosensors as well as molecules whose biological functions are regulated in useful ways.
Claim 21application scopesupports2010Source 1needs review

Proteins engineered to switch conformation in response to signaling events can serve as reagent-free biosensors and as molecules with regulated biological functions.

Proteins that switch conformations in response to a signaling event (e.g., ligand binding or chemical modification) present a unique solution to the design of reagent-free biosensors as well as molecules whose biological functions are regulated in useful ways.
Claim 22application scopesupports2010Source 1needs review

Proteins engineered to switch conformation in response to signaling events can serve as reagent-free biosensors and as molecules with regulated biological functions.

Proteins that switch conformations in response to a signaling event (e.g., ligand binding or chemical modification) present a unique solution to the design of reagent-free biosensors as well as molecules whose biological functions are regulated in useful ways.
Claim 23application scopesupports2010Source 1needs review

Proteins engineered to switch conformation in response to signaling events can serve as reagent-free biosensors and as molecules with regulated biological functions.

Proteins that switch conformations in response to a signaling event (e.g., ligand binding or chemical modification) present a unique solution to the design of reagent-free biosensors as well as molecules whose biological functions are regulated in useful ways.
Claim 24application scopesupports2010Source 1needs review

Proteins engineered to switch conformation in response to signaling events can serve as reagent-free biosensors and as molecules with regulated biological functions.

Proteins that switch conformations in response to a signaling event (e.g., ligand binding or chemical modification) present a unique solution to the design of reagent-free biosensors as well as molecules whose biological functions are regulated in useful ways.
Claim 25application scopesupports2010Source 1needs review

Proteins engineered to switch conformation in response to signaling events can serve as reagent-free biosensors and as molecules with regulated biological functions.

Proteins that switch conformations in response to a signaling event (e.g., ligand binding or chemical modification) present a unique solution to the design of reagent-free biosensors as well as molecules whose biological functions are regulated in useful ways.
Claim 26application scopesupports2010Source 1needs review

Proteins engineered to switch conformation in response to signaling events can serve as reagent-free biosensors and as molecules with regulated biological functions.

Proteins that switch conformations in response to a signaling event (e.g., ligand binding or chemical modification) present a unique solution to the design of reagent-free biosensors as well as molecules whose biological functions are regulated in useful ways.
Claim 27application scopesupports2010Source 1needs review

Proteins engineered to switch conformation in response to signaling events can serve as reagent-free biosensors and as molecules with regulated biological functions.

Proteins that switch conformations in response to a signaling event (e.g., ligand binding or chemical modification) present a unique solution to the design of reagent-free biosensors as well as molecules whose biological functions are regulated in useful ways.
Claim 28engineering strategy overviewsupports2010Source 1needs review

Recent protein engineering efforts introduce switching properties into binding proteins by leveraging natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins, and creating new switching mechanisms.

Herein, we review recent protein engineering efforts to introduce switching properties into binding proteins. By co-opting natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins in creative ways and formulating altogether new switching mechanisms, researchers are learning how to coax conformational changes from proteins that previously had none.
Claim 29engineering strategy overviewsupports2010Source 1needs review

Recent protein engineering efforts introduce switching properties into binding proteins by leveraging natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins, and creating new switching mechanisms.

Herein, we review recent protein engineering efforts to introduce switching properties into binding proteins. By co-opting natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins in creative ways and formulating altogether new switching mechanisms, researchers are learning how to coax conformational changes from proteins that previously had none.
Claim 30engineering strategy overviewsupports2010Source 1needs review

Recent protein engineering efforts introduce switching properties into binding proteins by leveraging natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins, and creating new switching mechanisms.

Herein, we review recent protein engineering efforts to introduce switching properties into binding proteins. By co-opting natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins in creative ways and formulating altogether new switching mechanisms, researchers are learning how to coax conformational changes from proteins that previously had none.
Claim 31engineering strategy overviewsupports2010Source 1needs review

Recent protein engineering efforts introduce switching properties into binding proteins by leveraging natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins, and creating new switching mechanisms.

Herein, we review recent protein engineering efforts to introduce switching properties into binding proteins. By co-opting natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins in creative ways and formulating altogether new switching mechanisms, researchers are learning how to coax conformational changes from proteins that previously had none.
Claim 32engineering strategy overviewsupports2010Source 1needs review

Recent protein engineering efforts introduce switching properties into binding proteins by leveraging natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins, and creating new switching mechanisms.

Herein, we review recent protein engineering efforts to introduce switching properties into binding proteins. By co-opting natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins in creative ways and formulating altogether new switching mechanisms, researchers are learning how to coax conformational changes from proteins that previously had none.
Claim 33engineering strategy overviewsupports2010Source 1needs review

Recent protein engineering efforts introduce switching properties into binding proteins by leveraging natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins, and creating new switching mechanisms.

Herein, we review recent protein engineering efforts to introduce switching properties into binding proteins. By co-opting natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins in creative ways and formulating altogether new switching mechanisms, researchers are learning how to coax conformational changes from proteins that previously had none.
Claim 34engineering strategy overviewsupports2010Source 1needs review

Recent protein engineering efforts introduce switching properties into binding proteins by leveraging natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins, and creating new switching mechanisms.

Herein, we review recent protein engineering efforts to introduce switching properties into binding proteins. By co-opting natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins in creative ways and formulating altogether new switching mechanisms, researchers are learning how to coax conformational changes from proteins that previously had none.
Claim 35engineering strategy overviewsupports2010Source 1needs review

Recent protein engineering efforts introduce switching properties into binding proteins by leveraging natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins, and creating new switching mechanisms.

Herein, we review recent protein engineering efforts to introduce switching properties into binding proteins. By co-opting natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins in creative ways and formulating altogether new switching mechanisms, researchers are learning how to coax conformational changes from proteins that previously had none.
Claim 36engineering strategy overviewsupports2010Source 1needs review

Recent protein engineering efforts introduce switching properties into binding proteins by leveraging natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins, and creating new switching mechanisms.

Herein, we review recent protein engineering efforts to introduce switching properties into binding proteins. By co-opting natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins in creative ways and formulating altogether new switching mechanisms, researchers are learning how to coax conformational changes from proteins that previously had none.
Claim 37engineering strategy overviewsupports2010Source 1needs review

Recent protein engineering efforts introduce switching properties into binding proteins by leveraging natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins, and creating new switching mechanisms.

Herein, we review recent protein engineering efforts to introduce switching properties into binding proteins. By co-opting natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins in creative ways and formulating altogether new switching mechanisms, researchers are learning how to coax conformational changes from proteins that previously had none.
Claim 38engineering strategy overviewsupports2010Source 1needs review

Recent protein engineering efforts introduce switching properties into binding proteins by leveraging natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins, and creating new switching mechanisms.

Herein, we review recent protein engineering efforts to introduce switching properties into binding proteins. By co-opting natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins in creative ways and formulating altogether new switching mechanisms, researchers are learning how to coax conformational changes from proteins that previously had none.
Claim 39engineering strategy overviewsupports2010Source 1needs review

Recent protein engineering efforts introduce switching properties into binding proteins by leveraging natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins, and creating new switching mechanisms.

Herein, we review recent protein engineering efforts to introduce switching properties into binding proteins. By co-opting natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins in creative ways and formulating altogether new switching mechanisms, researchers are learning how to coax conformational changes from proteins that previously had none.
Claim 40engineering strategy overviewsupports2010Source 1needs review

Recent protein engineering efforts introduce switching properties into binding proteins by leveraging natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins, and creating new switching mechanisms.

Herein, we review recent protein engineering efforts to introduce switching properties into binding proteins. By co-opting natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins in creative ways and formulating altogether new switching mechanisms, researchers are learning how to coax conformational changes from proteins that previously had none.
Claim 41engineering strategy overviewsupports2010Source 1needs review

Recent protein engineering efforts introduce switching properties into binding proteins by leveraging natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins, and creating new switching mechanisms.

Herein, we review recent protein engineering efforts to introduce switching properties into binding proteins. By co-opting natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins in creative ways and formulating altogether new switching mechanisms, researchers are learning how to coax conformational changes from proteins that previously had none.
Claim 42engineering strategy overviewsupports2010Source 1needs review

Recent protein engineering efforts introduce switching properties into binding proteins by leveraging natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins, and creating new switching mechanisms.

Herein, we review recent protein engineering efforts to introduce switching properties into binding proteins. By co-opting natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins in creative ways and formulating altogether new switching mechanisms, researchers are learning how to coax conformational changes from proteins that previously had none.
Claim 43engineering strategy overviewsupports2010Source 1needs review

Recent protein engineering efforts introduce switching properties into binding proteins by leveraging natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins, and creating new switching mechanisms.

Herein, we review recent protein engineering efforts to introduce switching properties into binding proteins. By co-opting natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins in creative ways and formulating altogether new switching mechanisms, researchers are learning how to coax conformational changes from proteins that previously had none.
Claim 44engineering strategy overviewsupports2010Source 1needs review

Recent protein engineering efforts introduce switching properties into binding proteins by leveraging natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins, and creating new switching mechanisms.

Herein, we review recent protein engineering efforts to introduce switching properties into binding proteins. By co-opting natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins in creative ways and formulating altogether new switching mechanisms, researchers are learning how to coax conformational changes from proteins that previously had none.
Claim 45engineering strategy overviewsupports2010Source 1needs review

Recent protein engineering efforts introduce switching properties into binding proteins by leveraging natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins, and creating new switching mechanisms.

Herein, we review recent protein engineering efforts to introduce switching properties into binding proteins. By co-opting natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins in creative ways and formulating altogether new switching mechanisms, researchers are learning how to coax conformational changes from proteins that previously had none.
Claim 46engineering strategy overviewsupports2010Source 1needs review

Recent protein engineering efforts introduce switching properties into binding proteins by leveraging natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins, and creating new switching mechanisms.

Herein, we review recent protein engineering efforts to introduce switching properties into binding proteins. By co-opting natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins in creative ways and formulating altogether new switching mechanisms, researchers are learning how to coax conformational changes from proteins that previously had none.
Claim 47engineering strategy overviewsupports2010Source 1needs review

Recent protein engineering efforts introduce switching properties into binding proteins by leveraging natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins, and creating new switching mechanisms.

Herein, we review recent protein engineering efforts to introduce switching properties into binding proteins. By co-opting natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins in creative ways and formulating altogether new switching mechanisms, researchers are learning how to coax conformational changes from proteins that previously had none.
Claim 48field challengesupports2010Source 1needs review

A major obstacle to developing such switching proteins is that most natural proteins do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding or chemical modification.

The principal roadblock in the path to develop such molecules is that the majority of natural proteins do not change conformation upon binding their cognate ligands or becoming chemically modified.
Claim 49field challengesupports2010Source 1needs review

A major obstacle to developing such switching proteins is that most natural proteins do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding or chemical modification.

The principal roadblock in the path to develop such molecules is that the majority of natural proteins do not change conformation upon binding their cognate ligands or becoming chemically modified.
Claim 50field challengesupports2010Source 1needs review

A major obstacle to developing such switching proteins is that most natural proteins do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding or chemical modification.

The principal roadblock in the path to develop such molecules is that the majority of natural proteins do not change conformation upon binding their cognate ligands or becoming chemically modified.
Claim 51field challengesupports2010Source 1needs review

A major obstacle to developing such switching proteins is that most natural proteins do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding or chemical modification.

The principal roadblock in the path to develop such molecules is that the majority of natural proteins do not change conformation upon binding their cognate ligands or becoming chemically modified.
Claim 52field challengesupports2010Source 1needs review

A major obstacle to developing such switching proteins is that most natural proteins do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding or chemical modification.

The principal roadblock in the path to develop such molecules is that the majority of natural proteins do not change conformation upon binding their cognate ligands or becoming chemically modified.
Claim 53field challengesupports2010Source 1needs review

A major obstacle to developing such switching proteins is that most natural proteins do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding or chemical modification.

The principal roadblock in the path to develop such molecules is that the majority of natural proteins do not change conformation upon binding their cognate ligands or becoming chemically modified.
Claim 54field challengesupports2010Source 1needs review

A major obstacle to developing such switching proteins is that most natural proteins do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding or chemical modification.

The principal roadblock in the path to develop such molecules is that the majority of natural proteins do not change conformation upon binding their cognate ligands or becoming chemically modified.
Claim 55field challengesupports2010Source 1needs review

A major obstacle to developing such switching proteins is that most natural proteins do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding or chemical modification.

The principal roadblock in the path to develop such molecules is that the majority of natural proteins do not change conformation upon binding their cognate ligands or becoming chemically modified.
Claim 56field challengesupports2010Source 1needs review

A major obstacle to developing such switching proteins is that most natural proteins do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding or chemical modification.

The principal roadblock in the path to develop such molecules is that the majority of natural proteins do not change conformation upon binding their cognate ligands or becoming chemically modified.
Claim 57field challengesupports2010Source 1needs review

A major obstacle to developing such switching proteins is that most natural proteins do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding or chemical modification.

The principal roadblock in the path to develop such molecules is that the majority of natural proteins do not change conformation upon binding their cognate ligands or becoming chemically modified.
Claim 58field challengesupports2010Source 1needs review

A major obstacle to developing such switching proteins is that most natural proteins do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding or chemical modification.

The principal roadblock in the path to develop such molecules is that the majority of natural proteins do not change conformation upon binding their cognate ligands or becoming chemically modified.
Claim 59field challengesupports2010Source 1needs review

A major obstacle to developing such switching proteins is that most natural proteins do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding or chemical modification.

The principal roadblock in the path to develop such molecules is that the majority of natural proteins do not change conformation upon binding their cognate ligands or becoming chemically modified.
Claim 60field challengesupports2010Source 1needs review

A major obstacle to developing such switching proteins is that most natural proteins do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding or chemical modification.

The principal roadblock in the path to develop such molecules is that the majority of natural proteins do not change conformation upon binding their cognate ligands or becoming chemically modified.
Claim 61field challengesupports2010Source 1needs review

A major obstacle to developing such switching proteins is that most natural proteins do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding or chemical modification.

The principal roadblock in the path to develop such molecules is that the majority of natural proteins do not change conformation upon binding their cognate ligands or becoming chemically modified.
Claim 62field challengesupports2010Source 1needs review

A major obstacle to developing such switching proteins is that most natural proteins do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding or chemical modification.

The principal roadblock in the path to develop such molecules is that the majority of natural proteins do not change conformation upon binding their cognate ligands or becoming chemically modified.
Claim 63field challengesupports2010Source 1needs review

A major obstacle to developing such switching proteins is that most natural proteins do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding or chemical modification.

The principal roadblock in the path to develop such molecules is that the majority of natural proteins do not change conformation upon binding their cognate ligands or becoming chemically modified.
Claim 64field challengesupports2010Source 1needs review

A major obstacle to developing such switching proteins is that most natural proteins do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding or chemical modification.

The principal roadblock in the path to develop such molecules is that the majority of natural proteins do not change conformation upon binding their cognate ligands or becoming chemically modified.
Claim 65field challengesupports2010Source 1needs review

A major obstacle to developing such switching proteins is that most natural proteins do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding or chemical modification.

The principal roadblock in the path to develop such molecules is that the majority of natural proteins do not change conformation upon binding their cognate ligands or becoming chemically modified.
Claim 66field challengesupports2010Source 1needs review

A major obstacle to developing such switching proteins is that most natural proteins do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding or chemical modification.

The principal roadblock in the path to develop such molecules is that the majority of natural proteins do not change conformation upon binding their cognate ligands or becoming chemically modified.
Claim 67field challengesupports2010Source 1needs review

A major obstacle to developing such switching proteins is that most natural proteins do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding or chemical modification.

The principal roadblock in the path to develop such molecules is that the majority of natural proteins do not change conformation upon binding their cognate ligands or becoming chemically modified.
Claim 68field challengesupports2010Source 1needs review

A major obstacle to developing such switching proteins is that most natural proteins do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding or chemical modification.

The principal roadblock in the path to develop such molecules is that the majority of natural proteins do not change conformation upon binding their cognate ligands or becoming chemically modified.
Claim 69field challengesupports2010Source 1needs review

A major obstacle to developing such switching proteins is that most natural proteins do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding or chemical modification.

The principal roadblock in the path to develop such molecules is that the majority of natural proteins do not change conformation upon binding their cognate ligands or becoming chemically modified.
Claim 70field challengesupports2010Source 1needs review

A major obstacle to developing such switching proteins is that most natural proteins do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding or chemical modification.

The principal roadblock in the path to develop such molecules is that the majority of natural proteins do not change conformation upon binding their cognate ligands or becoming chemically modified.
Claim 71field challengesupports2010Source 1needs review

A major obstacle to developing such switching proteins is that most natural proteins do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding or chemical modification.

The principal roadblock in the path to develop such molecules is that the majority of natural proteins do not change conformation upon binding their cognate ligands or becoming chemically modified.
Claim 72field challengesupports2010Source 1needs review

A major obstacle to developing such switching proteins is that most natural proteins do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding or chemical modification.

The principal roadblock in the path to develop such molecules is that the majority of natural proteins do not change conformation upon binding their cognate ligands or becoming chemically modified.
Claim 73field challengesupports2010Source 1needs review

A major obstacle to developing such switching proteins is that most natural proteins do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding or chemical modification.

The principal roadblock in the path to develop such molecules is that the majority of natural proteins do not change conformation upon binding their cognate ligands or becoming chemically modified.
Claim 74field challengesupports2010Source 1needs review

A major obstacle to developing such switching proteins is that most natural proteins do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding or chemical modification.

The principal roadblock in the path to develop such molecules is that the majority of natural proteins do not change conformation upon binding their cognate ligands or becoming chemically modified.

Approval Evidence

1 source2 linked approval claimsfirst-pass slug protein-conformational-switch
Proteins that switch conformations in response to a signaling event ... present a unique solution ... researchers are learning how to coax conformational changes from proteins that previously had none.

Source:

application scopesupports

Proteins engineered to switch conformation in response to signaling events can serve as reagent-free biosensors and as molecules with regulated biological functions.

Proteins that switch conformations in response to a signaling event (e.g., ligand binding or chemical modification) present a unique solution to the design of reagent-free biosensors as well as molecules whose biological functions are regulated in useful ways.

Source:

field challengesupports

A major obstacle to developing such switching proteins is that most natural proteins do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding or chemical modification.

The principal roadblock in the path to develop such molecules is that the majority of natural proteins do not change conformation upon binding their cognate ligands or becoming chemically modified.

Source:

Comparisons

Source-backed strengths

The reported strength is conceptual versatility: engineered conformational switching can be applied both to biosensing and to regulation of biological function. The literature also indicates multiple engineering routes, including leveraging natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins, and creating new switching mechanisms.

Source:

Herein, we review recent protein engineering efforts to introduce switching properties into binding proteins. By co-opting natural allosteric coupling, joining proteins in creative ways and formulating altogether new switching mechanisms, researchers are learning how to coax conformational changes from proteins that previously had none.

protein conformational switch and caging/uncaging events address a similar problem space because they share signaling.

Shared frame: same top-level item type; shared target processes: signaling; shared mechanisms: conformational uncaging, conformational_uncaging

Strengths here: looks easier to implement in practice.

protein conformational switch and engineered focal adhesion kinase two-input gate address a similar problem space because they share signaling.

Shared frame: same top-level item type; shared target processes: signaling; shared mechanisms: conformational uncaging, conformational_uncaging

Strengths here: looks easier to implement in practice.

protein conformational switch and NS3-peptide drug-displaceable complex address a similar problem space because they share signaling.

Shared frame: same top-level item type; shared target processes: signaling; same primary input modality: chemical

Ranked Citations

  1. 1.
    StructuralSource 1Protein Science2010Claim 24Claim 24Claim 24

    Seeded from load plan for claim cl1. Extracted from this source document.