Toolkit/single-component optogenetic tools for inducible RhoA GTPase signaling

single-component optogenetic tools for inducible RhoA GTPase signaling

Multi-Component Switch·Research·Since 2021

Taxonomy: Mechanism Branch / Architecture. Workflows sit above the mechanism and technique branches rather than replacing them.

Summary

Single-component optogenetic tools were created to control RhoA GTPase signaling with light. The reported system does not require protein binding partners and enables inducible RhoA-mediated cytoskeletal activation with downstream YAP nuclear localization and YAP-TEAD mechanotranscription.

Usefulness & Problems

Why this is useful

These tools are useful for perturbing RhoA signaling with light while avoiding the need for separate binding-partner components. The reported outputs include cytoskeletal remodeling and rapid YAP-dependent mechanotransduction, making the system relevant for studying contractility-linked signaling.

Source:

Direct membrane recruitment of these effectors induced potent contractile signaling sufficient to separate adherens junctions in response to as little as one pulse of blue light.

Source:

RhoA GTPase, or its upstream activating GEF effectors, were fused to BcLOV4, a photoreceptor that can be dynamically recruited to the plasma membrane by a light-regulated protein-lipid electrostatic interaction with the inner leaflet.

Problem solved

The tool addresses the problem of optically inducing RhoA GTPase signaling in a single-component format rather than through multi-protein partner systems. It also provides a way to connect acute RhoA activation to downstream mechanotransduction readouts such as YAP nuclear localization and YAP-TEAD transcriptional activity.

Taxonomy & Function

Primary hierarchy

Mechanism Branch

Architecture: A composed arrangement of multiple parts that instantiates one or more mechanisms.

Techniques

No technique tags yet.

Target processes

localizationrecombinationsignalingtranscription

Input: Light

Implementation Constraints

The source supports that the system is a single-component optogenetic design for light control of RhoA GTPase signaling and that it does not require protein binding partners. However, the provided evidence does not describe cofactors, expression system, delivery method, membrane-targeting sequence, or exact fusion design.

The available evidence here is sparse and does not specify the photoreceptor module, wavelengths, construct architecture, or quantitative performance metrics. Reported cytoskeletal morphology changes were context dependent, because their outcome depended on alignment between spatially patterned stimulation and the underlying cell polarization.

Validation

Cell-freeBacteriaMammalianMouseHumanTherapeuticIndep. Replication

Supporting Sources

Ranked Claims

Claim 1context dependencesupports2021Source 1needs review

Cytoskeletal morphology changes depended on the alignment of spatially patterned stimulation with the underlying cell polarization.

Cytoskeletal morphology changes were dependent on the alignment of the spatially patterned stimulation with the underlying cell polarization.
Claim 2context dependencesupports2021Source 1needs review

Cytoskeletal morphology changes depended on the alignment of spatially patterned stimulation with the underlying cell polarization.

Cytoskeletal morphology changes were dependent on the alignment of the spatially patterned stimulation with the underlying cell polarization.
Claim 3context dependencesupports2021Source 1needs review

Cytoskeletal morphology changes depended on the alignment of spatially patterned stimulation with the underlying cell polarization.

Cytoskeletal morphology changes were dependent on the alignment of the spatially patterned stimulation with the underlying cell polarization.
Claim 4context dependencesupports2021Source 1needs review

Cytoskeletal morphology changes depended on the alignment of spatially patterned stimulation with the underlying cell polarization.

Cytoskeletal morphology changes were dependent on the alignment of the spatially patterned stimulation with the underlying cell polarization.
Claim 5context dependencesupports2021Source 1needs review

Cytoskeletal morphology changes depended on the alignment of spatially patterned stimulation with the underlying cell polarization.

Cytoskeletal morphology changes were dependent on the alignment of the spatially patterned stimulation with the underlying cell polarization.
Claim 6context dependencesupports2021Source 1needs review

Cytoskeletal morphology changes depended on the alignment of spatially patterned stimulation with the underlying cell polarization.

Cytoskeletal morphology changes were dependent on the alignment of the spatially patterned stimulation with the underlying cell polarization.
Claim 7context dependencesupports2021Source 1needs review

Cytoskeletal morphology changes depended on the alignment of spatially patterned stimulation with the underlying cell polarization.

Cytoskeletal morphology changes were dependent on the alignment of the spatially patterned stimulation with the underlying cell polarization.
Claim 8design propertysupports2021Source 1needs review

These optogenetic tools are single-component and do not require protein binding partners.

These single-component tools, which do not require protein binding partners, offer spatiotemporally precise control over RhoA signaling
Claim 9design propertysupports2021Source 1needs review

These optogenetic tools are single-component and do not require protein binding partners.

These single-component tools, which do not require protein binding partners, offer spatiotemporally precise control over RhoA signaling
Claim 10design propertysupports2021Source 1needs review

These optogenetic tools are single-component and do not require protein binding partners.

These single-component tools, which do not require protein binding partners, offer spatiotemporally precise control over RhoA signaling
Claim 11design propertysupports2021Source 1needs review

These optogenetic tools are single-component and do not require protein binding partners.

These single-component tools, which do not require protein binding partners, offer spatiotemporally precise control over RhoA signaling
Claim 12design propertysupports2021Source 1needs review

These optogenetic tools are single-component and do not require protein binding partners.

These single-component tools, which do not require protein binding partners, offer spatiotemporally precise control over RhoA signaling
Claim 13design propertysupports2021Source 1needs review

These optogenetic tools are single-component and do not require protein binding partners.

These single-component tools, which do not require protein binding partners, offer spatiotemporally precise control over RhoA signaling
Claim 14design propertysupports2021Source 1needs review

These optogenetic tools are single-component and do not require protein binding partners.

These single-component tools, which do not require protein binding partners, offer spatiotemporally precise control over RhoA signaling
Claim 15downstream signalingsupports2021Source 1needs review

RhoA-mediated cytoskeletal activation induced YAP nuclear localization within minutes and subsequent mechanotransduction verified by YAP-TEAD transcriptional activity.

RhoA-mediated cytoskeletal activation induced YAP nuclear localization within minutes and subsequent mechanotransduction, verified by YAP- TEAD transcriptional activity.
time to YAP nuclear localization within minutes
Claim 16downstream signalingsupports2021Source 1needs review

RhoA-mediated cytoskeletal activation induced YAP nuclear localization within minutes and subsequent mechanotransduction verified by YAP-TEAD transcriptional activity.

RhoA-mediated cytoskeletal activation induced YAP nuclear localization within minutes and subsequent mechanotransduction, verified by YAP- TEAD transcriptional activity.
time to YAP nuclear localization within minutes
Claim 17downstream signalingsupports2021Source 1needs review

RhoA-mediated cytoskeletal activation induced YAP nuclear localization within minutes and subsequent mechanotransduction verified by YAP-TEAD transcriptional activity.

RhoA-mediated cytoskeletal activation induced YAP nuclear localization within minutes and subsequent mechanotransduction, verified by YAP- TEAD transcriptional activity.
time to YAP nuclear localization within minutes
Claim 18downstream signalingsupports2021Source 1needs review

RhoA-mediated cytoskeletal activation induced YAP nuclear localization within minutes and subsequent mechanotransduction verified by YAP-TEAD transcriptional activity.

RhoA-mediated cytoskeletal activation induced YAP nuclear localization within minutes and subsequent mechanotransduction, verified by YAP- TEAD transcriptional activity.
time to YAP nuclear localization within minutes
Claim 19downstream signalingsupports2021Source 1needs review

RhoA-mediated cytoskeletal activation induced YAP nuclear localization within minutes and subsequent mechanotransduction verified by YAP-TEAD transcriptional activity.

RhoA-mediated cytoskeletal activation induced YAP nuclear localization within minutes and subsequent mechanotransduction, verified by YAP- TEAD transcriptional activity.
time to YAP nuclear localization within minutes
Claim 20downstream signalingsupports2021Source 1needs review

RhoA-mediated cytoskeletal activation induced YAP nuclear localization within minutes and subsequent mechanotransduction verified by YAP-TEAD transcriptional activity.

RhoA-mediated cytoskeletal activation induced YAP nuclear localization within minutes and subsequent mechanotransduction, verified by YAP- TEAD transcriptional activity.
time to YAP nuclear localization within minutes
Claim 21downstream signalingsupports2021Source 1needs review

RhoA-mediated cytoskeletal activation induced YAP nuclear localization within minutes and subsequent mechanotransduction verified by YAP-TEAD transcriptional activity.

RhoA-mediated cytoskeletal activation induced YAP nuclear localization within minutes and subsequent mechanotransduction, verified by YAP- TEAD transcriptional activity.
time to YAP nuclear localization within minutes
Claim 22functional effectsupports2021Source 1needs review

Direct membrane recruitment of the fused effectors induced potent contractile signaling sufficient to separate adherens junctions after as little as one pulse of blue light.

Direct membrane recruitment of these effectors induced potent contractile signaling sufficient to separate adherens junctions in response to as little as one pulse of blue light.
light pulse requirement as little as one pulse
Claim 23functional effectsupports2021Source 1needs review

Direct membrane recruitment of the fused effectors induced potent contractile signaling sufficient to separate adherens junctions after as little as one pulse of blue light.

Direct membrane recruitment of these effectors induced potent contractile signaling sufficient to separate adherens junctions in response to as little as one pulse of blue light.
light pulse requirement as little as one pulse
Claim 24functional effectsupports2021Source 1needs review

Direct membrane recruitment of the fused effectors induced potent contractile signaling sufficient to separate adherens junctions after as little as one pulse of blue light.

Direct membrane recruitment of these effectors induced potent contractile signaling sufficient to separate adherens junctions in response to as little as one pulse of blue light.
light pulse requirement as little as one pulse
Claim 25functional effectsupports2021Source 1needs review

Direct membrane recruitment of the fused effectors induced potent contractile signaling sufficient to separate adherens junctions after as little as one pulse of blue light.

Direct membrane recruitment of these effectors induced potent contractile signaling sufficient to separate adherens junctions in response to as little as one pulse of blue light.
light pulse requirement as little as one pulse
Claim 26functional effectsupports2021Source 1needs review

Direct membrane recruitment of the fused effectors induced potent contractile signaling sufficient to separate adherens junctions after as little as one pulse of blue light.

Direct membrane recruitment of these effectors induced potent contractile signaling sufficient to separate adherens junctions in response to as little as one pulse of blue light.
light pulse requirement as little as one pulse
Claim 27functional effectsupports2021Source 1needs review

Direct membrane recruitment of the fused effectors induced potent contractile signaling sufficient to separate adherens junctions after as little as one pulse of blue light.

Direct membrane recruitment of these effectors induced potent contractile signaling sufficient to separate adherens junctions in response to as little as one pulse of blue light.
light pulse requirement as little as one pulse
Claim 28functional effectsupports2021Source 1needs review

Direct membrane recruitment of the fused effectors induced potent contractile signaling sufficient to separate adherens junctions after as little as one pulse of blue light.

Direct membrane recruitment of these effectors induced potent contractile signaling sufficient to separate adherens junctions in response to as little as one pulse of blue light.
light pulse requirement as little as one pulse
Claim 29tool mechanismsupports2021Source 1needs review

RhoA GTPase or its upstream activating GEF effectors can be fused to BcLOV4 for light-regulated plasma membrane recruitment.

RhoA GTPase, or its upstream activating GEF effectors, were fused to BcLOV4, a photoreceptor that can be dynamically recruited to the plasma membrane by a light-regulated protein-lipid electrostatic interaction with the inner leaflet.
Claim 30tool mechanismsupports2021Source 1needs review

RhoA GTPase or its upstream activating GEF effectors can be fused to BcLOV4 for light-regulated plasma membrane recruitment.

RhoA GTPase, or its upstream activating GEF effectors, were fused to BcLOV4, a photoreceptor that can be dynamically recruited to the plasma membrane by a light-regulated protein-lipid electrostatic interaction with the inner leaflet.
Claim 31tool mechanismsupports2021Source 1needs review

RhoA GTPase or its upstream activating GEF effectors can be fused to BcLOV4 for light-regulated plasma membrane recruitment.

RhoA GTPase, or its upstream activating GEF effectors, were fused to BcLOV4, a photoreceptor that can be dynamically recruited to the plasma membrane by a light-regulated protein-lipid electrostatic interaction with the inner leaflet.
Claim 32tool mechanismsupports2021Source 1needs review

RhoA GTPase or its upstream activating GEF effectors can be fused to BcLOV4 for light-regulated plasma membrane recruitment.

RhoA GTPase, or its upstream activating GEF effectors, were fused to BcLOV4, a photoreceptor that can be dynamically recruited to the plasma membrane by a light-regulated protein-lipid electrostatic interaction with the inner leaflet.
Claim 33tool mechanismsupports2021Source 1needs review

RhoA GTPase or its upstream activating GEF effectors can be fused to BcLOV4 for light-regulated plasma membrane recruitment.

RhoA GTPase, or its upstream activating GEF effectors, were fused to BcLOV4, a photoreceptor that can be dynamically recruited to the plasma membrane by a light-regulated protein-lipid electrostatic interaction with the inner leaflet.
Claim 34tool mechanismsupports2021Source 1needs review

RhoA GTPase or its upstream activating GEF effectors can be fused to BcLOV4 for light-regulated plasma membrane recruitment.

RhoA GTPase, or its upstream activating GEF effectors, were fused to BcLOV4, a photoreceptor that can be dynamically recruited to the plasma membrane by a light-regulated protein-lipid electrostatic interaction with the inner leaflet.
Claim 35tool mechanismsupports2021Source 1needs review

RhoA GTPase or its upstream activating GEF effectors can be fused to BcLOV4 for light-regulated plasma membrane recruitment.

RhoA GTPase, or its upstream activating GEF effectors, were fused to BcLOV4, a photoreceptor that can be dynamically recruited to the plasma membrane by a light-regulated protein-lipid electrostatic interaction with the inner leaflet.

Approval Evidence

1 source5 linked approval claimsfirst-pass slug single-component-optogenetic-tools-for-inducible-rhoa-gtpase-signaling
We created optogenetic tools to control RhoA GTPase

Source:

context dependencesupports

Cytoskeletal morphology changes depended on the alignment of spatially patterned stimulation with the underlying cell polarization.

Cytoskeletal morphology changes were dependent on the alignment of the spatially patterned stimulation with the underlying cell polarization.

Source:

design propertysupports

These optogenetic tools are single-component and do not require protein binding partners.

These single-component tools, which do not require protein binding partners, offer spatiotemporally precise control over RhoA signaling

Source:

downstream signalingsupports

RhoA-mediated cytoskeletal activation induced YAP nuclear localization within minutes and subsequent mechanotransduction verified by YAP-TEAD transcriptional activity.

RhoA-mediated cytoskeletal activation induced YAP nuclear localization within minutes and subsequent mechanotransduction, verified by YAP- TEAD transcriptional activity.

Source:

functional effectsupports

Direct membrane recruitment of the fused effectors induced potent contractile signaling sufficient to separate adherens junctions after as little as one pulse of blue light.

Direct membrane recruitment of these effectors induced potent contractile signaling sufficient to separate adherens junctions in response to as little as one pulse of blue light.

Source:

tool mechanismsupports

RhoA GTPase or its upstream activating GEF effectors can be fused to BcLOV4 for light-regulated plasma membrane recruitment.

RhoA GTPase, or its upstream activating GEF effectors, were fused to BcLOV4, a photoreceptor that can be dynamically recruited to the plasma membrane by a light-regulated protein-lipid electrostatic interaction with the inner leaflet.

Source:

Comparisons

Source-backed strengths

A key strength is the single-component design, which the source states does not require protein binding partners. The literature also reports that RhoA-mediated cytoskeletal activation induced YAP nuclear localization within minutes and produced downstream YAP-TEAD transcriptional activity, supporting functional coupling from light input to mechanotransduction.

Ranked Citations

  1. 1.

    Extracted from this source document.