Toolkit/SMN tudor domain

SMN tudor domain

Protein Domain·Research·Since 2020

Also known as: SMN's globular tudor domain

Taxonomy: Mechanism Branch / Component. Workflows sit above the mechanism and technique branches rather than replacing them.

Summary

The SMN tudor domain is a globular protein domain from SMN that is sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo. Its condensate-forming activity requires binding to dimethylarginine, supporting its use as a chemical-input interaction module for specifying membraneless organelle assembly.

Usefulness & Problems

Why this is useful

This domain is useful as a compact protein module for coupling dimethylarginine recognition to condensate formation in living cells. The cited study further indicates that DMA-tudor interaction modules can regulate membraneless organelle assembly and define condensate composition.

Problem solved

The SMN tudor domain helps address the problem of how to encode chemically specified assembly of intracellular condensates using a defined protein interaction module. It provides a way to link dimethylarginine-dependent molecular recognition to dimerization-induced condensation in vivo.

Taxonomy & Function

Primary hierarchy

Mechanism Branch

Component: A low-level protein part used inside a larger architecture that realizes a mechanism.

Techniques

No technique tags yet.

Target processes

No target processes tagged yet.

Input: Chemical

Implementation Constraints

cofactor dependency: cofactor requirement unknownencoding mode: genetically encodedimplementation constraint: context specific validationimplementation constraint: multi component delivery burdenoperating role: actuatorswitch architecture: multi componentswitch architecture: recruitment

Implementation appears to rely on the isolated SMN globular tudor domain and on dimerization-induced condensation in vivo. Practical use is expected to require access to dimethylarginine-dependent binding partners or contexts in which dimethylarginine recognition can occur, but the supplied evidence does not detail construct design beyond domain sufficiency.

The available evidence is limited to a single cited study and does not provide quantitative performance metrics, construct architectures, or cross-system benchmarking. The current evidence also does not specify host organisms, expression conditions, or the extent of validation beyond in vivo condensation assays.

Validation

Cell-freeBacteriaMammalianMouseHumanTherapeuticIndep. Replication

Supporting Sources

Ranked Claims

Claim 1generalizabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

The condensate-forming property associated with the SMN tudor domain is shared by at least seven additional tudor domains in six different proteins.

was shared by at least seven additional tudor domains in six different proteins
additional tudor domains 7different proteins 6
Claim 2generalizabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

The condensate-forming property associated with the SMN tudor domain is shared by at least seven additional tudor domains in six different proteins.

was shared by at least seven additional tudor domains in six different proteins
additional tudor domains 7different proteins 6
Claim 3generalizabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

The condensate-forming property associated with the SMN tudor domain is shared by at least seven additional tudor domains in six different proteins.

was shared by at least seven additional tudor domains in six different proteins
additional tudor domains 7different proteins 6
Claim 4generalizabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

The condensate-forming property associated with the SMN tudor domain is shared by at least seven additional tudor domains in six different proteins.

was shared by at least seven additional tudor domains in six different proteins
additional tudor domains 7different proteins 6
Claim 5generalizabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

The condensate-forming property associated with the SMN tudor domain is shared by at least seven additional tudor domains in six different proteins.

was shared by at least seven additional tudor domains in six different proteins
additional tudor domains 7different proteins 6
Claim 6generalizabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

The condensate-forming property associated with the SMN tudor domain is shared by at least seven additional tudor domains in six different proteins.

was shared by at least seven additional tudor domains in six different proteins
additional tudor domains 7different proteins 6
Claim 7generalizabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

The condensate-forming property associated with the SMN tudor domain is shared by at least seven additional tudor domains in six different proteins.

was shared by at least seven additional tudor domains in six different proteins
additional tudor domains 7different proteins 6
Claim 8generalizabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

The condensate-forming property associated with the SMN tudor domain is shared by at least seven additional tudor domains in six different proteins.

was shared by at least seven additional tudor domains in six different proteins
additional tudor domains 7different proteins 6
Claim 9generalizabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

The condensate-forming property associated with the SMN tudor domain is shared by at least seven additional tudor domains in six different proteins.

was shared by at least seven additional tudor domains in six different proteins
additional tudor domains 7different proteins 6
Claim 10generalizabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

The condensate-forming property associated with the SMN tudor domain is shared by at least seven additional tudor domains in six different proteins.

was shared by at least seven additional tudor domains in six different proteins
additional tudor domains 7different proteins 6
Claim 11generalizabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

The condensate-forming property associated with the SMN tudor domain is shared by at least seven additional tudor domains in six different proteins.

was shared by at least seven additional tudor domains in six different proteins
additional tudor domains 7different proteins 6
Claim 12generalizabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

The condensate-forming property associated with the SMN tudor domain is shared by at least seven additional tudor domains in six different proteins.

was shared by at least seven additional tudor domains in six different proteins
additional tudor domains 7different proteins 6
Claim 13generalizabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

The condensate-forming property associated with the SMN tudor domain is shared by at least seven additional tudor domains in six different proteins.

was shared by at least seven additional tudor domains in six different proteins
additional tudor domains 7different proteins 6
Claim 14generalizabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

The condensate-forming property associated with the SMN tudor domain is shared by at least seven additional tudor domains in six different proteins.

was shared by at least seven additional tudor domains in six different proteins
additional tudor domains 7different proteins 6
Claim 15generalizabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

The condensate-forming property associated with the SMN tudor domain is shared by at least seven additional tudor domains in six different proteins.

was shared by at least seven additional tudor domains in six different proteins
additional tudor domains 7different proteins 6
Claim 16generalizabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

The condensate-forming property associated with the SMN tudor domain is shared by at least seven additional tudor domains in six different proteins.

was shared by at least seven additional tudor domains in six different proteins
additional tudor domains 7different proteins 6
Claim 17generalizabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

The condensate-forming property associated with the SMN tudor domain is shared by at least seven additional tudor domains in six different proteins.

was shared by at least seven additional tudor domains in six different proteins
additional tudor domains 7different proteins 6
Claim 18mechanistic rolesupports2020Source 1needs review

A tudor domain bound to dimethylarginine constitutes a versatile yet specific interaction module that regulates membraneless organelle assembly and defines composition.

the combination of a tudor domain bound to its DMA ligand – DMA-tudor – represents a versatile yet specific interaction module that regulates MLO assembly and defines their composition
Claim 19mechanistic rolesupports2020Source 1needs review

A tudor domain bound to dimethylarginine constitutes a versatile yet specific interaction module that regulates membraneless organelle assembly and defines composition.

the combination of a tudor domain bound to its DMA ligand – DMA-tudor – represents a versatile yet specific interaction module that regulates MLO assembly and defines their composition
Claim 20mechanistic rolesupports2020Source 1needs review

A tudor domain bound to dimethylarginine constitutes a versatile yet specific interaction module that regulates membraneless organelle assembly and defines composition.

the combination of a tudor domain bound to its DMA ligand – DMA-tudor – represents a versatile yet specific interaction module that regulates MLO assembly and defines their composition
Claim 21mechanistic rolesupports2020Source 1needs review

A tudor domain bound to dimethylarginine constitutes a versatile yet specific interaction module that regulates membraneless organelle assembly and defines composition.

the combination of a tudor domain bound to its DMA ligand – DMA-tudor – represents a versatile yet specific interaction module that regulates MLO assembly and defines their composition
Claim 22mechanistic rolesupports2020Source 1needs review

A tudor domain bound to dimethylarginine constitutes a versatile yet specific interaction module that regulates membraneless organelle assembly and defines composition.

the combination of a tudor domain bound to its DMA ligand – DMA-tudor – represents a versatile yet specific interaction module that regulates MLO assembly and defines their composition
Claim 23mechanistic rolesupports2020Source 1needs review

A tudor domain bound to dimethylarginine constitutes a versatile yet specific interaction module that regulates membraneless organelle assembly and defines composition.

the combination of a tudor domain bound to its DMA ligand – DMA-tudor – represents a versatile yet specific interaction module that regulates MLO assembly and defines their composition
Claim 24mechanistic rolesupports2020Source 1needs review

A tudor domain bound to dimethylarginine constitutes a versatile yet specific interaction module that regulates membraneless organelle assembly and defines composition.

the combination of a tudor domain bound to its DMA ligand – DMA-tudor – represents a versatile yet specific interaction module that regulates MLO assembly and defines their composition
Claim 25mechanistic rolesupports2020Source 1needs review

A tudor domain bound to dimethylarginine constitutes a versatile yet specific interaction module that regulates membraneless organelle assembly and defines composition.

the combination of a tudor domain bound to its DMA ligand – DMA-tudor – represents a versatile yet specific interaction module that regulates MLO assembly and defines their composition
Claim 26mechanistic rolesupports2020Source 1needs review

A tudor domain bound to dimethylarginine constitutes a versatile yet specific interaction module that regulates membraneless organelle assembly and defines composition.

the combination of a tudor domain bound to its DMA ligand – DMA-tudor – represents a versatile yet specific interaction module that regulates MLO assembly and defines their composition
Claim 27mechanistic rolesupports2020Source 1needs review

A tudor domain bound to dimethylarginine constitutes a versatile yet specific interaction module that regulates membraneless organelle assembly and defines composition.

the combination of a tudor domain bound to its DMA ligand – DMA-tudor – represents a versatile yet specific interaction module that regulates MLO assembly and defines their composition
Claim 28requirementsupports2020Source 1needs review

The condensate-forming property of the SMN tudor domain requires binding to dimethylarginine.

The condensate-forming property of the SMN tudor domain required binding to its ligand, dimethylarginine (DMA)
Claim 29requirementsupports2020Source 1needs review

The condensate-forming property of the SMN tudor domain requires binding to dimethylarginine.

The condensate-forming property of the SMN tudor domain required binding to its ligand, dimethylarginine (DMA)
Claim 30requirementsupports2020Source 1needs review

The condensate-forming property of the SMN tudor domain requires binding to dimethylarginine.

The condensate-forming property of the SMN tudor domain required binding to its ligand, dimethylarginine (DMA)
Claim 31requirementsupports2020Source 1needs review

The condensate-forming property of the SMN tudor domain requires binding to dimethylarginine.

The condensate-forming property of the SMN tudor domain required binding to its ligand, dimethylarginine (DMA)
Claim 32requirementsupports2020Source 1needs review

The condensate-forming property of the SMN tudor domain requires binding to dimethylarginine.

The condensate-forming property of the SMN tudor domain required binding to its ligand, dimethylarginine (DMA)
Claim 33requirementsupports2020Source 1needs review

The condensate-forming property of the SMN tudor domain requires binding to dimethylarginine.

The condensate-forming property of the SMN tudor domain required binding to its ligand, dimethylarginine (DMA)
Claim 34requirementsupports2020Source 1needs review

The condensate-forming property of the SMN tudor domain requires binding to dimethylarginine.

The condensate-forming property of the SMN tudor domain required binding to its ligand, dimethylarginine (DMA)
Claim 35requirementsupports2020Source 1needs review

The condensate-forming property of the SMN tudor domain requires binding to dimethylarginine.

The condensate-forming property of the SMN tudor domain required binding to its ligand, dimethylarginine (DMA)
Claim 36requirementsupports2020Source 1needs review

The condensate-forming property of the SMN tudor domain requires binding to dimethylarginine.

The condensate-forming property of the SMN tudor domain required binding to its ligand, dimethylarginine (DMA)
Claim 37requirementsupports2020Source 1needs review

The condensate-forming property of the SMN tudor domain requires binding to dimethylarginine.

The condensate-forming property of the SMN tudor domain required binding to its ligand, dimethylarginine (DMA)
Claim 38requirementsupports2020Source 1needs review

The condensate-forming property of the SMN tudor domain requires binding to dimethylarginine.

The condensate-forming property of the SMN tudor domain required binding to its ligand, dimethylarginine (DMA)
Claim 39requirementsupports2020Source 1needs review

The condensate-forming property of the SMN tudor domain requires binding to dimethylarginine.

The condensate-forming property of the SMN tudor domain required binding to its ligand, dimethylarginine (DMA)
Claim 40requirementsupports2020Source 1needs review

The condensate-forming property of the SMN tudor domain requires binding to dimethylarginine.

The condensate-forming property of the SMN tudor domain required binding to its ligand, dimethylarginine (DMA)
Claim 41requirementsupports2020Source 1needs review

The condensate-forming property of the SMN tudor domain requires binding to dimethylarginine.

The condensate-forming property of the SMN tudor domain required binding to its ligand, dimethylarginine (DMA)
Claim 42requirementsupports2020Source 1needs review

The condensate-forming property of the SMN tudor domain requires binding to dimethylarginine.

The condensate-forming property of the SMN tudor domain required binding to its ligand, dimethylarginine (DMA)
Claim 43requirementsupports2020Source 1needs review

The condensate-forming property of the SMN tudor domain requires binding to dimethylarginine.

The condensate-forming property of the SMN tudor domain required binding to its ligand, dimethylarginine (DMA)
Claim 44requirementsupports2020Source 1needs review

The condensate-forming property of the SMN tudor domain requires binding to dimethylarginine.

The condensate-forming property of the SMN tudor domain required binding to its ligand, dimethylarginine (DMA)
Claim 45specificity controlsupports2020Source 1needs review

Asymmetric versus symmetric dimethylarginine determines whether gems and Cajal bodies are separate or overlapping.

asymmetric versus symmetric DMA determined whether two distinct nuclear MLOs – gems and Cajal bodies – were separate or overlapping
Claim 46specificity controlsupports2020Source 1needs review

Asymmetric versus symmetric dimethylarginine determines whether gems and Cajal bodies are separate or overlapping.

asymmetric versus symmetric DMA determined whether two distinct nuclear MLOs – gems and Cajal bodies – were separate or overlapping
Claim 47specificity controlsupports2020Source 1needs review

Asymmetric versus symmetric dimethylarginine determines whether gems and Cajal bodies are separate or overlapping.

asymmetric versus symmetric DMA determined whether two distinct nuclear MLOs – gems and Cajal bodies – were separate or overlapping
Claim 48specificity controlsupports2020Source 1needs review

Asymmetric versus symmetric dimethylarginine determines whether gems and Cajal bodies are separate or overlapping.

asymmetric versus symmetric DMA determined whether two distinct nuclear MLOs – gems and Cajal bodies – were separate or overlapping
Claim 49specificity controlsupports2020Source 1needs review

Asymmetric versus symmetric dimethylarginine determines whether gems and Cajal bodies are separate or overlapping.

asymmetric versus symmetric DMA determined whether two distinct nuclear MLOs – gems and Cajal bodies – were separate or overlapping
Claim 50specificity controlsupports2020Source 1needs review

Asymmetric versus symmetric dimethylarginine determines whether gems and Cajal bodies are separate or overlapping.

asymmetric versus symmetric DMA determined whether two distinct nuclear MLOs – gems and Cajal bodies – were separate or overlapping
Claim 51specificity controlsupports2020Source 1needs review

Asymmetric versus symmetric dimethylarginine determines whether gems and Cajal bodies are separate or overlapping.

asymmetric versus symmetric DMA determined whether two distinct nuclear MLOs – gems and Cajal bodies – were separate or overlapping
Claim 52specificity controlsupports2020Source 1needs review

Asymmetric versus symmetric dimethylarginine determines whether gems and Cajal bodies are separate or overlapping.

asymmetric versus symmetric DMA determined whether two distinct nuclear MLOs – gems and Cajal bodies – were separate or overlapping
Claim 53specificity controlsupports2020Source 1needs review

Asymmetric versus symmetric dimethylarginine determines whether gems and Cajal bodies are separate or overlapping.

asymmetric versus symmetric DMA determined whether two distinct nuclear MLOs – gems and Cajal bodies – were separate or overlapping
Claim 54specificity controlsupports2020Source 1needs review

Asymmetric versus symmetric dimethylarginine determines whether gems and Cajal bodies are separate or overlapping.

asymmetric versus symmetric DMA determined whether two distinct nuclear MLOs – gems and Cajal bodies – were separate or overlapping
Claim 55sufficiencysupports2020Source 1needs review

The SMN tudor domain is sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo.

SMN’s globular tudor domain was sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo
Claim 56sufficiencysupports2020Source 1needs review

The SMN tudor domain is sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo.

SMN’s globular tudor domain was sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo
Claim 57sufficiencysupports2020Source 1needs review

The SMN tudor domain is sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo.

SMN’s globular tudor domain was sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo
Claim 58sufficiencysupports2020Source 1needs review

The SMN tudor domain is sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo.

SMN’s globular tudor domain was sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo
Claim 59sufficiencysupports2020Source 1needs review

The SMN tudor domain is sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo.

SMN’s globular tudor domain was sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo
Claim 60sufficiencysupports2020Source 1needs review

The SMN tudor domain is sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo.

SMN’s globular tudor domain was sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo
Claim 61sufficiencysupports2020Source 1needs review

The SMN tudor domain is sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo.

SMN’s globular tudor domain was sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo
Claim 62sufficiencysupports2020Source 1needs review

The SMN tudor domain is sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo.

SMN’s globular tudor domain was sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo
Claim 63sufficiencysupports2020Source 1needs review

The SMN tudor domain is sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo.

SMN’s globular tudor domain was sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo
Claim 64sufficiencysupports2020Source 1needs review

The SMN tudor domain is sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo.

SMN’s globular tudor domain was sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo
Claim 65sufficiencysupports2020Source 1needs review

The SMN tudor domain is sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo.

SMN’s globular tudor domain was sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo
Claim 66sufficiencysupports2020Source 1needs review

The SMN tudor domain is sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo.

SMN’s globular tudor domain was sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo
Claim 67sufficiencysupports2020Source 1needs review

The SMN tudor domain is sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo.

SMN’s globular tudor domain was sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo
Claim 68sufficiencysupports2020Source 1needs review

The SMN tudor domain is sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo.

SMN’s globular tudor domain was sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo
Claim 69sufficiencysupports2020Source 1needs review

The SMN tudor domain is sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo.

SMN’s globular tudor domain was sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo
Claim 70sufficiencysupports2020Source 1needs review

The SMN tudor domain is sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo.

SMN’s globular tudor domain was sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo
Claim 71sufficiencysupports2020Source 1needs review

The SMN tudor domain is sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo.

SMN’s globular tudor domain was sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo

Approval Evidence

1 source3 linked approval claimsfirst-pass slug smn-tudor-domain
SMN’s globular tudor domain was sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo

Source:

generalizabilitysupports

The condensate-forming property associated with the SMN tudor domain is shared by at least seven additional tudor domains in six different proteins.

was shared by at least seven additional tudor domains in six different proteins

Source:

requirementsupports

The condensate-forming property of the SMN tudor domain requires binding to dimethylarginine.

The condensate-forming property of the SMN tudor domain required binding to its ligand, dimethylarginine (DMA)

Source:

sufficiencysupports

The SMN tudor domain is sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo.

SMN’s globular tudor domain was sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo

Source:

Comparisons

Source-backed strengths

The domain was reported to be sufficient for dimerization-induced condensation in vivo, indicating that the globular tudor domain alone can confer this behavior. The underlying interaction logic is supported by evidence that condensate formation requires dimethylarginine binding, and related condensate-forming behavior was observed for at least seven additional tudor domains in six proteins.

SMN tudor domain and basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) domain address a similar problem space.

Shared frame: same top-level item type; shared mechanisms: heterodimerization; same primary input modality: chemical

Compared with CIB1

SMN tudor domain and CIB1 address a similar problem space.

Shared frame: same top-level item type; shared mechanisms: heterodimerization; same primary input modality: chemical

Relative tradeoffs: appears more independently replicated; looks easier to implement in practice.

SMN tudor domain and heme PAS domain of Ec DOS address a similar problem space.

Shared frame: same top-level item type; shared mechanisms: heterodimerization; same primary input modality: chemical

Ranked Citations

  1. 1.

    Extracted from this source document.