Toolkit/SpCas9-HF1

SpCas9-HF1

Protein Domain·Research·Since 2017

Taxonomy: Mechanism Branch / Component. Workflows sit above the mechanism and technique branches rather than replacing them.

Summary

SpCas9-HF1 is an engineered high-fidelity Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 nuclease variant evaluated in comparative studies of increased-specificity SpCas9 enzymes. It is used for genome cleavage applications in which target-dependent optimization of specificity is required.

Usefulness & Problems

Why this is useful

SpCas9-HF1 is useful as part of a panel of increased-fidelity SpCas9 nucleases for selecting a nuclease-guide configuration that maximizes cleavage specificity at a given target. The cited study indicates that highest-specificity editing is achieved by matching each target with an appropriate high-fidelity nuclease rather than assuming one variant is optimal for all sites.

Source:

for highest specificity cleavage, each target needs to be matched with an appropriate high fidelity nuclease

Problem solved

This tool helps address the problem that genome editing specificity is strongly target dependent and that no single high-fidelity SpCas9 variant is uniformly best across targets. It therefore supports target-by-target optimization of nuclease choice for specific DNA cleavage.

Source:

for highest specificity cleavage, each target needs to be matched with an appropriate high fidelity nuclease

Taxonomy & Function

Primary hierarchy

Mechanism Branch

Component: A low-level protein part used inside a larger architecture that realizes a mechanism.

Techniques

No technique tags yet.

Target processes

recombination

Implementation Constraints

The cited evidence supports using SpCas9-HF1 in a target-matched selection workflow among high-fidelity SpCas9 variants. It also indicates that 5' guide extensions can affect activity, with a matching 5' G extension being more detrimental than a mismatching 5' G extension for increased-fidelity nucleases; no additional construct, delivery, or cofactor details are provided in the supplied evidence.

The supplied evidence does not provide SpCas9-HF1-specific quantitative performance data, mutation identities, or direct measurements of on-target versus off-target editing. It also states that no single high-fidelity SpCas9 nuclease is generally superior in fidelity across targets, limiting any claim of universal advantage for SpCas9-HF1.

Validation

Cell-freeBacteriaMammalianMouseHumanTherapeuticIndep. Replication

Supporting Sources

Ranked Claims

Claim 1activity effectsupports2017Source 1needs review

For the increased-fidelity nucleases, a matching 5' G extension is more detrimental to activity than a mismatching 5' G extension.

a matching 5' G extension being more detrimental to their activities than a mismatching one
Claim 2activity effectsupports2017Source 1needs review

For the increased-fidelity nucleases, a matching 5' G extension is more detrimental to activity than a mismatching 5' G extension.

a matching 5' G extension being more detrimental to their activities than a mismatching one
Claim 3activity effectsupports2017Source 1needs review

For the increased-fidelity nucleases, a matching 5' G extension is more detrimental to activity than a mismatching 5' G extension.

a matching 5' G extension being more detrimental to their activities than a mismatching one
Claim 4activity effectsupports2017Source 1needs review

For the increased-fidelity nucleases, a matching 5' G extension is more detrimental to activity than a mismatching 5' G extension.

a matching 5' G extension being more detrimental to their activities than a mismatching one
Claim 5activity effectsupports2017Source 1needs review

For the increased-fidelity nucleases, a matching 5' G extension is more detrimental to activity than a mismatching 5' G extension.

a matching 5' G extension being more detrimental to their activities than a mismatching one
Claim 6activity effectsupports2017Source 1needs review

For the increased-fidelity nucleases, a matching 5' G extension is more detrimental to activity than a mismatching 5' G extension.

a matching 5' G extension being more detrimental to their activities than a mismatching one
Claim 7activity effectsupports2017Source 1needs review

For the increased-fidelity nucleases, a matching 5' G extension is more detrimental to activity than a mismatching 5' G extension.

a matching 5' G extension being more detrimental to their activities than a mismatching one
Claim 8application guidancesupports2017Source 1needs review

For highest-specificity cleavage, each target should be matched with an appropriate high-fidelity nuclease.

for highest specificity cleavage, each target needs to be matched with an appropriate high fidelity nuclease
Claim 9application guidancesupports2017Source 1needs review

For highest-specificity cleavage, each target should be matched with an appropriate high-fidelity nuclease.

for highest specificity cleavage, each target needs to be matched with an appropriate high fidelity nuclease
Claim 10application guidancesupports2017Source 1needs review

For highest-specificity cleavage, each target should be matched with an appropriate high-fidelity nuclease.

for highest specificity cleavage, each target needs to be matched with an appropriate high fidelity nuclease
Claim 11application guidancesupports2017Source 1needs review

For highest-specificity cleavage, each target should be matched with an appropriate high-fidelity nuclease.

for highest specificity cleavage, each target needs to be matched with an appropriate high fidelity nuclease
Claim 12application guidancesupports2017Source 1needs review

For highest-specificity cleavage, each target should be matched with an appropriate high-fidelity nuclease.

for highest specificity cleavage, each target needs to be matched with an appropriate high fidelity nuclease
Claim 13application guidancesupports2017Source 1needs review

For highest-specificity cleavage, each target should be matched with an appropriate high-fidelity nuclease.

for highest specificity cleavage, each target needs to be matched with an appropriate high fidelity nuclease
Claim 14application guidancesupports2017Source 1needs review

For highest-specificity cleavage, each target should be matched with an appropriate high-fidelity nuclease.

for highest specificity cleavage, each target needs to be matched with an appropriate high fidelity nuclease
Claim 15comparative conclusionsupports2017Source 1needs review

No single high-fidelity SpCas9 nuclease variant is generally superior in fidelity across targets.

No single nuclease variant shows generally superior fidelity
Claim 16comparative conclusionsupports2017Source 1needs review

No single high-fidelity SpCas9 nuclease variant is generally superior in fidelity across targets.

No single nuclease variant shows generally superior fidelity
Claim 17comparative conclusionsupports2017Source 1needs review

No single high-fidelity SpCas9 nuclease variant is generally superior in fidelity across targets.

No single nuclease variant shows generally superior fidelity
Claim 18comparative conclusionsupports2017Source 1needs review

No single high-fidelity SpCas9 nuclease variant is generally superior in fidelity across targets.

No single nuclease variant shows generally superior fidelity
Claim 19comparative conclusionsupports2017Source 1needs review

No single high-fidelity SpCas9 nuclease variant is generally superior in fidelity across targets.

No single nuclease variant shows generally superior fidelity
Claim 20comparative conclusionsupports2017Source 1needs review

No single high-fidelity SpCas9 nuclease variant is generally superior in fidelity across targets.

No single nuclease variant shows generally superior fidelity
Claim 21comparative conclusionsupports2017Source 1needs review

No single high-fidelity SpCas9 nuclease variant is generally superior in fidelity across targets.

No single nuclease variant shows generally superior fidelity
Claim 22engineering resultsupports2017Source 1needs review

HeFSpCas9 variants were generated by combining mutations from eSpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1.

we generated new "Highly enhanced Fidelity" nuclease variants (HeFSpCas9s) containing mutations from both eSpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1
Claim 23engineering resultsupports2017Source 1needs review

HeFSpCas9 variants were generated by combining mutations from eSpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1.

we generated new "Highly enhanced Fidelity" nuclease variants (HeFSpCas9s) containing mutations from both eSpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1
Claim 24engineering resultsupports2017Source 1needs review

HeFSpCas9 variants were generated by combining mutations from eSpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1.

we generated new "Highly enhanced Fidelity" nuclease variants (HeFSpCas9s) containing mutations from both eSpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1
Claim 25engineering resultsupports2017Source 1needs review

HeFSpCas9 variants were generated by combining mutations from eSpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1.

we generated new "Highly enhanced Fidelity" nuclease variants (HeFSpCas9s) containing mutations from both eSpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1
Claim 26engineering resultsupports2017Source 1needs review

HeFSpCas9 variants were generated by combining mutations from eSpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1.

we generated new "Highly enhanced Fidelity" nuclease variants (HeFSpCas9s) containing mutations from both eSpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1
Claim 27engineering resultsupports2017Source 1needs review

HeFSpCas9 variants were generated by combining mutations from eSpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1.

we generated new "Highly enhanced Fidelity" nuclease variants (HeFSpCas9s) containing mutations from both eSpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1
Claim 28engineering resultsupports2017Source 1needs review

HeFSpCas9 variants were generated by combining mutations from eSpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1.

we generated new "Highly enhanced Fidelity" nuclease variants (HeFSpCas9s) containing mutations from both eSpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1
Claim 29mechanistic effectsupports2017Source 1needs review

Mutations in the increased-fidelity SpCas9 variants may reduce cleavage without reducing DNA binding.

the mutations in these variants may diminish the cleavage, but not the DNA-binding, of SpCas9s
Claim 30mechanistic effectsupports2017Source 1needs review

Mutations in the increased-fidelity SpCas9 variants may reduce cleavage without reducing DNA binding.

the mutations in these variants may diminish the cleavage, but not the DNA-binding, of SpCas9s
Claim 31mechanistic effectsupports2017Source 1needs review

Mutations in the increased-fidelity SpCas9 variants may reduce cleavage without reducing DNA binding.

the mutations in these variants may diminish the cleavage, but not the DNA-binding, of SpCas9s
Claim 32mechanistic effectsupports2017Source 1needs review

Mutations in the increased-fidelity SpCas9 variants may reduce cleavage without reducing DNA binding.

the mutations in these variants may diminish the cleavage, but not the DNA-binding, of SpCas9s
Claim 33mechanistic effectsupports2017Source 1needs review

Mutations in the increased-fidelity SpCas9 variants may reduce cleavage without reducing DNA binding.

the mutations in these variants may diminish the cleavage, but not the DNA-binding, of SpCas9s
Claim 34mechanistic effectsupports2017Source 1needs review

Mutations in the increased-fidelity SpCas9 variants may reduce cleavage without reducing DNA binding.

the mutations in these variants may diminish the cleavage, but not the DNA-binding, of SpCas9s
Claim 35mechanistic effectsupports2017Source 1needs review

Mutations in the increased-fidelity SpCas9 variants may reduce cleavage without reducing DNA binding.

the mutations in these variants may diminish the cleavage, but not the DNA-binding, of SpCas9s
Claim 36method frameworksupports2017Source 1needs review

The paper provides a framework for generating new nuclease variants for targets that currently lack a matching optimal nuclease and a simple means for identifying the optimal nuclease when accurate target-ranking prediction tools are absent.

We provide here a framework for generating new nuclease variants for targets that currently have no matching optimal nuclease, and offer a simple mean for identifying the optimal nuclease for targets in the absence of accurate target-ranking prediction tools
Claim 37method frameworksupports2017Source 1needs review

The paper provides a framework for generating new nuclease variants for targets that currently lack a matching optimal nuclease and a simple means for identifying the optimal nuclease when accurate target-ranking prediction tools are absent.

We provide here a framework for generating new nuclease variants for targets that currently have no matching optimal nuclease, and offer a simple mean for identifying the optimal nuclease for targets in the absence of accurate target-ranking prediction tools
Claim 38method frameworksupports2017Source 1needs review

The paper provides a framework for generating new nuclease variants for targets that currently lack a matching optimal nuclease and a simple means for identifying the optimal nuclease when accurate target-ranking prediction tools are absent.

We provide here a framework for generating new nuclease variants for targets that currently have no matching optimal nuclease, and offer a simple mean for identifying the optimal nuclease for targets in the absence of accurate target-ranking prediction tools
Claim 39method frameworksupports2017Source 1needs review

The paper provides a framework for generating new nuclease variants for targets that currently lack a matching optimal nuclease and a simple means for identifying the optimal nuclease when accurate target-ranking prediction tools are absent.

We provide here a framework for generating new nuclease variants for targets that currently have no matching optimal nuclease, and offer a simple mean for identifying the optimal nuclease for targets in the absence of accurate target-ranking prediction tools
Claim 40method frameworksupports2017Source 1needs review

The paper provides a framework for generating new nuclease variants for targets that currently lack a matching optimal nuclease and a simple means for identifying the optimal nuclease when accurate target-ranking prediction tools are absent.

We provide here a framework for generating new nuclease variants for targets that currently have no matching optimal nuclease, and offer a simple mean for identifying the optimal nuclease for targets in the absence of accurate target-ranking prediction tools
Claim 41method frameworksupports2017Source 1needs review

The paper provides a framework for generating new nuclease variants for targets that currently lack a matching optimal nuclease and a simple means for identifying the optimal nuclease when accurate target-ranking prediction tools are absent.

We provide here a framework for generating new nuclease variants for targets that currently have no matching optimal nuclease, and offer a simple mean for identifying the optimal nuclease for targets in the absence of accurate target-ranking prediction tools
Claim 42method frameworksupports2017Source 1needs review

The paper provides a framework for generating new nuclease variants for targets that currently lack a matching optimal nuclease and a simple means for identifying the optimal nuclease when accurate target-ranking prediction tools are absent.

We provide here a framework for generating new nuclease variants for targets that currently have no matching optimal nuclease, and offer a simple mean for identifying the optimal nuclease for targets in the absence of accurate target-ranking prediction tools
Claim 43optimization goalsupports2017Source 1needs review

The paper concerns crossing enhanced and high fidelity SpCas9 nucleases to optimize specificity and cleavage.

Claim 44optimization goalsupports2017Source 1needs review

The paper concerns crossing enhanced and high fidelity SpCas9 nucleases to optimize specificity and cleavage.

Claim 45optimization goalsupports2017Source 1needs review

The paper concerns crossing enhanced and high fidelity SpCas9 nucleases to optimize specificity and cleavage.

Claim 46optimization goalsupports2017Source 1needs review

The paper concerns crossing enhanced and high fidelity SpCas9 nucleases to optimize specificity and cleavage.

Claim 47optimization goalsupports2017Source 1needs review

The paper concerns crossing enhanced and high fidelity SpCas9 nucleases to optimize specificity and cleavage.

Claim 48optimization goalsupports2017Source 1needs review

The paper concerns crossing enhanced and high fidelity SpCas9 nucleases to optimize specificity and cleavage.

Claim 49optimization goalsupports2017Source 1needs review

The paper concerns crossing enhanced and high fidelity SpCas9 nucleases to optimize specificity and cleavage.

Claim 50specificity improvementsupports2017Source 1needs review

HeFSpCas9 variants show substantially improved specificity for targets where eSpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1 have higher off-target propensity.

HeFSpCas9s exhibit substantially improved specificity specifically for those targets for which eSpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1 have higher off-target propensity
Claim 51specificity improvementsupports2017Source 1needs review

HeFSpCas9 variants show substantially improved specificity for targets where eSpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1 have higher off-target propensity.

HeFSpCas9s exhibit substantially improved specificity specifically for those targets for which eSpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1 have higher off-target propensity
Claim 52specificity improvementsupports2017Source 1needs review

HeFSpCas9 variants show substantially improved specificity for targets where eSpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1 have higher off-target propensity.

HeFSpCas9s exhibit substantially improved specificity specifically for those targets for which eSpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1 have higher off-target propensity
Claim 53specificity improvementsupports2017Source 1needs review

HeFSpCas9 variants show substantially improved specificity for targets where eSpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1 have higher off-target propensity.

HeFSpCas9s exhibit substantially improved specificity specifically for those targets for which eSpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1 have higher off-target propensity
Claim 54specificity improvementsupports2017Source 1needs review

HeFSpCas9 variants show substantially improved specificity for targets where eSpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1 have higher off-target propensity.

HeFSpCas9s exhibit substantially improved specificity specifically for those targets for which eSpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1 have higher off-target propensity
Claim 55specificity improvementsupports2017Source 1needs review

HeFSpCas9 variants show substantially improved specificity for targets where eSpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1 have higher off-target propensity.

HeFSpCas9s exhibit substantially improved specificity specifically for those targets for which eSpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1 have higher off-target propensity
Claim 56specificity improvementsupports2017Source 1needs review

HeFSpCas9 variants show substantially improved specificity for targets where eSpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1 have higher off-target propensity.

HeFSpCas9s exhibit substantially improved specificity specifically for those targets for which eSpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1 have higher off-target propensity
Claim 57target dependencesupports2017Source 1needs review

Targets can be ranked by cleavability and off-target effects as manifested by the increased-fidelity nucleases.

There is also a ranking among the targets by their cleavability and off-target effects manifested by the increased fidelity nucleases
Claim 58target dependencesupports2017Source 1needs review

Targets can be ranked by cleavability and off-target effects as manifested by the increased-fidelity nucleases.

There is also a ranking among the targets by their cleavability and off-target effects manifested by the increased fidelity nucleases
Claim 59target dependencesupports2017Source 1needs review

Targets can be ranked by cleavability and off-target effects as manifested by the increased-fidelity nucleases.

There is also a ranking among the targets by their cleavability and off-target effects manifested by the increased fidelity nucleases
Claim 60target dependencesupports2017Source 1needs review

Targets can be ranked by cleavability and off-target effects as manifested by the increased-fidelity nucleases.

There is also a ranking among the targets by their cleavability and off-target effects manifested by the increased fidelity nucleases
Claim 61target dependencesupports2017Source 1needs review

Targets can be ranked by cleavability and off-target effects as manifested by the increased-fidelity nucleases.

There is also a ranking among the targets by their cleavability and off-target effects manifested by the increased fidelity nucleases
Claim 62target dependencesupports2017Source 1needs review

Targets can be ranked by cleavability and off-target effects as manifested by the increased-fidelity nucleases.

There is also a ranking among the targets by their cleavability and off-target effects manifested by the increased fidelity nucleases
Claim 63target dependencesupports2017Source 1needs review

Targets can be ranked by cleavability and off-target effects as manifested by the increased-fidelity nucleases.

There is also a ranking among the targets by their cleavability and off-target effects manifested by the increased fidelity nucleases
Claim 64usage constraintsupports2017Source 1needs review

The three increased-fidelity nucleases can routinely be used only with perfectly matching 20 nucleotide-long spacers.

These three increased-fidelity nucleases can routinely be used only with perfectly matching 20 nucleotide-long spacers
Claim 65usage constraintsupports2017Source 1needs review

The three increased-fidelity nucleases can routinely be used only with perfectly matching 20 nucleotide-long spacers.

These three increased-fidelity nucleases can routinely be used only with perfectly matching 20 nucleotide-long spacers
Claim 66usage constraintsupports2017Source 1needs review

The three increased-fidelity nucleases can routinely be used only with perfectly matching 20 nucleotide-long spacers.

These three increased-fidelity nucleases can routinely be used only with perfectly matching 20 nucleotide-long spacers
Claim 67usage constraintsupports2017Source 1needs review

The three increased-fidelity nucleases can routinely be used only with perfectly matching 20 nucleotide-long spacers.

These three increased-fidelity nucleases can routinely be used only with perfectly matching 20 nucleotide-long spacers
Claim 68usage constraintsupports2017Source 1needs review

The three increased-fidelity nucleases can routinely be used only with perfectly matching 20 nucleotide-long spacers.

These three increased-fidelity nucleases can routinely be used only with perfectly matching 20 nucleotide-long spacers
Claim 69usage constraintsupports2017Source 1needs review

The three increased-fidelity nucleases can routinely be used only with perfectly matching 20 nucleotide-long spacers.

These three increased-fidelity nucleases can routinely be used only with perfectly matching 20 nucleotide-long spacers
Claim 70usage constraintsupports2017Source 1needs review

The three increased-fidelity nucleases can routinely be used only with perfectly matching 20 nucleotide-long spacers.

These three increased-fidelity nucleases can routinely be used only with perfectly matching 20 nucleotide-long spacers

Approval Evidence

1 source8 linked approval claimsfirst-pass slug spcas9-hf1
SpCas9-HF1

Source:

activity effectsupports

For the increased-fidelity nucleases, a matching 5' G extension is more detrimental to activity than a mismatching 5' G extension.

a matching 5' G extension being more detrimental to their activities than a mismatching one

Source:

application guidancesupports

For highest-specificity cleavage, each target should be matched with an appropriate high-fidelity nuclease.

for highest specificity cleavage, each target needs to be matched with an appropriate high fidelity nuclease

Source:

comparative conclusionsupports

No single high-fidelity SpCas9 nuclease variant is generally superior in fidelity across targets.

No single nuclease variant shows generally superior fidelity

Source:

engineering resultsupports

HeFSpCas9 variants were generated by combining mutations from eSpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1.

we generated new "Highly enhanced Fidelity" nuclease variants (HeFSpCas9s) containing mutations from both eSpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1

Source:

mechanistic effectsupports

Mutations in the increased-fidelity SpCas9 variants may reduce cleavage without reducing DNA binding.

the mutations in these variants may diminish the cleavage, but not the DNA-binding, of SpCas9s

Source:

specificity improvementsupports

HeFSpCas9 variants show substantially improved specificity for targets where eSpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1 have higher off-target propensity.

HeFSpCas9s exhibit substantially improved specificity specifically for those targets for which eSpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1 have higher off-target propensity

Source:

target dependencesupports

Targets can be ranked by cleavability and off-target effects as manifested by the increased-fidelity nucleases.

There is also a ranking among the targets by their cleavability and off-target effects manifested by the increased fidelity nucleases

Source:

usage constraintsupports

The three increased-fidelity nucleases can routinely be used only with perfectly matching 20 nucleotide-long spacers.

These three increased-fidelity nucleases can routinely be used only with perfectly matching 20 nucleotide-long spacers

Source:

Comparisons

Source-backed strengths

The available evidence places SpCas9-HF1 among increased-fidelity nucleases specifically compared for cleavage specificity optimization across targets. The study further reports a guide-design-related activity effect in this class, namely that a matching 5' G extension is more detrimental to activity than a mismatching 5' G extension.

Source:

No single nuclease variant shows generally superior fidelity

Source:

we generated new "Highly enhanced Fidelity" nuclease variants (HeFSpCas9s) containing mutations from both eSpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1

Source:

The paper concerns crossing enhanced and high fidelity SpCas9 nucleases to optimize specificity and cleavage.

Ranked Citations

  1. 1.
    StructuralSource 1Genome biology2017Claim 1Claim 2Claim 3

    Extracted from this source document.