Source 1primary paper2025MED
Toolkit/transcranial ultrasound stimulation
transcranial ultrasound stimulation
Also known as: TUS
Taxonomy: Technique Branch / Method. Workflows sit above the mechanism and technique branches rather than replacing them.
Summary
Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques, such as ... transcranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS), have emerged as promising alternatives.
Usefulness & Problems
Why this is useful
TUS is included in the supplied scaffold as a related modality name within the ultrasound neuromodulation literature relevant to mood and psychiatric applications.; transcranial ultrasound neuromodulation studies of mental states and psychiatric circuits; TUS is presented as a non-invasive neuromodulation technique. The paper discusses it as a modality with promising clinical potential in rehabilitation and neurological disease research.; non-invasive neuromodulation; rehabilitation-related neuromodulation research; TUS uses low intensity ultrasound waves to modulate brain activity. In this review it is framed as a precise, noninvasive, and reversible brain stimulation technology with millimetric spatial accuracy.; noninvasive brain stimulation; millimetric spatial targeting in the brain; deep brain stimulation applications in psychiatry; TUS is presented as a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that modulates brain activity in the context of epilepsy management. The review includes it as one of the selected NIBS modalities.; non-invasive modulation of brain activity in epilepsy management; alternative treatment approach for drug-resistant epilepsy; Transcranial ultrasound stimulation is presented as a non-genetic neuromodulation modality for regulating neural activity.; non-genetic neuromodulation
Source:
TUS is included in the supplied scaffold as a related modality name within the ultrasound neuromodulation literature relevant to mood and psychiatric applications.
Source:
transcranial ultrasound neuromodulation studies of mental states and psychiatric circuits
Source:
TUS is presented as a non-invasive neuromodulation technique. The paper discusses it as a modality with promising clinical potential in rehabilitation and neurological disease research.
Source:
non-invasive neuromodulation
Source:
rehabilitation-related neuromodulation research
Source:
TUS uses low intensity ultrasound waves to modulate brain activity. In this review it is framed as a precise, noninvasive, and reversible brain stimulation technology with millimetric spatial accuracy.
Source:
noninvasive brain stimulation
Source:
millimetric spatial targeting in the brain
Source:
deep brain stimulation applications in psychiatry
Source:
TUS is presented as a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that modulates brain activity in the context of epilepsy management. The review includes it as one of the selected NIBS modalities.
Source:
non-invasive modulation of brain activity in epilepsy management
Source:
alternative treatment approach for drug-resistant epilepsy
Source:
Transcranial ultrasound stimulation is presented as a non-genetic neuromodulation modality for regulating neural activity.
Source:
non-genetic neuromodulation
Problem solved
It serves as a literature-recognized label for transcranial ultrasound-based neural modulation.; provides a broader transcranial ultrasound stimulation modality label used in the literature; It offers a way to modulate the brain without invasive procedures. The source frames this as useful for neuromodulation applications with therapeutic potential.; provides a non-invasive neuromodulation approach with clinical potential; The review positions TUS as a way to meet unmet needs for noninvasive deep brain stimulation, especially in psychiatric disorders. Its key advantage is combining noninvasiveness with precise spatial targeting.; addresses unmet noninvasive deep brain stimulation clinical needs in psychiatry; It is framed as an alternative therapeutic approach for epilepsy, especially where standard drug treatment is limited by resistance or side effects.; provides a non-pharmacological alternative where drug resistance or drug side effects limit treatment; It provides a non-genetic route to neuromodulation.; provides a non-genetic approach for modulating neural activity
Source:
It serves as a literature-recognized label for transcranial ultrasound-based neural modulation.
Source:
provides a broader transcranial ultrasound stimulation modality label used in the literature
Source:
It offers a way to modulate the brain without invasive procedures. The source frames this as useful for neuromodulation applications with therapeutic potential.
Source:
provides a non-invasive neuromodulation approach with clinical potential
Source:
The review positions TUS as a way to meet unmet needs for noninvasive deep brain stimulation, especially in psychiatric disorders. Its key advantage is combining noninvasiveness with precise spatial targeting.
Source:
addresses unmet noninvasive deep brain stimulation clinical needs in psychiatry
Source:
It is framed as an alternative therapeutic approach for epilepsy, especially where standard drug treatment is limited by resistance or side effects.
Source:
provides a non-pharmacological alternative where drug resistance or drug side effects limit treatment
Source:
It provides a non-genetic route to neuromodulation.
Source:
provides a non-genetic approach for modulating neural activity
Problem links
addresses unmet noninvasive deep brain stimulation clinical needs in psychiatry
LiteratureThe review positions TUS as a way to meet unmet needs for noninvasive deep brain stimulation, especially in psychiatric disorders. Its key advantage is combining noninvasiveness with precise spatial targeting.
Source:
The review positions TUS as a way to meet unmet needs for noninvasive deep brain stimulation, especially in psychiatric disorders. Its key advantage is combining noninvasiveness with precise spatial targeting.
provides a broader transcranial ultrasound stimulation modality label used in the literature
LiteratureIt serves as a literature-recognized label for transcranial ultrasound-based neural modulation.
Source:
It serves as a literature-recognized label for transcranial ultrasound-based neural modulation.
provides a non-genetic approach for modulating neural activity
LiteratureIt provides a non-genetic route to neuromodulation.
Source:
It provides a non-genetic route to neuromodulation.
provides a non-invasive neuromodulation approach with clinical potential
LiteratureIt offers a way to modulate the brain without invasive procedures. The source frames this as useful for neuromodulation applications with therapeutic potential.
Source:
It offers a way to modulate the brain without invasive procedures. The source frames this as useful for neuromodulation applications with therapeutic potential.
provides a non-pharmacological alternative where drug resistance or drug side effects limit treatment
LiteratureIt is framed as an alternative therapeutic approach for epilepsy, especially where standard drug treatment is limited by resistance or side effects.
Source:
It is framed as an alternative therapeutic approach for epilepsy, especially where standard drug treatment is limited by resistance or side effects.
Published Workflows
Transcranial ultrasound stimulation in neuromodulation: a bibliometric analysis from 2004 to 2024.
2025Objective: Analyze the status of transcranial ultrasound stimulation research by characterizing annual publication trends, international and institutional cooperation patterns, influential authors and journals, and keyword hotspots.
Why it works: The study combines a comprehensive Web of Science search, independent article screening by two researchers, and visualization with bibliometric software to summarize the research landscape.
literature searchindependent screeningbibliometric visualization
Stages
- 1.Comprehensive literature search(broad_screen)
To assemble the initial corpus of literature relevant to transcranial ultrasound stimulation research.
Selection: TUS-related subject headings in the Web of Science core database up to 27 December 2024
- 2.Independent article screening(selection)
To retain only articles meeting the study's predefined eligibility criteria for bibliometric analysis.
Selection: pre-determined inclusion and exclusion criteria applied independently by two researchers
- 3.Bibliometric visualization(secondary_characterization)
To visualize trends, cooperation patterns, and hotspots in the screened literature set.
Selection: visualization of the screened literature set using CiteSpace and VOSviewer
Steps
- 1.Search Web of Science core database with TUS-related subject headings
Identify literature relevant to transcranial ultrasound stimulation up to 27 December 2024.
A broad search is needed before screening and visualization can be performed.
- 2.Two researchers independently screen articles using pre-determined inclusion and exclusion criteria
Select eligible articles for the bibliometric analysis.
Screening follows the broad search to narrow the corpus to studies meeting predefined criteria.
- 3.Visualize the screened results with CiteSpace and VOSvieweranalysis software
Visualize publication trends, cooperation patterns, and keyword hotspots in the screened corpus.
Visualization is performed after screening so that patterns are computed on the final included literature set.
Taxonomy & Function
Primary hierarchy
Technique Branch
Method: A concrete measurement method used to characterize an engineered system.
Techniques
Functional AssayTarget processes
recombinationtranslationInput: Chemical
Implementation Constraints
cofactor dependency: cofactor requirement unknownencoding mode: genetically encodedimplementation constraint: context specific validationimplementation constraint: payload burdenoperating role: sensor
terminology overlap with LIFU and tFUS remains unresolved from the provided evidence; stimulation parameters strongly affect efficacy and safety; The abstract indicates that TUS depends on technological developments that enable accurate transcranial targeting. Specific hardware, planning, or imaging requirements are not detailed in the provided text.; requires technological developments enabling transcranial targeting accuracy; requires stimulation protocols that are effective and reproducible; response may vary across patients
The provided review abstract does not clarify parameterization, targeting differences, or whether TUS is narrower or broader than LIFU.; the abstract does not specify how TUS differs from LIFU or tFUS; The abstract does not establish standardized effective or safe parameter settings, and it states that further multicenter clinical validation is needed.; therapeutic efficacy is significantly influenced by stimulation parameters; safety is significantly influenced by stimulation parameters; requires further multicenter clinical validation; The abstract does not specify which technical or clinical weaknesses remain unresolved. It only states that strengths and weaknesses relevant to clinical translation are discussed.; the review discusses strengths and weaknesses of TUS technology, but the abstract does not specify the weaknesses; The abstract does not establish mature clinical deployment and notes broader NIBS limitations related to protocol variability and patient responsiveness.; clinical application is limited by variability in stimulation protocols; clinical application is limited by patient responsiveness
Validation
Cell-freeBacteriaMammalianMouseHumanTherapeuticIndep. Replication
Supporting Sources
Source 2review2025MED
Source 3primary paper2025MED
Ranked Claims
Non-invasive brain stimulation shows potential for treating drug-resistant epilepsy.
The bibliometric analysis included 577 literatures.
included literature count 577 literatures
Low intensity ultrasound waves can modulate brain activity.
The review identifies recently published psychiatric clinical proofs of concept for TUS in depression, anxiety, schizophrenia, and substance use disorders.
Although preclinical studies have shown promising neuromodulatory effects, transcranial ultrasound stimulation requires further multicenter clinical validation.
The review suggests that non-invasive brain stimulation alone or in combination with pharmacological therapy is a promising method for patients with epilepsy.
TUS provides precise, noninvasive, and reversible brain stimulation, described as a unique capability compared with transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct-current stimulation, and implanted-electrode deep brain stimulation.
Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques including TMS, tDCS, and TUS have emerged as promising alternatives for epilepsy management.
Clinical application of non-invasive brain stimulation in epilepsy is limited by variability in stimulation protocols and patient responsiveness.
Non-invasive brain stimulation methods modulate brain activity and have fewer side effects than drug therapy.
CiteSpace and VOSviewer were used to visualize the bibliometric analysis results.
Transcranial ultrasound stimulation is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique with promising clinical potential.
The therapeutic efficacy and safety of transcranial ultrasound stimulation are significantly influenced by stimulation parameters.
Annual publication volume in transcranial ultrasound stimulation research increased over time and peaked in 2024.
Research interest in transcranial ultrasound stimulation has grown exponentially since 2013.
Transcranial ultrasound stimulation is currently used primarily in neurological diseases, particularly in studies of Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease.
Technological developments have enabled TUS to achieve millimetric spatial accuracy.
TUS is described as technologically ready for clinical translation.
Approval Evidence
5 sources20 linked approval claimsfirst-pass slug transcranial-ultrasound-stimulation
This review categorizes neuromodulation techniques into non-genetic neuromodulation methods (including ... transcranial ultrasound stimulation ...)
Source:
Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques, such as ... transcranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS), have emerged as promising alternatives.
Source:
It also reviews the technological developments that have enabled transcranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS) to achieve millimetric spatial accuracy. This allows precise, noninvasive and reversible brain stimulation.
Source:
Transcranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique with promising clinical potential.
Source:
The supplied web research summary states that explicit related modality/component names include transcranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS).
Source:
application potentialsupports
Non-invasive brain stimulation shows potential for treating drug-resistant epilepsy.
Source:
application statementsupports
Neuromodulation techniques have shown significant advancements in treating neurological and psychiatric disorders.
Source:
bibliometric countsupports
The bibliometric analysis included 577 literatures.
Source:
capability summarysupports
Low intensity ultrasound waves can modulate brain activity.
Source:
categorizationsupports
The review categorizes neuromodulation techniques into genetic methods and non-genetic methods.
Source:
clinical scope summarysupports
The review identifies recently published psychiatric clinical proofs of concept for TUS in depression, anxiety, schizophrenia, and substance use disorders.
Source:
clinical translation needsupports
Although preclinical studies have shown promising neuromodulatory effects, transcranial ultrasound stimulation requires further multicenter clinical validation.
Source:
combination therapy potentialsupports
The review suggests that non-invasive brain stimulation alone or in combination with pharmacological therapy is a promising method for patients with epilepsy.
Source:
comparative positioningsupports
TUS provides precise, noninvasive, and reversible brain stimulation, described as a unique capability compared with transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct-current stimulation, and implanted-electrode deep brain stimulation.
Source:
comparative therapeutic potentialsupports
Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques including TMS, tDCS, and TUS have emerged as promising alternatives for epilepsy management.
Source:
field needsupports
Fully harnessing the therapeutic potential of neuromodulation requires integration and innovation in technologies, optimization of delivery methods, improvement of mediums, and evaluation of toxicity.
Source:
limitation statementsupports
Clinical application of non-invasive brain stimulation in epilepsy is limited by variability in stimulation protocols and patient responsiveness.
Source:
mechanism statementsupports
Non-invasive brain stimulation methods modulate brain activity and have fewer side effects than drug therapy.
Source:
modality descriptionsupports
Transcranial ultrasound stimulation is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique with promising clinical potential.
Source:
parameter sensitivitysupports
The therapeutic efficacy and safety of transcranial ultrasound stimulation are significantly influenced by stimulation parameters.
Source:
publication trendsupports
Annual publication volume in transcranial ultrasound stimulation research increased over time and peaked in 2024.
Source:
publication trendsupports
Research interest in transcranial ultrasound stimulation has grown exponentially since 2013.
Source:
research focussupports
Transcranial ultrasound stimulation is currently used primarily in neurological diseases, particularly in studies of Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease.
Source:
technical advantagesupports
Technological developments have enabled TUS to achieve millimetric spatial accuracy.
Source:
translational readinesssupports
TUS is described as technologically ready for clinical translation.
Source:
Comparisons
Source-stated alternatives
The supplied payload also names LIFU, tFUS, TPS, and LIPUS.; Research hotspots in the analyzed literature include transcranial magnetic stimulation and noninvasive brain stimulation more broadly, indicating nearby alternative neuromodulation approaches.; The abstract explicitly contrasts TUS with transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct-current stimulation, and deep brain stimulation with implanted electrodes.; The abstract compares TUS with pharmacological treatment and with other NIBS approaches including TMS and tDCS.
Source:
The supplied payload also names LIFU, tFUS, TPS, and LIPUS.
Source:
Research hotspots in the analyzed literature include transcranial magnetic stimulation and noninvasive brain stimulation more broadly, indicating nearby alternative neuromodulation approaches.
Source:
The abstract explicitly contrasts TUS with transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct-current stimulation, and deep brain stimulation with implanted electrodes.
Source:
The abstract compares TUS with pharmacological treatment and with other NIBS approaches including TMS and tDCS.
Source-backed strengths
explicitly represented as a related modality in the supplied review scaffold; non-invasive; promising clinical potential; millimetric spatial accuracy; precise brain stimulation; noninvasive; reversible; described as technologically ready for clinical translation; described as having fewer side effects than drug therapy; presented as a promising alternative approach
Source:
explicitly represented as a related modality in the supplied review scaffold
Source:
non-invasive
Source:
promising clinical potential
Source:
millimetric spatial accuracy
Source:
precise brain stimulation
Source:
noninvasive
Source:
reversible
Source:
described as technologically ready for clinical translation
Source:
described as having fewer side effects than drug therapy
Source:
presented as a promising alternative approach
Compared with brain stimulation
Research hotspots in the analyzed literature include transcranial magnetic stimulation and noninvasive brain stimulation more broadly, indicating nearby alternative neuromodulation approaches.; The abstract explicitly contrasts TUS with transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct-current stimulation, and deep brain stimulation with implanted electrodes.
Shared frame: source-stated alternative in extracted literature
Strengths here: explicitly represented as a related modality in the supplied review scaffold; non-invasive; promising clinical potential.
Relative tradeoffs: the abstract does not specify how TUS differs from LIFU or tFUS; therapeutic efficacy is significantly influenced by stimulation parameters; safety is significantly influenced by stimulation parameters.
Source:
Research hotspots in the analyzed literature include transcranial magnetic stimulation and noninvasive brain stimulation more broadly, indicating nearby alternative neuromodulation approaches.
Source:
The abstract explicitly contrasts TUS with transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct-current stimulation, and deep brain stimulation with implanted electrodes.
Compared with Deep Brain Stimulation
The abstract explicitly contrasts TUS with transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct-current stimulation, and deep brain stimulation with implanted electrodes.
Shared frame: source-stated alternative in extracted literature
Strengths here: explicitly represented as a related modality in the supplied review scaffold; non-invasive; promising clinical potential.
Relative tradeoffs: the abstract does not specify how TUS differs from LIFU or tFUS; therapeutic efficacy is significantly influenced by stimulation parameters; safety is significantly influenced by stimulation parameters.
Source:
The abstract explicitly contrasts TUS with transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct-current stimulation, and deep brain stimulation with implanted electrodes.
Compared with focused ultrasound
The supplied payload also names LIFU, tFUS, TPS, and LIPUS.
Shared frame: source-stated alternative in extracted literature
Strengths here: explicitly represented as a related modality in the supplied review scaffold; non-invasive; promising clinical potential.
Relative tradeoffs: the abstract does not specify how TUS differs from LIFU or tFUS; therapeutic efficacy is significantly influenced by stimulation parameters; safety is significantly influenced by stimulation parameters.
Source:
The supplied payload also names LIFU, tFUS, TPS, and LIPUS.
The abstract explicitly contrasts TUS with transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct-current stimulation, and deep brain stimulation with implanted electrodes.; The abstract compares TUS with pharmacological treatment and with other NIBS approaches including TMS and tDCS.
Shared frame: source-stated alternative in extracted literature
Strengths here: explicitly represented as a related modality in the supplied review scaffold; non-invasive; promising clinical potential.
Relative tradeoffs: the abstract does not specify how TUS differs from LIFU or tFUS; therapeutic efficacy is significantly influenced by stimulation parameters; safety is significantly influenced by stimulation parameters.
Source:
The abstract explicitly contrasts TUS with transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct-current stimulation, and deep brain stimulation with implanted electrodes.
Source:
The abstract compares TUS with pharmacological treatment and with other NIBS approaches including TMS and tDCS.
Research hotspots in the analyzed literature include transcranial magnetic stimulation and noninvasive brain stimulation more broadly, indicating nearby alternative neuromodulation approaches.; The abstract explicitly contrasts TUS with transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct-current stimulation, and deep brain stimulation with implanted electrodes.
Shared frame: source-stated alternative in extracted literature
Strengths here: explicitly represented as a related modality in the supplied review scaffold; non-invasive; promising clinical potential.
Relative tradeoffs: the abstract does not specify how TUS differs from LIFU or tFUS; therapeutic efficacy is significantly influenced by stimulation parameters; safety is significantly influenced by stimulation parameters.
Source:
Research hotspots in the analyzed literature include transcranial magnetic stimulation and noninvasive brain stimulation more broadly, indicating nearby alternative neuromodulation approaches.
Source:
The abstract explicitly contrasts TUS with transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct-current stimulation, and deep brain stimulation with implanted electrodes.
Ranked Citations
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.