Toolkit/wireless implantable system

wireless implantable system

Delivery Strategy·Research·Since 2015

Taxonomy: Mechanism Branch / Architecture. Workflows sit above the mechanism and technique branches rather than replacing them.

Summary

A wireless implantable system is described as a configuration class within platforms for combined optogenetics and electrophysiology in live animals. In the supplied evidence, it functions as an implantable format for in vivo light delivery together with electrophysiological work, but no specific device architecture or operating characteristics are provided.

Usefulness & Problems

Why this is useful

This configuration is useful as one of the deployment options considered for combining optical stimulation with electrophysiological recordings in living brain tissue. The source frames its selection as dependent on practical considerations and the experimental questions being addressed.

Source:

The review includes wireless implantable systems as a configuration class for combined optogenetics and electrophysiology in live animals.

Source:

wireless implantation for combined optogenetics and electrophysiology contexts

Problem solved

The tool addresses the need for an implantable configuration for performing combined optogenetic light delivery and electrophysiological experiments in vivo. The evidence does not show that it solves deeper constraints such as light penetration limits in tissue.

Source:

It represents a deployment format for performing combined optical stimulation and electrophysiological work in vivo.

Source:

provides an implantable system format discussed within combined optogenetics and electrophysiology configurations

Taxonomy & Function

Primary hierarchy

Mechanism Branch

Architecture: A delivery strategy grouped with the mechanism branch because it determines how a system is instantiated and deployed in context.

Mechanisms

light delivery

Target processes

No target processes tagged yet.

Input: Light

Implementation Constraints

The available text only supports that this is an implantable wireless system configuration used in combined optogenetics and electrophysiology in live animals. No details are provided on construct design, optical wavelength, hardware components, expression systems, cofactors, or surgical implementation.

The supplied evidence does not specify the device architecture, wireless modality, power strategy, recording performance, light output, or validation results. It also does not establish that wireless implantation overcomes challenges of light delivery in living brain tissue.

Validation

Cell-freeBacteriaMammalianMouseHumanTherapeuticIndep. Replication

Supporting Sources

Ranked Claims

Claim 1configuration guidancesupports2015Source 1needs review

Choice of combined optogenetics-electrophysiology configuration is guided by practical considerations and by the questions one seeks to address.

Claim 2configuration guidancesupports2015Source 1needs review

Choice of combined optogenetics-electrophysiology configuration is guided by practical considerations and by the questions one seeks to address.

Claim 3configuration guidancesupports2015Source 1needs review

Choice of combined optogenetics-electrophysiology configuration is guided by practical considerations and by the questions one seeks to address.

Claim 4configuration guidancesupports2015Source 1needs review

Choice of combined optogenetics-electrophysiology configuration is guided by practical considerations and by the questions one seeks to address.

Claim 5configuration guidancesupports2015Source 1needs review

Choice of combined optogenetics-electrophysiology configuration is guided by practical considerations and by the questions one seeks to address.

Claim 6configuration guidancesupports2015Source 1needs review

Choice of combined optogenetics-electrophysiology configuration is guided by practical considerations and by the questions one seeks to address.

Claim 7configuration guidancesupports2015Source 1needs review

Choice of combined optogenetics-electrophysiology configuration is guided by practical considerations and by the questions one seeks to address.

Claim 8configuration guidancesupports2015Source 1needs review

Choice of combined optogenetics-electrophysiology configuration is guided by practical considerations and by the questions one seeks to address.

Claim 9configuration guidancesupports2015Source 1needs review

Choice of combined optogenetics-electrophysiology configuration is guided by practical considerations and by the questions one seeks to address.

Claim 10definitionsupports2015Source 1needs review

Optodes or optrodes are neural probes that combine conventional electrophysiological recordings with optical channel or channels for optogenetic activation.

Claim 11definitionsupports2015Source 1needs review

Optodes or optrodes are neural probes that combine conventional electrophysiological recordings with optical channel or channels for optogenetic activation.

Claim 12definitionsupports2015Source 1needs review

Optodes or optrodes are neural probes that combine conventional electrophysiological recordings with optical channel or channels for optogenetic activation.

Claim 13definitionsupports2015Source 1needs review

Optodes or optrodes are neural probes that combine conventional electrophysiological recordings with optical channel or channels for optogenetic activation.

Claim 14definitionsupports2015Source 1needs review

Optodes or optrodes are neural probes that combine conventional electrophysiological recordings with optical channel or channels for optogenetic activation.

Claim 15definitionsupports2015Source 1needs review

Optodes or optrodes are neural probes that combine conventional electrophysiological recordings with optical channel or channels for optogenetic activation.

Claim 16definitionsupports2015Source 1needs review

Optodes or optrodes are neural probes that combine conventional electrophysiological recordings with optical channel or channels for optogenetic activation.

Claim 17definitionsupports2015Source 1needs review

Optodes or optrodes are neural probes that combine conventional electrophysiological recordings with optical channel or channels for optogenetic activation.

Claim 18definitionsupports2015Source 1needs review

Optodes or optrodes are neural probes that combine conventional electrophysiological recordings with optical channel or channels for optogenetic activation.

Claim 19design rationalesupports2015Source 1needs review

Because visible light penetration in tissue is limited, development of optogenetic tools was quickly followed by development of light-delivery devices for in vivo optogenetics applications.

Claim 20design rationalesupports2015Source 1needs review

Because visible light penetration in tissue is limited, development of optogenetic tools was quickly followed by development of light-delivery devices for in vivo optogenetics applications.

Claim 21design rationalesupports2015Source 1needs review

Because visible light penetration in tissue is limited, development of optogenetic tools was quickly followed by development of light-delivery devices for in vivo optogenetics applications.

Claim 22design rationalesupports2015Source 1needs review

Because visible light penetration in tissue is limited, development of optogenetic tools was quickly followed by development of light-delivery devices for in vivo optogenetics applications.

Claim 23design rationalesupports2015Source 1needs review

Because visible light penetration in tissue is limited, development of optogenetic tools was quickly followed by development of light-delivery devices for in vivo optogenetics applications.

Claim 24design rationalesupports2015Source 1needs review

Because visible light penetration in tissue is limited, development of optogenetic tools was quickly followed by development of light-delivery devices for in vivo optogenetics applications.

Claim 25design rationalesupports2015Source 1needs review

Because visible light penetration in tissue is limited, development of optogenetic tools was quickly followed by development of light-delivery devices for in vivo optogenetics applications.

Claim 26design rationalesupports2015Source 1needs review

Because visible light penetration in tissue is limited, development of optogenetic tools was quickly followed by development of light-delivery devices for in vivo optogenetics applications.

Claim 27design rationalesupports2015Source 1needs review

Because visible light penetration in tissue is limited, development of optogenetic tools was quickly followed by development of light-delivery devices for in vivo optogenetics applications.

Approval Evidence

1 source1 linked approval claimfirst-pass slug wireless-implantable-system
Several aspects including challenges for light delivery in living brain tissue, the combination of light delivery with electrophysiological recordings, probe designs, multimodality, wireless implantable system, and practical considerations guiding the choice of configuration depending on the questions one seeks to address are presented.

Source:

configuration guidancesupports

Choice of combined optogenetics-electrophysiology configuration is guided by practical considerations and by the questions one seeks to address.

Source:

Comparisons

Source-backed strengths

Its main supported strength is that it is recognized as a configuration class within multimodal optogenetics-electrophysiology systems for live animals. The evidence also indicates that configuration choice is guided by practical considerations, implying situational utility, but no quantitative performance data are reported.

Source:

presented as part of multimodal and practical configuration options for live-animal studies

Ranked Citations

  1. 1.
    StructuralSource 1Neurophotonics2015Claim 1Claim 2Claim 3

    Seeded from load plan for claim cl4. Extracted from this source document.