Toolkit/Channelrhodopsin variants

Channelrhodopsin variants

Construct Pattern·Research·Since 2016

Also known as: application-specific Channelrhodopsin variants, engineered Channelrhodopsin variants

Taxonomy: Mechanism Branch / Architecture. Workflows sit above the mechanism and technique branches rather than replacing them.

Summary

The demand for more application-specific Channelrhodopsin variants started a race between protein engineers to design improved variants. Here, we review new variants whose efficacy has already been proven in neurophysiological experiments, or variants which are likely to extend the optogenetic toolbox.

Usefulness & Problems

Why this is useful

Channelrhodopsin variants are light-gated ion-channel tools used to control the membrane potential of excitable cells with illumination. The review frames engineered variants as application-specific extensions of the optogenetic toolbox.; controlling membrane potential of excitable cells via illumination; expanding the optogenetic toolbox with application-specific actuators

Source:

Channelrhodopsin variants are light-gated ion-channel tools used to control the membrane potential of excitable cells with illumination. The review frames engineered variants as application-specific extensions of the optogenetic toolbox.

Source:

controlling membrane potential of excitable cells via illumination

Source:

expanding the optogenetic toolbox with application-specific actuators

Problem solved

These variants solve the need for optical control of excitable cells and for tuning actuator properties to specific experimental applications.; providing light-gated control of excitable cells; tailoring optogenetic actuators to different operational requirements

Source:

These variants solve the need for optical control of excitable cells and for tuning actuator properties to specific experimental applications.

Source:

providing light-gated control of excitable cells

Source:

tailoring optogenetic actuators to different operational requirements

Problem links

providing light-gated control of excitable cells

Literature

These variants solve the need for optical control of excitable cells and for tuning actuator properties to specific experimental applications.

Source:

These variants solve the need for optical control of excitable cells and for tuning actuator properties to specific experimental applications.

tailoring optogenetic actuators to different operational requirements

Literature

These variants solve the need for optical control of excitable cells and for tuning actuator properties to specific experimental applications.

Source:

These variants solve the need for optical control of excitable cells and for tuning actuator properties to specific experimental applications.

Taxonomy & Function

Primary hierarchy

Mechanism Branch

Architecture: A reusable architecture pattern for arranging parts into an engineered system.

Target processes

No target processes tagged yet.

Input: Light

Implementation Constraints

cofactor dependency: cofactor requirement unknownencoding mode: genetically encodedimplementation constraint: context specific validationimplementation constraint: spectral hardware requirementoperating role: actuator

Use requires illumination and expression of a channelrhodopsin variant in excitable cells. Variant selection is discussed in terms of expression, kinetics, ion selectivity, and wavelength responsivity.; variant choice depends on expression, kinetics, ion selectivity, and wavelength responsivity

The abstract does not indicate that any single variant solves all use cases, and it notes that the growing number of variants and names can itself create a usability problem.; variant proliferation and perplexing names can alienate users

Validation

Cell-freeBacteriaMammalianMouseHumanTherapeuticIndep. Replication

Supporting Sources

Ranked Claims

Claim 1comparative advantage summarysupports2016Source 1needs review

Many engineered channelrhodopsin variants have advantages compared with wild-type variants.

Claim 2engineering need summarysupports2016Source 1needs review

Demand for more application-specific channelrhodopsin variants drove engineering of improved variants.

Claim 3property axis summarysupports2016Source 1needs review

Channelrhodopsin variants in the review are described by mechanistic and operational properties including expression, kinetics, ion selectivity, and wavelength responsivity.

Claim 4review selection scopesupports2016Source 1needs review

The review covers new channelrhodopsin variants whose efficacy has been proven in neurophysiological experiments or that are likely to extend the optogenetic toolbox.

Claim 5tool role summarysupports2016Source 1needs review

Channelrhodopsins have become widely accepted as a tool to control the membrane potential of excitable cells via illumination.

Claim 6usability limitation summarysupports2016Source 1needs review

The large number of new channelrhodopsin variants and their perplexing names can alienate users.

Approval Evidence

1 source6 linked approval claimsfirst-pass slug channelrhodopsin-variants
The demand for more application-specific Channelrhodopsin variants started a race between protein engineers to design improved variants. Here, we review new variants whose efficacy has already been proven in neurophysiological experiments, or variants which are likely to extend the optogenetic toolbox.

Source:

comparative advantage summarysupports

Many engineered channelrhodopsin variants have advantages compared with wild-type variants.

Source:

engineering need summarysupports

Demand for more application-specific channelrhodopsin variants drove engineering of improved variants.

Source:

property axis summarysupports

Channelrhodopsin variants in the review are described by mechanistic and operational properties including expression, kinetics, ion selectivity, and wavelength responsivity.

Source:

review selection scopesupports

The review covers new channelrhodopsin variants whose efficacy has been proven in neurophysiological experiments or that are likely to extend the optogenetic toolbox.

Source:

tool role summarysupports

Channelrhodopsins have become widely accepted as a tool to control the membrane potential of excitable cells via illumination.

Source:

usability limitation summarysupports

The large number of new channelrhodopsin variants and their perplexing names can alienate users.

Source:

Comparisons

Source-stated alternatives

The abstract contrasts engineered variants with wild-type variants rather than naming non-channelrhodopsin alternatives.

Source:

The abstract contrasts engineered variants with wild-type variants rather than naming non-channelrhodopsin alternatives.

Source-backed strengths

widely accepted as a tool for optical control of membrane potential; engineered variants can offer advantages over wild-type variants

Source:

widely accepted as a tool for optical control of membrane potential

Source:

engineered variants can offer advantages over wild-type variants

Compared with mMORp

Channelrhodopsin variants and mMORp address a similar problem space.

Shared frame: same top-level item type; same primary input modality: light

Compared with optogenetic probes

Channelrhodopsin variants and optogenetic probes address a similar problem space.

Shared frame: same top-level item type; same primary input modality: light

Compared with organoid fusion

Channelrhodopsin variants and organoid fusion address a similar problem space.

Shared frame: same top-level item type; same primary input modality: light

Ranked Citations

  1. 1.
    StructuralSource 1Methods in molecular biology2016Claim 1Claim 2Claim 3

    Seeded from load plan for claim cl1. Extracted from this source document.