Toolkit/confocal laser scanning microscopy
confocal laser scanning microscopy
Also known as: CLSM
Taxonomy: Technique Branch / Method. Workflows sit above the mechanism and technique branches rather than replacing them.
Summary
Lipid uptake and localization was studied by flow cytometry and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and revealed a rapid uptake by bacteria within 5 min.
Usefulness & Problems
Why this is useful
CLSM was used to study uptake and localization of ceramide analogs in bacteria.; visualizing uptake and localization of ceramide analogs in bacteria
Source:
CLSM was used to study uptake and localization of ceramide analogs in bacteria.
Source:
visualizing uptake and localization of ceramide analogs in bacteria
Problem solved
It provides spatial evidence that the compounds are rapidly taken up by bacteria.; provides imaging-based readout of bacterial uptake and localization of lipid analogs
Source:
It provides spatial evidence that the compounds are rapidly taken up by bacteria.
Source:
provides imaging-based readout of bacterial uptake and localization of lipid analogs
Problem links
provides imaging-based readout of bacterial uptake and localization of lipid analogs
LiteratureIt provides spatial evidence that the compounds are rapidly taken up by bacteria.
Source:
It provides spatial evidence that the compounds are rapidly taken up by bacteria.
Published Workflows
Objective: Evaluate antibacterial activity, host-cell compatibility, and bacterial uptake/localization of sphingolipids and ceramide analogs against pathogenic Neisseria.
Why it works: The workflow combines antibacterial potency assays with kinetic, toxicity, and imaging readouts so that active compounds can be linked to rapid bacterial uptake and membrane localization while checking host-cell compatibility.
Stages
- 1.Antibacterial activity profiling by MIC and MBC(broad_screen)
This stage identifies which sphingolipids and ceramide analogs are active against pathogenic Neisseria and distinguishes them from compounds inactive against comparator bacteria.
Selection: Compounds showing antibacterial activity against Neisseria meningitidis and N. gonorrhoeae in MIC and MBC assays.
- 2.Kinetic killing characterization(secondary_characterization)
This stage characterizes the time scale of bactericidal action for an active compound after initial activity has been established.
Selection: Measure how quickly an active compound kills N. meningitidis.
- 3.Host-cell toxicity check(confirmatory_validation)
This stage checks whether antibacterial activity is accompanied by significant toxicity to host cells.
Selection: Assess whether bactericidal concentrations cause significant host-cell toxicity.
- 4.Bacterial uptake and membrane localization imaging(functional_characterization)
This stage provides spatial and temporal evidence that ceramide analogs enter bacteria rapidly and distribute in the bacterial membrane.
Selection: Visualize uptake timing and membrane distribution of ceramide analogs in bacteria.
Steps
- 1.Measure MIC and MBC of sphingolipids and ceramide analogs against pathogenic Neisseria and comparator bacteriatested antibacterial ceramide analog
Identify active compounds and assess organism selectivity.
Initial potency testing is needed before kinetic, toxicity, and localization follow-up can focus on active compounds.
- 2.Test killing kinetics of ω-azido-C6-ceramide against Neisseria meningitidisactive hit selected for kinetic follow-up
Determine how rapidly the active compound kills bacteria.
Kinetic characterization follows initial activity detection to refine understanding of bactericidal performance.
- 3.Assess host-cell toxicity of ω-azido-C6-ceramide at a bactericidal concentrationactive antibacterial candidate under safety check
Check whether bactericidal dosing causes significant host-cell toxicity.
A host-compatibility check is performed after antibacterial activity is established to evaluate whether the active compound remains usable in a host-relevant context.
- 4.Measure bacterial uptake of ceramide analogs by flow cytometry and CLSMassays used to quantify and visualize uptake
Determine whether ceramide analogs are rapidly taken up by bacteria.
After activity and host-compatibility are established, uptake measurements help connect antibacterial behavior to bacterial association.
- 5.Visualize membrane distribution of ceramide analogs by CLSM and dSTORMimaging assays used for localization
Determine spatial distribution of ceramide analogs in the bacterial membrane.
Localization imaging follows uptake detection to provide higher-resolution spatial evidence about where the compounds accumulate.
Taxonomy & Function
Primary hierarchy
Technique Branch
Method: A concrete measurement method used to characterize an engineered system.
Techniques
Functional AssayTarget processes
localizationImplementation Constraints
The method requires fluorescently detectable lipid analogs and confocal microscopy instrumentation.; requires confocal microscopy instrumentation
the abstract does not indicate nanoscale resolution
Validation
Supporting Sources
Ranked Claims
Short-chain ceramides and ω-azido-C6-ceramide are active against Neisseria meningitidis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.
Determination of the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) demonstrated that short-chain ceramides and a ω-azido-functionalized C6-ceramide were active against Neisseria meningitidis and N. gonorrhoeae
At a bactericidal concentration, ω-azido-C6-ceramide had no significant toxic effect on host cells.
Of note, at a bactericidal concentration, ω-azido-C6-ceramide had no significant toxic effect on host cells.
ω-azido-C6-ceramide killed Neisseria meningitidis within 2 hours at 1× MIC.
Kinetic assays showed that killing of N. meningitidis occurred within 2 h with ω-azido-C6-ceramide at 1 X the MIC.
CLSM and dSTORM showed homogeneous distribution of ceramide analogs in the bacterial membrane.
CLSM and super-resolution fluorescence imaging by direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy demonstrated homogeneous distribution of ceramide analogs in the bacterial membrane.
Short-chain ceramides and ω-azido-C6-ceramide were inactive against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus.
whereas they were inactive against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus
Ceramide analogs were rapidly taken up by bacteria within 5 minutes.
Lipid uptake and localization was studied by flow cytometry and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and revealed a rapid uptake by bacteria within 5 min.
Approval Evidence
Lipid uptake and localization was studied by flow cytometry and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and revealed a rapid uptake by bacteria within 5 min.
Source:
CLSM and dSTORM showed homogeneous distribution of ceramide analogs in the bacterial membrane.
CLSM and super-resolution fluorescence imaging by direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy demonstrated homogeneous distribution of ceramide analogs in the bacterial membrane.
Source:
Ceramide analogs were rapidly taken up by bacteria within 5 minutes.
Lipid uptake and localization was studied by flow cytometry and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and revealed a rapid uptake by bacteria within 5 min.
Source:
Comparisons
Source-stated alternatives
The abstract pairs CLSM with flow cytometry for uptake analysis and dSTORM for higher-resolution membrane localization.
Source:
The abstract pairs CLSM with flow cytometry for uptake analysis and dSTORM for higher-resolution membrane localization.
Source-backed strengths
supported rapid uptake observation within 5 min
Source:
supported rapid uptake observation within 5 min
Compared with 3D-dSTORM
The abstract pairs CLSM with flow cytometry for uptake analysis and dSTORM for higher-resolution membrane localization.
Shared frame: source-stated alternative in extracted literature
Strengths here: supported rapid uptake observation within 5 min.
Relative tradeoffs: the abstract does not indicate nanoscale resolution.
Source:
The abstract pairs CLSM with flow cytometry for uptake analysis and dSTORM for higher-resolution membrane localization.
Compared with direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy
The abstract pairs CLSM with flow cytometry for uptake analysis and dSTORM for higher-resolution membrane localization.
Shared frame: source-stated alternative in extracted literature
Strengths here: supported rapid uptake observation within 5 min.
Relative tradeoffs: the abstract does not indicate nanoscale resolution.
Source:
The abstract pairs CLSM with flow cytometry for uptake analysis and dSTORM for higher-resolution membrane localization.
Compared with dSTORM
The abstract pairs CLSM with flow cytometry for uptake analysis and dSTORM for higher-resolution membrane localization.
Shared frame: source-stated alternative in extracted literature
Strengths here: supported rapid uptake observation within 5 min.
Relative tradeoffs: the abstract does not indicate nanoscale resolution.
Source:
The abstract pairs CLSM with flow cytometry for uptake analysis and dSTORM for higher-resolution membrane localization.
Compared with flow cytometry
The abstract pairs CLSM with flow cytometry for uptake analysis and dSTORM for higher-resolution membrane localization.
Shared frame: source-stated alternative in extracted literature
Strengths here: supported rapid uptake observation within 5 min.
Relative tradeoffs: the abstract does not indicate nanoscale resolution.
Source:
The abstract pairs CLSM with flow cytometry for uptake analysis and dSTORM for higher-resolution membrane localization.
Ranked Citations
- 1.