Toolkit/Cr_ChR2

Cr_ChR2

Construct Pattern·Research·Since 2020

Taxonomy: Mechanism Branch / Architecture. Workflows sit above the mechanism and technique branches rather than replacing them.

Summary

Cr_ChR2 is a light-gated cation channel from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii used in optogenetics to activate neuronal excitability. The supplied evidence describes it as the first and most widely applied channelrhodopsin and as a benchmark comparator for newer light-gated cation channels such as Gt_CCR4.

Usefulness & Problems

Why this is useful

Cr_ChR2 is useful as an established optogenetic actuator for light-driven activation of neuronal function. The evidence also indicates that its extensive use and mechanistic study make it a well-characterized reference standard for comparing newer cation channel tools.

Source:

Cr_ChR2 is a light-gated cation channel used in optogenetics to activate neuronal excitability. In this review it serves as the benchmark comparator for Gt_CCR4.

Source:

optogenetics

Source:

activating neuronal excitability

Problem solved

Cr_ChR2 helps solve the problem of controlling neuronal excitability with light in optogenetic experiments. It also addresses the need for a benchmark channelrhodopsin against which alternative light-gated cation channels can be evaluated.

Source:

It enables light-based activation of neuronal function and is presented as the established optogenetic standard. Its extensive mechanistic study also makes it a well-characterized reference point.

Source:

provides a widely applied light-gated cation channel for neuronal activation

Problem links

provides a widely applied light-gated cation channel for neuronal activation

Literature

It enables light-based activation of neuronal function and is presented as the established optogenetic standard. Its extensive mechanistic study also makes it a well-characterized reference point.

Source:

It enables light-based activation of neuronal function and is presented as the established optogenetic standard. Its extensive mechanistic study also makes it a well-characterized reference point.

Taxonomy & Function

Primary hierarchy

Mechanism Branch

Architecture: A reusable architecture pattern for arranging parts into an engineered system.

Target processes

No target processes tagged yet.

Input: Light

Implementation Constraints

cofactor dependency: cofactor requirement unknownencoding mode: genetically encodedimplementation constraint: context specific validationimplementation constraint: spectral hardware requirementoperating role: actuator

Use of Cr_ChR2 requires optical illumination in an optogenetic setup. Beyond its origin in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and its use for neuronal activation, the supplied evidence does not specify construct architecture, cofactors, expression systems, or delivery methods.

The provided review-based evidence indicates that Cr_ChR2 has lower light sensitivity than Gt_CCR4. It also states that Cr_ChR2 does not match Gt_CCR4 in Na+ selectivity and primarily conducts H+, but the supplied evidence does not provide quantitative electrophysiological parameters or broader validation details.

Validation

Cell-freeBacteriaMammalianMouseHumanTherapeuticIndep. Replication

Supporting Sources

Ranked Claims

Claim 1comparative propertysupports2020Source 1needs review

Gt_CCR4 has a channel open lifetime in the same range as Cr_ChR2.

Claim 2comparative propertysupports2020Source 1needs review

Gt_CCR4 has a channel open lifetime in the same range as Cr_ChR2.

Claim 3comparative propertysupports2020Source 1needs review

Gt_CCR4 has a channel open lifetime in the same range as Cr_ChR2.

Claim 4comparative propertysupports2020Source 1needs review

Gt_CCR4 has a channel open lifetime in the same range as Cr_ChR2.

Claim 5comparative propertysupports2020Source 1needs review

Gt_CCR4 has a channel open lifetime in the same range as Cr_ChR2.

Claim 6comparative propertysupports2020Source 1needs review

Gt_CCR4 has a channel open lifetime in the same range as Cr_ChR2.

Claim 7comparative propertysupports2020Source 1needs review

Gt_CCR4 has a channel open lifetime in the same range as Cr_ChR2.

Claim 8comparative propertysupports2020Source 1needs review

Gt_CCR4 has a channel open lifetime in the same range as Cr_ChR2.

Claim 9comparative propertysupports2020Source 1needs review

Gt_CCR4 has a channel open lifetime in the same range as Cr_ChR2.

Claim 10comparative propertysupports2020Source 1needs review

Gt_CCR4 has significantly higher light sensitivity than Cr_ChR2.

Claim 11comparative propertysupports2020Source 1needs review

Gt_CCR4 has significantly higher light sensitivity than Cr_ChR2.

Claim 12comparative propertysupports2020Source 1needs review

Gt_CCR4 has significantly higher light sensitivity than Cr_ChR2.

Claim 13comparative propertysupports2020Source 1needs review

Gt_CCR4 has significantly higher light sensitivity than Cr_ChR2.

Claim 14comparative propertysupports2020Source 1needs review

Gt_CCR4 has significantly higher light sensitivity than Cr_ChR2.

Claim 15comparative propertysupports2020Source 1needs review

Gt_CCR4 has significantly higher light sensitivity than Cr_ChR2.

Claim 16comparative propertysupports2020Source 1needs review

Gt_CCR4 has significantly higher light sensitivity than Cr_ChR2.

Claim 17comparative propertysupports2020Source 1needs review

Gt_CCR4 has significantly higher light sensitivity than Cr_ChR2.

Claim 18comparative propertysupports2020Source 1needs review

Gt_CCR4 has significantly higher light sensitivity than Cr_ChR2.

Claim 19ion conductance profilesupports2020Source 1needs review

Under physiological conditions, Gt_CCR4 conducts almost no H+ and no Ca2+.

Claim 20ion conductance profilesupports2020Source 1needs review

Under physiological conditions, Gt_CCR4 conducts almost no H+ and no Ca2+.

Claim 21ion conductance profilesupports2020Source 1needs review

Under physiological conditions, Gt_CCR4 conducts almost no H+ and no Ca2+.

Claim 22ion conductance profilesupports2020Source 1needs review

Under physiological conditions, Gt_CCR4 conducts almost no H+ and no Ca2+.

Claim 23ion conductance profilesupports2020Source 1needs review

Under physiological conditions, Gt_CCR4 conducts almost no H+ and no Ca2+.

Claim 24ion conductance profilesupports2020Source 1needs review

Under physiological conditions, Gt_CCR4 conducts almost no H+ and no Ca2+.

Claim 25ion conductance profilesupports2020Source 1needs review

Under physiological conditions, Gt_CCR4 conducts almost no H+ and no Ca2+.

Claim 26ion conductance profilesupports2020Source 1needs review

Under physiological conditions, Gt_CCR4 conducts almost no H+ and no Ca2+.

Claim 27ion conductance profilesupports2020Source 1needs review

Under physiological conditions, Gt_CCR4 conducts almost no H+ and no Ca2+.

Claim 28ion selectivitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Gt_CCR4 shows high Na+ selectivity, with a Na+ selectivity ratio 37-fold larger than that of Cr_ChR2.

Na+ selectivity ratio increase versus Cr ChR2 37
Claim 29ion selectivitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Gt_CCR4 shows high Na+ selectivity, with a Na+ selectivity ratio 37-fold larger than that of Cr_ChR2.

Na+ selectivity ratio increase versus Cr ChR2 37
Claim 30ion selectivitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Gt_CCR4 shows high Na+ selectivity, with a Na+ selectivity ratio 37-fold larger than that of Cr_ChR2.

Na+ selectivity ratio increase versus Cr ChR2 37
Claim 31ion selectivitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Gt_CCR4 shows high Na+ selectivity, with a Na+ selectivity ratio 37-fold larger than that of Cr_ChR2.

Na+ selectivity ratio increase versus Cr ChR2 37
Claim 32ion selectivitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Gt_CCR4 shows high Na+ selectivity, with a Na+ selectivity ratio 37-fold larger than that of Cr_ChR2.

Na+ selectivity ratio increase versus Cr ChR2 37
Claim 33ion selectivitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Gt_CCR4 shows high Na+ selectivity, with a Na+ selectivity ratio 37-fold larger than that of Cr_ChR2.

Na+ selectivity ratio increase versus Cr ChR2 37
Claim 34ion selectivitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Gt_CCR4 shows high Na+ selectivity, with a Na+ selectivity ratio 37-fold larger than that of Cr_ChR2.

Na+ selectivity ratio increase versus Cr ChR2 37
Claim 35ion selectivitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Gt_CCR4 shows high Na+ selectivity, with a Na+ selectivity ratio 37-fold larger than that of Cr_ChR2.

Na+ selectivity ratio increase versus Cr ChR2 37
Claim 36ion selectivitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Gt_CCR4 shows high Na+ selectivity, with a Na+ selectivity ratio 37-fold larger than that of Cr_ChR2.

Na+ selectivity ratio increase versus Cr ChR2 37
Claim 37mechanistic distinctnesssupports2020Source 1needs review

Cryptophyte-type light-gated cation channels such as Gt_CCR family members are structurally and mechanistically distinct from chlorophyte channelrhodopsins such as Cr_ChR2.

Claim 38mechanistic distinctnesssupports2020Source 1needs review

Cryptophyte-type light-gated cation channels such as Gt_CCR family members are structurally and mechanistically distinct from chlorophyte channelrhodopsins such as Cr_ChR2.

Claim 39mechanistic distinctnesssupports2020Source 1needs review

Cryptophyte-type light-gated cation channels such as Gt_CCR family members are structurally and mechanistically distinct from chlorophyte channelrhodopsins such as Cr_ChR2.

Claim 40mechanistic distinctnesssupports2020Source 1needs review

Cryptophyte-type light-gated cation channels such as Gt_CCR family members are structurally and mechanistically distinct from chlorophyte channelrhodopsins such as Cr_ChR2.

Claim 41mechanistic distinctnesssupports2020Source 1needs review

Cryptophyte-type light-gated cation channels such as Gt_CCR family members are structurally and mechanistically distinct from chlorophyte channelrhodopsins such as Cr_ChR2.

Claim 42mechanistic distinctnesssupports2020Source 1needs review

Cryptophyte-type light-gated cation channels such as Gt_CCR family members are structurally and mechanistically distinct from chlorophyte channelrhodopsins such as Cr_ChR2.

Claim 43mechanistic distinctnesssupports2020Source 1needs review

Cryptophyte-type light-gated cation channels such as Gt_CCR family members are structurally and mechanistically distinct from chlorophyte channelrhodopsins such as Cr_ChR2.

Claim 44mechanistic distinctnesssupports2020Source 1needs review

Cryptophyte-type light-gated cation channels such as Gt_CCR family members are structurally and mechanistically distinct from chlorophyte channelrhodopsins such as Cr_ChR2.

Claim 45mechanistic distinctnesssupports2020Source 1needs review

Cryptophyte-type light-gated cation channels such as Gt_CCR family members are structurally and mechanistically distinct from chlorophyte channelrhodopsins such as Cr_ChR2.

Approval Evidence

1 source4 linked approval claimsfirst-pass slug cr-chr2
A light-gated cation channel, Cr_ChR2 from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, is the first and mostly applied to optogenetics for activating neuronal excitability.

Source:

comparative propertysupports

Gt_CCR4 has a channel open lifetime in the same range as Cr_ChR2.

Source:

comparative propertysupports

Gt_CCR4 has significantly higher light sensitivity than Cr_ChR2.

Source:

ion selectivitysupports

Gt_CCR4 shows high Na+ selectivity, with a Na+ selectivity ratio 37-fold larger than that of Cr_ChR2.

Source:

mechanistic distinctnesssupports

Cryptophyte-type light-gated cation channels such as Gt_CCR family members are structurally and mechanistically distinct from chlorophyte channelrhodopsins such as Cr_ChR2.

Source:

Comparisons

Source-stated alternatives

Gt_CCR4 is the direct alternative emphasized in the review. Other Guillardia theta cation channelrhodopsins are also mentioned as related alternatives.

Source:

Gt_CCR4 is the direct alternative emphasized in the review. Other Guillardia theta cation channelrhodopsins are also mentioned as related alternatives.

Source-backed strengths

The supplied evidence identifies Cr_ChR2 as the first and most widely applied channelrhodopsin in optogenetics, supporting its status as a mature reference tool. Comparative evidence further indicates that its channel open lifetime is in the same range as Gt_CCR4, reinforcing its use as a benchmark in functional comparisons.

Source:

first and mostly applied to optogenetics for activating neuronal excitability

Source:

molecular mechanism has been intensively studied

Compared with Gt_CCR4

Gt_CCR4 is the direct alternative emphasized in the review. Other Guillardia theta cation channelrhodopsins are also mentioned as related alternatives.

Shared frame: source-stated alternative in extracted literature

Strengths here: first and mostly applied to optogenetics for activating neuronal excitability; molecular mechanism has been intensively studied.

Relative tradeoffs: lower light sensitivity than Gt_CCR4; primarily conducts H+.

Source:

Gt_CCR4 is the direct alternative emphasized in the review. Other Guillardia theta cation channelrhodopsins are also mentioned as related alternatives.

Ranked Citations

  1. 1.
    StructuralSource 1Biophysical Reviews2020Claim 1Claim 2Claim 3

    Seeded from load plan for claim clm_1. Extracted from this source document.