Toolkit/SA-PSDΔVenus

SA-PSDΔVenus

Construct Pattern·Research·Since 2025

Taxonomy: Mechanism Branch / Architecture. Workflows sit above the mechanism and technique branches rather than replacing them.

Summary

we employed a post-synaptic translation-dependent reporter consistent with potentiation (SA-PSDΔVenus)

Usefulness & Problems

Why this is useful

SA-PSDΔVenus is used here as a post-synaptic translation-dependent reporter consistent with synaptic potentiation. The study uses it to label potentiated dendritic spines in mouse hippocampal CA1.; marking potentiation-consistent dendritic spines; mapping spatial distribution of potentiated synaptic inputs in hippocampal neurons

Source:

SA-PSDΔVenus is used here as a post-synaptic translation-dependent reporter consistent with synaptic potentiation. The study uses it to label potentiated dendritic spines in mouse hippocampal CA1.

Source:

marking potentiation-consistent dendritic spines

Source:

mapping spatial distribution of potentiated synaptic inputs in hippocampal neurons

Problem solved

It helps resolve where potentiation-consistent spines are located relative to neurons activated during encoding or recall. This addresses the unclear relationship between spine potentiation and neuron-wide activation.; provides a reporter for synapse-level potentiation-associated labeling during memory-related experiments

Source:

It helps resolve where potentiation-consistent spines are located relative to neurons activated during encoding or recall. This addresses the unclear relationship between spine potentiation and neuron-wide activation.

Source:

provides a reporter for synapse-level potentiation-associated labeling during memory-related experiments

Problem links

provides a reporter for synapse-level potentiation-associated labeling during memory-related experiments

Literature

It helps resolve where potentiation-consistent spines are located relative to neurons activated during encoding or recall. This addresses the unclear relationship between spine potentiation and neuron-wide activation.

Source:

It helps resolve where potentiation-consistent spines are located relative to neurons activated during encoding or recall. This addresses the unclear relationship between spine potentiation and neuron-wide activation.

Published Workflows

Objective: Determine the spatiotemporal correlation between potentiation-consistent dendritic spine labeling and neuronal activation in mouse hippocampal CA1 after contextual fear conditioning during encoding and recall phases.

Why it works: The study pairs a post-synaptic translation-dependent reporter consistent with potentiation with a neuronal activation reporter so that potentiated spines can be compared against activated neurons across memory phases and CA1 layers.

postsynaptic potentiation-associated spine labelingactivity-dependent neuronal labelingmemory encoding versus recall comparisondual reporter imagingcontextual fear conditioning

Taxonomy & Function

Primary hierarchy

Mechanism Branch

Architecture: A reusable architecture pattern for arranging parts into an engineered system.

Techniques

No technique tags yet.

Target processes

translation

Implementation Constraints

cofactor dependency: cofactor requirement unknownencoding mode: genetically encodedimplementation constraint: context specific validationoperating role: reporter

The abstract supports use in mouse hippocampal CA1 following contextual fear conditioning and in combination with imaging-based comparison to an activity reporter. Additional construct delivery details are not provided in the abstract.; requires expression in mouse hippocampal CA1 neurons; used in conjunction with contextual fear conditioning in this study

The abstract does not show that SA-PSDΔVenus alone identifies causal memory engrams or directly measures all aspects of synaptic plasticity. It is described as a reporter consistent with potentiation.; the abstract describes it as consistent with potentiation rather than a direct measurement of long-term potentiation

Validation

Cell-freeBacteriaMammalianMouseHumanTherapeuticIndep. Replication

Supporting Sources

Ranked Claims

Claim 1enrichmentsupports2025Source 1needs review

SA-PSDΔVenus-positive spines were enriched in ESARE-dTurquoise-positive neurons in mouse hippocampal CA1 following contextual fear conditioning.

SA-PSDΔVenus+ spines were enriched in ESARE-dTurquoise+ neurons
Claim 2phase differencesupports2025Source 1needs review

The relative weight and spatial distribution of potentiated synaptic inputs to hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons change between memory encoding and retrieval.

These findings demonstrate that the relative weight and spatial distribution of potentiated synaptic inputs to hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons change between the encoding and retrieval phases of memory.
Claim 3spatial distributionsupports2025Source 1needs review

After contextual fear conditioning during encoding, SA-PSDΔVenus-positive spines were more frequent in activated neurons in stratum oriens and stratum lacunosum moleculare.

SA-PSDΔVenus+ were more frequent in activated neurons in stratum oriens and stratum lacunosum moleculare after CFC (encoding)
Claim 4spatial distributionsupports2025Source 1needs review

During recall, recall-activated neurons showed a larger number of SA-PSDΔVenus-positive spines in stratum radiatum.

recall-activated neurons showed a larger number of SA-PSDΔVenus+ in the stratum radiatum

Approval Evidence

1 source4 linked approval claimsfirst-pass slug sa-psd-venus
we employed a post-synaptic translation-dependent reporter consistent with potentiation (SA-PSDΔVenus)

Source:

enrichmentsupports

SA-PSDΔVenus-positive spines were enriched in ESARE-dTurquoise-positive neurons in mouse hippocampal CA1 following contextual fear conditioning.

SA-PSDΔVenus+ spines were enriched in ESARE-dTurquoise+ neurons

Source:

phase differencesupports

The relative weight and spatial distribution of potentiated synaptic inputs to hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons change between memory encoding and retrieval.

These findings demonstrate that the relative weight and spatial distribution of potentiated synaptic inputs to hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons change between the encoding and retrieval phases of memory.

Source:

spatial distributionsupports

After contextual fear conditioning during encoding, SA-PSDΔVenus-positive spines were more frequent in activated neurons in stratum oriens and stratum lacunosum moleculare.

SA-PSDΔVenus+ were more frequent in activated neurons in stratum oriens and stratum lacunosum moleculare after CFC (encoding)

Source:

spatial distributionsupports

During recall, recall-activated neurons showed a larger number of SA-PSDΔVenus-positive spines in stratum radiatum.

recall-activated neurons showed a larger number of SA-PSDΔVenus+ in the stratum radiatum

Source:

Comparisons

Source-stated alternatives

The provided upstream summary names SynActive as the antecedent strategy and cites dual-eGRASP and AS-PaRac1 as related synapse-focused approaches. The abstract itself does not directly compare performance against these alternatives.

Source:

The provided upstream summary names SynActive as the antecedent strategy and cites dual-eGRASP and AS-PaRac1 as related synapse-focused approaches. The abstract itself does not directly compare performance against these alternatives.

Source-backed strengths

reports potentiation-consistent signal at postsynaptic spines; can be paired with a neuronal activation reporter for spatiotemporal correlation analysis

Source:

reports potentiation-consistent signal at postsynaptic spines

Source:

can be paired with a neuronal activation reporter for spatiotemporal correlation analysis

Compared with 4pLRE-cPAOX1

SA-PSDΔVenus and 4pLRE-cPAOX1 address a similar problem space because they share translation.

Shared frame: same top-level item type; shared target processes: translation; shared mechanisms: translation_control

Strengths here: looks easier to implement in practice.

SA-PSDΔVenus and blue-light-activated DNA template ON switch address a similar problem space because they share translation.

Shared frame: same top-level item type; shared target processes: translation; shared mechanisms: translation_control

Strengths here: looks easier to implement in practice.

SA-PSDΔVenus and functional electrical stimulation address a similar problem space because they share translation.

Shared frame: same top-level item type; shared target processes: translation; shared mechanisms: translation_control

Ranked Citations

  1. 1.

    Extracted from this source document.