Toolkit/ultraviolet photodissociation

ultraviolet photodissociation

Assay Method·Research·Since 2020

Also known as: 213 nm ultraviolet photodissociation, UVPD

Taxonomy: Technique Branch / Method. Workflows sit above the mechanism and technique branches rather than replacing them.

Summary

213 nm ultraviolet photodissociation (UVPD) is a top-down mass spectrometry fragmentation method used to characterize covalent insulin dimers. In the cited study, it fragmented cross-links and nearby backbone bonds and, together with multistage analysis or complementary fragmentation, supported identification of cross-link composition and residue-level cross-link sites.

Usefulness & Problems

Why this is useful

This method is useful for structural characterization of covalently cross-linked protein dimers by providing informative fragmentation of both the cross-link and adjacent peptide backbone. In insulin dimers, it enabled cross-link site assignment in at least one dimer class at the MS2 level and contributed to chemical composition analysis when combined with EThcD.

Source:

The combined utilization of EThcD and 213 nm ultraviolet photodissociation (UVPD) facilitated identification of the chemical composition of the cross-links.

Source:

Identification of cross-link sites between chains at residue level was achievable for both dimers with MS3 analysis of MS2 fragments cleaved at the cross-link or additionally the interchain disulfide bonds.

Source:

we here demonstrate on two case studies of covalent insulin dimers, induced by Fe2+ incubation or ultraviolet (UV) light stress, that de novo characterization in top-down mass spectrometry (MS) workflows can identify cross-link types and sites

Problem solved

It addresses the analytical problem of localizing and chemically characterizing covalent cross-links in intact protein dimers by top-down mass spectrometry. The cited work specifically used it to distinguish and map cross-links in Fe2+-induced and UV light-induced insulin dimers.

Problem links

Need precise spatiotemporal control with light input

Derived

213 nm ultraviolet photodissociation (UVPD) is a top-down mass spectrometry fragmentation method used to characterize covalent insulin dimers. In the cited study, it enabled fragmentation of cross-links and nearby backbone bonds and contributed to identifying cross-link composition and, with multistage analysis, residue-level cross-link sites.

Taxonomy & Function

Primary hierarchy

Technique Branch

Method: A concrete measurement method used to characterize an engineered system.

Target processes

No target processes tagged yet.

Input: Light

Implementation Constraints

cofactor dependency: cofactor requirement unknownencoding mode: genetically encodedimplementation constraint: context specific validationimplementation constraint: multi component delivery burdenimplementation constraint: spectral hardware requirementoperating role: sensorswitch architecture: multi componentswitch architecture: recruitment

The method uses 213 nm ultraviolet irradiation within a top-down mass spectrometry workflow. The cited implementation included MS2 analysis and, in some cases, multistage or combined fragmentation with EThcD to improve cross-link composition and site assignment.

MS2 UVPD was not sufficient for cross-link site identification in the UV light-induced insulin dimer, indicating context-dependent performance. Evidence is limited to a single 2020 study on insulin dimers, so broader generalizability across proteins and cross-link chemistries is not established here.

Validation

Cell-freeBacteriaMammalianMouseHumanTherapeuticIndep. Replication

Supporting Sources

Ranked Claims

Claim 1comparative method performancesupports2020Source 1needs review

UVPD at MS2 provided cross-link site identification for the Fe2+-induced insulin dimer without MS3, but MS2 was not sufficient for cross-link site identification in the UV light-induced dimer.

UVPD provided identification of cross-link sites in the Fe2+-induced dimer without MS3, while cross-link site identification with MS2 was not possible for the UV light-induced dimer.
Claim 2comparative method performancesupports2020Source 1needs review

UVPD at MS2 provided cross-link site identification for the Fe2+-induced insulin dimer without MS3, but MS2 was not sufficient for cross-link site identification in the UV light-induced dimer.

UVPD provided identification of cross-link sites in the Fe2+-induced dimer without MS3, while cross-link site identification with MS2 was not possible for the UV light-induced dimer.
Claim 3comparative method performancesupports2020Source 1needs review

UVPD at MS2 provided cross-link site identification for the Fe2+-induced insulin dimer without MS3, but MS2 was not sufficient for cross-link site identification in the UV light-induced dimer.

UVPD provided identification of cross-link sites in the Fe2+-induced dimer without MS3, while cross-link site identification with MS2 was not possible for the UV light-induced dimer.
Claim 4comparative method performancesupports2020Source 1needs review

UVPD at MS2 provided cross-link site identification for the Fe2+-induced insulin dimer without MS3, but MS2 was not sufficient for cross-link site identification in the UV light-induced dimer.

UVPD provided identification of cross-link sites in the Fe2+-induced dimer without MS3, while cross-link site identification with MS2 was not possible for the UV light-induced dimer.
Claim 5comparative method performancesupports2020Source 1needs review

UVPD at MS2 provided cross-link site identification for the Fe2+-induced insulin dimer without MS3, but MS2 was not sufficient for cross-link site identification in the UV light-induced dimer.

UVPD provided identification of cross-link sites in the Fe2+-induced dimer without MS3, while cross-link site identification with MS2 was not possible for the UV light-induced dimer.
Claim 6comparative method performancesupports2020Source 1needs review

UVPD at MS2 provided cross-link site identification for the Fe2+-induced insulin dimer without MS3, but MS2 was not sufficient for cross-link site identification in the UV light-induced dimer.

UVPD provided identification of cross-link sites in the Fe2+-induced dimer without MS3, while cross-link site identification with MS2 was not possible for the UV light-induced dimer.
Claim 7comparative method performancesupports2020Source 1needs review

UVPD at MS2 provided cross-link site identification for the Fe2+-induced insulin dimer without MS3, but MS2 was not sufficient for cross-link site identification in the UV light-induced dimer.

UVPD provided identification of cross-link sites in the Fe2+-induced dimer without MS3, while cross-link site identification with MS2 was not possible for the UV light-induced dimer.
Claim 8comparative method performancesupports2020Source 1needs review

UVPD at MS2 provided cross-link site identification for the Fe2+-induced insulin dimer without MS3, but MS2 was not sufficient for cross-link site identification in the UV light-induced dimer.

UVPD provided identification of cross-link sites in the Fe2+-induced dimer without MS3, while cross-link site identification with MS2 was not possible for the UV light-induced dimer.
Claim 9comparative method performancesupports2020Source 1needs review

UVPD at MS2 provided cross-link site identification for the Fe2+-induced insulin dimer without MS3, but MS2 was not sufficient for cross-link site identification in the UV light-induced dimer.

UVPD provided identification of cross-link sites in the Fe2+-induced dimer without MS3, while cross-link site identification with MS2 was not possible for the UV light-induced dimer.
Claim 10comparative method performancesupports2020Source 1needs review

UVPD at MS2 provided cross-link site identification for the Fe2+-induced insulin dimer without MS3, but MS2 was not sufficient for cross-link site identification in the UV light-induced dimer.

UVPD provided identification of cross-link sites in the Fe2+-induced dimer without MS3, while cross-link site identification with MS2 was not possible for the UV light-induced dimer.
Claim 11comparative method performancesupports2020Source 1needs review

UVPD at MS2 provided cross-link site identification for the Fe2+-induced insulin dimer without MS3, but MS2 was not sufficient for cross-link site identification in the UV light-induced dimer.

UVPD provided identification of cross-link sites in the Fe2+-induced dimer without MS3, while cross-link site identification with MS2 was not possible for the UV light-induced dimer.
Claim 12comparative method performancesupports2020Source 1needs review

UVPD at MS2 provided cross-link site identification for the Fe2+-induced insulin dimer without MS3, but MS2 was not sufficient for cross-link site identification in the UV light-induced dimer.

UVPD provided identification of cross-link sites in the Fe2+-induced dimer without MS3, while cross-link site identification with MS2 was not possible for the UV light-induced dimer.
Claim 13comparative method performancesupports2020Source 1needs review

UVPD at MS2 provided cross-link site identification for the Fe2+-induced insulin dimer without MS3, but MS2 was not sufficient for cross-link site identification in the UV light-induced dimer.

UVPD provided identification of cross-link sites in the Fe2+-induced dimer without MS3, while cross-link site identification with MS2 was not possible for the UV light-induced dimer.
Claim 14comparative method performancesupports2020Source 1needs review

UVPD at MS2 provided cross-link site identification for the Fe2+-induced insulin dimer without MS3, but MS2 was not sufficient for cross-link site identification in the UV light-induced dimer.

UVPD provided identification of cross-link sites in the Fe2+-induced dimer without MS3, while cross-link site identification with MS2 was not possible for the UV light-induced dimer.
Claim 15comparative method performancesupports2020Source 1needs review

UVPD at MS2 provided cross-link site identification for the Fe2+-induced insulin dimer without MS3, but MS2 was not sufficient for cross-link site identification in the UV light-induced dimer.

UVPD provided identification of cross-link sites in the Fe2+-induced dimer without MS3, while cross-link site identification with MS2 was not possible for the UV light-induced dimer.
Claim 16comparative method performancesupports2020Source 1needs review

UVPD at MS2 provided cross-link site identification for the Fe2+-induced insulin dimer without MS3, but MS2 was not sufficient for cross-link site identification in the UV light-induced dimer.

UVPD provided identification of cross-link sites in the Fe2+-induced dimer without MS3, while cross-link site identification with MS2 was not possible for the UV light-induced dimer.
Claim 17comparative method performancesupports2020Source 1needs review

UVPD at MS2 provided cross-link site identification for the Fe2+-induced insulin dimer without MS3, but MS2 was not sufficient for cross-link site identification in the UV light-induced dimer.

UVPD provided identification of cross-link sites in the Fe2+-induced dimer without MS3, while cross-link site identification with MS2 was not possible for the UV light-induced dimer.
Claim 18mechanistic explanationsupports2020Source 1needs review

The UV chromophoric side chain of Phe1 was implicated in the Fe2+-induced dimer cross-link, explaining why UVPD-MS2 effectively fragmented the cross-link and nearby backbone bonds.

The UV chromophoric side chain of Phe1 was indicated in the cross-link, explaining why UVPD-MS2 was effective in fragmenting the cross-link and nearby backbone bonds.
Claim 19mechanistic explanationsupports2020Source 1needs review

The UV chromophoric side chain of Phe1 was implicated in the Fe2+-induced dimer cross-link, explaining why UVPD-MS2 effectively fragmented the cross-link and nearby backbone bonds.

The UV chromophoric side chain of Phe1 was indicated in the cross-link, explaining why UVPD-MS2 was effective in fragmenting the cross-link and nearby backbone bonds.
Claim 20mechanistic explanationsupports2020Source 1needs review

The UV chromophoric side chain of Phe1 was implicated in the Fe2+-induced dimer cross-link, explaining why UVPD-MS2 effectively fragmented the cross-link and nearby backbone bonds.

The UV chromophoric side chain of Phe1 was indicated in the cross-link, explaining why UVPD-MS2 was effective in fragmenting the cross-link and nearby backbone bonds.
Claim 21mechanistic explanationsupports2020Source 1needs review

The UV chromophoric side chain of Phe1 was implicated in the Fe2+-induced dimer cross-link, explaining why UVPD-MS2 effectively fragmented the cross-link and nearby backbone bonds.

The UV chromophoric side chain of Phe1 was indicated in the cross-link, explaining why UVPD-MS2 was effective in fragmenting the cross-link and nearby backbone bonds.
Claim 22mechanistic explanationsupports2020Source 1needs review

The UV chromophoric side chain of Phe1 was implicated in the Fe2+-induced dimer cross-link, explaining why UVPD-MS2 effectively fragmented the cross-link and nearby backbone bonds.

The UV chromophoric side chain of Phe1 was indicated in the cross-link, explaining why UVPD-MS2 was effective in fragmenting the cross-link and nearby backbone bonds.
Claim 23mechanistic explanationsupports2020Source 1needs review

The UV chromophoric side chain of Phe1 was implicated in the Fe2+-induced dimer cross-link, explaining why UVPD-MS2 effectively fragmented the cross-link and nearby backbone bonds.

The UV chromophoric side chain of Phe1 was indicated in the cross-link, explaining why UVPD-MS2 was effective in fragmenting the cross-link and nearby backbone bonds.
Claim 24mechanistic explanationsupports2020Source 1needs review

The UV chromophoric side chain of Phe1 was implicated in the Fe2+-induced dimer cross-link, explaining why UVPD-MS2 effectively fragmented the cross-link and nearby backbone bonds.

The UV chromophoric side chain of Phe1 was indicated in the cross-link, explaining why UVPD-MS2 was effective in fragmenting the cross-link and nearby backbone bonds.
Claim 25mechanistic explanationsupports2020Source 1needs review

The UV chromophoric side chain of Phe1 was implicated in the Fe2+-induced dimer cross-link, explaining why UVPD-MS2 effectively fragmented the cross-link and nearby backbone bonds.

The UV chromophoric side chain of Phe1 was indicated in the cross-link, explaining why UVPD-MS2 was effective in fragmenting the cross-link and nearby backbone bonds.
Claim 26mechanistic explanationsupports2020Source 1needs review

The UV chromophoric side chain of Phe1 was implicated in the Fe2+-induced dimer cross-link, explaining why UVPD-MS2 effectively fragmented the cross-link and nearby backbone bonds.

The UV chromophoric side chain of Phe1 was indicated in the cross-link, explaining why UVPD-MS2 was effective in fragmenting the cross-link and nearby backbone bonds.
Claim 27mechanistic explanationsupports2020Source 1needs review

The UV chromophoric side chain of Phe1 was implicated in the Fe2+-induced dimer cross-link, explaining why UVPD-MS2 effectively fragmented the cross-link and nearby backbone bonds.

The UV chromophoric side chain of Phe1 was indicated in the cross-link, explaining why UVPD-MS2 was effective in fragmenting the cross-link and nearby backbone bonds.
Claim 28mechanistic explanationsupports2020Source 1needs review

The UV chromophoric side chain of Phe1 was implicated in the Fe2+-induced dimer cross-link, explaining why UVPD-MS2 effectively fragmented the cross-link and nearby backbone bonds.

The UV chromophoric side chain of Phe1 was indicated in the cross-link, explaining why UVPD-MS2 was effective in fragmenting the cross-link and nearby backbone bonds.
Claim 29mechanistic explanationsupports2020Source 1needs review

The UV chromophoric side chain of Phe1 was implicated in the Fe2+-induced dimer cross-link, explaining why UVPD-MS2 effectively fragmented the cross-link and nearby backbone bonds.

The UV chromophoric side chain of Phe1 was indicated in the cross-link, explaining why UVPD-MS2 was effective in fragmenting the cross-link and nearby backbone bonds.
Claim 30mechanistic explanationsupports2020Source 1needs review

The UV chromophoric side chain of Phe1 was implicated in the Fe2+-induced dimer cross-link, explaining why UVPD-MS2 effectively fragmented the cross-link and nearby backbone bonds.

The UV chromophoric side chain of Phe1 was indicated in the cross-link, explaining why UVPD-MS2 was effective in fragmenting the cross-link and nearby backbone bonds.
Claim 31mechanistic explanationsupports2020Source 1needs review

The UV chromophoric side chain of Phe1 was implicated in the Fe2+-induced dimer cross-link, explaining why UVPD-MS2 effectively fragmented the cross-link and nearby backbone bonds.

The UV chromophoric side chain of Phe1 was indicated in the cross-link, explaining why UVPD-MS2 was effective in fragmenting the cross-link and nearby backbone bonds.
Claim 32mechanistic explanationsupports2020Source 1needs review

The UV chromophoric side chain of Phe1 was implicated in the Fe2+-induced dimer cross-link, explaining why UVPD-MS2 effectively fragmented the cross-link and nearby backbone bonds.

The UV chromophoric side chain of Phe1 was indicated in the cross-link, explaining why UVPD-MS2 was effective in fragmenting the cross-link and nearby backbone bonds.
Claim 33mechanistic explanationsupports2020Source 1needs review

The UV chromophoric side chain of Phe1 was implicated in the Fe2+-induced dimer cross-link, explaining why UVPD-MS2 effectively fragmented the cross-link and nearby backbone bonds.

The UV chromophoric side chain of Phe1 was indicated in the cross-link, explaining why UVPD-MS2 was effective in fragmenting the cross-link and nearby backbone bonds.
Claim 34mechanistic explanationsupports2020Source 1needs review

The UV chromophoric side chain of Phe1 was implicated in the Fe2+-induced dimer cross-link, explaining why UVPD-MS2 effectively fragmented the cross-link and nearby backbone bonds.

The UV chromophoric side chain of Phe1 was indicated in the cross-link, explaining why UVPD-MS2 was effective in fragmenting the cross-link and nearby backbone bonds.
Claim 35method capabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Combined EThcD and 213 nm UVPD facilitated identification of the chemical composition of cross-links in insulin dimers.

The combined utilization of EThcD and 213 nm ultraviolet photodissociation (UVPD) facilitated identification of the chemical composition of the cross-links.
Claim 36method capabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Combined EThcD and 213 nm UVPD facilitated identification of the chemical composition of cross-links in insulin dimers.

The combined utilization of EThcD and 213 nm ultraviolet photodissociation (UVPD) facilitated identification of the chemical composition of the cross-links.
Claim 37method capabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Combined EThcD and 213 nm UVPD facilitated identification of the chemical composition of cross-links in insulin dimers.

The combined utilization of EThcD and 213 nm ultraviolet photodissociation (UVPD) facilitated identification of the chemical composition of the cross-links.
Claim 38method capabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Combined EThcD and 213 nm UVPD facilitated identification of the chemical composition of cross-links in insulin dimers.

The combined utilization of EThcD and 213 nm ultraviolet photodissociation (UVPD) facilitated identification of the chemical composition of the cross-links.
Claim 39method capabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Combined EThcD and 213 nm UVPD facilitated identification of the chemical composition of cross-links in insulin dimers.

The combined utilization of EThcD and 213 nm ultraviolet photodissociation (UVPD) facilitated identification of the chemical composition of the cross-links.
Claim 40method capabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Combined EThcD and 213 nm UVPD facilitated identification of the chemical composition of cross-links in insulin dimers.

The combined utilization of EThcD and 213 nm ultraviolet photodissociation (UVPD) facilitated identification of the chemical composition of the cross-links.
Claim 41method capabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Combined EThcD and 213 nm UVPD facilitated identification of the chemical composition of cross-links in insulin dimers.

The combined utilization of EThcD and 213 nm ultraviolet photodissociation (UVPD) facilitated identification of the chemical composition of the cross-links.
Claim 42method capabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Combined EThcD and 213 nm UVPD facilitated identification of the chemical composition of cross-links in insulin dimers.

The combined utilization of EThcD and 213 nm ultraviolet photodissociation (UVPD) facilitated identification of the chemical composition of the cross-links.
Claim 43method capabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Combined EThcD and 213 nm UVPD facilitated identification of the chemical composition of cross-links in insulin dimers.

The combined utilization of EThcD and 213 nm ultraviolet photodissociation (UVPD) facilitated identification of the chemical composition of the cross-links.
Claim 44method capabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Combined EThcD and 213 nm UVPD facilitated identification of the chemical composition of cross-links in insulin dimers.

The combined utilization of EThcD and 213 nm ultraviolet photodissociation (UVPD) facilitated identification of the chemical composition of the cross-links.
Claim 45method capabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Combined EThcD and 213 nm UVPD facilitated identification of the chemical composition of cross-links in insulin dimers.

The combined utilization of EThcD and 213 nm ultraviolet photodissociation (UVPD) facilitated identification of the chemical composition of the cross-links.
Claim 46method capabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Combined EThcD and 213 nm UVPD facilitated identification of the chemical composition of cross-links in insulin dimers.

The combined utilization of EThcD and 213 nm ultraviolet photodissociation (UVPD) facilitated identification of the chemical composition of the cross-links.
Claim 47method capabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Combined EThcD and 213 nm UVPD facilitated identification of the chemical composition of cross-links in insulin dimers.

The combined utilization of EThcD and 213 nm ultraviolet photodissociation (UVPD) facilitated identification of the chemical composition of the cross-links.
Claim 48method capabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Combined EThcD and 213 nm UVPD facilitated identification of the chemical composition of cross-links in insulin dimers.

The combined utilization of EThcD and 213 nm ultraviolet photodissociation (UVPD) facilitated identification of the chemical composition of the cross-links.
Claim 49method capabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Combined EThcD and 213 nm UVPD facilitated identification of the chemical composition of cross-links in insulin dimers.

The combined utilization of EThcD and 213 nm ultraviolet photodissociation (UVPD) facilitated identification of the chemical composition of the cross-links.
Claim 50method capabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Combined EThcD and 213 nm UVPD facilitated identification of the chemical composition of cross-links in insulin dimers.

The combined utilization of EThcD and 213 nm ultraviolet photodissociation (UVPD) facilitated identification of the chemical composition of the cross-links.
Claim 51method capabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Combined EThcD and 213 nm UVPD facilitated identification of the chemical composition of cross-links in insulin dimers.

The combined utilization of EThcD and 213 nm ultraviolet photodissociation (UVPD) facilitated identification of the chemical composition of the cross-links.
Claim 52method capabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Residue-level identification of cross-link sites between chains was achievable for both dimers with MS3 analysis of MS2 fragments cleaved at the cross-link or additionally the interchain disulfide bonds.

Identification of cross-link sites between chains at residue level was achievable for both dimers with MS3 analysis of MS2 fragments cleaved at the cross-link or additionally the interchain disulfide bonds.
Claim 53method capabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Residue-level identification of cross-link sites between chains was achievable for both dimers with MS3 analysis of MS2 fragments cleaved at the cross-link or additionally the interchain disulfide bonds.

Identification of cross-link sites between chains at residue level was achievable for both dimers with MS3 analysis of MS2 fragments cleaved at the cross-link or additionally the interchain disulfide bonds.
Claim 54method capabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Residue-level identification of cross-link sites between chains was achievable for both dimers with MS3 analysis of MS2 fragments cleaved at the cross-link or additionally the interchain disulfide bonds.

Identification of cross-link sites between chains at residue level was achievable for both dimers with MS3 analysis of MS2 fragments cleaved at the cross-link or additionally the interchain disulfide bonds.
Claim 55method capabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Residue-level identification of cross-link sites between chains was achievable for both dimers with MS3 analysis of MS2 fragments cleaved at the cross-link or additionally the interchain disulfide bonds.

Identification of cross-link sites between chains at residue level was achievable for both dimers with MS3 analysis of MS2 fragments cleaved at the cross-link or additionally the interchain disulfide bonds.
Claim 56method capabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Residue-level identification of cross-link sites between chains was achievable for both dimers with MS3 analysis of MS2 fragments cleaved at the cross-link or additionally the interchain disulfide bonds.

Identification of cross-link sites between chains at residue level was achievable for both dimers with MS3 analysis of MS2 fragments cleaved at the cross-link or additionally the interchain disulfide bonds.
Claim 57method capabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Residue-level identification of cross-link sites between chains was achievable for both dimers with MS3 analysis of MS2 fragments cleaved at the cross-link or additionally the interchain disulfide bonds.

Identification of cross-link sites between chains at residue level was achievable for both dimers with MS3 analysis of MS2 fragments cleaved at the cross-link or additionally the interchain disulfide bonds.
Claim 58method capabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Residue-level identification of cross-link sites between chains was achievable for both dimers with MS3 analysis of MS2 fragments cleaved at the cross-link or additionally the interchain disulfide bonds.

Identification of cross-link sites between chains at residue level was achievable for both dimers with MS3 analysis of MS2 fragments cleaved at the cross-link or additionally the interchain disulfide bonds.
Claim 59method capabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Residue-level identification of cross-link sites between chains was achievable for both dimers with MS3 analysis of MS2 fragments cleaved at the cross-link or additionally the interchain disulfide bonds.

Identification of cross-link sites between chains at residue level was achievable for both dimers with MS3 analysis of MS2 fragments cleaved at the cross-link or additionally the interchain disulfide bonds.
Claim 60method capabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Residue-level identification of cross-link sites between chains was achievable for both dimers with MS3 analysis of MS2 fragments cleaved at the cross-link or additionally the interchain disulfide bonds.

Identification of cross-link sites between chains at residue level was achievable for both dimers with MS3 analysis of MS2 fragments cleaved at the cross-link or additionally the interchain disulfide bonds.
Claim 61method capabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Residue-level identification of cross-link sites between chains was achievable for both dimers with MS3 analysis of MS2 fragments cleaved at the cross-link or additionally the interchain disulfide bonds.

Identification of cross-link sites between chains at residue level was achievable for both dimers with MS3 analysis of MS2 fragments cleaved at the cross-link or additionally the interchain disulfide bonds.
Claim 62method capabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Top-down mass spectrometry workflows can identify cross-link types and sites in covalent insulin dimers induced by Fe2+ incubation or UV light stress.

we here demonstrate on two case studies of covalent insulin dimers, induced by Fe2+ incubation or ultraviolet (UV) light stress, that de novo characterization in top-down mass spectrometry (MS) workflows can identify cross-link types and sites
Claim 63method capabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Top-down mass spectrometry workflows can identify cross-link types and sites in covalent insulin dimers induced by Fe2+ incubation or UV light stress.

we here demonstrate on two case studies of covalent insulin dimers, induced by Fe2+ incubation or ultraviolet (UV) light stress, that de novo characterization in top-down mass spectrometry (MS) workflows can identify cross-link types and sites
Claim 64method capabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Top-down mass spectrometry workflows can identify cross-link types and sites in covalent insulin dimers induced by Fe2+ incubation or UV light stress.

we here demonstrate on two case studies of covalent insulin dimers, induced by Fe2+ incubation or ultraviolet (UV) light stress, that de novo characterization in top-down mass spectrometry (MS) workflows can identify cross-link types and sites
Claim 65method capabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Top-down mass spectrometry workflows can identify cross-link types and sites in covalent insulin dimers induced by Fe2+ incubation or UV light stress.

we here demonstrate on two case studies of covalent insulin dimers, induced by Fe2+ incubation or ultraviolet (UV) light stress, that de novo characterization in top-down mass spectrometry (MS) workflows can identify cross-link types and sites
Claim 66method capabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Top-down mass spectrometry workflows can identify cross-link types and sites in covalent insulin dimers induced by Fe2+ incubation or UV light stress.

we here demonstrate on two case studies of covalent insulin dimers, induced by Fe2+ incubation or ultraviolet (UV) light stress, that de novo characterization in top-down mass spectrometry (MS) workflows can identify cross-link types and sites
Claim 67method capabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Top-down mass spectrometry workflows can identify cross-link types and sites in covalent insulin dimers induced by Fe2+ incubation or UV light stress.

we here demonstrate on two case studies of covalent insulin dimers, induced by Fe2+ incubation or ultraviolet (UV) light stress, that de novo characterization in top-down mass spectrometry (MS) workflows can identify cross-link types and sites
Claim 68method capabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Top-down mass spectrometry workflows can identify cross-link types and sites in covalent insulin dimers induced by Fe2+ incubation or UV light stress.

we here demonstrate on two case studies of covalent insulin dimers, induced by Fe2+ incubation or ultraviolet (UV) light stress, that de novo characterization in top-down mass spectrometry (MS) workflows can identify cross-link types and sites
Claim 69method capabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Top-down mass spectrometry workflows can identify cross-link types and sites in covalent insulin dimers induced by Fe2+ incubation or UV light stress.

we here demonstrate on two case studies of covalent insulin dimers, induced by Fe2+ incubation or ultraviolet (UV) light stress, that de novo characterization in top-down mass spectrometry (MS) workflows can identify cross-link types and sites
Claim 70method capabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Top-down mass spectrometry workflows can identify cross-link types and sites in covalent insulin dimers induced by Fe2+ incubation or UV light stress.

we here demonstrate on two case studies of covalent insulin dimers, induced by Fe2+ incubation or ultraviolet (UV) light stress, that de novo characterization in top-down mass spectrometry (MS) workflows can identify cross-link types and sites
Claim 71method capabilitysupports2020Source 1needs review

Top-down mass spectrometry workflows can identify cross-link types and sites in covalent insulin dimers induced by Fe2+ incubation or UV light stress.

we here demonstrate on two case studies of covalent insulin dimers, induced by Fe2+ incubation or ultraviolet (UV) light stress, that de novo characterization in top-down mass spectrometry (MS) workflows can identify cross-link types and sites
Claim 72method conclusionsupports2020Source 1needs review

HCD, EThcD, and UVPD combined with MS3 were powerful tools for direct de novo characterization of cross-linked insulin dimers.

Our results demonstrated that higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD), EThcD, and UVPD combined with MS3 were powerful tools for direct de novo characterization of cross-linked insulin dimers.
Claim 73method conclusionsupports2020Source 1needs review

HCD, EThcD, and UVPD combined with MS3 were powerful tools for direct de novo characterization of cross-linked insulin dimers.

Our results demonstrated that higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD), EThcD, and UVPD combined with MS3 were powerful tools for direct de novo characterization of cross-linked insulin dimers.
Claim 74method conclusionsupports2020Source 1needs review

HCD, EThcD, and UVPD combined with MS3 were powerful tools for direct de novo characterization of cross-linked insulin dimers.

Our results demonstrated that higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD), EThcD, and UVPD combined with MS3 were powerful tools for direct de novo characterization of cross-linked insulin dimers.
Claim 75method conclusionsupports2020Source 1needs review

HCD, EThcD, and UVPD combined with MS3 were powerful tools for direct de novo characterization of cross-linked insulin dimers.

Our results demonstrated that higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD), EThcD, and UVPD combined with MS3 were powerful tools for direct de novo characterization of cross-linked insulin dimers.
Claim 76method conclusionsupports2020Source 1needs review

HCD, EThcD, and UVPD combined with MS3 were powerful tools for direct de novo characterization of cross-linked insulin dimers.

Our results demonstrated that higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD), EThcD, and UVPD combined with MS3 were powerful tools for direct de novo characterization of cross-linked insulin dimers.
Claim 77method conclusionsupports2020Source 1needs review

HCD, EThcD, and UVPD combined with MS3 were powerful tools for direct de novo characterization of cross-linked insulin dimers.

Our results demonstrated that higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD), EThcD, and UVPD combined with MS3 were powerful tools for direct de novo characterization of cross-linked insulin dimers.
Claim 78method conclusionsupports2020Source 1needs review

HCD, EThcD, and UVPD combined with MS3 were powerful tools for direct de novo characterization of cross-linked insulin dimers.

Our results demonstrated that higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD), EThcD, and UVPD combined with MS3 were powerful tools for direct de novo characterization of cross-linked insulin dimers.
Claim 79method conclusionsupports2020Source 1needs review

HCD, EThcD, and UVPD combined with MS3 were powerful tools for direct de novo characterization of cross-linked insulin dimers.

Our results demonstrated that higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD), EThcD, and UVPD combined with MS3 were powerful tools for direct de novo characterization of cross-linked insulin dimers.
Claim 80method conclusionsupports2020Source 1needs review

HCD, EThcD, and UVPD combined with MS3 were powerful tools for direct de novo characterization of cross-linked insulin dimers.

Our results demonstrated that higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD), EThcD, and UVPD combined with MS3 were powerful tools for direct de novo characterization of cross-linked insulin dimers.
Claim 81method conclusionsupports2020Source 1needs review

HCD, EThcD, and UVPD combined with MS3 were powerful tools for direct de novo characterization of cross-linked insulin dimers.

Our results demonstrated that higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD), EThcD, and UVPD combined with MS3 were powerful tools for direct de novo characterization of cross-linked insulin dimers.
Claim 82method conclusionsupports2020Source 1needs review

HCD, EThcD, and UVPD combined with MS3 were powerful tools for direct de novo characterization of cross-linked insulin dimers.

Our results demonstrated that higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD), EThcD, and UVPD combined with MS3 were powerful tools for direct de novo characterization of cross-linked insulin dimers.
Claim 83method conclusionsupports2020Source 1needs review

HCD, EThcD, and UVPD combined with MS3 were powerful tools for direct de novo characterization of cross-linked insulin dimers.

Our results demonstrated that higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD), EThcD, and UVPD combined with MS3 were powerful tools for direct de novo characterization of cross-linked insulin dimers.
Claim 84method conclusionsupports2020Source 1needs review

HCD, EThcD, and UVPD combined with MS3 were powerful tools for direct de novo characterization of cross-linked insulin dimers.

Our results demonstrated that higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD), EThcD, and UVPD combined with MS3 were powerful tools for direct de novo characterization of cross-linked insulin dimers.
Claim 85method conclusionsupports2020Source 1needs review

HCD, EThcD, and UVPD combined with MS3 were powerful tools for direct de novo characterization of cross-linked insulin dimers.

Our results demonstrated that higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD), EThcD, and UVPD combined with MS3 were powerful tools for direct de novo characterization of cross-linked insulin dimers.
Claim 86method conclusionsupports2020Source 1needs review

HCD, EThcD, and UVPD combined with MS3 were powerful tools for direct de novo characterization of cross-linked insulin dimers.

Our results demonstrated that higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD), EThcD, and UVPD combined with MS3 were powerful tools for direct de novo characterization of cross-linked insulin dimers.
Claim 87method conclusionsupports2020Source 1needs review

HCD, EThcD, and UVPD combined with MS3 were powerful tools for direct de novo characterization of cross-linked insulin dimers.

Our results demonstrated that higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD), EThcD, and UVPD combined with MS3 were powerful tools for direct de novo characterization of cross-linked insulin dimers.
Claim 88method conclusionsupports2020Source 1needs review

HCD, EThcD, and UVPD combined with MS3 were powerful tools for direct de novo characterization of cross-linked insulin dimers.

Our results demonstrated that higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD), EThcD, and UVPD combined with MS3 were powerful tools for direct de novo characterization of cross-linked insulin dimers.
Claim 89method observationsupports2020Source 1needs review

At the MS2 level, EThcD efficiently cleaved interchain disulfide bonds in insulin dimers to reveal cross-link connectivities between chains.

On the MS2 level, electron-transfer/higher-energy collision dissociation (EThcD) efficiently cleaved the interchain disulfide bonds in the dimers to reveal cross-link connectivities between chains.
Claim 90method observationsupports2020Source 1needs review

At the MS2 level, EThcD efficiently cleaved interchain disulfide bonds in insulin dimers to reveal cross-link connectivities between chains.

On the MS2 level, electron-transfer/higher-energy collision dissociation (EThcD) efficiently cleaved the interchain disulfide bonds in the dimers to reveal cross-link connectivities between chains.
Claim 91method observationsupports2020Source 1needs review

At the MS2 level, EThcD efficiently cleaved interchain disulfide bonds in insulin dimers to reveal cross-link connectivities between chains.

On the MS2 level, electron-transfer/higher-energy collision dissociation (EThcD) efficiently cleaved the interchain disulfide bonds in the dimers to reveal cross-link connectivities between chains.
Claim 92method observationsupports2020Source 1needs review

At the MS2 level, EThcD efficiently cleaved interchain disulfide bonds in insulin dimers to reveal cross-link connectivities between chains.

On the MS2 level, electron-transfer/higher-energy collision dissociation (EThcD) efficiently cleaved the interchain disulfide bonds in the dimers to reveal cross-link connectivities between chains.
Claim 93method observationsupports2020Source 1needs review

At the MS2 level, EThcD efficiently cleaved interchain disulfide bonds in insulin dimers to reveal cross-link connectivities between chains.

On the MS2 level, electron-transfer/higher-energy collision dissociation (EThcD) efficiently cleaved the interchain disulfide bonds in the dimers to reveal cross-link connectivities between chains.
Claim 94method observationsupports2020Source 1needs review

At the MS2 level, EThcD efficiently cleaved interchain disulfide bonds in insulin dimers to reveal cross-link connectivities between chains.

On the MS2 level, electron-transfer/higher-energy collision dissociation (EThcD) efficiently cleaved the interchain disulfide bonds in the dimers to reveal cross-link connectivities between chains.
Claim 95method observationsupports2020Source 1needs review

At the MS2 level, EThcD efficiently cleaved interchain disulfide bonds in insulin dimers to reveal cross-link connectivities between chains.

On the MS2 level, electron-transfer/higher-energy collision dissociation (EThcD) efficiently cleaved the interchain disulfide bonds in the dimers to reveal cross-link connectivities between chains.
Claim 96method observationsupports2020Source 1needs review

At the MS2 level, EThcD efficiently cleaved interchain disulfide bonds in insulin dimers to reveal cross-link connectivities between chains.

On the MS2 level, electron-transfer/higher-energy collision dissociation (EThcD) efficiently cleaved the interchain disulfide bonds in the dimers to reveal cross-link connectivities between chains.
Claim 97method observationsupports2020Source 1needs review

At the MS2 level, EThcD efficiently cleaved interchain disulfide bonds in insulin dimers to reveal cross-link connectivities between chains.

On the MS2 level, electron-transfer/higher-energy collision dissociation (EThcD) efficiently cleaved the interchain disulfide bonds in the dimers to reveal cross-link connectivities between chains.
Claim 98method observationsupports2020Source 1needs review

At the MS2 level, EThcD efficiently cleaved interchain disulfide bonds in insulin dimers to reveal cross-link connectivities between chains.

On the MS2 level, electron-transfer/higher-energy collision dissociation (EThcD) efficiently cleaved the interchain disulfide bonds in the dimers to reveal cross-link connectivities between chains.
Claim 99structural assignmentsupports2020Source 1needs review

In the Fe2+-induced insulin dimer, Phe1 from both B-chains were cross-linked through a -CH2- linkage.

In the Fe2+-induced dimer, Phe1 from both B-chains were cross-linked through a -CH2-.
Claim 100structural assignmentsupports2020Source 1needs review

In the Fe2+-induced insulin dimer, Phe1 from both B-chains were cross-linked through a -CH2- linkage.

In the Fe2+-induced dimer, Phe1 from both B-chains were cross-linked through a -CH2-.
Claim 101structural assignmentsupports2020Source 1needs review

In the Fe2+-induced insulin dimer, Phe1 from both B-chains were cross-linked through a -CH2- linkage.

In the Fe2+-induced dimer, Phe1 from both B-chains were cross-linked through a -CH2-.
Claim 102structural assignmentsupports2020Source 1needs review

In the Fe2+-induced insulin dimer, Phe1 from both B-chains were cross-linked through a -CH2- linkage.

In the Fe2+-induced dimer, Phe1 from both B-chains were cross-linked through a -CH2-.
Claim 103structural assignmentsupports2020Source 1needs review

In the Fe2+-induced insulin dimer, Phe1 from both B-chains were cross-linked through a -CH2- linkage.

In the Fe2+-induced dimer, Phe1 from both B-chains were cross-linked through a -CH2-.
Claim 104structural assignmentsupports2020Source 1needs review

In the Fe2+-induced insulin dimer, Phe1 from both B-chains were cross-linked through a -CH2- linkage.

In the Fe2+-induced dimer, Phe1 from both B-chains were cross-linked through a -CH2-.
Claim 105structural assignmentsupports2020Source 1needs review

In the Fe2+-induced insulin dimer, Phe1 from both B-chains were cross-linked through a -CH2- linkage.

In the Fe2+-induced dimer, Phe1 from both B-chains were cross-linked through a -CH2-.
Claim 106structural assignmentsupports2020Source 1needs review

In the Fe2+-induced insulin dimer, Phe1 from both B-chains were cross-linked through a -CH2- linkage.

In the Fe2+-induced dimer, Phe1 from both B-chains were cross-linked through a -CH2-.
Claim 107structural assignmentsupports2020Source 1needs review

In the Fe2+-induced insulin dimer, Phe1 from both B-chains were cross-linked through a -CH2- linkage.

In the Fe2+-induced dimer, Phe1 from both B-chains were cross-linked through a -CH2-.
Claim 108structural assignmentsupports2020Source 1needs review

In the Fe2+-induced insulin dimer, Phe1 from both B-chains were cross-linked through a -CH2- linkage.

In the Fe2+-induced dimer, Phe1 from both B-chains were cross-linked through a -CH2-.
Claim 109structural assignmentsupports2020Source 1needs review

In the UV light-induced insulin dimer, Tyr14 of the A-chain participated in an -O-S- cross-link in which the sulfur was derived either from Cys7 or Cys19 of the B-chain.

in the UV light-induced dimer, Tyr14 of the A-chain participated in an -O-S- cross-link in which the sulfur was derived either from Cys7 or Cys19 of the B-chain
Claim 110structural assignmentsupports2020Source 1needs review

In the UV light-induced insulin dimer, Tyr14 of the A-chain participated in an -O-S- cross-link in which the sulfur was derived either from Cys7 or Cys19 of the B-chain.

in the UV light-induced dimer, Tyr14 of the A-chain participated in an -O-S- cross-link in which the sulfur was derived either from Cys7 or Cys19 of the B-chain
Claim 111structural assignmentsupports2020Source 1needs review

In the UV light-induced insulin dimer, Tyr14 of the A-chain participated in an -O-S- cross-link in which the sulfur was derived either from Cys7 or Cys19 of the B-chain.

in the UV light-induced dimer, Tyr14 of the A-chain participated in an -O-S- cross-link in which the sulfur was derived either from Cys7 or Cys19 of the B-chain
Claim 112structural assignmentsupports2020Source 1needs review

In the UV light-induced insulin dimer, Tyr14 of the A-chain participated in an -O-S- cross-link in which the sulfur was derived either from Cys7 or Cys19 of the B-chain.

in the UV light-induced dimer, Tyr14 of the A-chain participated in an -O-S- cross-link in which the sulfur was derived either from Cys7 or Cys19 of the B-chain
Claim 113structural assignmentsupports2020Source 1needs review

In the UV light-induced insulin dimer, Tyr14 of the A-chain participated in an -O-S- cross-link in which the sulfur was derived either from Cys7 or Cys19 of the B-chain.

in the UV light-induced dimer, Tyr14 of the A-chain participated in an -O-S- cross-link in which the sulfur was derived either from Cys7 or Cys19 of the B-chain
Claim 114structural assignmentsupports2020Source 1needs review

In the UV light-induced insulin dimer, Tyr14 of the A-chain participated in an -O-S- cross-link in which the sulfur was derived either from Cys7 or Cys19 of the B-chain.

in the UV light-induced dimer, Tyr14 of the A-chain participated in an -O-S- cross-link in which the sulfur was derived either from Cys7 or Cys19 of the B-chain
Claim 115structural assignmentsupports2020Source 1needs review

In the UV light-induced insulin dimer, Tyr14 of the A-chain participated in an -O-S- cross-link in which the sulfur was derived either from Cys7 or Cys19 of the B-chain.

in the UV light-induced dimer, Tyr14 of the A-chain participated in an -O-S- cross-link in which the sulfur was derived either from Cys7 or Cys19 of the B-chain
Claim 116structural assignmentsupports2020Source 1needs review

In the UV light-induced insulin dimer, Tyr14 of the A-chain participated in an -O-S- cross-link in which the sulfur was derived either from Cys7 or Cys19 of the B-chain.

in the UV light-induced dimer, Tyr14 of the A-chain participated in an -O-S- cross-link in which the sulfur was derived either from Cys7 or Cys19 of the B-chain
Claim 117structural assignmentsupports2020Source 1needs review

In the UV light-induced insulin dimer, Tyr14 of the A-chain participated in an -O-S- cross-link in which the sulfur was derived either from Cys7 or Cys19 of the B-chain.

in the UV light-induced dimer, Tyr14 of the A-chain participated in an -O-S- cross-link in which the sulfur was derived either from Cys7 or Cys19 of the B-chain
Claim 118structural assignmentsupports2020Source 1needs review

In the UV light-induced insulin dimer, Tyr14 of the A-chain participated in an -O-S- cross-link in which the sulfur was derived either from Cys7 or Cys19 of the B-chain.

in the UV light-induced dimer, Tyr14 of the A-chain participated in an -O-S- cross-link in which the sulfur was derived either from Cys7 or Cys19 of the B-chain

Approval Evidence

1 source4 linked approval claimsfirst-pass slug ultraviolet-photodissociation
213 nm ultraviolet photodissociation (UVPD)

Source:

comparative method performancesupports

UVPD at MS2 provided cross-link site identification for the Fe2+-induced insulin dimer without MS3, but MS2 was not sufficient for cross-link site identification in the UV light-induced dimer.

UVPD provided identification of cross-link sites in the Fe2+-induced dimer without MS3, while cross-link site identification with MS2 was not possible for the UV light-induced dimer.

Source:

mechanistic explanationsupports

The UV chromophoric side chain of Phe1 was implicated in the Fe2+-induced dimer cross-link, explaining why UVPD-MS2 effectively fragmented the cross-link and nearby backbone bonds.

The UV chromophoric side chain of Phe1 was indicated in the cross-link, explaining why UVPD-MS2 was effective in fragmenting the cross-link and nearby backbone bonds.

Source:

method capabilitysupports

Combined EThcD and 213 nm UVPD facilitated identification of the chemical composition of cross-links in insulin dimers.

The combined utilization of EThcD and 213 nm ultraviolet photodissociation (UVPD) facilitated identification of the chemical composition of the cross-links.

Source:

method conclusionsupports

HCD, EThcD, and UVPD combined with MS3 were powerful tools for direct de novo characterization of cross-linked insulin dimers.

Our results demonstrated that higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD), EThcD, and UVPD combined with MS3 were powerful tools for direct de novo characterization of cross-linked insulin dimers.

Source:

Comparisons

Source-backed strengths

In the Fe2+-induced insulin dimer, UVPD at MS2 was sufficient for cross-link site identification without requiring MS3. The study also reported that combined EThcD and 213 nm UVPD facilitated identification of cross-link chemical composition, indicating complementarity with other fragmentation modes.

Source:

UVPD provided identification of cross-link sites in the Fe2+-induced dimer without MS3, while cross-link site identification with MS2 was not possible for the UV light-induced dimer.

ultraviolet photodissociation and electron-electron double resonance spectroscopy address a similar problem space.

Shared frame: same top-level item type; shared mechanisms: heterodimerization; same primary input modality: light

ultraviolet photodissociation and electron-transfer/higher-energy collision dissociation address a similar problem space.

Shared frame: same top-level item type; shared mechanisms: heterodimerization, ultraviolet photodissociation; same primary input modality: light

Strengths here: looks easier to implement in practice.

ultraviolet photodissociation and top-down mass spectrometry address a similar problem space.

Shared frame: same top-level item type; shared mechanisms: heterodimerization; same primary input modality: light

Ranked Citations

  1. 1.
    StructuralSource 1Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2020Claim 14Claim 2Claim 3

    Extracted from this source document.