Toolkit/Adeno-associated virus
Adeno-associated virus
Also known as: AAV, AAV vector, AAV vectors, adeno-associated vectors, adeno-associated viral vectors, adeno-associated virus, adeno-associated virus (AAV), adeno-associated viruses, adeno-associated virus vectors, herpes simplex virus, lentivirus, recombinant AAVs, viral vectors
Taxonomy: Mechanism Branch / Architecture. Workflows sit above the mechanism and technique branches rather than replacing them.
Summary
Adeno-associated virus (AAV) is a viral delivery harness used to package and express CRISPR genome-editing components in vivo. In the cited literature, AAV supports single-vector delivery when smaller Cas9 orthologues and their chimeric guide RNAs fit within AAV packaging constraints, enabling robust in vivo genome editing.
Usefulness & Problems
Why this is useful
AAV is useful as an in vivo delivery platform for CRISPR systems because it can carry genome-editing cargo into animal tissues and support transgene expression. The cited review states that combining small Cas9 orthologues with tissue-specific minimal promoters, AAV serotypes, and different administration routes has advanced efficient and precise in vivo genome editing.
Problem solved
AAV helps solve the delivery problem for in vivo CRISPR editing, particularly the challenge of fitting both a Cas9 nuclease and guide RNA expression cassette into a single vector. The cited literature specifically identifies smaller Cas9 orthologues as enabling single-AAV packaging of Cas9 and chimeric guide RNA.
Problem links
AAV is an actionable in vivo delivery harness for genetic payloads, which is a practical bottleneck when trying to program cells within complex organisms. The summary specifically supports delivery of compact genome-editing systems in vivo.
Several gap capabilities involve genetically encoded neural reporters or actuators in the brain, and AAV is a directly actionable in vivo delivery platform with explicit CNS and neural circuit targeting hints. It could support first tests of minimally invasive brain interfacing concepts that depend on transgene expression, although it does not itself solve noninvasive sensing or modulation.
combining delivery tropism with expression control
LiteratureIt enables delivery of transgenes to brain cells and supports genetic access to molecularly defined cell types.
Source:
It enables delivery of transgenes to brain cells and supports genetic access to molecularly defined cell types.
delivering therapeutic genes in preclinical and clinical studies
LiteratureIt addresses the need to deliver therapeutic genes for neurodegenerative disease interventions.
Source:
It addresses the need to deliver therapeutic genes for neurodegenerative disease interventions.
delivering therapeutic genetic cargo to ocular tissues
LiteratureIt addresses the need to deliver therapeutic genetic material into ocular tissues using relatively small doses in a confined organ. The review emphasizes its suitability for stable transduction in the eye.
Source:
It addresses the need to deliver therapeutic genetic material into ocular tissues using relatively small doses in a confined organ. The review emphasizes its suitability for stable transduction in the eye.
delivering transgenes to brain cells
LiteratureIt enables delivery of transgenes to brain cells and supports genetic access to molecularly defined cell types.
Source:
It enables delivery of transgenes to brain cells and supports genetic access to molecularly defined cell types.
enables delivery of gene therapy payloads
LiteratureIt addresses the need to deliver therapeutic genetic cargo in viral-mediated gene therapy.
Source:
It addresses the need to deliver therapeutic genetic cargo in viral-mediated gene therapy.
enabling in vivo delivery of editing systems
LiteratureIt provides a delivery route for in vivo gene editing applications.
Source:
It provides a delivery route for in vivo gene editing applications.
enabling small-dose stable transduction in the eye
LiteratureIt addresses the need to deliver therapeutic genetic material into ocular tissues using relatively small doses in a confined organ. The review emphasizes its suitability for stable transduction in the eye.
Source:
It addresses the need to deliver therapeutic genetic material into ocular tissues using relatively small doses in a confined organ. The review emphasizes its suitability for stable transduction in the eye.
improves flexibility and accuracy of opsin delivery
LiteratureAAV-based delivery addresses the need for flexible and accurate opsin delivery to defined target cells.
Source:
AAV-based delivery addresses the need for flexible and accurate opsin delivery to defined target cells.
provides a delivery vehicle for in vivo gene editing applications
LiteratureIt addresses the need to deliver gene editing systems in vivo.
Source:
It addresses the need to deliver gene editing systems in vivo.
provides a vector platform for CNS gene therapy cargo delivery
LiteratureIt addresses the need to deliver therapeutic genetic payloads into CNS cells, including dividing and non-dividing cells. The source emphasizes its suitability for CNS gene therapy because of transduction efficiency and tissue specificity.
Source:
It addresses the need to deliver therapeutic genetic payloads into CNS cells, including dividing and non-dividing cells. The source emphasizes its suitability for CNS gene therapy because of transduction efficiency and tissue specificity.
provides a viral delivery platform for RPGR gene therapy
LiteratureIt enables delivery of the therapeutic RPGR gene in the reviewed treatment approach.
Source:
It enables delivery of the therapeutic RPGR gene in the reviewed treatment approach.
provides a viral delivery vehicle for therapeutic genetic payloads
LiteratureIt helps solve the delivery problem for getting therapeutic genetic material into target cells.
Source:
It helps solve the delivery problem for getting therapeutic genetic material into target cells.
provides a viral delivery vehicle for therapeutic gene transfer
LiteratureIt addresses the need to deliver therapeutic genetic material in gene therapy settings.
Source:
It addresses the need to deliver therapeutic genetic material in gene therapy settings.
provides a viral platform for delivering genetic payloads
LiteratureIt is presented as a vector platform for carrying genetic payloads in gene therapy contexts.
Source:
It is presented as a vector platform for carrying genetic payloads in gene therapy contexts.
Published Workflows
Objective: Synthesize clinical efficacy and safety evidence for AAV-based RPGR gene therapy in RPGR-associated XLRP to guide clinical decisions and future research.
Why it works: The review first identifies controlled clinical trials, then extracts outcomes and bias information, and finally pools dichotomous and continuous endpoints using heterogeneity-aware meta-analytic models.
Stages
- 1.Literature search and study identification(in_silico_filter)
This stage narrows the evidence base to studies directly relevant to the review question before screening and pooling.
Selection: Search PubMed, Embase, and other databases through March 2025 for controlled clinical trials evaluating AAV gene therapy for RPGR-related XLRP.
- 2.Independent screening and data extraction(hit_picking)
Independent screening and extraction support consistent inclusion decisions and structured outcome capture before bias assessment and meta-analysis.
Selection: Two reviewers independently screened literature and extracted data.
- 3.Risk of bias assessment(counter_screen)
Bias assessment acts as a quality control step before pooled inference.
- 4.Meta-analysis of efficacy and safety endpoints(confirmatory_validation)
This stage quantitatively integrates the included evidence to estimate treatment effects on visual outcomes and adverse events.
Selection: Risk ratios were calculated for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference/standardized mean difference for continuous outcomes, with random/fixed-effects models based on heterogeneity.
Steps
- 1.Search bibliographic databases for eligible controlled clinical trials
Identify the candidate evidence base for AAV gene therapy in RPGR-related XLRP.
A comprehensive search is required before any screening or synthesis can occur.
- 2.Independently screen studies and extract data
Select eligible studies and capture the data needed for pooled efficacy and safety analysis.
Screening and extraction follow the search so that only eligible studies contribute structured data to later appraisal and synthesis.
- 3.Assess included studies for bias using the Cochrane tool
Evaluate study quality before quantitative pooling.
Bias assessment is performed after inclusion and extraction because it depends on the final included study set and informs confidence in pooled results.
- 4.Pool dichotomous and continuous outcomes with heterogeneity-based model selection
Generate summary estimates for efficacy and safety outcomes across included studies.
Quantitative synthesis comes after study identification, extraction, and bias assessment so pooled estimates are based on curated and appraised evidence.
Objective: Achieve genetic access to molecularly defined brain cell types by combining delivery tropism engineering with expression-control engineering.
Why it works: The review abstract explicitly frames AAV design around two engineerable features: capsid for delivery/tropism and cargo for expression control. Combining these axes is presented as enabling highly specific transgene expression in brain cells and circuits.
Stages
- 1.Capsid engineering for delivery tropism(library_design)
The abstract identifies capsid as an engineerable feature used to alter where AAV vectors transduce.
Selection: Enhance cell type or tissue tropism, including central nervous system transduction and retrograde transport.
- 2.Cargo and regulatory-element design for expression specificity(library_design)
The abstract states that cargo and regulatory elements control transgene expression and, when paired with engineered AAVs, enable highly specific expression.
Selection: Control transgene expression using gene regulatory elements and reporter, sensor, or effector cargo.
Taxonomy & Function
Primary hierarchy
Mechanism Branch
Architecture: A delivery strategy grouped with the mechanism branch because it determines how a system is instantiated and deployed in context.
Target processes
editingmanufacturingrecombinationtranslationInput: Light
Implementation Constraints
Practical implementation in the cited literature involves selecting smaller Cas9 orthologues so that the nuclease and chimeric guide RNA can be packaged into one AAV vector. Additional design variables supported by the source include tissue-specific minimal promoters, AAV serotype selection, and route of administration; no further construct or production details are provided in the supplied evidence.
The evidence here is limited to a review-level description and does not provide quantitative data on packaging limits, editing rates, tissue tropism, or adverse events. The need for smaller Cas9 orthologues and minimal promoters indicates a cargo-size constraint for single-vector AAV delivery.
Validation
Observations
transgene expression
Inferred from claim c1 during normalization. In mice, intraperitoneal AAV injection during the resting phase (ZT6) produced greater transgene expression over several weeks than equivalent injection during the waking phase (ZT18). Derived from claim c1. Quoted text: intraperitoneal doses of AAVs injected during the resting phase (ZT6, 12:00PM) produced greater transgene expression over several weeks than equivalent doses injected during the waking phase (ZT18, 12:00AM).
Source:
Inferred from claim c4 during normalization. AAV-based therapies such as Elevidys for DMD and Zolgensma for SMA demonstrate functional improvements, although immune responses and hepatotoxicity remain concerns. Derived from claim c4. Quoted text: Clinically, AAV-based therapies (e.g., Elevidys® for DMD, Zolgensma® for SMA) demonstrate functional improvements, though immune responses and hepatotoxicity remain concerns.
Source:
Supporting Sources
Ranked Claims
The study established imaging conditions optimized for physiological temperature and oxygen because these conditions critically shape NO bioavailability.
We establish imaging conditions optimized for physiological temperature and oxygen, which critically shape NO bioavailability.
Both endogenous and exogenously applied NO dampen spontaneous Ca2+ spikes in primary hippocampal neurons.
Conversely, both endogenous and exogenously applied NO dampen spontaneous Ca2+ spikes
Robust Ca2+ elevation induced by high extracellular K+ or glutamate evokes robust NO signals in primary hippocampal neurons.
whereas robust Ca2+ elevation by high extracellular K+ (50 mM) or glutamate (30 μM) evokes robust NO signals
Under the optimized conditions, spontaneous Ca2+ spikes and network activity are largely insufficient to elicit detectable NO production in primary hippocampal neurons.
Under these conditions, spontaneous Ca2+ spikes and network activity are largely insufficient to elicit detectable NO production
MscS showed exceptional genomic compatibility with fewer off-target gene alterations than the MscL variants.
Optogenetics enables precise control of neural activity through light-sensitive opsins.
MscL-G22N produced weaker ultrasound responses than MscL-G22S despite having a lower mechanical threshold.
MscL-G22S showed strong ultrasound sensitivity in rat hippocampus, including amplified evoked potentials and reduced response latency under focused ultrasound.
NO signals evoked by robust Ca2+ elevation surpass responses to exogenous NO donors.
evokes robust NO signals that surpass responses to exogenous NO donors
Adeno-associated viruses and lentiviruses have shown promise for delivering targeted genetic interventions in epilepsy gene therapy.
viral vectors, such as adeno-associated viruses and lentiviruses, have shown promise in delivering targeted genetic interventions
The approved viral gene therapy products highlighted in the abstract rely on adeno-associated vectors and lentiviral vectors for delivery.
The review discusses AAVs, LNPs, lentivirus, and virus-like particles as emerging delivery vehicles for gene editing therapies targeting lipid metabolism in cardiovascular disease.
Emerging delivery vehicles (AAVs, LNPs, lentivirus, virus-like particles) and their translational implications are discussed.
Adeno-associated viruses are presented as a promising clinical delivery approach for opsins to target cells and can improve flexibility and accuracy of opsin delivery when combined with cell-specific promoters and serotype choice.
Advances in capsid engineering, tissue-specific promoters, and delivery strategies have enhanced podocyte targeting while minimizing off-target effects.
Improvements in viral-mediated gene transfer efficiency and clinical-scale manufacturing have helped propel the clinical adoption of gene therapy products.
Nearly 30 new viral gene therapy programs have been approved by the US FDA since the first AAV-based gene therapy approval in 2017.
Major challenges for epilepsy gene therapy include safe and efficient gene delivery, maintaining long-term therapeutic effects, and mitigating potential side effects.
However, significant challenges exist, including ensuring safe and efficient gene delivery, maintaining long-term therapeutic effects, and mitigating potential side effects.
The comparison between MscL-G22N and MscL-G22S suggests that ultrasound sensitivity depends on factors beyond nominal mechanical gating threshold.
The findings demonstrate bidirectional functional coupling between Ca2+ and NO signals in primary hippocampal neurons.
Together, these findings demonstrate bidirectional functional coupling between Ca2+ and NO signals in primary hippocampal neurons
Bioluminescent optogenetics combines optogenetic principles with bioluminescent proteins to visualize and manipulate neural activity in real time and can support efficient, less invasive monitoring of neuronal activity.
MscS showed diminished ultrasound responses at higher stimulation intensities.
Preclinical successes including AAV-mediated rescue of NPHS2-associated nephrotic syndrome and complement modulation in IgA nephropathy support the therapeutic potential of gene-based interventions in podocytopathies.
AAV-based RPGR gene therapy significantly increased ocular treatment-emergent adverse event risk in pooled controlled clinical evidence for RPGR-associated XLRP.
Increasing clinical experience with in vivo editing using LNP- and AAV-based platforms has revealed safety considerations including vector immunogenicity, systemic inflammation, and organ-specific toxicities.
Next-generation editors and targeted delivery systems have expanded the scope of feasible cardiovascular applications, but biological barriers still limit translation to well tolerated durable one-time genomic therapies.
Cell-specific promoters are essential for precise and efficient optogenetic stimulation because they restrict opsin expression to selected target cells.
Emerging editing technologies aim to overcome limited vector cargo capacity, PAM incompatibility, chromatin accessibility, suboptimal editing efficiency, and off-target activity.
Gene therapy has emerged as a transformative approach for podocytopathies using AAV vectors, CRISPR-based editing, and RNA modulation to correct pathogenic mutations or restore disrupted pathways.
The paper reports a bicistronic dual biosensor that combines jGCaMP8s and O-geNOps and is delivered by AAV to primary hippocampal neurons.
Here we report a bicistronic dual biosensor that combines jGCaMP8s for high-sensitivity Ca2+ imaging with the orange fluorescent NO reporter O-geNOps, delivered by adeno-associated virus (AAV) to primary hippocampal neurons.
Immune responses, vector biodistribution, and disease heterogeneity remain challenges for podocytopathy gene therapy.
Successful clinical translation of gene and base editing for cardiovascular disease depends on efficient and precise delivery and on mitigating immunogenicity and toxicity from both delivery vectors and gene-editing enzymes.
Gene delivery approaches may advance conventional antibody therapeutics against viral infections and other diseases through local persistence of the proteins.
Lipid nanoparticle transfection efficiency was significantly higher than lipofectamine in almost all treatments.
Transfection efficiency was significantly higher compared to lipofectamine in almost all treatments.
AAV-based gene therapy has achieved approved clinical use, including Luxturna for a genetic retinal disease.
including the approval of Luxturna for a genetic retinal disease
First-in-human dual AAV therapy for hereditary hearing loss showcased restoration of auditory function in patients.
has showcased the restoration of auditory function for patients
AAV-based therapies such as Elevidys for DMD and Zolgensma for SMA demonstrate functional improvements, although immune responses and hepatotoxicity remain concerns.
Clinically, AAV-based therapies (e.g., Elevidys® for DMD, Zolgensma® for SMA) demonstrate functional improvements, though immune responses and hepatotoxicity remain concerns.
LNP and GalNAc non-viral vectors have led to successful gene therapy products.
non-viral vectors such as lipid nanoparticles (LNP) and N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) have led to successful gene therapy products
Lipid nanoparticles are presented as a promising non-viral platform for optogenetic delivery because they can overcome some AAV-related limitations.
lipid nanoparticles can overcome some of the previously mentioned problems of AAV vectors, making them prime candidates for optogenetic delivery
Non-viral vectors including liposomes, polymers, and exosomes offer advantages in cargo capacity, biocompatibility, and scalable production, but they face challenges in transduction efficiency and endosomal escape.
Non-viral vectors (liposomes, polymers, exosomes) offer advantages in cargo capacity (delivering full-length dystrophin), biocompatibility, and scalable production but face challenges in transduction efficiency and endosomal escape.
AAV transduction was more efficient in pigeon telencephalon than mesencephalon.
AAV transduction being more efficient in the telencephalon than mesencephalon
AAV vectors are presented as the primary delivery platform for DMD gene therapy because of muscle tropism, low immunogenicity, and long-term transgene expression.
Lipid nanoparticles were evaluated for delivery of the ChrimsonR plasmid in neurons in vitro.
we evaluated their suitability for the delivery of the ChrimsonR plasmid in neurons in vitro
DNA sequencing technologies enhance identification and incorporation of therapeutic genes into AAV vectors for ovarian cancer gene therapy.
AAV vectors dominate clinical applications for gene therapy in hereditary skeletal myopathies because they efficiently transduce post-mitotic myofibers and support sustained transgene expression.
Adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors dominate clinical applications due to their efficient transduction of post-mitotic myofibers and sustained transgene expression.
The duration of AAV-mediated expression is limited by the episomal nature of AAV genomes and their loss during muscle fiber regeneration.
AAV engineering innovations including capsid modification, self-complementary genomes, and tissue-specific promoters such as MHCK7 enhance muscle tropism while mitigating immunogenicity and off-target effects.
Innovations in AAV engineering, such as capsid modification (chemical conjugation, rational design, directed evolution), self-complementary genomes, and tissue-specific promoters (e.g., MHCK7), enhance muscle tropism while mitigating immunogenicity and off-target effects.
The hChR2 component significantly affected transduction efficiency in the pigeon AAV experiments.
the hChR2 component significantly affecting transduction efficiency
Despite substantial progress, safety, immunogenicity, and stability of genetic correction remain unresolved issues in AAV-mediated DMD therapy.
Further in vitro analysis showed altered electrophysiological parameters with reduced signal amplitudes after lipid nanoparticle-mediated delivery.
Further in vitro analysis showed that electrophysiological parameters were altered, with reduced signal amplitudes
Future targeted gene delivery strategies for muscular disorders emphasize AI-driven vector design, AAV-exosome hybrid systems, and standardized manufacturing to pursue single-dose lifelong therapeutic benefit.
Future directions focus on AI-driven vector design, hybrid systems (AAV-exosomes), and standardized manufacturing to achieve "single-dose, lifelong cure" paradigms for muscular disorders.
AAV limitations for delivering CRISPR modalities continue to impede viable therapeutic interventions targeting the brain.
However, AAV limitations for delivering CRISPR modalities continue to impede viable therapeutic interventions targeting the brain.
AAV vectors for gene therapy are limited by the cost and toxicity of the large doses required.
The promise of adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors for gene therapy is held back by the cost and toxicity of the large doses required.
Major challenges for AAV-mediated DMD gene therapy include immune responses against viral capsid and transgene products and inability to perform repeated administrations.
mRNA platforms, viral vectors, and engineered cell therapies have matured considerably due to years of clinical experience and growing regulatory confidence.
Dual AAV therapy can overcome large gene delivery limitations.
the first-in-human dual AAV therapy for hereditary hearing loss, which overcomes large gene delivery
The study determined optimum injection dose and transduction period guidelines for each location and serotype tested in pigeons.
The optimum injection dose and transduction period guideline for each location and serotype were determined.
Lipid nanoparticles represent a promising non-viral platform for optogenetic delivery, but formulation optimization is required to achieve full functional efficacy.
These results demonstrate that lipid nanoparticles represent a promising non-viral platform for optogenetic delivery, though formulation optimization is required to achieve full functional efficacy.
AAV packaging capacity is approximately 4.7 kb, which necessitates truncated mini- and micro-dystrophin transgenes and compact genome editing systems for DMD applications.
In pigeons, AAV serotypes 1 and 11 with ubiquitous promoters transduced well across all brain regions tested.
We found serotypes 1 and 11 with ubiquitous promoters transducing well at all brain regions
In mice, intraperitoneal AAV injection during the resting phase (ZT6) produced greater transgene expression over several weeks than equivalent injection during the waking phase (ZT18).
intraperitoneal doses of AAVs injected during the resting phase (ZT6, 12:00PM) produced greater transgene expression over several weeks than equivalent doses injected during the waking phase (ZT18, 12:00AM).
AAV vectors have potential for gene therapy in ovarian cancer.
AAV is characterized by high transduction efficiency in dividing and non-dividing cells, low immunogenicity and toxicity, and exceptional tissue specificity.
AAV is characterized by high transduction efficiency in both dividing and non-dividing cells, low immunogenicity and toxicity, and exceptional tissue specificity.
Cell viability assays showed no decline in cell viability after lipid nanoparticle-mediated delivery in vitro.
however, cell viability assays showed no decline in cell viability
In rat cortical neurons, lipid nanoparticles did not reduce several measured neuronal morphological parameters in most tested concentrations compared with lipofectamine.
In rat cortical neurons, in most of the concentrations tested, there was no reduction in several neuron morphological parameters that we measured when compared to another non-viral nanoparticle called lipofectamine.
Rational ovarian cancer AAV gene therapy strategies can be categorized by target cells and target genes to determine effective approaches.
Innovations in AAV capsid design allow targeted delivery focused on ovarian cancer stem cells identified by specific markers.
Timing AAV administration by circadian phase could improve safety and reduce costs of AAV gene therapy and potentially other nanoparticle therapies.
This insight could lead to future work that improves safety and reduces costs of AAV gene therapy and other nanoparticle therapies.
Clinical success of AAV- and lentiviral-based interventions and approval of CAR-T cell therapies highlight the potential of these technologies to transform delivery of antibody therapeutics.
AAV is a promising and widely utilized vector for gene therapy applications including the CNS.
The adeno-associated virus (AAV) is a promising and most widely utilized vector for gene therapy application including the CNS.
Lentiviral vectors, adenoviral vectors, and AAV are widely used viral vectors that have enabled notable preclinical and clinical successes in gene therapy over the past two decades.
Over the past two decades, three widely used viral vectors-lentiviruses (LV), adenoviruses (Ad), and adeno-associated viruses (AAV)-have enabled notable preclinical and clinical successes
This review concerns adeno-associated virus as a delivery vector for gene therapy of human diseases.
The review covers characteristics of different AAV delivery routes in ocular clinical applications.
The review discusses progress of AAV in ocular optogenetic therapy.
The review outlines recent progress in AAV-mediated gene editing and silencing strategies for genetic ocular diseases, especially base editing and prime editing.
AAV is presented as one of the most promising viral gene delivery tools for ocular gene therapy because it can infect various tissue types and is considered relatively safe.
An increasing number of clinical trials of AAV-mediated gene therapy are underway for ocular diseases.
The eye is described as a favorable organ for AAV gene therapy because its limited volume is suitable for small doses that can achieve stable transduction.
The review identifies difficulties in the clinical transformation of AAV-mediated ocular gene therapy.
Viral vehicles combined with genetic tools enable visualization of functional neural networks and monitoring and manipulation of neural circuit functions with cell type- and projection-specific targeting.
Viral vehicles combined with genetic tools provide the possibility to visualize entire functional neural networks and monitor and manipulate neural circuit functions by high-resolution cell type- and projection-specific targeting.
Pairing engineered AAVs with gene regulatory elements and reporter, sensor, or effector cargo enables highly specific transgene expression for anatomical and functional analyses of brain cells and circuits.
AAV vectors have two engineerable features, the capsid and the cargo, which can be modified to alter tropism and transgene expression control.
The review presents a comprehensive capsid-and-cargo AAV toolkit for genetic access to molecularly defined brain cell types.
The review summarizes current and emerging viral strategies for targeting neural circuits with a focus on AAV vectors.
In this review, we summarize current and emerging viral strategies for targeting neural circuits and focus on adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors.
Recombinant AAVs are commonly used gene delivery vehicles for neuroscience research.
Intersectional AAV circuit-targeting approaches can target expression of fluorescent reporters, optogenetic ion channels, chemogenetic receptors, disease-associated proteins, and other factors to defined neural circuits.
These approaches can precisely target the expression of fluorescent reporters, optogenetic ion channels, chemogenetic receptors, disease-associated proteins, and other factors to defined neural circuits
The review covers axonal-transport-based intersectional AAV approaches for targeting neuron populations defined by connectivity.
We review emerging techniques that use the axonal transport of adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors to dissect neural circuits. These intersectional approaches specifically target AAV-mediated gene expression to discrete neuron populations based on their axonal connectivity
AAV1-mediated anterograde transsynaptic tagging is presented in the supplied source summary as a basis for input-defined and input-plus-output-defined circuit targeting schemes discussed by the review.
forming the basis of input-defined and input+output-defined circuit targeting schemes discussed in the review
AAV2-retro is presented in the supplied source summary as a key engineered retrograde capsid enabling output-defined intersectional targeting strategies discussed by the review.
the engineered retrograde capsid AAV2-retro (Tervo et al., 2016)
INTRSECT is presented in the supplied source summary as a multi-recombinase Boolean expression framework connected to reviewed intersectional AAV approaches.
introducing the multi-recombinase Boolean expression framework explicitly connected to reviewed intersectional AAV approaches
Genetically modified viral vectors broaden the ability to express genes of interest and support inducible manipulations in neural systems.
Chemogenetics can be activated via a systemic drug without indwelling fiber optics and acts in a more naturalistic modulatory fashion through second-messenger pathways than optogenetics.
Optogenetic and chemogenetic approaches allow mechanistic, temporally specific, cell-type-specific, and circuit-specific neural regulation of behaviors.
Smaller Cas9 orthologues enabled packaging of Cas9 nuclease and its chimeric guide RNA into a single AAV delivery vehicle for robust in vivo genome editing.
Recent discoveries of smaller Cas9 orthologues have enabled the packaging of Cas9 nuclease and its chimeric guide RNA into a single AAV delivery vehicle for robust in vivo genome editing.
Smaller Cas9 orthologues enabled packaging of Cas9 nuclease and its chimeric guide RNA into a single AAV delivery vehicle for robust in vivo genome editing.
Recent discoveries of smaller Cas9 orthologues have enabled the packaging of Cas9 nuclease and its chimeric guide RNA into a single AAV delivery vehicle for robust in vivo genome editing.
Smaller Cas9 orthologues enabled packaging of Cas9 nuclease and its chimeric guide RNA into a single AAV delivery vehicle for robust in vivo genome editing.
Recent discoveries of smaller Cas9 orthologues have enabled the packaging of Cas9 nuclease and its chimeric guide RNA into a single AAV delivery vehicle for robust in vivo genome editing.
Smaller Cas9 orthologues enabled packaging of Cas9 nuclease and its chimeric guide RNA into a single AAV delivery vehicle for robust in vivo genome editing.
Recent discoveries of smaller Cas9 orthologues have enabled the packaging of Cas9 nuclease and its chimeric guide RNA into a single AAV delivery vehicle for robust in vivo genome editing.
Smaller Cas9 orthologues enabled packaging of Cas9 nuclease and its chimeric guide RNA into a single AAV delivery vehicle for robust in vivo genome editing.
Recent discoveries of smaller Cas9 orthologues have enabled the packaging of Cas9 nuclease and its chimeric guide RNA into a single AAV delivery vehicle for robust in vivo genome editing.
Smaller Cas9 orthologues enabled packaging of Cas9 nuclease and its chimeric guide RNA into a single AAV delivery vehicle for robust in vivo genome editing.
Recent discoveries of smaller Cas9 orthologues have enabled the packaging of Cas9 nuclease and its chimeric guide RNA into a single AAV delivery vehicle for robust in vivo genome editing.
Smaller Cas9 orthologues enabled packaging of Cas9 nuclease and its chimeric guide RNA into a single AAV delivery vehicle for robust in vivo genome editing.
Recent discoveries of smaller Cas9 orthologues have enabled the packaging of Cas9 nuclease and its chimeric guide RNA into a single AAV delivery vehicle for robust in vivo genome editing.
The combined use of small Cas9 orthologues, tissue-specific minimal promoters, AAV serotypes, and different routes of administration has advanced efficient and precise in vivo genome editing.
the combined use of small Cas9 orthologues, tissue-specific minimal promoters, AAV serotypes, and different routes of administration has advanced the development of efficient and precise in vivo genome editing
The combined use of small Cas9 orthologues, tissue-specific minimal promoters, AAV serotypes, and different routes of administration has advanced efficient and precise in vivo genome editing.
the combined use of small Cas9 orthologues, tissue-specific minimal promoters, AAV serotypes, and different routes of administration has advanced the development of efficient and precise in vivo genome editing
The combined use of small Cas9 orthologues, tissue-specific minimal promoters, AAV serotypes, and different routes of administration has advanced efficient and precise in vivo genome editing.
the combined use of small Cas9 orthologues, tissue-specific minimal promoters, AAV serotypes, and different routes of administration has advanced the development of efficient and precise in vivo genome editing
The combined use of small Cas9 orthologues, tissue-specific minimal promoters, AAV serotypes, and different routes of administration has advanced efficient and precise in vivo genome editing.
the combined use of small Cas9 orthologues, tissue-specific minimal promoters, AAV serotypes, and different routes of administration has advanced the development of efficient and precise in vivo genome editing
The combined use of small Cas9 orthologues, tissue-specific minimal promoters, AAV serotypes, and different routes of administration has advanced efficient and precise in vivo genome editing.
the combined use of small Cas9 orthologues, tissue-specific minimal promoters, AAV serotypes, and different routes of administration has advanced the development of efficient and precise in vivo genome editing
The combined use of small Cas9 orthologues, tissue-specific minimal promoters, AAV serotypes, and different routes of administration has advanced efficient and precise in vivo genome editing.
the combined use of small Cas9 orthologues, tissue-specific minimal promoters, AAV serotypes, and different routes of administration has advanced the development of efficient and precise in vivo genome editing
The combined use of small Cas9 orthologues, tissue-specific minimal promoters, AAV serotypes, and different routes of administration has advanced efficient and precise in vivo genome editing.
the combined use of small Cas9 orthologues, tissue-specific minimal promoters, AAV serotypes, and different routes of administration has advanced the development of efficient and precise in vivo genome editing
AAV delivery vehicles and CRISPR components are associated with off-target effects, immunogenicity, and toxicity as challenges for therapeutic use.
potential strategies to overcome off-target effects, immunogenicity, and toxicity associated with CRISPR components and AAV delivery vehicles
AAV delivery vehicles and CRISPR components are associated with off-target effects, immunogenicity, and toxicity as challenges for therapeutic use.
potential strategies to overcome off-target effects, immunogenicity, and toxicity associated with CRISPR components and AAV delivery vehicles
AAV delivery vehicles and CRISPR components are associated with off-target effects, immunogenicity, and toxicity as challenges for therapeutic use.
potential strategies to overcome off-target effects, immunogenicity, and toxicity associated with CRISPR components and AAV delivery vehicles
AAV delivery vehicles and CRISPR components are associated with off-target effects, immunogenicity, and toxicity as challenges for therapeutic use.
potential strategies to overcome off-target effects, immunogenicity, and toxicity associated with CRISPR components and AAV delivery vehicles
AAV delivery vehicles and CRISPR components are associated with off-target effects, immunogenicity, and toxicity as challenges for therapeutic use.
potential strategies to overcome off-target effects, immunogenicity, and toxicity associated with CRISPR components and AAV delivery vehicles
AAV delivery vehicles and CRISPR components are associated with off-target effects, immunogenicity, and toxicity as challenges for therapeutic use.
potential strategies to overcome off-target effects, immunogenicity, and toxicity associated with CRISPR components and AAV delivery vehicles
AAV delivery vehicles and CRISPR components are associated with off-target effects, immunogenicity, and toxicity as challenges for therapeutic use.
potential strategies to overcome off-target effects, immunogenicity, and toxicity associated with CRISPR components and AAV delivery vehicles
AAV provides a suitable viral vector to package, deliver, and express CRISPR components for targeted gene editing.
AAV provides one of the most suitable viral vectors to package, deliver, and express CRISPR components for targeted gene editing.
AAV provides a suitable viral vector to package, deliver, and express CRISPR components for targeted gene editing.
AAV provides one of the most suitable viral vectors to package, deliver, and express CRISPR components for targeted gene editing.
AAV provides a suitable viral vector to package, deliver, and express CRISPR components for targeted gene editing.
AAV provides one of the most suitable viral vectors to package, deliver, and express CRISPR components for targeted gene editing.
AAV provides a suitable viral vector to package, deliver, and express CRISPR components for targeted gene editing.
AAV provides one of the most suitable viral vectors to package, deliver, and express CRISPR components for targeted gene editing.
AAV provides a suitable viral vector to package, deliver, and express CRISPR components for targeted gene editing.
AAV provides one of the most suitable viral vectors to package, deliver, and express CRISPR components for targeted gene editing.
AAV provides a suitable viral vector to package, deliver, and express CRISPR components for targeted gene editing.
AAV provides one of the most suitable viral vectors to package, deliver, and express CRISPR components for targeted gene editing.
AAV provides a suitable viral vector to package, deliver, and express CRISPR components for targeted gene editing.
AAV provides one of the most suitable viral vectors to package, deliver, and express CRISPR components for targeted gene editing.
DREADD technology is presented as the most robust model of chemogenetics.
Anterograde projection targeting and retrograde transport of viral vectors are two projection-targeting approaches for probing neural circuits.
We discuss two projection targeting approaches for probing neural circuits: anterograde projection targeting and retrograde transport of viral vectors.
Cell type-specific promoters and other nucleotide sequences can be used in viral vectors to target neuronal types at the transcriptional level.
cell type-specific promoters and other nucleotide sequences that can be used in viral vectors to target neuronal types at the transcriptional level
Targeting specific neuronal types with optogenetic and chemogenetic tools remains challenging in primates.
In primates, however, targeting specific types of neurons with these tools remains challenging.
Viral-vector targeting performance is discussed in terms of cell-type tropism and prospects for improved efficacy and selectivity through new variants.
their tropism for different cell types, and prospects for new variants with improved efficacy and selectivity
AAV and lentiviral vectors are major viral-vector platforms discussed for gene delivery to neurons in the adult primate central nervous system.
We review the literature on viral vectors for gene delivery to neurons, focusing on adeno-associated viral vectors and lentiviral vectors
This paper is about AAV at its 50-year milestone.
AAV has shown success in some clinical and research applications.
some of the clinical and research applications where AAV has shown success
AAV is capable of transducing a wide range of species and tissues in vivo.
It is capable of transducing a wide range of species and tissues in vivo
AAV generates relatively mild innate and adaptive immune responses.
and it generates relatively mild innate and adaptive immune responses
AAV shows no evidence of toxicity in the abstract's summarized in vivo context.
with no evidence of toxicity
AAV was adapted for use as a gene transfer vehicle.
Adeno-associated virus (AAV) is a small, nonenveloped virus that was adapted 30 years ago for use as a gene transfer vehicle.
Approval Evidence
increasing clinical experience with in-vivo editing - particularly using lipid nanoparticle (LNP) and adeno-associated virus (AAV)-based platforms - that has also revealed important safety considerations
Source:
all these products rely on delivery via adeno-associated vectors (AAVs) and lentiviral vectors (LVs)
Source:
adeno-associated viral (AAV)-based RPGR gene therapy
Source:
Emerging delivery vehicles (AAVs, LNPs, lentivirus, virus-like particles) and their translational implications are discussed.
Source:
viral vectors, such as adeno-associated viruses and lentiviruses, have shown promise in delivering targeted genetic interventions
Source:
These strategies include the use of adeno-associated viruses, cell-specific promoters, modified opsins, and methodologies such as bioluminescent optogenetics. The application of viral recombinant vectors, particularly adeno-associated viruses, is emerging as a promising avenue for clinical use in delivering opsins to target cells.
Source:
The adeno-associated virus (AAV) is a promising and most widely utilized vector for gene therapy application including the CNS.
Source:
Adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) and lentiviruses have been used for gene delivery in preclinical and clinical studies.
Source:
Title: "Adeno-associated virus as a delivery vector for gene therapy of human diseases"
Source:
Adeno-associated virus (AAV) is considered one of the most promising viral gene delivery tools because it can infect various types of tissues and is considered as a relatively safe gene delivery vector.
Source:
Recombinant adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) are commonly used gene delivery vehicles for neuroscience research.
Source:
Adeno-associated virus (AAV) has shown promising therapeutic efficacy with a good safety profile
Source:
Adeno-associated viruses and lentiviruses have shown promise for delivering targeted genetic interventions in epilepsy gene therapy.
viral vectors, such as adeno-associated viruses and lentiviruses, have shown promise in delivering targeted genetic interventions
Source:
The approved viral gene therapy products highlighted in the abstract rely on adeno-associated vectors and lentiviral vectors for delivery.
Source:
The review discusses AAVs, LNPs, lentivirus, and virus-like particles as emerging delivery vehicles for gene editing therapies targeting lipid metabolism in cardiovascular disease.
Emerging delivery vehicles (AAVs, LNPs, lentivirus, virus-like particles) and their translational implications are discussed.
Source:
Adeno-associated viruses are presented as a promising clinical delivery approach for opsins to target cells and can improve flexibility and accuracy of opsin delivery when combined with cell-specific promoters and serotype choice.
Source:
Improvements in viral-mediated gene transfer efficiency and clinical-scale manufacturing have helped propel the clinical adoption of gene therapy products.
Source:
Nearly 30 new viral gene therapy programs have been approved by the US FDA since the first AAV-based gene therapy approval in 2017.
Source:
Major challenges for epilepsy gene therapy include safe and efficient gene delivery, maintaining long-term therapeutic effects, and mitigating potential side effects.
However, significant challenges exist, including ensuring safe and efficient gene delivery, maintaining long-term therapeutic effects, and mitigating potential side effects.
Source:
AAV-based RPGR gene therapy significantly increased ocular treatment-emergent adverse event risk in pooled controlled clinical evidence for RPGR-associated XLRP.
Source:
Increasing clinical experience with in vivo editing using LNP- and AAV-based platforms has revealed safety considerations including vector immunogenicity, systemic inflammation, and organ-specific toxicities.
Source:
Next-generation editors and targeted delivery systems have expanded the scope of feasible cardiovascular applications, but biological barriers still limit translation to well tolerated durable one-time genomic therapies.
Source:
Emerging editing technologies aim to overcome limited vector cargo capacity, PAM incompatibility, chromatin accessibility, suboptimal editing efficiency, and off-target activity.
Source:
Successful clinical translation of gene and base editing for cardiovascular disease depends on efficient and precise delivery and on mitigating immunogenicity and toxicity from both delivery vectors and gene-editing enzymes.
Source:
AAVs and lentiviruses have been used for gene delivery in preclinical and clinical studies.
Adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) and lentiviruses have been used for gene delivery in preclinical and clinical studies
Source:
AAV limitations for delivering CRISPR modalities continue to impede viable therapeutic interventions targeting the brain.
However, AAV limitations for delivering CRISPR modalities continue to impede viable therapeutic interventions targeting the brain.
Source:
AAV is characterized by high transduction efficiency in dividing and non-dividing cells, low immunogenicity and toxicity, and exceptional tissue specificity.
AAV is characterized by high transduction efficiency in both dividing and non-dividing cells, low immunogenicity and toxicity, and exceptional tissue specificity.
Source:
Current and developing therapeutic strategies for neurodegeneration include viral vector-based gene delivery, antisense oligonucleotide and RNA interference methods, stem cell transplantation, and genome editing technologies.
In this review, we describe current and developing therapeutic strategies that include viral vector-based gene delivery, antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) and RNA interference methods, stem cell transplantation, and genome editing technologies.
Source:
AAV is a promising and widely utilized vector for gene therapy applications including the CNS.
The adeno-associated virus (AAV) is a promising and most widely utilized vector for gene therapy application including the CNS.
Source:
This review concerns adeno-associated virus as a delivery vector for gene therapy of human diseases.
Source:
The review covers characteristics of different AAV delivery routes in ocular clinical applications.
Source:
The review discusses progress of AAV in ocular optogenetic therapy.
Source:
Comparisons
Source-stated alternatives
The abstract mentions recombinant viral vectors more broadly, along with modified opsins and bioluminescent optogenetics as adjacent strategies.; The abstract mentions lentiviruses as another viral vector option.; The abstract contrasts AAV with LNPs, lentivirus, and virus-like particles.; No alternative delivery platforms are explicitly discussed in the abstract.; The abstract contrasts AAV with lentiviral vectors as the other main viral carrier discussed.; The abstract directly contrasts AAV-based platforms with LNP-based platforms.; The abstract contrasts AAV with lentiviruses as another viral delivery modality, and also discusses non-viral approaches such as ASOs, RNA interference, stem cell transplantation, and genome editing.; The abstract does not name alternative delivery vehicles. It contrasts AAV's promise with its remaining limitations for CRISPR delivery.; The supplied payload identifies AAV as a viral vector platform, but does not explicitly describe alternative delivery systems in the review text.; The abstract does not name non-AAV delivery platforms as direct alternatives. It instead contrasts different AAV delivery routes and downstream application modes such as editing, silencing, and optogenetics.; The abstract does not explicitly discuss non-AAV delivery alternatives.
Source:
The abstract mentions recombinant viral vectors more broadly, along with modified opsins and bioluminescent optogenetics as adjacent strategies.
Source:
The abstract mentions lentiviruses as another viral vector option.
Source:
The abstract contrasts AAV with LNPs, lentivirus, and virus-like particles.
Source:
No alternative delivery platforms are explicitly discussed in the abstract.
Source:
The abstract contrasts AAV with lentiviral vectors as the other main viral carrier discussed.
Source:
The abstract directly contrasts AAV-based platforms with LNP-based platforms.
Source:
The abstract contrasts AAV with lentiviruses as another viral delivery modality, and also discusses non-viral approaches such as ASOs, RNA interference, stem cell transplantation, and genome editing.
Source:
The abstract does not name alternative delivery vehicles. It contrasts AAV's promise with its remaining limitations for CRISPR delivery.
Source:
The supplied payload identifies AAV as a viral vector platform, but does not explicitly describe alternative delivery systems in the review text.
Source:
The abstract does not name non-AAV delivery platforms as direct alternatives. It instead contrasts different AAV delivery routes and downstream application modes such as editing, silencing, and optogenetics.
Source:
The abstract does not explicitly discuss non-AAV delivery alternatives.
Source-backed strengths
The supplied evidence describes AAV as having promising therapeutic efficacy with a good safety profile. It also supports robust in vivo genome editing and can be optimized through serotype choice, tissue-specific minimal promoters, and route of administration to improve editing efficiency and precision.
Compared with antisense oligonucleotide
The abstract contrasts AAV with lentiviruses as another viral delivery modality, and also discusses non-viral approaches such as ASOs, RNA interference, stem cell transplantation, and genome editing.
Shared frame: source-stated alternative in extracted literature
Strengths here: promising avenue for clinical use; greater flexibility and accuracy in opsin delivery; supports restricted expression through promoter and serotype choice.
Relative tradeoffs: the review discusses limitations of optogenetic tools that motivate use of improved delivery strategies; safe and efficient gene delivery remains a challenge; long-term therapeutic effects and side effects remain concerns.
Source:
The abstract contrasts AAV with lentiviruses as another viral delivery modality, and also discusses non-viral approaches such as ASOs, RNA interference, stem cell transplantation, and genome editing.
Compared with anti-sense oligonucleotides
The abstract contrasts AAV with lentiviruses as another viral delivery modality, and also discusses non-viral approaches such as ASOs, RNA interference, stem cell transplantation, and genome editing.
Shared frame: source-stated alternative in extracted literature
Strengths here: promising avenue for clinical use; greater flexibility and accuracy in opsin delivery; supports restricted expression through promoter and serotype choice.
Relative tradeoffs: the review discusses limitations of optogenetic tools that motivate use of improved delivery strategies; safe and efficient gene delivery remains a challenge; long-term therapeutic effects and side effects remain concerns.
Source:
The abstract contrasts AAV with lentiviruses as another viral delivery modality, and also discusses non-viral approaches such as ASOs, RNA interference, stem cell transplantation, and genome editing.
Compared with antisense oligonucleotides
The abstract contrasts AAV with lentiviruses as another viral delivery modality, and also discusses non-viral approaches such as ASOs, RNA interference, stem cell transplantation, and genome editing.
Shared frame: source-stated alternative in extracted literature
Strengths here: promising avenue for clinical use; greater flexibility and accuracy in opsin delivery; supports restricted expression through promoter and serotype choice.
Relative tradeoffs: the review discusses limitations of optogenetic tools that motivate use of improved delivery strategies; safe and efficient gene delivery remains a challenge; long-term therapeutic effects and side effects remain concerns.
Source:
The abstract contrasts AAV with lentiviruses as another viral delivery modality, and also discusses non-viral approaches such as ASOs, RNA interference, stem cell transplantation, and genome editing.
Compared with CRISPR/Cas9
The abstract does not name alternative delivery vehicles. It contrasts AAV's promise with its remaining limitations for CRISPR delivery.
Shared frame: source-stated alternative in extracted literature
Strengths here: promising avenue for clinical use; greater flexibility and accuracy in opsin delivery; supports restricted expression through promoter and serotype choice.
Relative tradeoffs: the review discusses limitations of optogenetic tools that motivate use of improved delivery strategies; safe and efficient gene delivery remains a challenge; long-term therapeutic effects and side effects remain concerns.
Source:
The abstract does not name alternative delivery vehicles. It contrasts AAV's promise with its remaining limitations for CRISPR delivery.
Compared with CRISPR/Cas9 system
The abstract does not name alternative delivery vehicles. It contrasts AAV's promise with its remaining limitations for CRISPR delivery.
Shared frame: source-stated alternative in extracted literature
Strengths here: promising avenue for clinical use; greater flexibility and accuracy in opsin delivery; supports restricted expression through promoter and serotype choice.
Relative tradeoffs: the review discusses limitations of optogenetic tools that motivate use of improved delivery strategies; safe and efficient gene delivery remains a challenge; long-term therapeutic effects and side effects remain concerns.
Source:
The abstract does not name alternative delivery vehicles. It contrasts AAV's promise with its remaining limitations for CRISPR delivery.
Compared with lentivirus
The abstract mentions lentiviruses as another viral vector option.; The abstract contrasts AAV with LNPs, lentivirus, and virus-like particles.; The abstract contrasts AAV with lentiviruses as another viral delivery modality, and also discusses non-viral approaches such as ASOs, RNA interference, stem cell transplantation, and genome editing.
Shared frame: source-stated alternative in extracted literature
Strengths here: promising avenue for clinical use; greater flexibility and accuracy in opsin delivery; supports restricted expression through promoter and serotype choice.
Relative tradeoffs: the review discusses limitations of optogenetic tools that motivate use of improved delivery strategies; safe and efficient gene delivery remains a challenge; long-term therapeutic effects and side effects remain concerns.
Source:
The abstract mentions lentiviruses as another viral vector option.
Source:
The abstract contrasts AAV with LNPs, lentivirus, and virus-like particles.
Source:
The abstract contrasts AAV with lentiviruses as another viral delivery modality, and also discusses non-viral approaches such as ASOs, RNA interference, stem cell transplantation, and genome editing.
Compared with lipid nanoparticles
The abstract contrasts AAV with LNPs, lentivirus, and virus-like particles.
Shared frame: source-stated alternative in extracted literature
Strengths here: promising avenue for clinical use; greater flexibility and accuracy in opsin delivery; supports restricted expression through promoter and serotype choice.
Relative tradeoffs: the review discusses limitations of optogenetic tools that motivate use of improved delivery strategies; safe and efficient gene delivery remains a challenge; long-term therapeutic effects and side effects remain concerns.
Source:
The abstract contrasts AAV with LNPs, lentivirus, and virus-like particles.
Compared with mRNA-lipid nanoparticles
The abstract contrasts AAV with LNPs, lentivirus, and virus-like particles.
Shared frame: source-stated alternative in extracted literature
Strengths here: promising avenue for clinical use; greater flexibility and accuracy in opsin delivery; supports restricted expression through promoter and serotype choice.
Relative tradeoffs: the review discusses limitations of optogenetic tools that motivate use of improved delivery strategies; safe and efficient gene delivery remains a challenge; long-term therapeutic effects and side effects remain concerns.
Source:
The abstract contrasts AAV with LNPs, lentivirus, and virus-like particles.
Compared with mRNA-loaded lipid nanoparticles
The abstract contrasts AAV with LNPs, lentivirus, and virus-like particles.
Shared frame: source-stated alternative in extracted literature
Strengths here: promising avenue for clinical use; greater flexibility and accuracy in opsin delivery; supports restricted expression through promoter and serotype choice.
Relative tradeoffs: the review discusses limitations of optogenetic tools that motivate use of improved delivery strategies; safe and efficient gene delivery remains a challenge; long-term therapeutic effects and side effects remain concerns.
Source:
The abstract contrasts AAV with LNPs, lentivirus, and virus-like particles.
Compared with opsins
The abstract mentions recombinant viral vectors more broadly, along with modified opsins and bioluminescent optogenetics as adjacent strategies.
Shared frame: source-stated alternative in extracted literature
Strengths here: promising avenue for clinical use; greater flexibility and accuracy in opsin delivery; supports restricted expression through promoter and serotype choice.
Relative tradeoffs: the review discusses limitations of optogenetic tools that motivate use of improved delivery strategies; safe and efficient gene delivery remains a challenge; long-term therapeutic effects and side effects remain concerns.
Source:
The abstract mentions recombinant viral vectors more broadly, along with modified opsins and bioluminescent optogenetics as adjacent strategies.
Compared with optogenetic functional interrogation
The abstract mentions recombinant viral vectors more broadly, along with modified opsins and bioluminescent optogenetics as adjacent strategies.; The abstract does not name non-AAV delivery platforms as direct alternatives. It instead contrasts different AAV delivery routes and downstream application modes such as editing, silencing, and optogenetics.
Shared frame: source-stated alternative in extracted literature
Strengths here: promising avenue for clinical use; greater flexibility and accuracy in opsin delivery; supports restricted expression through promoter and serotype choice.
Relative tradeoffs: the review discusses limitations of optogenetic tools that motivate use of improved delivery strategies; safe and efficient gene delivery remains a challenge; long-term therapeutic effects and side effects remain concerns.
Source:
The abstract mentions recombinant viral vectors more broadly, along with modified opsins and bioluminescent optogenetics as adjacent strategies.
Source:
The abstract does not name non-AAV delivery platforms as direct alternatives. It instead contrasts different AAV delivery routes and downstream application modes such as editing, silencing, and optogenetics.
Compared with optogenetic membrane potential perturbation
The abstract mentions recombinant viral vectors more broadly, along with modified opsins and bioluminescent optogenetics as adjacent strategies.; The abstract does not name non-AAV delivery platforms as direct alternatives. It instead contrasts different AAV delivery routes and downstream application modes such as editing, silencing, and optogenetics.
Shared frame: source-stated alternative in extracted literature
Strengths here: promising avenue for clinical use; greater flexibility and accuracy in opsin delivery; supports restricted expression through promoter and serotype choice.
Relative tradeoffs: the review discusses limitations of optogenetic tools that motivate use of improved delivery strategies; safe and efficient gene delivery remains a challenge; long-term therapeutic effects and side effects remain concerns.
Source:
The abstract mentions recombinant viral vectors more broadly, along with modified opsins and bioluminescent optogenetics as adjacent strategies.
Source:
The abstract does not name non-AAV delivery platforms as direct alternatives. It instead contrasts different AAV delivery routes and downstream application modes such as editing, silencing, and optogenetics.
Compared with stem cell transplantation
The abstract contrasts AAV with lentiviruses as another viral delivery modality, and also discusses non-viral approaches such as ASOs, RNA interference, stem cell transplantation, and genome editing.
Shared frame: source-stated alternative in extracted literature
Strengths here: promising avenue for clinical use; greater flexibility and accuracy in opsin delivery; supports restricted expression through promoter and serotype choice.
Relative tradeoffs: the review discusses limitations of optogenetic tools that motivate use of improved delivery strategies; safe and efficient gene delivery remains a challenge; long-term therapeutic effects and side effects remain concerns.
Source:
The abstract contrasts AAV with lentiviruses as another viral delivery modality, and also discusses non-viral approaches such as ASOs, RNA interference, stem cell transplantation, and genome editing.
Compared with virus-like particles
The abstract contrasts AAV with LNPs, lentivirus, and virus-like particles.
Shared frame: source-stated alternative in extracted literature
Strengths here: promising avenue for clinical use; greater flexibility and accuracy in opsin delivery; supports restricted expression through promoter and serotype choice.
Relative tradeoffs: the review discusses limitations of optogenetic tools that motivate use of improved delivery strategies; safe and efficient gene delivery remains a challenge; long-term therapeutic effects and side effects remain concerns.
Source:
The abstract contrasts AAV with LNPs, lentivirus, and virus-like particles.
Compared with virus-like particle vaccine platform
The abstract contrasts AAV with LNPs, lentivirus, and virus-like particles.
Shared frame: source-stated alternative in extracted literature
Strengths here: promising avenue for clinical use; greater flexibility and accuracy in opsin delivery; supports restricted expression through promoter and serotype choice.
Relative tradeoffs: the review discusses limitations of optogenetic tools that motivate use of improved delivery strategies; safe and efficient gene delivery remains a challenge; long-term therapeutic effects and side effects remain concerns.
Source:
The abstract contrasts AAV with LNPs, lentivirus, and virus-like particles.
Ranked Citations
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.
- 15.
- 16.
- 17.
- 18.
- 19.
- 20.
- 21.
- 22.
- 23.
- 24.
- 25.
- 26.
- 27.
- 28.