Source 1primary paper2026MED
Toolkit/ASTM D695-15 compression testing
ASTM D695-15 compression testing
Also known as: ASTM D695-15
Taxonomy: Technique Branch / Method. Workflows sit above the mechanism and technique branches rather than replacing them.
Summary
The web research summary states that the source paper explicitly names ASTM D695-15 as the compression standard.
Usefulness & Problems
Why this is useful
ASTM D695-15 is the named standard governing the uniaxial compression testing used in the paper.; standardized uniaxial compression testing of lattice specimens
Source:
ASTM D695-15 is the named standard governing the uniaxial compression testing used in the paper.
Source:
standardized uniaxial compression testing of lattice specimens
Problem solved
It standardizes how compressive mechanical properties are measured across the tested gyroid structures.; provides a standard framework for mechanical compression measurements
Source:
It standardizes how compressive mechanical properties are measured across the tested gyroid structures.
Source:
provides a standard framework for mechanical compression measurements
Problem links
provides a standard framework for mechanical compression measurements
LiteratureIt standardizes how compressive mechanical properties are measured across the tested gyroid structures.
Source:
It standardizes how compressive mechanical properties are measured across the tested gyroid structures.
Published Workflows
Objective: Design and mechanically optimize gyroid TPMS lattice structures as a function of build orientation using combined fabrication, testing, and computational analysis.
Why it works: The study combines physical compression testing with computational and analytical methods to compare how different build orientations affect gyroid lattice mechanics.
orientation-dependent mechanical response of gyroid TPMS latticesdesign software-based geometry generationFFF fabricationcompression testingfinite element analysishomogenizationCAD-derived cross-sectional stress analysisGibson-Ashby-style scaling
Stages
- 1.Lattice design and orientation definition(library_design)
This stage creates the orientation-varied gyroid designs that are later fabricated and compared mechanically.
Selection: Generate gyroid lattice structures across six build orientations using design software and local coordinate frame redefinition.
- 2.Physical specimen fabrication(library_build)
This stage converts the designed lattice orientations into physical samples for experimental mechanical evaluation.
Selection: Fabricate the designed gyroid orientations by FFF in a PLA-metal composite.
- 3.Mechanical testing and computational characterization(functional_characterization)
This stage measures and interprets the mechanical consequences of build orientation.
Selection: Assess mechanical behavior using ASTM-governed compression testing together with FEA, homogenization, CAD-derived stress analysis, and Gibson-Ashby-style scaling.
Taxonomy & Function
Primary hierarchy
Technique Branch
Method: A concrete measurement method used to characterize an engineered system.
Mechanisms
uniaxial mechanical compressionTechniques
Functional AssayTarget processes
No target processes tagged yet.
Implementation Constraints
cofactor dependency: cofactor requirement unknownencoding mode: genetically encodedimplementation constraint: context specific validationoperating role: sensor
It requires physical specimens and compression testing performed according to the cited standard.; requires compression testing performed under the ASTM D695-15 standard
Independent follow-up evidence is still limited. Validation breadth across biological contexts is still narrow. Independent reuse still looks limited, so the evidence base may be fragile. No canonical validation observations are stored yet, so context-specific performance remains under-specified.
Validation
Cell-freeBacteriaMammalianMouseHumanTherapeuticIndep. Replication
Supporting Sources
Ranked Claims
The paper uses nTopology to generate the lattice structures and redefine local coordinate frames.
The study examines six gyroid build orientations designated G0 through G5 fabricated by fused filament fabrication in a PLA-metal composite.
The study combines compression testing, finite element analysis, homogenization, CAD-derived cross-sectional stress analysis, and Gibson-Ashby-style scaling.
The paper uses ASTM D695-15 as the standard for uniaxial compression testing.
Approval Evidence
1 source2 linked approval claimsfirst-pass slug astm-d695-15-compression-testing
The web research summary states that the source paper explicitly names ASTM D695-15 as the compression standard.
Source:
methods usedsupports
The study combines compression testing, finite element analysis, homogenization, CAD-derived cross-sectional stress analysis, and Gibson-Ashby-style scaling.
Source:
testing standardsupports
The paper uses ASTM D695-15 as the standard for uniaxial compression testing.
Source:
Comparisons
Source-backed strengths
standardized testing basis explicitly used in the study
Source:
standardized testing basis explicitly used in the study
Compared with Langendorff perfused heart electrical recordings
ASTM D695-15 compression testing and Langendorff perfused heart electrical recordings address a similar problem space.
Shared frame: same top-level item type
Strengths here: looks easier to implement in practice.
Compared with native green gel system
ASTM D695-15 compression testing and native green gel system address a similar problem space.
Shared frame: same top-level item type
Strengths here: looks easier to implement in practice.
ASTM D695-15 compression testing and sub-picosecond pump-probe analysis of bacteriorhodopsin pigments address a similar problem space.
Shared frame: same top-level item type
Strengths here: looks easier to implement in practice.
Ranked Citations
- 1.