Toolkit/native green gel system

native green gel system

Assay Method·Research·Since 1994

Taxonomy: Technique Branch / Method. Workflows sit above the mechanism and technique branches rather than replacing them.

Summary

The native green gel system is an assay method used to study light-induced assembly of chlorophyll-protein complexes during greening. In etiolated barley (Hordeum vulgare), it was used to resolve LHCII-associated bands and follow the appearance of type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins during illumination.

Usefulness & Problems

Why this is useful

This method is useful for monitoring how chlorophyll-protein complexes assemble in response to light during seedling greening. In the cited barley study, it enabled analysis of LHCII apoprotein accumulation kinetics and assessment of whether higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and type 3 LHCII apoproteins were detectable.

Problem solved

It addresses the problem of tracking light-dependent formation of photosynthetic pigment-protein complexes in developing plastids. Specifically, it provided a way to examine the appearance of type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins during greening of etiolated barley seedlings.

Problem links

Need precise spatiotemporal control with light input

Derived

The native green gel system is an assay method used to study light-induced assembly of chlorophyll-protein complexes during greening. In etiolated barley (Hordeum vulgare), it was used to resolve LHCII-associated bands and follow the appearance of type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins during illumination.

Taxonomy & Function

Primary hierarchy

Technique Branch

Method: A concrete measurement method used to characterize an engineered system.

Target processes

No target processes tagged yet.

Input: Light

Implementation Constraints

cofactor dependency: cofactor requirement unknownencoding mode: genetically encodedimplementation constraint: context specific validationimplementation constraint: spectral hardware requirementoperating role: sensor

The assay was used to study greening under light input in etiolated barley seedlings and was paired with identification of LHCII apoprotein bands by immunoblotting. The supplied evidence does not specify construct requirements, cofactors, instrumentation settings, or detailed electrophoresis conditions.

The evidence is limited to a single cited study in etiolated barley and does not establish performance across organisms, tissues, or other chlorophyll-protein complexes. Available evidence does not provide technical parameters such as gel composition, sensitivity, quantitative range, or reproducibility metrics.

Validation

Cell-freeBacteriaMammalianMouseHumanTherapeuticIndep. Replication

Supporting Sources

Ranked Claims

Claim 1absence of higher mass formssupports1994Source 1needs review

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and type 3 LHCII apoproteins were detected.

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and 3 LHCII apoproteins could be detected
Claim 2absence of higher mass formssupports1994Source 1needs review

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and type 3 LHCII apoproteins were detected.

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and 3 LHCII apoproteins could be detected
Claim 3absence of higher mass formssupports1994Source 1needs review

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and type 3 LHCII apoproteins were detected.

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and 3 LHCII apoproteins could be detected
Claim 4absence of higher mass formssupports1994Source 1needs review

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and type 3 LHCII apoproteins were detected.

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and 3 LHCII apoproteins could be detected
Claim 5absence of higher mass formssupports1994Source 1needs review

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and type 3 LHCII apoproteins were detected.

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and 3 LHCII apoproteins could be detected
Claim 6absence of higher mass formssupports1994Source 1needs review

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and type 3 LHCII apoproteins were detected.

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and 3 LHCII apoproteins could be detected
Claim 7absence of higher mass formssupports1994Source 1needs review

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and type 3 LHCII apoproteins were detected.

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and 3 LHCII apoproteins could be detected
Claim 8absence of higher mass formssupports1994Source 1needs review

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and type 3 LHCII apoproteins were detected.

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and 3 LHCII apoproteins could be detected
Claim 9absence of higher mass formssupports1994Source 1needs review

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and type 3 LHCII apoproteins were detected.

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and 3 LHCII apoproteins could be detected
Claim 10absence of higher mass formssupports1994Source 1needs review

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and type 3 LHCII apoproteins were detected.

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and 3 LHCII apoproteins could be detected
Claim 11absence of higher mass formssupports1994Source 1needs review

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and type 3 LHCII apoproteins were detected.

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and 3 LHCII apoproteins could be detected
Claim 12absence of higher mass formssupports1994Source 1needs review

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and type 3 LHCII apoproteins were detected.

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and 3 LHCII apoproteins could be detected
Claim 13absence of higher mass formssupports1994Source 1needs review

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and type 3 LHCII apoproteins were detected.

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and 3 LHCII apoproteins could be detected
Claim 14absence of higher mass formssupports1994Source 1needs review

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and type 3 LHCII apoproteins were detected.

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and 3 LHCII apoproteins could be detected
Claim 15accumulation kineticssupports1994Source 1needs review

During light-induced greening of etiolated barley seedlings, type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates.

During light-induced greening of 6-d-old etiolated barley seedlings, the type 1, 2, and 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates
Claim 16accumulation kineticssupports1994Source 1needs review

During light-induced greening of etiolated barley seedlings, type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates.

During light-induced greening of 6-d-old etiolated barley seedlings, the type 1, 2, and 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates
Claim 17accumulation kineticssupports1994Source 1needs review

During light-induced greening of etiolated barley seedlings, type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates.

During light-induced greening of 6-d-old etiolated barley seedlings, the type 1, 2, and 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates
Claim 18accumulation kineticssupports1994Source 1needs review

During light-induced greening of etiolated barley seedlings, type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates.

During light-induced greening of 6-d-old etiolated barley seedlings, the type 1, 2, and 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates
Claim 19accumulation kineticssupports1994Source 1needs review

During light-induced greening of etiolated barley seedlings, type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates.

During light-induced greening of 6-d-old etiolated barley seedlings, the type 1, 2, and 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates
Claim 20accumulation kineticssupports1994Source 1needs review

During light-induced greening of etiolated barley seedlings, type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates.

During light-induced greening of 6-d-old etiolated barley seedlings, the type 1, 2, and 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates
Claim 21accumulation kineticssupports1994Source 1needs review

During light-induced greening of etiolated barley seedlings, type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates.

During light-induced greening of 6-d-old etiolated barley seedlings, the type 1, 2, and 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates
Claim 22accumulation kineticssupports1994Source 1needs review

During light-induced greening of etiolated barley seedlings, type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates.

During light-induced greening of 6-d-old etiolated barley seedlings, the type 1, 2, and 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates
Claim 23accumulation kineticssupports1994Source 1needs review

During light-induced greening of etiolated barley seedlings, type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates.

During light-induced greening of 6-d-old etiolated barley seedlings, the type 1, 2, and 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates
Claim 24accumulation kineticssupports1994Source 1needs review

During light-induced greening of etiolated barley seedlings, type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates.

During light-induced greening of 6-d-old etiolated barley seedlings, the type 1, 2, and 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates
Claim 25accumulation kineticssupports1994Source 1needs review

During light-induced greening of etiolated barley seedlings, type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates.

During light-induced greening of 6-d-old etiolated barley seedlings, the type 1, 2, and 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates
Claim 26accumulation kineticssupports1994Source 1needs review

During light-induced greening of etiolated barley seedlings, type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates.

During light-induced greening of 6-d-old etiolated barley seedlings, the type 1, 2, and 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates
Claim 27accumulation kineticssupports1994Source 1needs review

During light-induced greening of etiolated barley seedlings, type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates.

During light-induced greening of 6-d-old etiolated barley seedlings, the type 1, 2, and 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates
Claim 28accumulation kineticssupports1994Source 1needs review

During light-induced greening of etiolated barley seedlings, type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates.

During light-induced greening of 6-d-old etiolated barley seedlings, the type 1, 2, and 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates
Claim 29band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.0 kD lowest LHCII band as containing type 3 LHCII apoproteins.

the lowest band at 26.0 kD as containing the type 3 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26 kD
Claim 30band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.0 kD lowest LHCII band as containing type 3 LHCII apoproteins.

the lowest band at 26.0 kD as containing the type 3 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26 kD
Claim 31band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.0 kD lowest LHCII band as containing type 3 LHCII apoproteins.

the lowest band at 26.0 kD as containing the type 3 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26 kD
Claim 32band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.0 kD lowest LHCII band as containing type 3 LHCII apoproteins.

the lowest band at 26.0 kD as containing the type 3 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26 kD
Claim 33band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.0 kD lowest LHCII band as containing type 3 LHCII apoproteins.

the lowest band at 26.0 kD as containing the type 3 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26 kD
Claim 34band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.0 kD lowest LHCII band as containing type 3 LHCII apoproteins.

the lowest band at 26.0 kD as containing the type 3 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26 kD
Claim 35band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.0 kD lowest LHCII band as containing type 3 LHCII apoproteins.

the lowest band at 26.0 kD as containing the type 3 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26 kD
Claim 36band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.0 kD lowest LHCII band as containing type 3 LHCII apoproteins.

the lowest band at 26.0 kD as containing the type 3 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26 kD
Claim 37band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.0 kD lowest LHCII band as containing type 3 LHCII apoproteins.

the lowest band at 26.0 kD as containing the type 3 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26 kD
Claim 38band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.0 kD lowest LHCII band as containing type 3 LHCII apoproteins.

the lowest band at 26.0 kD as containing the type 3 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26 kD
Claim 39band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.0 kD lowest LHCII band as containing type 3 LHCII apoproteins.

the lowest band at 26.0 kD as containing the type 3 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26 kD
Claim 40band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.0 kD lowest LHCII band as containing type 3 LHCII apoproteins.

the lowest band at 26.0 kD as containing the type 3 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26 kD
Claim 41band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.0 kD lowest LHCII band as containing type 3 LHCII apoproteins.

the lowest band at 26.0 kD as containing the type 3 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26 kD
Claim 42band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.0 kD lowest LHCII band as containing type 3 LHCII apoproteins.

the lowest band at 26.0 kD as containing the type 3 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26 kD
Claim 43band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.9 kD middle LHCII band as containing type 1 LHCII apoproteins.

the middle band at 26.9 kD as containing the type 1 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26.9 kD
Claim 44band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.9 kD middle LHCII band as containing type 1 LHCII apoproteins.

the middle band at 26.9 kD as containing the type 1 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26.9 kD
Claim 45band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.9 kD middle LHCII band as containing type 1 LHCII apoproteins.

the middle band at 26.9 kD as containing the type 1 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26.9 kD
Claim 46band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.9 kD middle LHCII band as containing type 1 LHCII apoproteins.

the middle band at 26.9 kD as containing the type 1 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26.9 kD
Claim 47band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.9 kD middle LHCII band as containing type 1 LHCII apoproteins.

the middle band at 26.9 kD as containing the type 1 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26.9 kD
Claim 48band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.9 kD middle LHCII band as containing type 1 LHCII apoproteins.

the middle band at 26.9 kD as containing the type 1 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26.9 kD
Claim 49band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.9 kD middle LHCII band as containing type 1 LHCII apoproteins.

the middle band at 26.9 kD as containing the type 1 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26.9 kD
Claim 50band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.9 kD middle LHCII band as containing type 1 LHCII apoproteins.

the middle band at 26.9 kD as containing the type 1 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26.9 kD
Claim 51band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.9 kD middle LHCII band as containing type 1 LHCII apoproteins.

the middle band at 26.9 kD as containing the type 1 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26.9 kD
Claim 52band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.9 kD middle LHCII band as containing type 1 LHCII apoproteins.

the middle band at 26.9 kD as containing the type 1 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26.9 kD
Claim 53band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.9 kD middle LHCII band as containing type 1 LHCII apoproteins.

the middle band at 26.9 kD as containing the type 1 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26.9 kD
Claim 54band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.9 kD middle LHCII band as containing type 1 LHCII apoproteins.

the middle band at 26.9 kD as containing the type 1 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26.9 kD
Claim 55band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.9 kD middle LHCII band as containing type 1 LHCII apoproteins.

the middle band at 26.9 kD as containing the type 1 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26.9 kD
Claim 56band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.9 kD middle LHCII band as containing type 1 LHCII apoproteins.

the middle band at 26.9 kD as containing the type 1 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26.9 kD
Claim 57band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 27.5 kD highest molecular mass LHCII band as containing type 2 LHCII apoproteins.

Western blot analysis of the three major LHCII apoprotein bands has identified the highest molecular mass band at 27.5 kD as containing the type 2 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 27.5 kD
Claim 58band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 27.5 kD highest molecular mass LHCII band as containing type 2 LHCII apoproteins.

Western blot analysis of the three major LHCII apoprotein bands has identified the highest molecular mass band at 27.5 kD as containing the type 2 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 27.5 kD
Claim 59band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 27.5 kD highest molecular mass LHCII band as containing type 2 LHCII apoproteins.

Western blot analysis of the three major LHCII apoprotein bands has identified the highest molecular mass band at 27.5 kD as containing the type 2 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 27.5 kD
Claim 60band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 27.5 kD highest molecular mass LHCII band as containing type 2 LHCII apoproteins.

Western blot analysis of the three major LHCII apoprotein bands has identified the highest molecular mass band at 27.5 kD as containing the type 2 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 27.5 kD
Claim 61band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 27.5 kD highest molecular mass LHCII band as containing type 2 LHCII apoproteins.

Western blot analysis of the three major LHCII apoprotein bands has identified the highest molecular mass band at 27.5 kD as containing the type 2 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 27.5 kD
Claim 62band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 27.5 kD highest molecular mass LHCII band as containing type 2 LHCII apoproteins.

Western blot analysis of the three major LHCII apoprotein bands has identified the highest molecular mass band at 27.5 kD as containing the type 2 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 27.5 kD
Claim 63band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 27.5 kD highest molecular mass LHCII band as containing type 2 LHCII apoproteins.

Western blot analysis of the three major LHCII apoprotein bands has identified the highest molecular mass band at 27.5 kD as containing the type 2 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 27.5 kD
Claim 64band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 27.5 kD highest molecular mass LHCII band as containing type 2 LHCII apoproteins.

Western blot analysis of the three major LHCII apoprotein bands has identified the highest molecular mass band at 27.5 kD as containing the type 2 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 27.5 kD
Claim 65band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 27.5 kD highest molecular mass LHCII band as containing type 2 LHCII apoproteins.

Western blot analysis of the three major LHCII apoprotein bands has identified the highest molecular mass band at 27.5 kD as containing the type 2 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 27.5 kD
Claim 66band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 27.5 kD highest molecular mass LHCII band as containing type 2 LHCII apoproteins.

Western blot analysis of the three major LHCII apoprotein bands has identified the highest molecular mass band at 27.5 kD as containing the type 2 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 27.5 kD
Claim 67band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 27.5 kD highest molecular mass LHCII band as containing type 2 LHCII apoproteins.

Western blot analysis of the three major LHCII apoprotein bands has identified the highest molecular mass band at 27.5 kD as containing the type 2 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 27.5 kD
Claim 68band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 27.5 kD highest molecular mass LHCII band as containing type 2 LHCII apoproteins.

Western blot analysis of the three major LHCII apoprotein bands has identified the highest molecular mass band at 27.5 kD as containing the type 2 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 27.5 kD
Claim 69band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 27.5 kD highest molecular mass LHCII band as containing type 2 LHCII apoproteins.

Western blot analysis of the three major LHCII apoprotein bands has identified the highest molecular mass band at 27.5 kD as containing the type 2 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 27.5 kD
Claim 70band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 27.5 kD highest molecular mass LHCII band as containing type 2 LHCII apoproteins.

Western blot analysis of the three major LHCII apoprotein bands has identified the highest molecular mass band at 27.5 kD as containing the type 2 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 27.5 kD
Claim 71complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 72complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 73complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 74complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 75complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 76complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 77complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 78complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 79complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 80complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 81complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 82complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 83complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 84complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 85precursor accumulationsupports1994Source 1needs review

During the 8-24 h rapid phase of thylakoid development, two slightly larger type 2 LHCII apoproteins of 28.3 and 28.7 kD also accumulate in thylakoids.

During the most rapid phase of thylakoid development (8-24 h), two slightly larger (28.3 and 28.7 kD) type 2 LHCII apoproteins (precursor intermediates?) also accumulate in the thylakoids
molecular mass 28.3 kDmolecular mass 28.7 kDtime window 8-24 h
Claim 86precursor accumulationsupports1994Source 1needs review

During the 8-24 h rapid phase of thylakoid development, two slightly larger type 2 LHCII apoproteins of 28.3 and 28.7 kD also accumulate in thylakoids.

During the most rapid phase of thylakoid development (8-24 h), two slightly larger (28.3 and 28.7 kD) type 2 LHCII apoproteins (precursor intermediates?) also accumulate in the thylakoids
molecular mass 28.3 kDmolecular mass 28.7 kDtime window 8-24 h
Claim 87precursor accumulationsupports1994Source 1needs review

During the 8-24 h rapid phase of thylakoid development, two slightly larger type 2 LHCII apoproteins of 28.3 and 28.7 kD also accumulate in thylakoids.

During the most rapid phase of thylakoid development (8-24 h), two slightly larger (28.3 and 28.7 kD) type 2 LHCII apoproteins (precursor intermediates?) also accumulate in the thylakoids
molecular mass 28.3 kDmolecular mass 28.7 kDtime window 8-24 h
Claim 88precursor accumulationsupports1994Source 1needs review

During the 8-24 h rapid phase of thylakoid development, two slightly larger type 2 LHCII apoproteins of 28.3 and 28.7 kD also accumulate in thylakoids.

During the most rapid phase of thylakoid development (8-24 h), two slightly larger (28.3 and 28.7 kD) type 2 LHCII apoproteins (precursor intermediates?) also accumulate in the thylakoids
molecular mass 28.3 kDmolecular mass 28.7 kDtime window 8-24 h
Claim 89precursor accumulationsupports1994Source 1needs review

During the 8-24 h rapid phase of thylakoid development, two slightly larger type 2 LHCII apoproteins of 28.3 and 28.7 kD also accumulate in thylakoids.

During the most rapid phase of thylakoid development (8-24 h), two slightly larger (28.3 and 28.7 kD) type 2 LHCII apoproteins (precursor intermediates?) also accumulate in the thylakoids
molecular mass 28.3 kDmolecular mass 28.7 kDtime window 8-24 h
Claim 90precursor accumulationsupports1994Source 1needs review

During the 8-24 h rapid phase of thylakoid development, two slightly larger type 2 LHCII apoproteins of 28.3 and 28.7 kD also accumulate in thylakoids.

During the most rapid phase of thylakoid development (8-24 h), two slightly larger (28.3 and 28.7 kD) type 2 LHCII apoproteins (precursor intermediates?) also accumulate in the thylakoids
molecular mass 28.3 kDmolecular mass 28.7 kDtime window 8-24 h
Claim 91precursor accumulationsupports1994Source 1needs review

During the 8-24 h rapid phase of thylakoid development, two slightly larger type 2 LHCII apoproteins of 28.3 and 28.7 kD also accumulate in thylakoids.

During the most rapid phase of thylakoid development (8-24 h), two slightly larger (28.3 and 28.7 kD) type 2 LHCII apoproteins (precursor intermediates?) also accumulate in the thylakoids
molecular mass 28.3 kDmolecular mass 28.7 kDtime window 8-24 h
Claim 92precursor accumulationsupports1994Source 1needs review

During the 8-24 h rapid phase of thylakoid development, two slightly larger type 2 LHCII apoproteins of 28.3 and 28.7 kD also accumulate in thylakoids.

During the most rapid phase of thylakoid development (8-24 h), two slightly larger (28.3 and 28.7 kD) type 2 LHCII apoproteins (precursor intermediates?) also accumulate in the thylakoids
molecular mass 28.3 kDmolecular mass 28.7 kDtime window 8-24 h
Claim 93precursor accumulationsupports1994Source 1needs review

During the 8-24 h rapid phase of thylakoid development, two slightly larger type 2 LHCII apoproteins of 28.3 and 28.7 kD also accumulate in thylakoids.

During the most rapid phase of thylakoid development (8-24 h), two slightly larger (28.3 and 28.7 kD) type 2 LHCII apoproteins (precursor intermediates?) also accumulate in the thylakoids
molecular mass 28.3 kDmolecular mass 28.7 kDtime window 8-24 h
Claim 94precursor accumulationsupports1994Source 1needs review

During the 8-24 h rapid phase of thylakoid development, two slightly larger type 2 LHCII apoproteins of 28.3 and 28.7 kD also accumulate in thylakoids.

During the most rapid phase of thylakoid development (8-24 h), two slightly larger (28.3 and 28.7 kD) type 2 LHCII apoproteins (precursor intermediates?) also accumulate in the thylakoids
molecular mass 28.3 kDmolecular mass 28.7 kDtime window 8-24 h
Claim 95precursor accumulationsupports1994Source 1needs review

During the 8-24 h rapid phase of thylakoid development, two slightly larger type 2 LHCII apoproteins of 28.3 and 28.7 kD also accumulate in thylakoids.

During the most rapid phase of thylakoid development (8-24 h), two slightly larger (28.3 and 28.7 kD) type 2 LHCII apoproteins (precursor intermediates?) also accumulate in the thylakoids
molecular mass 28.3 kDmolecular mass 28.7 kDtime window 8-24 h
Claim 96precursor accumulationsupports1994Source 1needs review

During the 8-24 h rapid phase of thylakoid development, two slightly larger type 2 LHCII apoproteins of 28.3 and 28.7 kD also accumulate in thylakoids.

During the most rapid phase of thylakoid development (8-24 h), two slightly larger (28.3 and 28.7 kD) type 2 LHCII apoproteins (precursor intermediates?) also accumulate in the thylakoids
molecular mass 28.3 kDmolecular mass 28.7 kDtime window 8-24 h
Claim 97precursor accumulationsupports1994Source 1needs review

During the 8-24 h rapid phase of thylakoid development, two slightly larger type 2 LHCII apoproteins of 28.3 and 28.7 kD also accumulate in thylakoids.

During the most rapid phase of thylakoid development (8-24 h), two slightly larger (28.3 and 28.7 kD) type 2 LHCII apoproteins (precursor intermediates?) also accumulate in the thylakoids
molecular mass 28.3 kDmolecular mass 28.7 kDtime window 8-24 h
Claim 98precursor accumulationsupports1994Source 1needs review

During the 8-24 h rapid phase of thylakoid development, two slightly larger type 2 LHCII apoproteins of 28.3 and 28.7 kD also accumulate in thylakoids.

During the most rapid phase of thylakoid development (8-24 h), two slightly larger (28.3 and 28.7 kD) type 2 LHCII apoproteins (precursor intermediates?) also accumulate in the thylakoids
molecular mass 28.3 kDmolecular mass 28.7 kDtime window 8-24 h
Claim 99regional timing differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins appear sooner in thylakoids from apical leaf segments than from basal leaf segments during greening.

appear somewhat sooner (< 4 h) in thylakoids from apical than from basal (4-8 h) leaf segments
appearance time 4 happearance time 4-8 h
Claim 100regional timing differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins appear sooner in thylakoids from apical leaf segments than from basal leaf segments during greening.

appear somewhat sooner (< 4 h) in thylakoids from apical than from basal (4-8 h) leaf segments
appearance time 4 happearance time 4-8 h
Claim 101regional timing differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins appear sooner in thylakoids from apical leaf segments than from basal leaf segments during greening.

appear somewhat sooner (< 4 h) in thylakoids from apical than from basal (4-8 h) leaf segments
appearance time 4 happearance time 4-8 h
Claim 102regional timing differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins appear sooner in thylakoids from apical leaf segments than from basal leaf segments during greening.

appear somewhat sooner (< 4 h) in thylakoids from apical than from basal (4-8 h) leaf segments
appearance time 4 happearance time 4-8 h
Claim 103regional timing differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins appear sooner in thylakoids from apical leaf segments than from basal leaf segments during greening.

appear somewhat sooner (< 4 h) in thylakoids from apical than from basal (4-8 h) leaf segments
appearance time 4 happearance time 4-8 h
Claim 104regional timing differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins appear sooner in thylakoids from apical leaf segments than from basal leaf segments during greening.

appear somewhat sooner (< 4 h) in thylakoids from apical than from basal (4-8 h) leaf segments
appearance time 4 happearance time 4-8 h
Claim 105regional timing differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins appear sooner in thylakoids from apical leaf segments than from basal leaf segments during greening.

appear somewhat sooner (< 4 h) in thylakoids from apical than from basal (4-8 h) leaf segments
appearance time 4 happearance time 4-8 h
Claim 106regional timing differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins appear sooner in thylakoids from apical leaf segments than from basal leaf segments during greening.

appear somewhat sooner (< 4 h) in thylakoids from apical than from basal (4-8 h) leaf segments
appearance time 4 happearance time 4-8 h
Claim 107regional timing differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins appear sooner in thylakoids from apical leaf segments than from basal leaf segments during greening.

appear somewhat sooner (< 4 h) in thylakoids from apical than from basal (4-8 h) leaf segments
appearance time 4 happearance time 4-8 h
Claim 108regional timing differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins appear sooner in thylakoids from apical leaf segments than from basal leaf segments during greening.

appear somewhat sooner (< 4 h) in thylakoids from apical than from basal (4-8 h) leaf segments
appearance time 4 happearance time 4-8 h
Claim 109regional timing differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins appear sooner in thylakoids from apical leaf segments than from basal leaf segments during greening.

appear somewhat sooner (< 4 h) in thylakoids from apical than from basal (4-8 h) leaf segments
appearance time 4 happearance time 4-8 h
Claim 110regional timing differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins appear sooner in thylakoids from apical leaf segments than from basal leaf segments during greening.

appear somewhat sooner (< 4 h) in thylakoids from apical than from basal (4-8 h) leaf segments
appearance time 4 happearance time 4-8 h
Claim 111regional timing differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins appear sooner in thylakoids from apical leaf segments than from basal leaf segments during greening.

appear somewhat sooner (< 4 h) in thylakoids from apical than from basal (4-8 h) leaf segments
appearance time 4 happearance time 4-8 h
Claim 112regional timing differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins appear sooner in thylakoids from apical leaf segments than from basal leaf segments during greening.

appear somewhat sooner (< 4 h) in thylakoids from apical than from basal (4-8 h) leaf segments
appearance time 4 happearance time 4-8 h

Approval Evidence

1 source1 linked approval claimfirst-pass slug native-green-gel-system
we have studied the light-induced assembly of chlorophyll-protein complexes with a native green gel system

Source:

complex composition differencesupports

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d

Source:

Comparisons

Source-backed strengths

The method was applied directly to light-induced greening and supported resolution of LHCII-related species in a native context. In the cited work, it showed that type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulated simultaneously and at similar rates, and no corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and type 3 LHCII apoproteins were detected.

Compared with CLARITY technology

native green gel system and CLARITY technology address a similar problem space.

Shared frame: same top-level item type; same primary input modality: light

native green gel system and Langendorff perfused heart electrical recordings address a similar problem space.

Shared frame: same top-level item type; same primary input modality: light

native green gel system and plant transcriptome profiling address a similar problem space.

Shared frame: same top-level item type; same primary input modality: light

Ranked Citations

  1. 1.
    StructuralSource 1PLANT PHYSIOLOGY1994Claim 1Claim 2Claim 3

    Extracted from this source document.