Toolkit/native green gel system

native green gel system

Assay Method·Research·Since 1994

Taxonomy: Technique Branch / Method. Workflows sit above the mechanism and technique branches rather than replacing them.

Summary

The native green gel system is an assay method used to study light-induced assembly of chlorophyll-protein complexes during greening. In etiolated barley (Hordeum vulgare), it was used to resolve LHCII-associated bands and follow the appearance of type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins during illumination.

Usefulness & Problems

Why this is useful

This method is useful for monitoring how chlorophyll-protein complexes assemble in response to light during seedling greening. In the cited barley study, it enabled analysis of LHCII apoprotein accumulation kinetics and assessment of whether higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and type 3 LHCII apoproteins were detectable.

Problem solved

It addresses the problem of tracking light-dependent formation of photosynthetic pigment-protein complexes in developing plastids. Specifically, it provided a way to examine the appearance of type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins during greening of etiolated barley seedlings.

Problem links

Need precise spatiotemporal control with light input

Derived

The native green gel system is an assay method used to study light-induced assembly of chlorophyll-protein complexes during greening. In the cited work, it was applied to etiolated barley (Hordeum vulgare) to resolve LHCII-associated bands and track the appearance of type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins.

Taxonomy & Function

Primary hierarchy

Technique Branch

Method: A concrete measurement method used to characterize an engineered system.

Target processes

No target processes tagged yet.

Input: Light

Implementation Constraints

cofactor dependency: cofactor requirement unknownencoding mode: genetically encodedimplementation constraint: context specific validationimplementation constraint: spectral hardware requirementoperating role: sensor

The assay was used to study greening under light input in etiolated barley seedlings and was paired with identification of LHCII apoprotein bands by immunoblotting. The supplied evidence does not specify construct requirements, cofactors, instrumentation settings, or detailed electrophoresis conditions.

The evidence is limited to a single cited study in etiolated barley and does not establish performance across organisms, tissues, or other chlorophyll-protein complexes. Available evidence does not provide technical parameters such as gel composition, sensitivity, quantitative range, or reproducibility metrics.

Validation

Cell-freeBacteriaMammalianMouseHumanTherapeuticIndep. Replication

Supporting Sources

Ranked Claims

Claim 1absence of higher mass formssupports1994Source 1needs review

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and type 3 LHCII apoproteins were detected.

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and 3 LHCII apoproteins could be detected
Claim 2absence of higher mass formssupports1994Source 1needs review

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and type 3 LHCII apoproteins were detected.

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and 3 LHCII apoproteins could be detected
Claim 3absence of higher mass formssupports1994Source 1needs review

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and type 3 LHCII apoproteins were detected.

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and 3 LHCII apoproteins could be detected
Claim 4absence of higher mass formssupports1994Source 1needs review

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and type 3 LHCII apoproteins were detected.

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and 3 LHCII apoproteins could be detected
Claim 5absence of higher mass formssupports1994Source 1needs review

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and type 3 LHCII apoproteins were detected.

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and 3 LHCII apoproteins could be detected
Claim 6absence of higher mass formssupports1994Source 1needs review

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and type 3 LHCII apoproteins were detected.

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and 3 LHCII apoproteins could be detected
Claim 7absence of higher mass formssupports1994Source 1needs review

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and type 3 LHCII apoproteins were detected.

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and 3 LHCII apoproteins could be detected
Claim 8absence of higher mass formssupports1994Source 1needs review

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and type 3 LHCII apoproteins were detected.

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and 3 LHCII apoproteins could be detected
Claim 9absence of higher mass formssupports1994Source 1needs review

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and type 3 LHCII apoproteins were detected.

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and 3 LHCII apoproteins could be detected
Claim 10absence of higher mass formssupports1994Source 1needs review

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and type 3 LHCII apoproteins were detected.

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and 3 LHCII apoproteins could be detected
Claim 11absence of higher mass formssupports1994Source 1needs review

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and type 3 LHCII apoproteins were detected.

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and 3 LHCII apoproteins could be detected
Claim 12absence of higher mass formssupports1994Source 1needs review

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and type 3 LHCII apoproteins were detected.

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and 3 LHCII apoproteins could be detected
Claim 13absence of higher mass formssupports1994Source 1needs review

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and type 3 LHCII apoproteins were detected.

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and 3 LHCII apoproteins could be detected
Claim 14absence of higher mass formssupports1994Source 1needs review

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and type 3 LHCII apoproteins were detected.

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and 3 LHCII apoproteins could be detected
Claim 15absence of higher mass formssupports1994Source 1needs review

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and type 3 LHCII apoproteins were detected.

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and 3 LHCII apoproteins could be detected
Claim 16absence of higher mass formssupports1994Source 1needs review

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and type 3 LHCII apoproteins were detected.

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and 3 LHCII apoproteins could be detected
Claim 17absence of higher mass formssupports1994Source 1needs review

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and type 3 LHCII apoproteins were detected.

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and 3 LHCII apoproteins could be detected
Claim 18absence of higher mass formssupports1994Source 1needs review

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and type 3 LHCII apoproteins were detected.

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and 3 LHCII apoproteins could be detected
Claim 19absence of higher mass formssupports1994Source 1needs review

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and type 3 LHCII apoproteins were detected.

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and 3 LHCII apoproteins could be detected
Claim 20absence of higher mass formssupports1994Source 1needs review

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and type 3 LHCII apoproteins were detected.

No corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and 3 LHCII apoproteins could be detected
Claim 21accumulation kineticssupports1994Source 1needs review

During light-induced greening of etiolated barley seedlings, type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates.

During light-induced greening of 6-d-old etiolated barley seedlings, the type 1, 2, and 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates
Claim 22accumulation kineticssupports1994Source 1needs review

During light-induced greening of etiolated barley seedlings, type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates.

During light-induced greening of 6-d-old etiolated barley seedlings, the type 1, 2, and 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates
Claim 23accumulation kineticssupports1994Source 1needs review

During light-induced greening of etiolated barley seedlings, type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates.

During light-induced greening of 6-d-old etiolated barley seedlings, the type 1, 2, and 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates
Claim 24accumulation kineticssupports1994Source 1needs review

During light-induced greening of etiolated barley seedlings, type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates.

During light-induced greening of 6-d-old etiolated barley seedlings, the type 1, 2, and 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates
Claim 25accumulation kineticssupports1994Source 1needs review

During light-induced greening of etiolated barley seedlings, type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates.

During light-induced greening of 6-d-old etiolated barley seedlings, the type 1, 2, and 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates
Claim 26accumulation kineticssupports1994Source 1needs review

During light-induced greening of etiolated barley seedlings, type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates.

During light-induced greening of 6-d-old etiolated barley seedlings, the type 1, 2, and 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates
Claim 27accumulation kineticssupports1994Source 1needs review

During light-induced greening of etiolated barley seedlings, type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates.

During light-induced greening of 6-d-old etiolated barley seedlings, the type 1, 2, and 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates
Claim 28accumulation kineticssupports1994Source 1needs review

During light-induced greening of etiolated barley seedlings, type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates.

During light-induced greening of 6-d-old etiolated barley seedlings, the type 1, 2, and 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates
Claim 29accumulation kineticssupports1994Source 1needs review

During light-induced greening of etiolated barley seedlings, type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates.

During light-induced greening of 6-d-old etiolated barley seedlings, the type 1, 2, and 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates
Claim 30accumulation kineticssupports1994Source 1needs review

During light-induced greening of etiolated barley seedlings, type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates.

During light-induced greening of 6-d-old etiolated barley seedlings, the type 1, 2, and 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates
Claim 31accumulation kineticssupports1994Source 1needs review

During light-induced greening of etiolated barley seedlings, type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates.

During light-induced greening of 6-d-old etiolated barley seedlings, the type 1, 2, and 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates
Claim 32accumulation kineticssupports1994Source 1needs review

During light-induced greening of etiolated barley seedlings, type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates.

During light-induced greening of 6-d-old etiolated barley seedlings, the type 1, 2, and 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates
Claim 33accumulation kineticssupports1994Source 1needs review

During light-induced greening of etiolated barley seedlings, type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates.

During light-induced greening of 6-d-old etiolated barley seedlings, the type 1, 2, and 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates
Claim 34accumulation kineticssupports1994Source 1needs review

During light-induced greening of etiolated barley seedlings, type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates.

During light-induced greening of 6-d-old etiolated barley seedlings, the type 1, 2, and 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates
Claim 35accumulation kineticssupports1994Source 1needs review

During light-induced greening of etiolated barley seedlings, type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates.

During light-induced greening of 6-d-old etiolated barley seedlings, the type 1, 2, and 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates
Claim 36accumulation kineticssupports1994Source 1needs review

During light-induced greening of etiolated barley seedlings, type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates.

During light-induced greening of 6-d-old etiolated barley seedlings, the type 1, 2, and 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates
Claim 37accumulation kineticssupports1994Source 1needs review

During light-induced greening of etiolated barley seedlings, type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates.

During light-induced greening of 6-d-old etiolated barley seedlings, the type 1, 2, and 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates
Claim 38accumulation kineticssupports1994Source 1needs review

During light-induced greening of etiolated barley seedlings, type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates.

During light-induced greening of 6-d-old etiolated barley seedlings, the type 1, 2, and 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates
Claim 39accumulation kineticssupports1994Source 1needs review

During light-induced greening of etiolated barley seedlings, type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates.

During light-induced greening of 6-d-old etiolated barley seedlings, the type 1, 2, and 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates
Claim 40accumulation kineticssupports1994Source 1needs review

During light-induced greening of etiolated barley seedlings, type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates.

During light-induced greening of 6-d-old etiolated barley seedlings, the type 1, 2, and 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulate simultaneously and at similar rates
Claim 41band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.0 kD lowest LHCII band as containing type 3 LHCII apoproteins.

the lowest band at 26.0 kD as containing the type 3 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26 kD
Claim 42band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.0 kD lowest LHCII band as containing type 3 LHCII apoproteins.

the lowest band at 26.0 kD as containing the type 3 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26 kD
Claim 43band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.0 kD lowest LHCII band as containing type 3 LHCII apoproteins.

the lowest band at 26.0 kD as containing the type 3 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26 kD
Claim 44band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.0 kD lowest LHCII band as containing type 3 LHCII apoproteins.

the lowest band at 26.0 kD as containing the type 3 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26 kD
Claim 45band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.0 kD lowest LHCII band as containing type 3 LHCII apoproteins.

the lowest band at 26.0 kD as containing the type 3 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26 kD
Claim 46band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.0 kD lowest LHCII band as containing type 3 LHCII apoproteins.

the lowest band at 26.0 kD as containing the type 3 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26 kD
Claim 47band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.0 kD lowest LHCII band as containing type 3 LHCII apoproteins.

the lowest band at 26.0 kD as containing the type 3 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26 kD
Claim 48band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.0 kD lowest LHCII band as containing type 3 LHCII apoproteins.

the lowest band at 26.0 kD as containing the type 3 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26 kD
Claim 49band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.0 kD lowest LHCII band as containing type 3 LHCII apoproteins.

the lowest band at 26.0 kD as containing the type 3 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26 kD
Claim 50band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.0 kD lowest LHCII band as containing type 3 LHCII apoproteins.

the lowest band at 26.0 kD as containing the type 3 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26 kD
Claim 51band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.0 kD lowest LHCII band as containing type 3 LHCII apoproteins.

the lowest band at 26.0 kD as containing the type 3 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26 kD
Claim 52band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.0 kD lowest LHCII band as containing type 3 LHCII apoproteins.

the lowest band at 26.0 kD as containing the type 3 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26 kD
Claim 53band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.0 kD lowest LHCII band as containing type 3 LHCII apoproteins.

the lowest band at 26.0 kD as containing the type 3 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26 kD
Claim 54band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.0 kD lowest LHCII band as containing type 3 LHCII apoproteins.

the lowest band at 26.0 kD as containing the type 3 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26 kD
Claim 55band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.0 kD lowest LHCII band as containing type 3 LHCII apoproteins.

the lowest band at 26.0 kD as containing the type 3 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26 kD
Claim 56band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.0 kD lowest LHCII band as containing type 3 LHCII apoproteins.

the lowest band at 26.0 kD as containing the type 3 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26 kD
Claim 57band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.0 kD lowest LHCII band as containing type 3 LHCII apoproteins.

the lowest band at 26.0 kD as containing the type 3 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26 kD
Claim 58band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.0 kD lowest LHCII band as containing type 3 LHCII apoproteins.

the lowest band at 26.0 kD as containing the type 3 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26 kD
Claim 59band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.0 kD lowest LHCII band as containing type 3 LHCII apoproteins.

the lowest band at 26.0 kD as containing the type 3 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26 kD
Claim 60band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.0 kD lowest LHCII band as containing type 3 LHCII apoproteins.

the lowest band at 26.0 kD as containing the type 3 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26 kD
Claim 61band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.9 kD middle LHCII band as containing type 1 LHCII apoproteins.

the middle band at 26.9 kD as containing the type 1 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26.9 kD
Claim 62band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.9 kD middle LHCII band as containing type 1 LHCII apoproteins.

the middle band at 26.9 kD as containing the type 1 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26.9 kD
Claim 63band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.9 kD middle LHCII band as containing type 1 LHCII apoproteins.

the middle band at 26.9 kD as containing the type 1 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26.9 kD
Claim 64band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.9 kD middle LHCII band as containing type 1 LHCII apoproteins.

the middle band at 26.9 kD as containing the type 1 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26.9 kD
Claim 65band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.9 kD middle LHCII band as containing type 1 LHCII apoproteins.

the middle band at 26.9 kD as containing the type 1 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26.9 kD
Claim 66band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.9 kD middle LHCII band as containing type 1 LHCII apoproteins.

the middle band at 26.9 kD as containing the type 1 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26.9 kD
Claim 67band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.9 kD middle LHCII band as containing type 1 LHCII apoproteins.

the middle band at 26.9 kD as containing the type 1 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26.9 kD
Claim 68band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.9 kD middle LHCII band as containing type 1 LHCII apoproteins.

the middle band at 26.9 kD as containing the type 1 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26.9 kD
Claim 69band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.9 kD middle LHCII band as containing type 1 LHCII apoproteins.

the middle band at 26.9 kD as containing the type 1 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26.9 kD
Claim 70band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.9 kD middle LHCII band as containing type 1 LHCII apoproteins.

the middle band at 26.9 kD as containing the type 1 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26.9 kD
Claim 71band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.9 kD middle LHCII band as containing type 1 LHCII apoproteins.

the middle band at 26.9 kD as containing the type 1 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26.9 kD
Claim 72band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.9 kD middle LHCII band as containing type 1 LHCII apoproteins.

the middle band at 26.9 kD as containing the type 1 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26.9 kD
Claim 73band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.9 kD middle LHCII band as containing type 1 LHCII apoproteins.

the middle band at 26.9 kD as containing the type 1 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26.9 kD
Claim 74band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.9 kD middle LHCII band as containing type 1 LHCII apoproteins.

the middle band at 26.9 kD as containing the type 1 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26.9 kD
Claim 75band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.9 kD middle LHCII band as containing type 1 LHCII apoproteins.

the middle band at 26.9 kD as containing the type 1 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26.9 kD
Claim 76band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.9 kD middle LHCII band as containing type 1 LHCII apoproteins.

the middle band at 26.9 kD as containing the type 1 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26.9 kD
Claim 77band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.9 kD middle LHCII band as containing type 1 LHCII apoproteins.

the middle band at 26.9 kD as containing the type 1 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26.9 kD
Claim 78band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.9 kD middle LHCII band as containing type 1 LHCII apoproteins.

the middle band at 26.9 kD as containing the type 1 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26.9 kD
Claim 79band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.9 kD middle LHCII band as containing type 1 LHCII apoproteins.

the middle band at 26.9 kD as containing the type 1 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26.9 kD
Claim 80band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 26.9 kD middle LHCII band as containing type 1 LHCII apoproteins.

the middle band at 26.9 kD as containing the type 1 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 26.9 kD
Claim 81band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 27.5 kD highest molecular mass LHCII band as containing type 2 LHCII apoproteins.

Western blot analysis of the three major LHCII apoprotein bands has identified the highest molecular mass band at 27.5 kD as containing the type 2 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 27.5 kD
Claim 82band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 27.5 kD highest molecular mass LHCII band as containing type 2 LHCII apoproteins.

Western blot analysis of the three major LHCII apoprotein bands has identified the highest molecular mass band at 27.5 kD as containing the type 2 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 27.5 kD
Claim 83band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 27.5 kD highest molecular mass LHCII band as containing type 2 LHCII apoproteins.

Western blot analysis of the three major LHCII apoprotein bands has identified the highest molecular mass band at 27.5 kD as containing the type 2 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 27.5 kD
Claim 84band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 27.5 kD highest molecular mass LHCII band as containing type 2 LHCII apoproteins.

Western blot analysis of the three major LHCII apoprotein bands has identified the highest molecular mass band at 27.5 kD as containing the type 2 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 27.5 kD
Claim 85band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 27.5 kD highest molecular mass LHCII band as containing type 2 LHCII apoproteins.

Western blot analysis of the three major LHCII apoprotein bands has identified the highest molecular mass band at 27.5 kD as containing the type 2 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 27.5 kD
Claim 86band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 27.5 kD highest molecular mass LHCII band as containing type 2 LHCII apoproteins.

Western blot analysis of the three major LHCII apoprotein bands has identified the highest molecular mass band at 27.5 kD as containing the type 2 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 27.5 kD
Claim 87band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 27.5 kD highest molecular mass LHCII band as containing type 2 LHCII apoproteins.

Western blot analysis of the three major LHCII apoprotein bands has identified the highest molecular mass band at 27.5 kD as containing the type 2 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 27.5 kD
Claim 88band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 27.5 kD highest molecular mass LHCII band as containing type 2 LHCII apoproteins.

Western blot analysis of the three major LHCII apoprotein bands has identified the highest molecular mass band at 27.5 kD as containing the type 2 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 27.5 kD
Claim 89band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 27.5 kD highest molecular mass LHCII band as containing type 2 LHCII apoproteins.

Western blot analysis of the three major LHCII apoprotein bands has identified the highest molecular mass band at 27.5 kD as containing the type 2 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 27.5 kD
Claim 90band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 27.5 kD highest molecular mass LHCII band as containing type 2 LHCII apoproteins.

Western blot analysis of the three major LHCII apoprotein bands has identified the highest molecular mass band at 27.5 kD as containing the type 2 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 27.5 kD
Claim 91band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 27.5 kD highest molecular mass LHCII band as containing type 2 LHCII apoproteins.

Western blot analysis of the three major LHCII apoprotein bands has identified the highest molecular mass band at 27.5 kD as containing the type 2 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 27.5 kD
Claim 92band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 27.5 kD highest molecular mass LHCII band as containing type 2 LHCII apoproteins.

Western blot analysis of the three major LHCII apoprotein bands has identified the highest molecular mass band at 27.5 kD as containing the type 2 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 27.5 kD
Claim 93band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 27.5 kD highest molecular mass LHCII band as containing type 2 LHCII apoproteins.

Western blot analysis of the three major LHCII apoprotein bands has identified the highest molecular mass band at 27.5 kD as containing the type 2 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 27.5 kD
Claim 94band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 27.5 kD highest molecular mass LHCII band as containing type 2 LHCII apoproteins.

Western blot analysis of the three major LHCII apoprotein bands has identified the highest molecular mass band at 27.5 kD as containing the type 2 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 27.5 kD
Claim 95band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 27.5 kD highest molecular mass LHCII band as containing type 2 LHCII apoproteins.

Western blot analysis of the three major LHCII apoprotein bands has identified the highest molecular mass band at 27.5 kD as containing the type 2 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 27.5 kD
Claim 96band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 27.5 kD highest molecular mass LHCII band as containing type 2 LHCII apoproteins.

Western blot analysis of the three major LHCII apoprotein bands has identified the highest molecular mass band at 27.5 kD as containing the type 2 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 27.5 kD
Claim 97band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 27.5 kD highest molecular mass LHCII band as containing type 2 LHCII apoproteins.

Western blot analysis of the three major LHCII apoprotein bands has identified the highest molecular mass band at 27.5 kD as containing the type 2 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 27.5 kD
Claim 98band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 27.5 kD highest molecular mass LHCII band as containing type 2 LHCII apoproteins.

Western blot analysis of the three major LHCII apoprotein bands has identified the highest molecular mass band at 27.5 kD as containing the type 2 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 27.5 kD
Claim 99band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 27.5 kD highest molecular mass LHCII band as containing type 2 LHCII apoproteins.

Western blot analysis of the three major LHCII apoprotein bands has identified the highest molecular mass band at 27.5 kD as containing the type 2 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 27.5 kD
Claim 100band identitysupports1994Source 1needs review

Western blot analysis identified the 27.5 kD highest molecular mass LHCII band as containing type 2 LHCII apoproteins.

Western blot analysis of the three major LHCII apoprotein bands has identified the highest molecular mass band at 27.5 kD as containing the type 2 LHCII apoproteins
molecular mass 27.5 kD
Claim 101complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 102complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 103complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 104complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 105complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 106complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 107complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 108complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 109complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 110complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 111complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 112complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 113complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 114complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 115complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 116complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 117complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 118complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 119complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 120complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 121complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 122complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 123complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 124complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 125complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 126complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 127complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 128complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 129complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 130complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 131complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 132complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 133complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 134complex composition differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d
greening duration 8 d
Claim 135precursor accumulationsupports1994Source 1needs review

During the 8-24 h rapid phase of thylakoid development, two slightly larger type 2 LHCII apoproteins of 28.3 and 28.7 kD also accumulate in thylakoids.

During the most rapid phase of thylakoid development (8-24 h), two slightly larger (28.3 and 28.7 kD) type 2 LHCII apoproteins (precursor intermediates?) also accumulate in the thylakoids
molecular mass 28.3 kDmolecular mass 28.7 kDtime window 8-24 h
Claim 136precursor accumulationsupports1994Source 1needs review

During the 8-24 h rapid phase of thylakoid development, two slightly larger type 2 LHCII apoproteins of 28.3 and 28.7 kD also accumulate in thylakoids.

During the most rapid phase of thylakoid development (8-24 h), two slightly larger (28.3 and 28.7 kD) type 2 LHCII apoproteins (precursor intermediates?) also accumulate in the thylakoids
molecular mass 28.3 kDmolecular mass 28.7 kDtime window 8-24 h
Claim 137precursor accumulationsupports1994Source 1needs review

During the 8-24 h rapid phase of thylakoid development, two slightly larger type 2 LHCII apoproteins of 28.3 and 28.7 kD also accumulate in thylakoids.

During the most rapid phase of thylakoid development (8-24 h), two slightly larger (28.3 and 28.7 kD) type 2 LHCII apoproteins (precursor intermediates?) also accumulate in the thylakoids
molecular mass 28.3 kDmolecular mass 28.7 kDtime window 8-24 h
Claim 138precursor accumulationsupports1994Source 1needs review

During the 8-24 h rapid phase of thylakoid development, two slightly larger type 2 LHCII apoproteins of 28.3 and 28.7 kD also accumulate in thylakoids.

During the most rapid phase of thylakoid development (8-24 h), two slightly larger (28.3 and 28.7 kD) type 2 LHCII apoproteins (precursor intermediates?) also accumulate in the thylakoids
molecular mass 28.3 kDmolecular mass 28.7 kDtime window 8-24 h
Claim 139precursor accumulationsupports1994Source 1needs review

During the 8-24 h rapid phase of thylakoid development, two slightly larger type 2 LHCII apoproteins of 28.3 and 28.7 kD also accumulate in thylakoids.

During the most rapid phase of thylakoid development (8-24 h), two slightly larger (28.3 and 28.7 kD) type 2 LHCII apoproteins (precursor intermediates?) also accumulate in the thylakoids
molecular mass 28.3 kDmolecular mass 28.7 kDtime window 8-24 h
Claim 140precursor accumulationsupports1994Source 1needs review

During the 8-24 h rapid phase of thylakoid development, two slightly larger type 2 LHCII apoproteins of 28.3 and 28.7 kD also accumulate in thylakoids.

During the most rapid phase of thylakoid development (8-24 h), two slightly larger (28.3 and 28.7 kD) type 2 LHCII apoproteins (precursor intermediates?) also accumulate in the thylakoids
molecular mass 28.3 kDmolecular mass 28.7 kDtime window 8-24 h
Claim 141precursor accumulationsupports1994Source 1needs review

During the 8-24 h rapid phase of thylakoid development, two slightly larger type 2 LHCII apoproteins of 28.3 and 28.7 kD also accumulate in thylakoids.

During the most rapid phase of thylakoid development (8-24 h), two slightly larger (28.3 and 28.7 kD) type 2 LHCII apoproteins (precursor intermediates?) also accumulate in the thylakoids
molecular mass 28.3 kDmolecular mass 28.7 kDtime window 8-24 h
Claim 142precursor accumulationsupports1994Source 1needs review

During the 8-24 h rapid phase of thylakoid development, two slightly larger type 2 LHCII apoproteins of 28.3 and 28.7 kD also accumulate in thylakoids.

During the most rapid phase of thylakoid development (8-24 h), two slightly larger (28.3 and 28.7 kD) type 2 LHCII apoproteins (precursor intermediates?) also accumulate in the thylakoids
molecular mass 28.3 kDmolecular mass 28.7 kDtime window 8-24 h
Claim 143precursor accumulationsupports1994Source 1needs review

During the 8-24 h rapid phase of thylakoid development, two slightly larger type 2 LHCII apoproteins of 28.3 and 28.7 kD also accumulate in thylakoids.

During the most rapid phase of thylakoid development (8-24 h), two slightly larger (28.3 and 28.7 kD) type 2 LHCII apoproteins (precursor intermediates?) also accumulate in the thylakoids
molecular mass 28.3 kDmolecular mass 28.7 kDtime window 8-24 h
Claim 144precursor accumulationsupports1994Source 1needs review

During the 8-24 h rapid phase of thylakoid development, two slightly larger type 2 LHCII apoproteins of 28.3 and 28.7 kD also accumulate in thylakoids.

During the most rapid phase of thylakoid development (8-24 h), two slightly larger (28.3 and 28.7 kD) type 2 LHCII apoproteins (precursor intermediates?) also accumulate in the thylakoids
molecular mass 28.3 kDmolecular mass 28.7 kDtime window 8-24 h
Claim 145precursor accumulationsupports1994Source 1needs review

During the 8-24 h rapid phase of thylakoid development, two slightly larger type 2 LHCII apoproteins of 28.3 and 28.7 kD also accumulate in thylakoids.

During the most rapid phase of thylakoid development (8-24 h), two slightly larger (28.3 and 28.7 kD) type 2 LHCII apoproteins (precursor intermediates?) also accumulate in the thylakoids
molecular mass 28.3 kDmolecular mass 28.7 kDtime window 8-24 h
Claim 146precursor accumulationsupports1994Source 1needs review

During the 8-24 h rapid phase of thylakoid development, two slightly larger type 2 LHCII apoproteins of 28.3 and 28.7 kD also accumulate in thylakoids.

During the most rapid phase of thylakoid development (8-24 h), two slightly larger (28.3 and 28.7 kD) type 2 LHCII apoproteins (precursor intermediates?) also accumulate in the thylakoids
molecular mass 28.3 kDmolecular mass 28.7 kDtime window 8-24 h
Claim 147precursor accumulationsupports1994Source 1needs review

During the 8-24 h rapid phase of thylakoid development, two slightly larger type 2 LHCII apoproteins of 28.3 and 28.7 kD also accumulate in thylakoids.

During the most rapid phase of thylakoid development (8-24 h), two slightly larger (28.3 and 28.7 kD) type 2 LHCII apoproteins (precursor intermediates?) also accumulate in the thylakoids
molecular mass 28.3 kDmolecular mass 28.7 kDtime window 8-24 h
Claim 148precursor accumulationsupports1994Source 1needs review

During the 8-24 h rapid phase of thylakoid development, two slightly larger type 2 LHCII apoproteins of 28.3 and 28.7 kD also accumulate in thylakoids.

During the most rapid phase of thylakoid development (8-24 h), two slightly larger (28.3 and 28.7 kD) type 2 LHCII apoproteins (precursor intermediates?) also accumulate in the thylakoids
molecular mass 28.3 kDmolecular mass 28.7 kDtime window 8-24 h
Claim 149precursor accumulationsupports1994Source 1needs review

During the 8-24 h rapid phase of thylakoid development, two slightly larger type 2 LHCII apoproteins of 28.3 and 28.7 kD also accumulate in thylakoids.

During the most rapid phase of thylakoid development (8-24 h), two slightly larger (28.3 and 28.7 kD) type 2 LHCII apoproteins (precursor intermediates?) also accumulate in the thylakoids
molecular mass 28.3 kDmolecular mass 28.7 kDtime window 8-24 h
Claim 150precursor accumulationsupports1994Source 1needs review

During the 8-24 h rapid phase of thylakoid development, two slightly larger type 2 LHCII apoproteins of 28.3 and 28.7 kD also accumulate in thylakoids.

During the most rapid phase of thylakoid development (8-24 h), two slightly larger (28.3 and 28.7 kD) type 2 LHCII apoproteins (precursor intermediates?) also accumulate in the thylakoids
molecular mass 28.3 kDmolecular mass 28.7 kDtime window 8-24 h
Claim 151precursor accumulationsupports1994Source 1needs review

During the 8-24 h rapid phase of thylakoid development, two slightly larger type 2 LHCII apoproteins of 28.3 and 28.7 kD also accumulate in thylakoids.

During the most rapid phase of thylakoid development (8-24 h), two slightly larger (28.3 and 28.7 kD) type 2 LHCII apoproteins (precursor intermediates?) also accumulate in the thylakoids
molecular mass 28.3 kDmolecular mass 28.7 kDtime window 8-24 h
Claim 152precursor accumulationsupports1994Source 1needs review

During the 8-24 h rapid phase of thylakoid development, two slightly larger type 2 LHCII apoproteins of 28.3 and 28.7 kD also accumulate in thylakoids.

During the most rapid phase of thylakoid development (8-24 h), two slightly larger (28.3 and 28.7 kD) type 2 LHCII apoproteins (precursor intermediates?) also accumulate in the thylakoids
molecular mass 28.3 kDmolecular mass 28.7 kDtime window 8-24 h
Claim 153precursor accumulationsupports1994Source 1needs review

During the 8-24 h rapid phase of thylakoid development, two slightly larger type 2 LHCII apoproteins of 28.3 and 28.7 kD also accumulate in thylakoids.

During the most rapid phase of thylakoid development (8-24 h), two slightly larger (28.3 and 28.7 kD) type 2 LHCII apoproteins (precursor intermediates?) also accumulate in the thylakoids
molecular mass 28.3 kDmolecular mass 28.7 kDtime window 8-24 h
Claim 154precursor accumulationsupports1994Source 1needs review

During the 8-24 h rapid phase of thylakoid development, two slightly larger type 2 LHCII apoproteins of 28.3 and 28.7 kD also accumulate in thylakoids.

During the most rapid phase of thylakoid development (8-24 h), two slightly larger (28.3 and 28.7 kD) type 2 LHCII apoproteins (precursor intermediates?) also accumulate in the thylakoids
molecular mass 28.3 kDmolecular mass 28.7 kDtime window 8-24 h
Claim 155regional timing differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins appear sooner in thylakoids from apical leaf segments than from basal leaf segments during greening.

appear somewhat sooner (< 4 h) in thylakoids from apical than from basal (4-8 h) leaf segments
appearance time 4 happearance time 4-8 h
Claim 156regional timing differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins appear sooner in thylakoids from apical leaf segments than from basal leaf segments during greening.

appear somewhat sooner (< 4 h) in thylakoids from apical than from basal (4-8 h) leaf segments
appearance time 4 happearance time 4-8 h
Claim 157regional timing differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins appear sooner in thylakoids from apical leaf segments than from basal leaf segments during greening.

appear somewhat sooner (< 4 h) in thylakoids from apical than from basal (4-8 h) leaf segments
appearance time 4 happearance time 4-8 h
Claim 158regional timing differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins appear sooner in thylakoids from apical leaf segments than from basal leaf segments during greening.

appear somewhat sooner (< 4 h) in thylakoids from apical than from basal (4-8 h) leaf segments
appearance time 4 happearance time 4-8 h
Claim 159regional timing differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins appear sooner in thylakoids from apical leaf segments than from basal leaf segments during greening.

appear somewhat sooner (< 4 h) in thylakoids from apical than from basal (4-8 h) leaf segments
appearance time 4 happearance time 4-8 h
Claim 160regional timing differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins appear sooner in thylakoids from apical leaf segments than from basal leaf segments during greening.

appear somewhat sooner (< 4 h) in thylakoids from apical than from basal (4-8 h) leaf segments
appearance time 4 happearance time 4-8 h
Claim 161regional timing differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins appear sooner in thylakoids from apical leaf segments than from basal leaf segments during greening.

appear somewhat sooner (< 4 h) in thylakoids from apical than from basal (4-8 h) leaf segments
appearance time 4 happearance time 4-8 h
Claim 162regional timing differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins appear sooner in thylakoids from apical leaf segments than from basal leaf segments during greening.

appear somewhat sooner (< 4 h) in thylakoids from apical than from basal (4-8 h) leaf segments
appearance time 4 happearance time 4-8 h
Claim 163regional timing differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins appear sooner in thylakoids from apical leaf segments than from basal leaf segments during greening.

appear somewhat sooner (< 4 h) in thylakoids from apical than from basal (4-8 h) leaf segments
appearance time 4 happearance time 4-8 h
Claim 164regional timing differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins appear sooner in thylakoids from apical leaf segments than from basal leaf segments during greening.

appear somewhat sooner (< 4 h) in thylakoids from apical than from basal (4-8 h) leaf segments
appearance time 4 happearance time 4-8 h
Claim 165regional timing differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins appear sooner in thylakoids from apical leaf segments than from basal leaf segments during greening.

appear somewhat sooner (< 4 h) in thylakoids from apical than from basal (4-8 h) leaf segments
appearance time 4 happearance time 4-8 h
Claim 166regional timing differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins appear sooner in thylakoids from apical leaf segments than from basal leaf segments during greening.

appear somewhat sooner (< 4 h) in thylakoids from apical than from basal (4-8 h) leaf segments
appearance time 4 happearance time 4-8 h
Claim 167regional timing differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins appear sooner in thylakoids from apical leaf segments than from basal leaf segments during greening.

appear somewhat sooner (< 4 h) in thylakoids from apical than from basal (4-8 h) leaf segments
appearance time 4 happearance time 4-8 h
Claim 168regional timing differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins appear sooner in thylakoids from apical leaf segments than from basal leaf segments during greening.

appear somewhat sooner (< 4 h) in thylakoids from apical than from basal (4-8 h) leaf segments
appearance time 4 happearance time 4-8 h
Claim 169regional timing differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins appear sooner in thylakoids from apical leaf segments than from basal leaf segments during greening.

appear somewhat sooner (< 4 h) in thylakoids from apical than from basal (4-8 h) leaf segments
appearance time 4 happearance time 4-8 h
Claim 170regional timing differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins appear sooner in thylakoids from apical leaf segments than from basal leaf segments during greening.

appear somewhat sooner (< 4 h) in thylakoids from apical than from basal (4-8 h) leaf segments
appearance time 4 happearance time 4-8 h
Claim 171regional timing differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins appear sooner in thylakoids from apical leaf segments than from basal leaf segments during greening.

appear somewhat sooner (< 4 h) in thylakoids from apical than from basal (4-8 h) leaf segments
appearance time 4 happearance time 4-8 h
Claim 172regional timing differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins appear sooner in thylakoids from apical leaf segments than from basal leaf segments during greening.

appear somewhat sooner (< 4 h) in thylakoids from apical than from basal (4-8 h) leaf segments
appearance time 4 happearance time 4-8 h
Claim 173regional timing differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins appear sooner in thylakoids from apical leaf segments than from basal leaf segments during greening.

appear somewhat sooner (< 4 h) in thylakoids from apical than from basal (4-8 h) leaf segments
appearance time 4 happearance time 4-8 h
Claim 174regional timing differencesupports1994Source 1needs review

Type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins appear sooner in thylakoids from apical leaf segments than from basal leaf segments during greening.

appear somewhat sooner (< 4 h) in thylakoids from apical than from basal (4-8 h) leaf segments
appearance time 4 happearance time 4-8 h

Approval Evidence

1 source1 linked approval claimfirst-pass slug native-green-gel-system
we have studied the light-induced assembly of chlorophyll-protein complexes with a native green gel system

Source:

complex composition differencesupports

Differences remain apparent in chlorophyll-protein complex composition between light-control plants and etiolated plants greened for 8 days.

differences are still apparent in the composition of chlorophyll-protein complexes of light-control plants and those of etiolated plants greened for 8 d

Source:

Comparisons

Source-backed strengths

The method was applied directly to light-induced greening and supported resolution of LHCII-related species in a native context. In the cited work, it showed that type 1, type 2, and type 3 LHCII apoproteins accumulated simultaneously and at similar rates, and no corresponding higher molecular mass forms of type 1 and type 3 LHCII apoproteins were detected.

native green gel system and open-source microplate reader address a similar problem space.

Shared frame: same top-level item type; same primary input modality: light

native green gel system and plant transcriptome profiling address a similar problem space.

Shared frame: same top-level item type; same primary input modality: light

native green gel system and two-photon guided whole-cell recording address a similar problem space.

Shared frame: same top-level item type; same primary input modality: light

Ranked Citations

  1. 1.
    StructuralSource 1PLANT PHYSIOLOGY1994Claim 19Claim 20Claim 20

    Extracted from this source document.