Toolkit/time-resolved infrared spectroscopy
time-resolved infrared spectroscopy
Also known as: infrared spectroscopy, time-resolved IR spectroscopy, transient infrared spectroscopy
Taxonomy: Technique Branch / Method. Workflows sit above the mechanism and technique branches rather than replacing them.
Summary
Time-resolved infrared spectroscopy, also termed transient infrared spectroscopy, is a light-triggered functional assay that monitors vibrational and structural dynamics of LOV photoreceptors on picosecond-to-microsecond timescales. In the cited studies, it resolved FMN triplet-state progression to cysteinyl-FMN adduct formation and subsequent protein conformational changes, including Jα helix unfolding.
Usefulness & Problems
Why this is useful
This assay is useful for dissecting ultrafast and early-time photocycles in LOV domains by directly tracking vibrational signatures of chromophore and protein structural states after photoexcitation. The cited work shows that it can compare conserved versus divergent activation steps across AsLOV2, YtvA, EL222, and LovK.
Problem solved
It addresses the problem of measuring how light absorption in LOV photoreceptors is converted into specific chemical intermediates and protein structural responses over picosecond-to-microsecond intervals. The method specifically enables observation of the pathway from the FMN triplet state to cysteinyl adduct formation and the divergence of post-adduct dynamics linked to output function.
Problem links
Time-resolved infrared spectroscopy could help preserve more structural information than simpler static measurements by adding temporal signatures to spectral data. That may make structure inference better constrained, even if it does not itself solve the inverse problem.
Taxonomy & Function
Primary hierarchy
Technique Branch
Method: A concrete measurement method used to characterize an engineered system.
Mechanisms
conformational change monitoringconformational change monitoringcovalent cysteinyl-fmn adduct formation monitoringcovalent cysteinyl-fmn adduct formation monitoringtime-resolved detection of photoinduced state transitionstime-resolved detection of photoinduced state transitionsvibrational spectroscopyvibrational spectroscopyTechniques
Functional AssayTarget processes
No target processes tagged yet.
Input: Light
Implementation Constraints
The assay is light-triggered and was applied to LOV photoreceptors containing FMN, with measurements spanning picoseconds to microseconds. The cited examples include AsLOV2, YtvA, EL222, and LovK, but the supplied evidence does not specify instrument configuration or sample preparation details.
The supplied evidence is limited to LOV photoreceptors and does not establish performance outside this protein family. The evidence also does not provide practical details on spectral resolution, sample requirements, throughput, or compatibility with in vivo measurements.
Validation
Supporting Sources
Ranked Claims
Across AsLOV2, YtvA, EL222, and LovK, the overall pathway leading to cysteine adduct formation from the FMN triplet state is highly conserved despite differences in tertiary structure.
Despite differences in tertiary structure, the overall pathway leading to cysteine adduct formation from the FMN triplet state is highly conserved, although there are slight variations in rate.
Across AsLOV2, YtvA, EL222, and LovK, the overall pathway leading to cysteine adduct formation from the FMN triplet state is highly conserved despite differences in tertiary structure.
Despite differences in tertiary structure, the overall pathway leading to cysteine adduct formation from the FMN triplet state is highly conserved, although there are slight variations in rate.
Across AsLOV2, YtvA, EL222, and LovK, the overall pathway leading to cysteine adduct formation from the FMN triplet state is highly conserved despite differences in tertiary structure.
Despite differences in tertiary structure, the overall pathway leading to cysteine adduct formation from the FMN triplet state is highly conserved, although there are slight variations in rate.
Across AsLOV2, YtvA, EL222, and LovK, the overall pathway leading to cysteine adduct formation from the FMN triplet state is highly conserved despite differences in tertiary structure.
Despite differences in tertiary structure, the overall pathway leading to cysteine adduct formation from the FMN triplet state is highly conserved, although there are slight variations in rate.
Across AsLOV2, YtvA, EL222, and LovK, the overall pathway leading to cysteine adduct formation from the FMN triplet state is highly conserved despite differences in tertiary structure.
Despite differences in tertiary structure, the overall pathway leading to cysteine adduct formation from the FMN triplet state is highly conserved, although there are slight variations in rate.
Across AsLOV2, YtvA, EL222, and LovK, the overall pathway leading to cysteine adduct formation from the FMN triplet state is highly conserved despite differences in tertiary structure.
Despite differences in tertiary structure, the overall pathway leading to cysteine adduct formation from the FMN triplet state is highly conserved, although there are slight variations in rate.
Across AsLOV2, YtvA, EL222, and LovK, the overall pathway leading to cysteine adduct formation from the FMN triplet state is highly conserved despite differences in tertiary structure.
Despite differences in tertiary structure, the overall pathway leading to cysteine adduct formation from the FMN triplet state is highly conserved, although there are slight variations in rate.
Across AsLOV2, YtvA, EL222, and LovK, the overall pathway leading to cysteine adduct formation from the FMN triplet state is highly conserved despite differences in tertiary structure.
Despite differences in tertiary structure, the overall pathway leading to cysteine adduct formation from the FMN triplet state is highly conserved, although there are slight variations in rate.
Across AsLOV2, YtvA, EL222, and LovK, the overall pathway leading to cysteine adduct formation from the FMN triplet state is highly conserved despite differences in tertiary structure.
Despite differences in tertiary structure, the overall pathway leading to cysteine adduct formation from the FMN triplet state is highly conserved, although there are slight variations in rate.
Across AsLOV2, YtvA, EL222, and LovK, the overall pathway leading to cysteine adduct formation from the FMN triplet state is highly conserved despite differences in tertiary structure.
Despite differences in tertiary structure, the overall pathway leading to cysteine adduct formation from the FMN triplet state is highly conserved, although there are slight variations in rate.
After adduct formation, vibrational spectra and kinetics differ significantly among the full-length LOV photoreceptors and are directly linked to the specific output function of the LOV domain.
However, significant differences are observed in the vibrational spectra and kinetics after adduct formation, which are directly linked to the specific output function of the LOV domain.
After adduct formation, vibrational spectra and kinetics differ significantly among the full-length LOV photoreceptors and are directly linked to the specific output function of the LOV domain.
However, significant differences are observed in the vibrational spectra and kinetics after adduct formation, which are directly linked to the specific output function of the LOV domain.
After adduct formation, vibrational spectra and kinetics differ significantly among the full-length LOV photoreceptors and are directly linked to the specific output function of the LOV domain.
However, significant differences are observed in the vibrational spectra and kinetics after adduct formation, which are directly linked to the specific output function of the LOV domain.
After adduct formation, vibrational spectra and kinetics differ significantly among the full-length LOV photoreceptors and are directly linked to the specific output function of the LOV domain.
However, significant differences are observed in the vibrational spectra and kinetics after adduct formation, which are directly linked to the specific output function of the LOV domain.
After adduct formation, vibrational spectra and kinetics differ significantly among the full-length LOV photoreceptors and are directly linked to the specific output function of the LOV domain.
However, significant differences are observed in the vibrational spectra and kinetics after adduct formation, which are directly linked to the specific output function of the LOV domain.
The rate of adduct formation varies by only 3.6-fold among the studied LOV proteins.
While the rate of adduct formation varies by only 3.6-fold among the proteins
The rate of adduct formation varies by only 3.6-fold among the studied LOV proteins.
While the rate of adduct formation varies by only 3.6-fold among the proteins
The rate of adduct formation varies by only 3.6-fold among the studied LOV proteins.
While the rate of adduct formation varies by only 3.6-fold among the proteins
The rate of adduct formation varies by only 3.6-fold among the studied LOV proteins.
While the rate of adduct formation varies by only 3.6-fold among the proteins
The rate of adduct formation varies by only 3.6-fold among the studied LOV proteins.
While the rate of adduct formation varies by only 3.6-fold among the proteins
The rate of adduct formation varies by only 3.6-fold among the studied LOV proteins.
While the rate of adduct formation varies by only 3.6-fold among the proteins
The rate of adduct formation varies by only 3.6-fold among the studied LOV proteins.
While the rate of adduct formation varies by only 3.6-fold among the proteins
The rate of adduct formation varies by only 3.6-fold among the studied LOV proteins.
While the rate of adduct formation varies by only 3.6-fold among the proteins
The rate of adduct formation varies by only 3.6-fold among the studied LOV proteins.
While the rate of adduct formation varies by only 3.6-fold among the proteins
The rate of adduct formation varies by only 3.6-fold among the studied LOV proteins.
While the rate of adduct formation varies by only 3.6-fold among the proteins
Large-scale structural changes in the full-length LOV photoreceptors occur over micro- to submillisecond time scales and vary by orders of magnitude depending on output function.
the subsequent large-scale structural changes in the full-length LOV photoreceptors occur over the micro- to submillisecond time scales and vary by orders of magnitude depending on the different output function of each LOV domain.
Large-scale structural changes in the full-length LOV photoreceptors occur over micro- to submillisecond time scales and vary by orders of magnitude depending on output function.
the subsequent large-scale structural changes in the full-length LOV photoreceptors occur over the micro- to submillisecond time scales and vary by orders of magnitude depending on the different output function of each LOV domain.
Large-scale structural changes in the full-length LOV photoreceptors occur over micro- to submillisecond time scales and vary by orders of magnitude depending on output function.
the subsequent large-scale structural changes in the full-length LOV photoreceptors occur over the micro- to submillisecond time scales and vary by orders of magnitude depending on the different output function of each LOV domain.
Large-scale structural changes in the full-length LOV photoreceptors occur over micro- to submillisecond time scales and vary by orders of magnitude depending on output function.
the subsequent large-scale structural changes in the full-length LOV photoreceptors occur over the micro- to submillisecond time scales and vary by orders of magnitude depending on the different output function of each LOV domain.
Large-scale structural changes in the full-length LOV photoreceptors occur over micro- to submillisecond time scales and vary by orders of magnitude depending on output function.
the subsequent large-scale structural changes in the full-length LOV photoreceptors occur over the micro- to submillisecond time scales and vary by orders of magnitude depending on the different output function of each LOV domain.
By 500 μs, the final time-resolved spectrum is essentially identical to the steady-state light-minus-dark FTIR spectrum, indicating that Jα helix unfolding is complete on that time scale.
The final spectrum at 500 μcs is essentially identical to the steady-state light-minus-dark Fourier transform infrared spectrum, indicating that Jα helix unfolding is complete on that time scale.
By 500 μs, the final time-resolved spectrum is essentially identical to the steady-state light-minus-dark FTIR spectrum, indicating that Jα helix unfolding is complete on that time scale.
The final spectrum at 500 μcs is essentially identical to the steady-state light-minus-dark Fourier transform infrared spectrum, indicating that Jα helix unfolding is complete on that time scale.
By 500 μs, the final time-resolved spectrum is essentially identical to the steady-state light-minus-dark FTIR spectrum, indicating that Jα helix unfolding is complete on that time scale.
The final spectrum at 500 μcs is essentially identical to the steady-state light-minus-dark Fourier transform infrared spectrum, indicating that Jα helix unfolding is complete on that time scale.
By 500 μs, the final time-resolved spectrum is essentially identical to the steady-state light-minus-dark FTIR spectrum, indicating that Jα helix unfolding is complete on that time scale.
The final spectrum at 500 μcs is essentially identical to the steady-state light-minus-dark Fourier transform infrared spectrum, indicating that Jα helix unfolding is complete on that time scale.
By 500 μs, the final time-resolved spectrum is essentially identical to the steady-state light-minus-dark FTIR spectrum, indicating that Jα helix unfolding is complete on that time scale.
The final spectrum at 500 μcs is essentially identical to the steady-state light-minus-dark Fourier transform infrared spectrum, indicating that Jα helix unfolding is complete on that time scale.
By 500 μs, the final time-resolved spectrum is essentially identical to the steady-state light-minus-dark FTIR spectrum, indicating that Jα helix unfolding is complete on that time scale.
The final spectrum at 500 μcs is essentially identical to the steady-state light-minus-dark Fourier transform infrared spectrum, indicating that Jα helix unfolding is complete on that time scale.
By 500 μs, the final time-resolved spectrum is essentially identical to the steady-state light-minus-dark FTIR spectrum, indicating that Jα helix unfolding is complete on that time scale.
The final spectrum at 500 μcs is essentially identical to the steady-state light-minus-dark Fourier transform infrared spectrum, indicating that Jα helix unfolding is complete on that time scale.
By 500 μs, the final time-resolved spectrum is essentially identical to the steady-state light-minus-dark FTIR spectrum, indicating that Jα helix unfolding is complete on that time scale.
The final spectrum at 500 μcs is essentially identical to the steady-state light-minus-dark Fourier transform infrared spectrum, indicating that Jα helix unfolding is complete on that time scale.
By 500 μs, the final time-resolved spectrum is essentially identical to the steady-state light-minus-dark FTIR spectrum, indicating that Jα helix unfolding is complete on that time scale.
The final spectrum at 500 μcs is essentially identical to the steady-state light-minus-dark Fourier transform infrared spectrum, indicating that Jα helix unfolding is complete on that time scale.
By 500 μs, the final time-resolved spectrum is essentially identical to the steady-state light-minus-dark FTIR spectrum, indicating that Jα helix unfolding is complete on that time scale.
The final spectrum at 500 μcs is essentially identical to the steady-state light-minus-dark Fourier transform infrared spectrum, indicating that Jα helix unfolding is complete on that time scale.
By 500 μs, the final time-resolved spectrum is essentially identical to the steady-state light-minus-dark FTIR spectrum, indicating that Jα helix unfolding is complete on that time scale.
The final spectrum at 500 μcs is essentially identical to the steady-state light-minus-dark Fourier transform infrared spectrum, indicating that Jα helix unfolding is complete on that time scale.
By 500 μs, the final time-resolved spectrum is essentially identical to the steady-state light-minus-dark FTIR spectrum, indicating that Jα helix unfolding is complete on that time scale.
The final spectrum at 500 μcs is essentially identical to the steady-state light-minus-dark Fourier transform infrared spectrum, indicating that Jα helix unfolding is complete on that time scale.
By 500 μs, the final time-resolved spectrum is essentially identical to the steady-state light-minus-dark FTIR spectrum, indicating that Jα helix unfolding is complete on that time scale.
The final spectrum at 500 μcs is essentially identical to the steady-state light-minus-dark Fourier transform infrared spectrum, indicating that Jα helix unfolding is complete on that time scale.
By 500 μs, the final time-resolved spectrum is essentially identical to the steady-state light-minus-dark FTIR spectrum, indicating that Jα helix unfolding is complete on that time scale.
The final spectrum at 500 μcs is essentially identical to the steady-state light-minus-dark Fourier transform infrared spectrum, indicating that Jα helix unfolding is complete on that time scale.
By 500 μs, the final time-resolved spectrum is essentially identical to the steady-state light-minus-dark FTIR spectrum, indicating that Jα helix unfolding is complete on that time scale.
The final spectrum at 500 μcs is essentially identical to the steady-state light-minus-dark Fourier transform infrared spectrum, indicating that Jα helix unfolding is complete on that time scale.
By 500 μs, the final time-resolved spectrum is essentially identical to the steady-state light-minus-dark FTIR spectrum, indicating that Jα helix unfolding is complete on that time scale.
The final spectrum at 500 μcs is essentially identical to the steady-state light-minus-dark Fourier transform infrared spectrum, indicating that Jα helix unfolding is complete on that time scale.
By 500 μs, the final time-resolved spectrum is essentially identical to the steady-state light-minus-dark FTIR spectrum, indicating that Jα helix unfolding is complete on that time scale.
The final spectrum at 500 μcs is essentially identical to the steady-state light-minus-dark Fourier transform infrared spectrum, indicating that Jα helix unfolding is complete on that time scale.
In D2O buffer, covalent cysteinyl-FMN adduct formation in Avena sativa LOV2 occurs in 10 μs.
formation of the covalent cysteinyl-FMN adduct in 10 μcs
In D2O buffer, covalent cysteinyl-FMN adduct formation in Avena sativa LOV2 occurs in 10 μs.
formation of the covalent cysteinyl-FMN adduct in 10 μcs
In D2O buffer, covalent cysteinyl-FMN adduct formation in Avena sativa LOV2 occurs in 10 μs.
formation of the covalent cysteinyl-FMN adduct in 10 μcs
In D2O buffer, covalent cysteinyl-FMN adduct formation in Avena sativa LOV2 occurs in 10 μs.
formation of the covalent cysteinyl-FMN adduct in 10 μcs
In D2O buffer, covalent cysteinyl-FMN adduct formation in Avena sativa LOV2 occurs in 10 μs.
formation of the covalent cysteinyl-FMN adduct in 10 μcs
In D2O buffer, FMN singlet-to-triplet conversion in Avena sativa LOV2 occurs in 2 ns.
In D2O buffer, FMN singlet-to-triplet conversion occurs in 2 ns
In D2O buffer, FMN singlet-to-triplet conversion in Avena sativa LOV2 occurs in 2 ns.
In D2O buffer, FMN singlet-to-triplet conversion occurs in 2 ns
In D2O buffer, FMN singlet-to-triplet conversion in Avena sativa LOV2 occurs in 2 ns.
In D2O buffer, FMN singlet-to-triplet conversion occurs in 2 ns
In D2O buffer, FMN singlet-to-triplet conversion in Avena sativa LOV2 occurs in 2 ns.
In D2O buffer, FMN singlet-to-triplet conversion occurs in 2 ns
In D2O buffer, FMN singlet-to-triplet conversion in Avena sativa LOV2 occurs in 2 ns.
In D2O buffer, FMN singlet-to-triplet conversion occurs in 2 ns
Jα helix unfolding in Avena sativa LOV2 proceeds in two steps, with a first phase at 10 μs concomitant with Cys-FMN adduct formation and a second phase at approximately 240 μs.
We observe a two-step unfolding of the Jα helix: The first phase occurs concomitantly with Cys-FMN covalent adduct formation in 10 μcs ... The second phase occurs in approximately 240 μcs.
Jα helix unfolding in Avena sativa LOV2 proceeds in two steps, with a first phase at 10 μs concomitant with Cys-FMN adduct formation and a second phase at approximately 240 μs.
We observe a two-step unfolding of the Jα helix: The first phase occurs concomitantly with Cys-FMN covalent adduct formation in 10 μcs ... The second phase occurs in approximately 240 μcs.
Jα helix unfolding in Avena sativa LOV2 proceeds in two steps, with a first phase at 10 μs concomitant with Cys-FMN adduct formation and a second phase at approximately 240 μs.
We observe a two-step unfolding of the Jα helix: The first phase occurs concomitantly with Cys-FMN covalent adduct formation in 10 μcs ... The second phase occurs in approximately 240 μcs.
Jα helix unfolding in Avena sativa LOV2 proceeds in two steps, with a first phase at 10 μs concomitant with Cys-FMN adduct formation and a second phase at approximately 240 μs.
We observe a two-step unfolding of the Jα helix: The first phase occurs concomitantly with Cys-FMN covalent adduct formation in 10 μcs ... The second phase occurs in approximately 240 μcs.
Jα helix unfolding in Avena sativa LOV2 proceeds in two steps, with a first phase at 10 μs concomitant with Cys-FMN adduct formation and a second phase at approximately 240 μs.
We observe a two-step unfolding of the Jα helix: The first phase occurs concomitantly with Cys-FMN covalent adduct formation in 10 μcs ... The second phase occurs in approximately 240 μcs.
The Avena sativa LOV2 domain binds a C-terminal Jα helix docked on a β-sheet, and the Jα helix unfolds upon light absorption by the FMN chromophore.
The light, oxygen, and voltage 2 (LOV2) sensing domain of plant phototropin binds a C-terminal Jα helix that is docked on a β-sheet and unfolds upon light absorption by the flavin mononucleotide (FMN) chromophore.
The Avena sativa LOV2 domain binds a C-terminal Jα helix docked on a β-sheet, and the Jα helix unfolds upon light absorption by the FMN chromophore.
The light, oxygen, and voltage 2 (LOV2) sensing domain of plant phototropin binds a C-terminal Jα helix that is docked on a β-sheet and unfolds upon light absorption by the flavin mononucleotide (FMN) chromophore.
The Avena sativa LOV2 domain binds a C-terminal Jα helix docked on a β-sheet, and the Jα helix unfolds upon light absorption by the FMN chromophore.
The light, oxygen, and voltage 2 (LOV2) sensing domain of plant phototropin binds a C-terminal Jα helix that is docked on a β-sheet and unfolds upon light absorption by the flavin mononucleotide (FMN) chromophore.
The Avena sativa LOV2 domain binds a C-terminal Jα helix docked on a β-sheet, and the Jα helix unfolds upon light absorption by the FMN chromophore.
The light, oxygen, and voltage 2 (LOV2) sensing domain of plant phototropin binds a C-terminal Jα helix that is docked on a β-sheet and unfolds upon light absorption by the flavin mononucleotide (FMN) chromophore.
The Avena sativa LOV2 domain binds a C-terminal Jα helix docked on a β-sheet, and the Jα helix unfolds upon light absorption by the FMN chromophore.
The light, oxygen, and voltage 2 (LOV2) sensing domain of plant phototropin binds a C-terminal Jα helix that is docked on a β-sheet and unfolds upon light absorption by the flavin mononucleotide (FMN) chromophore.
The first phase of Jα helix unfolding is accompanied by rupture of the hydrogen bond between FMN C4=O and Gln-513, motion of the β-sheet, and an additional helical element.
The first phase occurs concomitantly with Cys-FMN covalent adduct formation in 10 μcs, along with hydrogen-bond rupture of the FMN C4═O with Gln-513, motion of the β-sheet, and an additional helical element.
The first phase of Jα helix unfolding is accompanied by rupture of the hydrogen bond between FMN C4=O and Gln-513, motion of the β-sheet, and an additional helical element.
The first phase occurs concomitantly with Cys-FMN covalent adduct formation in 10 μcs, along with hydrogen-bond rupture of the FMN C4═O with Gln-513, motion of the β-sheet, and an additional helical element.
The first phase of Jα helix unfolding is accompanied by rupture of the hydrogen bond between FMN C4=O and Gln-513, motion of the β-sheet, and an additional helical element.
The first phase occurs concomitantly with Cys-FMN covalent adduct formation in 10 μcs, along with hydrogen-bond rupture of the FMN C4═O with Gln-513, motion of the β-sheet, and an additional helical element.
The first phase of Jα helix unfolding is accompanied by rupture of the hydrogen bond between FMN C4=O and Gln-513, motion of the β-sheet, and an additional helical element.
The first phase occurs concomitantly with Cys-FMN covalent adduct formation in 10 μcs, along with hydrogen-bond rupture of the FMN C4═O with Gln-513, motion of the β-sheet, and an additional helical element.
The first phase of Jα helix unfolding is accompanied by rupture of the hydrogen bond between FMN C4=O and Gln-513, motion of the β-sheet, and an additional helical element.
The first phase occurs concomitantly with Cys-FMN covalent adduct formation in 10 μcs, along with hydrogen-bond rupture of the FMN C4═O with Gln-513, motion of the β-sheet, and an additional helical element.
A range of different spectroscopical approaches is necessary to cover the full set of channelrhodopsin time regimes from ultrafast photochemistry to slow dark-state recovery.
Infrared spectroscopy is a preferred method for studying channelrhodopsins because it allows observation of proteins and their function at a molecular level and in near-native environment.
Approval Evidence
Time-Resolved Infrared Spectroscopy
Source:
investigated using time-resolved infrared spectroscopy from picoseconds to microseconds
Source:
One of the preferred methods for these studies is infrared spectroscopy since it allows observation of proteins and their function at a molecular level and in near-native environment. This mini-review focuses on time-resolved applications of the infrared technique to study channelrhodopsins and other light triggered proteins.
Source:
By 500 μs, the final time-resolved spectrum is essentially identical to the steady-state light-minus-dark FTIR spectrum, indicating that Jα helix unfolding is complete on that time scale.
The final spectrum at 500 μcs is essentially identical to the steady-state light-minus-dark Fourier transform infrared spectrum, indicating that Jα helix unfolding is complete on that time scale.
Source:
A range of different spectroscopical approaches is necessary to cover the full set of channelrhodopsin time regimes from ultrafast photochemistry to slow dark-state recovery.
Source:
Infrared spectroscopy is a preferred method for studying channelrhodopsins because it allows observation of proteins and their function at a molecular level and in near-native environment.
Source:
Comparisons
Source-backed strengths
The cited studies indicate that the method captures mechanistic conservation across multiple LOV proteins, showing a highly conserved pathway leading to cysteine adduct formation from the FMN triplet state. It also resolves function-linked divergence after adduct formation and quantified that adduct formation rates varied by only 3.6-fold among the studied proteins.
Compared with native green gel system
time-resolved infrared spectroscopy and native green gel system address a similar problem space.
Shared frame: same top-level item type; same primary input modality: light
Strengths here: appears more independently replicated; looks easier to implement in practice.
Compared with open-source microplate reader
time-resolved infrared spectroscopy and open-source microplate reader address a similar problem space.
Shared frame: same top-level item type; same primary input modality: light
Strengths here: appears more independently replicated; looks easier to implement in practice.
Compared with plant transcriptome profiling
time-resolved infrared spectroscopy and plant transcriptome profiling address a similar problem space.
Shared frame: same top-level item type; same primary input modality: light
Strengths here: appears more independently replicated; looks easier to implement in practice.
Ranked Citations
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.